Four-day week means happier workers: study
Working a four-day week reduces burnout and improves job satisfaction, a large-scale new study has found.
The research from Boston College in the United States tested the effect of reducing employees' hours to a four-day week with no reduction in pay.
The study held six-month trials reducing the working hours for 2896 employees across 141 organisations in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland and the US.
Outcomes of the trials were then compared with 12 control companies that did not transition to the shorter work week.
Researchers found that employees with a reduction of eight hours or more per work week self-reported experiencing larger reductions in burnout and improvements in job satisfaction and mental health, as compared with those at companies that maintained a five-day work week.
A small change in physical health was also seen, but the researchers said they expected this was less significant because changes in physical health take time to manifest.
Associate Professor Paula O'Kane, from the University of Otago's business school, said it was good to see growing evidence that reductions in working hours could significantly impact well-being, reduce burnout and improve job satisfaction.
"While the study centred on a four-day week, the broader implication is clear: flexible and potentially individualised working arrangements can deliver similar benefits."
O'Kane said research globally was showing that work structures needed a rethink.
"Traditionally, time spent working is used as a proxy for productivity, when in fact better rested and healthier people can be more productive in less time.
"Moving forward, it would be really good to think about output based measures of production and productivity - making sure that we understand what it is we want our employees to do in a week rather than how much time we want them to spend at work.
The traditional 9am to 5pm shift did not work for everyone, she said, and there was a growing body of evidence that non-traditional models of working were in fact working better for people. It was also already clear that the younger generation would be demanding more flexibility.
"If we look at the students that are coming through university and looking at how they operate their lives, they are going to want flexibility. We can see it already - they're not going to accept the traditional structures."
Organisations would have to start thinking about organising work structures differently if they wanted to keep attracting top talent in the future, she believed.
Dr Dougal Sutherland, principal psychologist at Umbrella Wellbeing, told RNZ's Morning Report programme many studies in this area had shown productivity remained the same or even increased when dropping down to 32 hours of work a week over four days.
He said it also had positive effects on people's overall well-being.
"Four-day weeks force businesses to look at productivity to use worker time more efficiently."
The research is published in the Nature Human Behaviour journal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Documents show alleged ties between NZ First and tobacco giant
New Zealand First should be stripped of the tobacco and vaping portfolio, according to an advocacy group set up to keep kids off nicotine. The call comes after RNZ published documents alleging close ties between tobacco giant Philip Morris and New Zealand First. Guyon Espiner broke the story, and spoke to Melissa Chan-Green. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Global Study Finds 4-Day Work Week Linked To Improved Wellbeing
A four-day work week is linked to improved employee wellbeing and job satisfaction, according to trials in over 140 organisations across six countries including New Zealand. A US and Irish research team ran six-month trials involving almost 3000 employees at 141 organisations, reducing their hours to four days a week without a pay reduction. Compared with employees at 12 companies that didn't shorten their work weeks, the workers reported improvements in burnout, job satisfaction, and physical and mental health. The researchers say the improvements were mostly driven by the workers reporting fewer sleep problems, less fatigue, and greater work ability. The Science Media Centre asked third-party experts to comment. Dr Dougal Sutherland, Principal Psychologist, Umbrella Wellbeing, comments: 'Findings from research over the last decade have been generally positive about the effectiveness of a four-day work week at full pay for employee wellbeing and company performance. However, much of the published research has been limited by difficult data collection conditions, lacking controls and longitudinal data. 'This study sets a new standard, finding across a large sample that employee wellbeing improved over a six-month trial period when work hours were reduced, explained in part by increases in people's perceived productivity, sleep and energy. One important factor contributing to the trial's success, no doubt, was that participating organisations were coached in the weeks before the trial to find smarter ways of working for staff, streamlining processes, and reducing unnecessary meetings or tasks. Reducing work hours without any supporting workplace scaffolds is unlikely to produce the same results. 'As organisations continue to look for innovative ways to improve wellbeing, this study offers a strong business case for businesses to work smarter, rather than longer, to keep workers and their work output strong.' Conflict of interest statement: Umbrella Wellbeing provides workplace wellbeing services to organisations. Associate Professor Paula O'Kane, Otago Business School, University of Otago, comments: 'It's great to see growing evidence that reductions in working hours can significantly impact well-being, reduce burnout and improve job satisfaction. Traditionally, time spent working is used as a proxy for productivity, when in fact better rested and healthier people can be more productive in less time. The four-day week model in this study enhanced work ability, reduced sleep problems, and decreased fatigue—all of which contributed to the positive outcomes. While the study centred on a four-day week, the broader implication is clear: flexible and potentially individualised working arrangements can deliver similar benefits. 'Interestingly, many organisations who participated in the trial were not-for-profits, who often offer flexibility in lieu of higher salaries, perhaps the for-profit sector can learn from them. Although self-report measures have limitations, the study effectively addressed many of these. It was also insightful to examine both average company-wide reductions and individual-level changes in working hours.'
Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Lobbying Docs Show Govt's Weakness
Today's revelations of tobacco industry lobbying lay bare why Labour's Tobacco Transparency Bill is needed to stop governments putting the interests of the industry above people's health. Today's RNZ story shows the wide range of politicians, experts, and officials tobacco lobbyists Philip Morris targeted to influence regulations and garner support for their products, including targeting Winston Peters. 'Christopher Luxon's weak leadership has allowed Winston Peters and the tobacco industry ride roughshod over him by agreeing to a $200 million tax break for the tobacco industry,' Labour health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said. 'Philip Morris even wrote legislation for NZ First to loosen the regulations around vaping. They note that Winston Peters is 'industry friendly and highly geared towards commercial interests in the sector. 'I launched a members' bill earlier this year to require disclosure of government contact with the tobacco industry, to make sure industry efforts to undermine New Zealanders' health are reported,' Ayesha Verrall said. The documents revealed today also show how vaping company JUUL targeted New Zealand as a market. 'It's gutting to think we might not have the youth vaping problem we have today if my Bill was in place in 2018 before any of this lobbying took place. 'Around the world, tobacco companies have a long history of influencing and weakening health policies to better suit their bottom line – and here we see evidence of it happening in New Zealand. 'It's time we get rid of the smokescreen and protect Kiwis from big tobacco's lobbying tactics – they have no place in health policy,' Ayesha Verrall said.
