&w=3840&q=100)
Trump wants 15% cap on foreign students: What it means for Indians
'I think they should have a cap of maybe around 15%, not 31%,' Trump said on Wednesday at the White House, taking direct aim at the institution's current admissions practices. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can't get in because we have foreign students there.'
This new target follows Trump's attempt last week to stop Harvard from enrolling any foreign students. His push against Harvard and other universities has become part of a wider drive to reshape policies on everything from admissions to hiring. Officials say the move is part of efforts to tackle antisemitism linked to protests against Israel's war in Gaza.
Funding freezes and lawsuits
Trump's remarks come as the administration has frozen more than $2.6 billion in federal research funding for Harvard.
Harvard has responded by suing the government over the funding cuts and secured a temporary court order stopping the administration from banning international students altogether.
At Harvard, nearly 6,800 students — 27% of the student body — come from overseas, up from 20% in 2006, according to the university. When including fellows, non-degree participants and their dependents, the number of international people on campus exceeds 10,000.
'I want to make sure that the foreign students are people that can love our country,' Trump said.
Foreign students are a key source of revenue for US universities, typically paying full tuition fees. Harvard offers financial aid to international undergraduates.
Trump has also repeated calls for Harvard to lose its tax-exempt status, despite its endowment of $53 billion. His administration is moving to end all federal contracts with the university.
Impact on Indian students
Among those watching closely are the roughly 788 Indian students currently enrolled at Harvard.
'This development is particularly concerning given that India has become the leading source of international students in the US,' noted Sanjog Anand, co-founder of Rostrum Education. He pointed out that over 331,600 Indian students were enrolled in the US during the 2023–24 academic year, making up nearly 30% of the international student body.
Anand told Business Standard, 'While the situation is concerning, it's important to remember that universities and advocacy groups are already working towards swift resolutions. The Trump administration has given Harvard six conditions that need to be fulfilled. Instead of jumping to conclusions, we should allow the matter to unfold further.'
Saurabh Arora, founder and CEO of University Living, weighed in: 'The US Department of Homeland Security's move to pause Harvard's ability to enrol new international students comes amid concerns around campus climate and administrative oversight.
'The United States remains a top choice for Indian students, thanks to its world-class universities, research opportunities, and professional pathways. However, these developments may prompt families to more carefully weigh their options, especially those prioritising policy consistency and transparency.
'It's important to remember that international students contribute more than just tuition. They bring global perspectives that enrich classrooms and research. According to our Indian Student Mobility Report 2024, Indian students are projected to spend $17.4 billion annually, including $10.1 billion on academic expenses alone.'
A mixed picture
For Rahul Subramaniam, co-founder of Athena Education, the recent policy signals should be seen in a wider context. 'International students — especially those from India — are integral to the US higher education ecosystem. Many public universities rely on their presence for both academic strength and financial sustainability,' he said.
He continued: 'We see the current developments as a moment of flux, not a structural shift. While some recent measures may appear restrictive, similar actions in the past have been swiftly reversed or modified to avoid long-term impact. At the same time, there have been contrasting proposals aimed at attracting top international talent, including suggestions like automatic green cards for high-achieving graduates. These reaffirm the United States' continued recognition of global talent.'
Nikhil Mudgal, founder and CEO of Lorien Finance, noted: 'It's important to remember that this is a developing story. A federal judge in California has already issued an injunction, providing temporary relief by blocking the administration's efforts to revoke the legal status of thousands of international students.
'That said, the situation highlights the need to stay informed and prepared. Students should maintain close communication with university officials, seek expert immigration advice and be open to alternative pathways if necessary.'
Sripal Jain, co-founder of Simandhar Education, cautioned that the situation could have far-reaching consequences: 'While national security and institutional accountability are important considerations, the sweeping nature of this action, impacting nearly 6,800 international students, raises concerns about proportionality and the broader implications for global academic collaboration.
'It is crucial that affected students seek timely guidance from educational counsellors and relevant authorities to manage this evolving situation. We remain hopeful that constructive dialogue will lead to a resolution that upholds both national interests and the foundational values of academic freedom and international exchange.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Why are Indians sending less money abroad?
Overseas remittances by Indians fell to $2.3 billion in May 2025 amid stricter visa rules, tighter government controls and reduced investment options. From education to gifting, most categories saw a decline, reflecting a broader effort to curb capital outflows under LRS. read more Overseas remittances by Indian residents are on the decline. Under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS), outward transfers dropped to $2.3 billion in May 2025, down from $2.5 billion in April. This continues a broader downward trend, with average monthly remittances falling from $2.8 billion in FY24 to $2.5 billion in FY25. According to a report by Times of India, multiple factors are contributing to this slowdown. Education-related transfers have been impacted by stricter visa regulations in key destination countries. At the same time, the government has stepped up scrutiny of fund outflows, particularly those made under the 'gift' category as part of a wider effort to limit capital flight. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In recent months, authorities have tightened the rules governing remittances. A tax collected at source (TCS) now applies to foreign transfers and any funds sent abroad must be used within 180 days or returned. This has made it harder for individuals to park idle funds in overseas accounts. Restrictions on overseas investments by mutual funds have also narrowed investment options. The decline in remittances during May was widespread. Equity and debt investments fell sharply from $203 million in April to $105 million. Funds sent as gifts dropped from $291 million to $233 million. Transfers for the upkeep of close relatives abroad slid to $323 million from $398 million. Spending on education and foreign real estate also slowed. Even travel, which had seen a post-pandemic rebound, is beginning to show signs of moderation. Outflows for international travel rose slightly from $1.3 billion in April to $1.4 billion in May, but the pace of growth has eased compared to previous months. Across nearly all categories, remittance volumes fell in May, pointing to a combination of regulatory tightening, limited investment opportunities, and shifting global conditions affecting Indians' overseas spending patterns.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
New York, Michigan, Iowa...: Is Trump getting desperate to shape US midterms that are due in 2026?
Donald Trump is steering key Republicans away from statewide races to protect the GOP's narrow House majority in 2026 read more As the political calendar turns its attention toward the 2026 US midterm elections, President Donald Trump appears to be exerting increasingly overt control over Republican congressional strategy. In recent weeks, Trump has played a decisive role in shaping GOP candidacies across battleground states like New York, Michigan and Iowa. While his supporters hail this as party discipline in action, many view it as a calculated and possibly desperate attempt to prevent another electoral debacle like the 2018 House flip. The question now looms: is Trump consolidating power or compensating for vulnerability? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Keeping the House at all costs At the core of Trump's strategy is a single, obsessive goal: protecting the GOP's razor-thin majority in the House of Representatives. Republicans control the chamber by only a handful of seats, a fact not lost on the president. According to reporting by NBC News, Trump has been personally intervening to dissuade vulnerable House Republicans from seeking higher office, thereby keeping reliable incumbents in place. The Associated Press quoted Trump campaign sources as saying that the move marks a departure from earlier cycles where Trump often endorsed insurgent Senate candidates without much concern for broader party dynamics. Now, the emphasis is on unity and incumbency especially in marginal districts. New York: Lawler stays put, Stefanik in waiting One of the clearest examples of this effort unfolded in New York. Congressman Mike Lawler, who represents a swing district in the Hudson Valley that former vice president Kamala Harris won in 2024, recently confirmed he would not challenge Governor Kathy Hochul for the state's top job. While Lawler stressed the decision was his alone, he acknowledged that Trump had 'offered his perspective' during a private meeting. Lawler's re-election campaign was endorsed by Trump in May—an early signal that the president wanted him to stay in the House. Republican strategists see Lawler's decision as critical to retaining the seat in a high-stakes midterm. Meanwhile, this move potentially clears the gubernatorial path for Representative Elise Stefanik, a staunch Trump ally whose name was floated after her nomination to the United Nations ambassadorship was withdrawn. Stefanik has indicated she will reveal her intentions after this fall's elections. As reported by NBC News, her possible candidacy highlights Trump's willingness to elevate allies from safer districts while reinforcing GOP infrastructure where it's most needed. Michigan: Avoiding a GOP civil war Trump's influence is equally visible in Michigan, where Congressman Bill Huizenga opted out of a Senate run after meeting with the president at the White House. The Associated Press revealed that Trump's priority was keeping Huizenga in the House to secure his west Michigan seat, rated 'likely Republican' by the Cook Political Report. Huizenga's exit from the Senate race effectively clears the way for former Congressman Mike Rogers, a Trump-friendly figure who has staffed his campaign with former Trump aides. Though Trump has not yet formally endorsed Rogers, insiders expect that move soon. While Huizenga has not officially announced a re-election bid, GOP operatives suggest his decision—shaped directly by Trump—is part of a broader strategy to avoid intra-party conflict in swing states and to maximise resources toward winnable districts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Iowa: Nunn bows to Trump's midterm playbook In Iowa, Representative Zach Nunn had been considering a run for governor following Governor Kim Reynolds' decision not to seek re-election. However, after a conversation with Trump, Nunn chose to remain in the House. The district he represents is a Democratic target in 2026, having been won by only four points in the last cycle. Trump's endorsement of Nunn's re-election was quick and emphatic, with sources describing the congressman as a 'team player.' According to NBC News, this move is emblematic of Trump's new playbook which is of convincing lawmakers in contested districts that the national interest of the party outweighs individual ambitions. Representative Randy Feenstra, who holds a safer seat, is now among those considering a gubernatorial run. This supports the notion that Trump is willing to let GOP members seek higher office only when their departure doesn't threaten House control. A calculated silence in the Senate Interestingly, while Trump is taking a hands-on approach with House races, he has remained relatively circumspect when it comes to open Senate contests. In states like Georgia and North Carolina, Trump has not yet waded into contentious primaries. Political observers interpret this as a deliberate contrast to his previous, often chaotic, endorsement patterns. That said, former North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper is widely expected to run for the Senate seat being vacated by Republican Thom Tillis. This could create a high-stakes showdown that may yet draw Trump's attention. For now, his priority appears to be ensuring a stable, loyal and electorally viable House majority. Trump's direct involvement has not gone unnoticed. Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama told The Hill that Trump now commands more influence over the Republican Party than any president he's ever seen. Tuberville also issued a warning to dissenters, stating that GOP lawmakers who refuse to align with Trump should prepare to face primary challenges. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, not all Republicans are falling in line. Michigan's Representative John James has chosen to run for governor, a decision that reportedly displeased Trump. During a recent event, Trump jokingly suggested that James shouldn't be allowed to run unless his House seat could be adequately filled. Such moments illustrate the limits of Trump's control—even as most GOP lawmakers seem to heed his directives. As Lawler candidly put it in a media appearance, while Trump's opinion was valuable, 'I didn't get here by doing as told.' Desperation or discipline? Democrats, unsurprisingly, interpret these moves through a lens of weakness. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries framed Trump's interventions as coercion, saying that Republicans are being 'ordered' to stay in place because of their grim electoral prospects. Still, it's hard to ignore the effectiveness of Trump's manoeuvres. He's minimising damaging primaries, bolstering vulnerable districts and testing a more disciplined version of his political machine. This could either be the product of maturity in strategy or of nervous anticipation about what's at stake if the GOP fails to hold the House again. If Trump's campaign is marked by calculation rather than chaos in 2026, it may not be desperation at all but rather a serious, if ruthless, effort to ensure that history does not repeat itself. Whether that's enough to counteract traditional midterm losses remains to be seen. What's clear is that Trump intends to leave nothing to chance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD


Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Will raise a glass of Johnnie Walker': How UK CEOs reacted to India-UK free trade deal
Businesses across India and the United Kingdom have welcomed the free trade agreement between the two countries with open arms. The agreement, which was signed on Thursday after negotiations that lasted for around three years, will make it easier for traders of both India and UK to do business with the other country. The India-UK free trade agreement was signed on Thursday during PM Modi's UK visit where he met his British counterpart Keir Starmer(Bloomberg) While for India, 99 per cent exports will see duty-free access to the UK, unlocking nearly $23 billion in opportunities for labour-intensive sectors, the United Kingdom will enjoy a collective uplift in wages of £2.2 billion (around $2.85 billion) each year and could also see cheaper prices and more choice on clothes, shoes, and food products, along with several tariff slashes. Also read: Duty on single malt cut by half: What gets cheaper with key India-UK trade deal With this trade deal, several UK businesses will have better access to the Indian market and vice versa. Many products made in the UK, such as cars, medical equipment, cosmetics, and whisky among others, will potentially be available in India for more affordable prices. How UK businesses reacted to the FTA Tufan Erginbiligic, Chief Executive Officer of luxury car maker Rolls-Royce, welcomed the agreement and said that the FTA will benefit Rolls-Royce and their customers, paving the way for future aerospace growth in India. 'India is an important market for our business, with over 90 years of partnership with Indian industry and the Indian Government. We welcome the provisions in this Free Trade Agreement, including those that bring closer alignment with international standards for trade in civil aerospace. These agreements will benefit Rolls-Royce and our customers, paving the way for future aerospace growth in India,' he said. Also read: India-UK sign FTA, PM Starmer calls it 'most significant' deal since EU exit His remarks come as Airbus & Rolls-Royce will soon begin delivering Airbus aircraft – with over half powered by Rolls-Royce engines – to major Indian airlines as part of around £5 billion worth of contracts recently agreed. Johnnie Walker chief on India-UK FTA Nik Jhangiani, the interim Chief Executive of Diageo - the UK company behind iconic scotch whisky brands such as Johnnie Walker, said that the 'agreement marks a great moment for both Scotch and Scotland.' 'We'll be raising a glass of Johnnie Walker to all those who have worked so hard to get it secured,' he said. Under the FTA, it will be easier for British firms to also export whisky to India with tariffs slashed in half, reduced immediately from 150 per cent to 75 per cent and then dropped even further to 40 per cent over the next ten years. Jean-Etienne Gourgues, Chivas Brothers Chairman and CEO, said that the FTA is 'a sign of hope in challenging times for the spirits industry'. 'India is the world's biggest whisky market by volume and greater access will be an eventual game changer for the export of our Scotch whisky brands, such as Chivas Regal and Ballantine's,' he said. 'The deal will support long term investment and jobs in our distilleries in Speyside and our bottling plant at Kilmalid and help deliver growth in both Scotland and India over the next decade,' he added. William Bain, head of trade policy at British Chambers of Commerce, said that the FTA 'will open a new era for our businesses and boost investment between two of the world's largest economies.' 'Currently around 16,000 UK companies are trading goods with Indian companies, and there is high interest in our Chamber Network to grow that. This deal will create new opportunities in the transport, travel, creative and business support sectors alongside traditional strengths in finance and professional services,' he said.