
Sunday Times letters: RAF's inability to protect its own bases
Write to letters@sunday-times.co.uk
Aviators will know all about an 'air miss' and know, too, that something is amiss with today's RAF ('Palestine Action attacks cause '£55m damage'', Jun 22). Vandalised transport aircraft at RAF Brize Norton will cost taxpayers millions — money the RAF would have preferred to spend on its 11 display teams. Brize Norton is also home to 5,800 personnel, although one might wonder what so many do when the station is so unprotected — where were they in the small hours that night? Defence ministers must review security and RAF priorities: less showing off, more patrolling perimeters and guarding defence assets.
Most RAF frontline operations are conducted in support of land forces. Perhaps it is time to hand control of the service to the army, ending the 107-year 'experiment' of an independent air force. The move would save billions of pounds and provide better operational efficiency with no loss of air capability.Lester MayLieutenant commander, Royal Navy (ret'd)London NW1
While studying the Second World War at school we were taught that during the Malayan campaign British defenders would flee in terror from Japanese troops on bicycles because they thought that the sound of rattling wheels was the rumble of approaching tanks. At the time I rolled my eyes at this explanation, dismissing it as a myth or at best a massive oversimplification to cut the topic enough to fit into a school textbook.
Last week, however, as I watched footage of activists on dinky scooters making a mockery of the RAF, I wondered whether that old textbook was more accurate than I gave it credit for and the British armed forces were never as tough as I had wanted to believe. It appears the only reason the RAF's entire fleet has not been reduced to ashes on the tarmac is that Russian agents and jihadists never believed what Palestine Action pulled off could be so easy.Robert FrazerSalford
Palestine Action is only one of many such groups that are pushing the present limit of protest. Allowing incessant marches in London that have questionable motives while police stand by as war memorials are defaced is symptomatic of the same 'blind eye' that allowed grooming gangs to operate. The public are fully aware of this two-tier attitude towards criminality. Our society is facing a deep threat that politicians need to wake up to — and quickly.Dr Gerald EdwardsGlasgow
I am appalled that the prime minister described the attack on RAF Brize Norton as an 'act of vandalism'. Surely it was an act of sabotage and, when the culprits are caught, the courts will impose a real deterrent to stop further acts of this kind.Norman SpoonerWantage, Oxon
Rod Liddle asks a pertinent question regarding the two members of Palestine Action who broke into RAF Brize Norton (comment, Jun 22). Most of the UK's military bases are guarded by sentries who carry rifles. Why weren't they used?Dr John ChamberlinAshbourne, Derbyshire
Rather than merely proscribing Palestine Action as a group, we should charge its activists with sedition and hold them jointly and severally liable for the estimated £55 million of damage they have allegedly caused.David MillerChigwell, Essex
Luke Malley's exam diary shows the hard work by, and pressures placed on, pupils ('Diary of a GCSE pupil with 27 exams: 'I woke up screaming'', thetimes.com, Jun 22). It illustrates a GCSE system that is asking too much of pupils and teachers. That needs to change. Exams remain the fairest way to assess a pupil: everyone is asked exactly the same things at the same time and their answers are marked anonymously. But, as a recent report by the OCR exam board demonstrated, GCSEs are imbalanced, with too many exams compressed into a short period of time.
Our experts found that the volume of exams could be reduced without affecting the rigour of the system. Luke and his peers should be exceptionally proud of their achievements this exam season. While they enjoy a well-earned summer break, the government-commissioned curriculum and assessment review team is preparing its final report. When it is published this year, it must suggest a clear plan to rebalance assessment at 16.Jill DuffyChief executive of the OCR exam boardCambridge University Press & Assessment
Asif Ghafoor (letter, Jun 22) propagates the notion that electric cars need to be charged up. They don't; their batteries do. Surely the answer is to manufacture EV batteries in standard sizes, make their replacement simple and create centres that maintain a stock of fully charged batteries that could be exchanged for a fee. These centres could be in busy places and include shops and restaurants. An entrepreneur in Nairobi has already set up such a system for electric motorcycles.Peter ChadwickWadebridge, Cornwall
Regarding Asif Ghafoor and the expansion of electric vehicle charging points, I own a plug-in hybrid estate that delivers 12p/mile in long-distance hybrid use and 6-7p/mile on pure electric local mileage, based mainly on night-rate charging at home. Mass uptake of EVs requires public charging, for those renting and those without driveways, at competitive prices. I agree with Ghafoor on the need to accelerate grid connection. Bringing charging prices down to an affordable level would help.Nick HortinHouston, Renfrewshire
The debate over the assisted dying bill has raised points from those for and against that seem designed purely to conflate and confuse, including the affordability of such a 'service' under the NHS ('Streeting: NHS has no cash for assisted dying', Jun 22). The cost quoted by the health secretary, £425 million over a decade, equates to £42.5 million a year, roughly twice the NHS annual spend on medication to treat acne. Thus it is affordable. As for the cost of drugs that might be used in assisted dying, synthetic opioids have a proven efficacy and are cheap, easy to administer and humane. The morality of the bill may be emotive but the practicalities — the alleviation of extreme pain and suffering for a clearly defined cohort of patients in desperate need — should not be.James Sherifi GP (ret'd)Author, General Practice Under the NHS Stratford St Mary, Essex
I commend Stephen Bleach ('There must be better steps to growth than 300 million pairs of shoes', Jun 22). Like him, I am one of those who unwittingly help economic growth by having an excess of items in my home. Here lies the problem: I am an 80-year-old woman who keeps having birthdays. Kind friends (who are diminishing by the day) and relatives insist on giving me something to mark the day. There is no point telling them to donate the money to charity as they want to give me something I can unwrap in front of them and exclaim how wonderful it is. I could open a shop selling scented candles, hand cream, perfume, bed socks and vases, none of which I need. Now, however, I can die happy knowing I helped the economy, if not the poor.Jacqueline PilotLondon SW20
In light of your report on the state of our justice system ('Court short', magazine, Jun 22), in Wakefield we have a decommissioned crown court, while our magistrates' court also lies empty and forlorn, its work having been transferred to Leeds. Both could be brought back into service were we to employ those carrying out community service to polish the brass and give them a lick of paint. We would then need people to staff them. Why not a Dad's Army-style court service? It is more than ten years since I retired from the Crown Prosecution Service. I have forgotten all the law I ever knew, am deaf and crotchety and have a tendency to doze off after lunch. I would be an ideal candidate to be one of the judges.Chris JacksonHorbury, W Yorks
My grandsons have called me Fadge since they were able to speak (letters, Jun 22). We were puzzled by this and it turns out that it is derived from my son referring to me as a 'fat git'. The name has stuck and even my wife sometimes uses it — as she says, it's better than 'fat git'.Sidney (Fadge) FrenchCanterbury
Your royal editor, Roya Nikkhah, reports a soldier as saying that Prince William and the King are 'revered' by the armed forces ('William's changing of the guard', news, Jun 22). It is a good while since I left the Royal Navy but the armed forces are drawn from all sectors of society, excluding, as much as can be, the extremes of the very far left and very far right. Members show respect for their role, yes. Revere? No. With a hereditary system, things can change quickly. If anything had happened to Charles before William was born, we would have Andrew as king.Fred JeffriesCheddleton, Staffs
Nothing in the Prince of Wales's plans for the monarchy worry me half as much as his intention to 'look under the hood' rather than 'look under the bonnet'. Is he planning a deal with President Trump?Brian EasttyWestcliff-on-Sea, Essex
In your excellent article on the great British seaside holiday ('That's the way to do it', thetimes.com, Jun 23) it was asserted that the second-longest pleasure pier in the UK is at Ryde on the Isle of Wight. As any Lancastrian will tell you, that honour falls to the magnificent Southport Pier. Clocking in at 3,635ft in length, it makes Ryde, at just 2,235ft, a prince among piers rather than a king.Chris CadmanSouthport, Merseyside
In light of the tariffs being imposed by Donald Trump and the worrying effect this is having on British exports and productivity, I propose that we impose tariffs on the United States for its continued use of the English language, backdated to, say, 1776. Americans have never paid to use our language and continue to abuse it with abandon. Hell, they can't even spell some of it correctly.Michael KinsellaSutton Coldfield, W Midlands
Send your letter to: letters@sunday-times.co.uk Please include an address for publication and a phone number in case of any queries. Letters should be received by midday on the Thursday before publication.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Streeting condemns anti-IDF chants at Glastonbury but says ‘Israel should get its own house in order'
Chants of death to the Israeli military at Glastonbury were 'appalling' and the BBC and the festival have questions to answer, Wes Streeting has said, while adding that Israel needs to 'get its own house in order'. The health secretary said the chanting should not have been broadcast to those watching at home, highlighting that Israelis at a similar music festival were kidnapped, murdered and raped. 'I thought it's appalling, to be honest, and I think the BBC and Glastonbury have got questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens,' he told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips on Sky News. 'But I also think it's a pretty shameless publicity stunt, which I don't really want to give too much indulgence to for that reason.' He also had strong words for Israel, which has condemned the chanting. Streeting said what people should be talking about in the context of Israel and Gaza is the humanitarian catastrophe in the territory and the fact that Israeli settlers attacked a Christian village in the West Bank this week. 'All life is sacred. And I find it pretty revolting we've got to a state in this conflict where you're supposed to sort of cheer on one side or the other like it's a football team,' he said. Asked about the Israel embassy's response to the chants at Glastonbury, he said: 'Well, I'd say sort of two things in response to those words from the Israeli embassy. Firstly, I do think that if I take the equivalent of the war in Ukraine, I'm unequivocal about which side of that war I'm on. I want Ukraine to win. Would I be celebrating or chanting for the death of Russian soldiers? No, I want to see an end to the war, and I want to see an end to the conflict. 'I'd also say to the Israeli embassy, get your own house in order in terms of the conduct of your own citizens and the settlers in the West Bank. So, you know, I think there's a serious point there by the Israeli embassy I take seriously. I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens towards Palestinians more seriously.' Police are examining videos of comments made by the acts Bob Vylan and Kneecap at Glastonbury as the festival enters its third day. On Saturday the rapper Bobby Vylan, of the rap punk duo Bob Vylan, led crowds at the festival's West Holts stage in chants of 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]'. Describing himself as a 'violent punk', he said: 'Sometimes we have to get our message across with violence because that's the only language some people speak, unfortunately.' Glastonbury organisers said on Sunday that the act had crossed a line. 'With almost 4,000 performances at Glastonbury 2025, there will inevitably be artists and speakers appearing on our stages whose views we do not share, and a performer's presence here should never be seen as a tacit endorsement of their opinions and beliefs,' the festival said in a statement. 'However, we are appalled by the statements made from the West Holts stage by Bob Vylan yesterday. 'Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence.' Bob Vylan performed before the Irish rap trio Kneecap, who called on fans to show up at Westminster magistrates to support the band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, known as Mo Chara, who was charged with a terrorism offence for holding a Hezbollah flag at a London gig last November. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Ó hAnnaidh told the crowd on Saturday: 'Glastonbury, I'm a free man!' He added: 'If anybody falls down, you've got to pick them up. We've got to keep each other safe.' He thanked the Eavis family, the festival's organisers, for 'holding strong' and allowing their performance to go ahead. Avon and Somerset police said: 'We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts stage at Glastonbury festival this afternoon. Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation.' The Israeli embassy said it was 'deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury festival'. A statement on X said: 'Freedom of expression is a cornerstone of democracy. But when speech crosses into incitement, hatred, and advocacy of ethnic cleansing, it must be called out – especially when amplified by public figures on prominent platforms. 'Chants such as 'Death to the IDF,' and 'From the river to the sea' are slogans that advocate for the dismantling of the state of Israel and implicitly call for the elimination of Jewish self-determination. When such messages are delivered before tens of thousands of festivalgoers and met with applause, it raises serious concerns about the normalisation of extremist language and the glorification of violence. 'We call on Glastonbury festival organisers, artists, and public leaders in the UK to denounce this rhetoric and reject of all forms of hatred.' Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative party leader, called the scenes 'grotesque', and said: 'Glorifying violence against Jews isn't edgy. The west is playing with fire if we allow this sort of behaviour to go unchecked.' Asked about the controversy ahead of Kneecap's performance on Wednesday, Emily Eavis said: 'There have been a lot of really heated topics this year, but we remain a platform for many, many artists from all over the world and, you know, everyone is welcome here.'


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Albanian burglar with almost 50 convictions wins the right to stay in the UK as 'his crimes weren't extreme enough to "revolt" the public'
An Albanian burglar with nearly 50 convictions has won the right to stay in the UK as 'his crimes were not extreme enough to "revolt" the public'. Zenel Beshi has been dubbed a 'genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat' to the UK by the Home Office, which said he should be deported. But upper immigration tribunal judge Leonie Hirst found his crimes were not of the 'very extreme' type that would cause 'deep public revulsion' - and let him stay. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the ruling was 'out of touch' as Beshi is 'clearly a danger to the British public', The Telegraph reports. 'It's time these judges started to prioritise protecting law-abiding British citizens instead of foreign criminals', he said. Mr Philp added foreign criminals, no matter where their crime was committed, should all be sent back to their country of origin, 'no ifs, no buts'. It comes as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper proposes to change the law to make it harder to allow foreign citizens to stay in the UK on a human rights claim. Her suggested scheme would oblige judges to consider public safety more in such decisions. Beshi came to the UK in August 2020 - three years after he received a six-year prison sentence in Turin, Italy. As well as robbery and false imprisonment, he had been jailed for 44 counts of burglary and theft. But he failed to disclose his previous convictions upon his arrival in Britain. The Albanian applied for a European Economic Area (EEA) residence card, on the grounds he was a spouse of an EEA national. He was granted this, after his application was initially refused and he appealed. While he waited to hear back on this appeal, he applied for leave to remain under the EU Settlement Scheme. The Home Office, though, decided to deport him as a threat to the British public. Beshi appealed, which was upheld by a first tier tribunal, after a psychologist said he did not in fact constitute a 'serious threat' to society. They also said he posed a 'low risk' of reoffending. Ms Cooper appealed this decision - but an upper tribunal has now found Beshi not disclosing his previous convictions is of 'little relevance'. Judge Hirst said the deportation threshold and notions of rehabilitation had been applied correctly. She also lauded the legal arguments behind the decision to allow Beshi to stay as 'detailed, clear and well-structured'. The judge found there was no legal mistake to require overturning the decision - and allowed the criminal to remain. Almost half of Brits have no confidence that the police will show up if their home was burgled, a poll revealed earlier this year. Some 46 per cent of adults said they did not believe a home burglary would be properly investigated, with 49 per cent saying the same for car thefts. When looking at pensioners, with 54 per cent of those aged 65 or older expressing a lack of confidence in officers attending their property. And fears are not unjustified, as police failed to solve 94 per cent of burglary cases in 2023/24, according to Home Office figures. Just 16,912 (six per cent) of 266,215 recorded burglaries resulted in a charge. In nearly three-quarters of cases police officers were unable to even identify a suspect, and a further 15 per cent ran into evidential difficulties after a suspect was identified. Reported burglaries have fallen in the past decade, from around 444,000 in 2013/14 to the more than 266,000 in 2023/24. Meanwhile, 13 per cent of people move house because they cannot bear to stay in their home after it has been burgled. A similar proportion have said they are unable to stand being home alone after their house has been invaded. A Home Office spokesperson has previously said: 'We do not agree with this judgment and are considering options for appeal. 'Foreign nationals who commit crime should be in no doubt that we will do everything to make sure they are not free on Britain's streets, including removal from the UK at the earliest opportunity.'


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Broadcasters must air the view that trans women are women, media watchdog says
Broadcasters should air the opinion that trans women are women when covering transgender topics, the UK's media watchdog has reportedly said. Ofcom allegedly told GB News that transgender issues should not be seen as 'settled' despite the Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that the legal definition of a woman should be based on their sex at birth. The Telegraph say they have seen a letter from the watchdog where they tell the channel that broadcasters should potentially share the view that a woman could be someone who has been born a biological man. GB News had reportedly written to Ofcom asking them to confirm that the ruling had cleared up any confusion over whether a person could be addressed by their biological sex rather than what they identify as. The channel also allegedly asked Ofcom to confirm that broadcasters could refer to sports players by their biological pronoun and not gender identity. The newspaper say GB News posed the point that the ruling had made it a 'settled matter that a trans woman is not a biological female, and a trans man is not a biological male'. The channel reportedly added: 'Following the Supreme Court judgment we are of the view that (provided there is no deliberate intention to cause harm or offence), contributors should generally be able to use biological pronouns.' However, the watchdog is said to have responded that the ruling should be contextualised in the Equality Act, suggesting that a person's preferred choice of identity should instead be used on air. The newspaper went on to say that Ofcom labelled GB News's propositions as 'dogmatic' and that the topics required 'nuanced decision-making'. Their response allegedly said that they did not follow the thought that the Supreme Court ruling had 'settled' wider debate about the 'appropriate meaning, usage and effect of such terms in all contexts outside the scope of the Equality Act'. They are alleged to have said that this includes 'in broadcast programmes in which issues relating to sex and gender-based rights are discussed generally', which they say 'the judgment does not purport to do so'. The Ofcom response reportedly continued to say that each broadcaster has a right to 'freedom of expression' as well as the 'editorial discretion which uncontroversially accompanies the exercise of those rights on issues of significant public interest'. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Ofcom is a post-broadcast regulator. 'In line with the rights of broadcasters and audiences to freedom of expression, our rules allow broadcasters editorial freedom to choose how to cover issues in their programmes subject to the Broadcasting Code. 'Our assessment of whether content complies with the Broadcasting Code is always fact-specific and takes into account all relevant contextual factors, requiring nuanced decision-making, and not a "one size fits all" approach.'