Muslim Council ‘acted in bad faith by trying to suppress reporting'
It accused the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), set up and run by MCB, of pressurising journalists and programme makers to accept its partisan view of Islam.
In the 94-page report, published by the think tank and educational charity Policy Exchange, CfMM was said to have exposed 'a tiny number' of false and harmful stories in its seven-year history.The CfMM is understood to have concerns about the findings of Policy Exchange's report. It said that it 'engages constructively' with media owners and regulators.
Andrew Neil, the journalist and Times Radio presenter, backed the report. He said that CfMM was at the heart of claims that the British media habitually misrepresents and slanders Muslims.
He said: 'This Policy Exchange report forensically demonstrates that CfMM, its evidence and its conclusions are badly flawed. It shows how CfMM has a purpose far wider than the correction of supposed factual errors.'It seeks to enforce a tendentious view of Islam and sometimes seeking to suppress truthful, factual reporting which happens to contradict that view. The increasing role played by self-appointed, unrepresentative and often rather small activist groups in shaping public debate has been examined too little.'The report highlighted CfMM claims that it has been 'instrumental' in forging the Independent Press Standards Organisation's (Ipso) guidance on the reporting of Muslims, that it has been 'feeding into the BBC's terminology guidebook' on how to report about Islam and teaches 'masterclasses' on reporting at university journalism schools.
A CfMM representative said that it had shared its style guide with the BBC for it to consider and had previously joined an Ipso roundtable, where it pushed for the press watchdog's guidelines to the media to be more robust.
Andrew Gilligan and Damon Perry, the authors of the report, dismissed CfMM claims that almost 10 per cent of the 55,000 articles that it has monitored misrepresent Muslims and that almost 60 per cent of news stories involving the faith are negative.
Gilligan and Perry warned that accurate and factual reporting of Islamist terror attacks was being labelled as Islamophobic, with media outlets attacked for calling Isis's executioner Mohammed Emwazi, dubbed Jihadi John, a terrorist and the Westminster killer, Khalid Masood, an 'Islamic extremist'.
They also called into question the pressure it has brought to bear on regulators over dramas that 'insult' Muslim characters who are gay or dislike the hijab.
'This report provides all who need it with the evidence that the Centre for Media Monitoring is a bad-faith actor. It should not be engaged with or taken at face value by journalists, regulators or anyone else,' they said.
Labour suspended ties in 2009 with the MCB, which represents more than 500 mosques, schools and charities, after one of its leaders was alleged to have supported violence against Israel — which the group denies.
A review of the Prevent counterextremism strategy by Sir William Shawcross in 2023 said that non-engagement remained a policy for ministers because of 'unresolved extremism concerns'. The CfMM has been contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Free speech under threat as Brits fear causing offence over race religion and immigration
Free speech is under threat in Britain because people fear causing offence over race, religion and immigration, according to a new study. More than a third of Britons felt they had to self-censor their views on race or ethnicity while 32 per cent said they felt they could not speak freely about immigration or religious extremism. Some 41 per cent felt they had to hold back their views on transgender issues while 31 per cent felt constrained from discussing the conflict in Gaza following the October 7 Hamas terror attack. Almost half of Britons believe people are too easily offended, according to research for the Commission for Countering Extremism, which advises the Government. Older, white males are among those who feel the most restricted, and the more outspoken a person's views, the more likely they are feel constrained by the risk of offending others. The study, based on interviews with 2,500 people, was conducted by Ipsos to establish the state of free speech in Britain and was first reported by the Telegraph. People who are white, male, older and not university educated were more strongly in favour of free speech, regardless of the issue, but felt less able to speak their minds, the poll found. Some 48 per cent of this group said they felt they had to hold back their comments on race, far higher than the average of 36 per cent. The same was true on immigration, where 43 per cent felt they had to hold back on their views compared to an overall average among the public of 32 per cent. Among religious groups, Christians were more likely to back the right to free speech, but also more likely to feel they had to hold back on expressing their views. By contrast, women, younger Britons and people from ethnic minorities or non-Christian religions tended to think that people needed to be more sensitive in the way they spoke. Meanwhile the poll found that people predominantly held back from expressing their views to avoid causing offence or starting an argument. Some 46 per cent resisted expressing their views on any religious figure, text or teaching and 35 per cent held back their political views to avoid causing offence. Some people held back because of heightened concerns about their safety, with a quarter restraining themselves from discussing religion because of safety fears and 17 per cent their political views. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said that the Left's 'determination to shut down debate around immigration has created a chilling environment for free speech'. He told the Telegraph: 'In this context, a catch-all definition of Islamophobia would be a disaster, worsening the culture of fear that has spread throughout society.'
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK's anti-corruption champion to go to offshore haven on fact-finding mission
The Foreign Office will dispatch the UK's anti-corruption champion, Margaret Hodge, to the British Virgin Islands (BVIs) to find out why the offshore haven is dragging its feet on proposals designed to fight financial crime. Several of the UK's semi-autonomous British overseas territories missed last month's deadline to implement new registers of corporate ownership, a measure targeting the secrecy regimes campaigners say benefit criminals and kleptocrats. But, while territories such as Anguilla and Bermuda are understood to be on the verge of complying, Foreign Office ministers are running out of patience with the BVIs' slow progress. Companies based on the islands have appeared in multiple international investigations into alleged wrongdoing, including the Paradise Papers and revelations about alleged tax evasion by the Russian oligarch and former Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich. On Wednesday, the day after meeting leaders of the overseas territories, the Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty said he would send the veteran anti-corruption campaigner Lady Hodge to the islands on a 'fact-finding' mission. 'This government is committed to tackling illicit finance and working with our overseas territories is crucial to addressing this issue in the UK and overseas,' said Doughty. 'Some of our overseas territories are making progress towards transparent, accessible registers of company ownership, but we have made clear we need to see rapid, consistent progress across the board. 'As an immediate next step, I have asked Baroness Hodge to undertake a fact-finding visit to the British Virgin Islands and report back to me. I will consider further steps carefully in light of the findings.' Hodge, 80, was named the UK's anti-corruption champion in December last year in recognition of her record in combating illicit finance and advocating for transparency in Britain's offshore financial havens in particular. Hodge, who has held six ministerial posts, was the Labour MP for Barking from 1994 until she stood down before the general election last year. David Lammy, the foreign secretary, has vowed to lift the veil of corporate secrecy that allows people to disguise their business dealings in jurisdictions such as the BVIs. Successive governments have been pushing overseas territories, and a separate group of crown dependencies, such as Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man, to introduce fully publicly accessible registers of beneficial ownership (Parbos). At a meeting in London last November, five overseas territories, including the BVIs, promised to introduce legitimate interest access registers of beneficial interests (Liarbos) as a prelude to further steps. A spokesperson for the BVIs' government said: 'We continue to collaborate closely with international partners, including the UK government, working together to uphold high standards and protect our financial system. 'This week's productive talks in London between premier Natalio Wheatley and minister Stephen Doughty reflect our shared commitment to strengthening governance and democracy in the Virgin Islands. We look forward to building on this cooperation in a spirit of mutual respect.' The Guardian has approached Hodge for comment.
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Badenoch and Starmer clash over 'modest income' tax pledge
Kemi Badenoch and Sir Keir Starmer have clashed over a cabinet minister's promise that people on "modest" incomes will be protected from tax Secretary Heidi Alexander made the pledge when interviewed on Sunday about possible hikes at this autumn's then, ministers have tied themselves in knots when asked who this at Prime Minister's Questions, Tory leader Badenoch said Sir Keir "doesn't know" what the answer prime minister defended the government's record, and accused the Conservatives of delivering "stagnant" economic growth over 14 years. Labour promised in its election manifesto to protect "working people" from tax hikes - an assurance that dominated the run-up to last year's Budget, as ministers struggled to spell out who they Sunday, Alexander complicated the picture still further by suggesting in a Sky News interview that "people on modest incomes, working people" would be shielded from rises this time PMQs, Badenoch called on Sir Keir to "clear up the confusion," adding that ministers "seem incapable of explaining who is in that category".In response, the prime minister said the government was "fixing the country" for "the sort of people that work hard but haven't necessarily got the savings to buy themselves out of problems"."That's who we're working for, and that's why we put the national living wage up, that's an extra £1,400," he added. Tax pledges The government is widely expected to raise taxes at this autumn's Budget, after poor economic figures and a series of U-turns on welfare cuts made it harder to meet its self-imposed spending have repeatedly insisted they cannot write the Budget in advance, whilst at the same time promising not to raise the biggest revenue-raising taxes available to the Treasury ahead of the next general election. These include income tax rates; VAT, a sales tax; and corporation tax, which is paid by companies on their also promised not to raise National Insurance - prompting a row last autumn when it announced a rise in the contributions paid by employers. It means ministers could be in for a long summer, as they are repeatedly pressed why they cannot rule out rises on other areas. 'Working person' wrangle Recent reports have suggested ministers are considering freezing income tax thresholds beyond the 2028 date fixed by the last government, allowing more people to be dragged into higher bands as their wages rise over are also facing pressure from some Labour backbenchers to consider some sort of additional tax targeting PMQs Badenoch accused the government of also "considering taxing" pension contributions, although she did not explain what she meant by ministers have previously come up with a wide range of definitions for who would qualify for tax protection as a "working person".Ahead of last autumn's Budget, the prime minister said the category included those who "go out and earn their living" and can't "write a cheque to get out of difficulties".He added that those with additional income from assets, such as shares or property, would not come under his spokesman later said those with a "small amount of savings" could qualify under the prime minister's definition, and those holding stocks and shares in a tax-free Individual Savings Accounts (ISA). Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
