‘We are the media now': why Tesla's robotaxis were dominated by Elon Musk superfans
Over the years, Tesla has built part of its reputation on hosting big, bold events to generate authentic hype for upcoming releases. The robotaxi launch in Austin, Texas, last week wasn't one of them.
Coverage of the rollout was dominated by a close-knit cohort of Tesla influencers and Elon Musk superfans, many of whom are openly supportive of the CEO's vision. Journalists and tech bloggers who might have been more critical of the technology were not only excluded but also actively ridiculed and mocked by Tesla fans and some of their followers for attempting to ask basic questions about the service. In Austin and online, Tesla fans were taking a cue from Musk, who has spent years fomenting a culture of resentment toward critical media.
One of the more prominent influencers, who goes by Zack on X, claimed he was approached multiple times by a Reuters journalist, whom he promptly ignored. That post, which has over 2,000 likes, received supportive responses from other users — one wrote that the publication and other legacy media outlets 'can go F themselves.' Another said they would unfollow any account that simply responded to members of the media.
'The best response would [be] to add a precondition and ask them to go on camera blanket apologising for all the lies and smears against Elon and Tesla first,' the account Tesla insights wrote. 'That will shut them up, and make them think!'
That general sentiment reverberated across the parts of X and YouTube most actively covering the launch. Kim Java, a Tesla influencer with 258,000 YouTube subscribers, posted a comment saying she had been contacted by several major media outlets to speak about her experience but turned them down so she could 'control [her] own narrative.'
The phrase 'we are the media now' appears repeatedly in posts and replies related to the robotaxi launch. This so-called alternative media is now receiving the very same closed-door access many of them criticize legacy publications for indulging in.
The end result of that adversarial dynamic, experts tell The Verge, is a rollout that feels less like a transparent tech demo and more like a beta test — one amplified by livestreaming influencers who willingly promote Tesla's marketing material. Much of that coverage unfolds within small echo chambers on Musk-owned X and YouTube, where receptive audiences have largely already made up their minds about the robotaxi's significance. Boston University professor and Meme Wars author Joan Donovan says the rollout so far this week has been a textbook example of what she calls 'corporate propaganda.'
'The big push around robotaxis is explicitly about recuperating the reputation of Tesla,' Donovan says. 'It has a bit of an echo chamber effect.'
'The big push around robotaxis is explicitly about recuperating the reputation of Tesla,' Donovan says. 'It has a bit of an echo chamber effect.'
Ed Niedermeyer, author of the Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors, who filmed a robotaxi braking hard in the middle of the road when passing a police cruiser, echoes that sentiment and compares the influencers to a 'Greek chorus' collectively working to bolster the robotaxi's perception. Some of that narrative building appeared to be underway on the popular Reddit forum r/SelfDrivingCars. A user posting late last week claimed the forum has been 'flooded with Tesla apologist propaganda and disinformation,' following the robotaxi launch. Niedermeyer claims he's previously observed a Tesla employee moderating the r/Tesla forum.
'They know what their job is and Tesla knows how to use them,' Niedermeyer tells The Verge. Donovan and Niedermeyer are outspoken critics of Tesla. Both played active roles in the Tesla Takedown protests organized around the country earlier this year. Needless to say, they aren't in the 'superfan' club.
Tesla did not respond to our request for comment. The Verge also reached out to several of the influencers cited above but hasn't heard back.
This week's bizarre, influencer-led robotaxi event is the culmination of a yearslong evolution by Tesla to subtly cultivate its preferred media while simultaneously sidelining traditional journalistic outlets. Tesla has a long and bitter history of antagonism with the press. The company unofficially dissolved its PR team back in 2020 and has since made a point of dodging reporters' questions about its products and tech stack. Since acquiring Twitter in 2022, Elon Musk has further tilted the playing field by periodically banning accounts critical of him and his companies.
At the same time, Tesla has built a loyal fan base, which Donovan compares to early Apple enthusiasts — eager to call out media critics as biased against Musk and the company. At first, much of that support was organic. The company attracted a devoted following of technologists, clean energy advocates, and entrepreneurs drawn to its willingness to take big swings at tough problems.
But as Niedermeyer notes, some of that enthusiasm has tapered off in recent years, due in part to a series of underwhelming demos — like last year's lackluster 'We robot' event, which raised new doubts about the company's ability to deliver on its most ambitious promises around autonomy. Those who remain tend to be reliably loyal and often openly aligned with Tesla's success.
Boosting Tesla's image online has its perks. Many in the community share personalized referral codes, which can be redeemed for rewards ranging from a few extra Supercharger miles to discounts on a new car purchase. (Some Tesla owners allege they've been abruptly removed from the program after posting content critical of the company.)
'They know what their job is and Tesla knows how to use them.'
Loyal supporters in Tesla's online ranks may also gain access to exclusive events, as appears to have been the case with the robotaxi launch. Those who own stock in the company, Niedermeyer says, have an even more direct incentive to ensure Tesla is seen in a favorable light.
'The product is so dope they don't need a PR department,' YouTube creator and Tesla fan Galileo Russell said in an interview with CNN Business. 'I got involved with Tesla to make sure the company succeeded.'
Operating in an echo chamber can only work for so long. Eventually, if Musk's vision of millions of autonomous Teslas zooming through city streets is to be realized, the company will have to open its doors to the broader public — including its detractors. That risks exposing more of the company's mistakes, which even influencers are already having trouble pushing aside.
'They know what their job is,' Niedermeyer says, 'and Tesla knows how to use them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
My dad, the main breadwinner, just lost his job at 61. And he fears he won't find work at his age — what now?
Losing a job can be a huge blow at any age. But when you're in your 60s, it can be an even harder struggle. Although it's illegal for employers to discriminate against job candidates based on age, it happens frequently and it's hard to prove if it happens to you. AARP reports that 74% of job seekers aged 50 and over have concerns that their older age will be an impediment to being hired. If you're in the position in question, it could make for a difficult financial situation. Plus, you're still a year away from being able to claim Social Security benefits. While you're old enough to access a 401(k) or IRA without facing an early withdrawal penalty, tapping one of those accounts at 61 could lead to a savings shortfall later on. There's also the issue of health insurance to think about. If you were covered through your job, you're still four years away from being eligible for Medicare. Here's how to handle this unfortunate situation on a short- and longer-term basis. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Losing a job can be a shock, so you may need a few days or even weeks before you feel ready to dive into a job search. But one thing you should do immediately is file for unemployment benefits. Typically, you're eligible for up to six months of benefits if you lose a job through no fault of your own and meet your state's earnings requirements. Unemployment benefits won't replace your full paycheck, but at least you'll have a portion covered. You should also talk to your employer about severance, if applicable. And if there's no severance package, see if you're entitled to be paid out on accrued vacation or sick days you never used. That could add some extra money in your bank account while you figure out your next steps. Additionally, it's time to assess your emergency fund to see how many months of bills it can cover. If you're able to cut back on spending, between lower expenses, your wife's paycheck and unemployment benefits, you may be able to get away with minimally tapping your emergency fund while you start your job search. You'll also need to figure out next steps regarding health insurance — check to see If you can get onto your wife's job plan (if it offers health benefits). The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) may be an option, as it allows you to retain your employer coverage for a period of 18 to 36 months. But it can prove to be extremely expensive, since you're effectively paying the unsubsidized rate for your old health plan. You may find that a marketplace plan through is cheaper, especially if you qualify for a subsidy. Read more: You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to . In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how This is the time to be aggressively job-hunting. Until you're able to find a full-time job, it's important to preserve your savings — both your emergency fund and your retirement nest egg. If you're still unemployed at the six-month mark, look at gig work, a side hustle or a part-time job when your unemployment benefits run out. That way, you'll have some income coming in while you continue looking for a full-time job. It's also important to look at your retirement portfolio carefully. If you weren't planning to use that money for another five years or longer, you may have a larger portion of your portfolio in stocks. If it's looking like you may need to tap into your nest egg sooner, shift a portion of your portfolio out of stocks and into assets that are stable, such as bonds and CD ladders. The good news is that interest rates are still pretty strong, so you can earn a decent return from a CD ladder without taking on the same risks you do with other investments. You can even keep a chunk of your retirement funds in a high-yield savings account, for added flexibility. It can be discouraging once you've reached the 12-month mark of being unemployed. But keep the faith and don't give up! It could make sense to shift away from seeking a full-time job and see if you can get by with a couple of part-time jobs or expand your side hustle to tide yourself over until retirement. Of course, you may not end up being able to earn the income you want in the coming years, so you'll need to figure out if you can maintain a pared-down lifestyle to avoid draining your nest egg early. By now, your home may be paid off. If so, downsizing is an option. It could allow you to not only lower your housing costs, but walk away with some equity you can use as income. Another option you can look at is claiming early Social Security. You'll face a permanent reduction in benefits if you don't wait until age 67 to claim them, since that's your full retirement age based on your year of birth. But if you're scared to tap your retirement funds and can only reduce your expenses so much, at least it's on the table. Depending on your situation, it could make more sense to tap your savings than to claim Social Security early. If you get a full-time job at the 18- or 24-month mark, you can replenish your savings then. But once you claim Social Security early, you're generally locked into the lower monthly benefit for life. Looking on the bright side, if your financial situation permits, you could leverage your current lower income by converting some retirement funds to a Roth IRA, which offers tax-free withdrawals in retirement. Keep in mind, though, that you'll need to pay taxes on the converted amount in the current tax year. If you're experiencing financial difficulties, adding this tax burden might not be the best choice right now. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Last-minute changes to Senate's 'big, beautiful bill' stun clean energy industry (and Elon Musk)
The Senate is making a final push to advance President Trump's signature legislation with a flurry of last-minute changes that stunned Elon Musk and the already besieged clean energy industry while offering new support for fossil fuels. The controversy surrounding the bill's energy approach is just one front in a frenzied final push with plenty of additional attention on the price tag after a new weekend tally found that bill has grown by nearly $1 trillion since the Senate took it up. Meanwhile a grueling final Senate push to approve the package cleared a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, with consideration continuing and an amendment process expected to take up much of Monday before a final vote later Monday or perhaps Tuesday. The energy provisions of the 900-plus page bill have come in for particular scrutiny after last minute changes phased out clean energy tax credits faster than expected and also added new taxes on wind and solar projects. At the same time, new last minute inducements were unveiled for fossil fuels, including one classifying coal as a critical mineral when it comes to a government manufacturing credit. "We're doing coal," Trump said in an interview released over the weekend on Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" where he also called solar energy projects "ugly as hell." The mix left fossil fuel advocates celebrating and clean energy advocates slamming the bill at a new higher volume. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk — who worked in the White House before his dramatic falling out with the president — was perhaps the loudest voice in the latter group. He issued a series of weekend posts calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive [with] handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." The energy changes came as top-line costs of the deal remained a key point of contention. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office tally released over the weekend showed the revised bill would add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt. That assessment, which does not include additional interest costs, comes after a similar analysis of the House package found a $2.4 trillion tab. Trump suggested Republicans look past the deficit implications in one of his weekend posts, urging passage as soon as possible saying he also wants to cut costs but adding to lawmakers: "REMEMBER, you still have to get reelected." He also made a case that White House projections of blockbuster economic growth (dismissed by many economists as fantastical) will make the math add up in the end. The focus on energy comes after weeks of debate over Biden-era energy credits. The initial Senate blueprint had offered a slower rollback of clean energy credits for things like solar panels and electric vehicles but last minute changes to the bill put it more in line with the harder line House version which seeks to eliminate the credits sooner. Some provisions are even more immediate with the Senate version proposing to eliminate EV credits by September 30 of this year. And on top of that, a new tax was unveiled when the bill was released that would not just eliminate government help for renewable energy projects — but add a new cost for wind and solar projects completed after 2027 if a certain amount of supplies came from China. The changes stunned many clean energy advocates — not just Musk — with a statement from the American Clean Power Association saying the effect would be to "strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments." What that could means for consumers down the road — some concluded — are higher utility bills as currently under construction AI data centers are set to increase electricity demand in the years ahead. Some are even projecting double digit price increases in some utility bills by 2029. An analysis from the left-leaning Center for American Progress found that the bill would exacerbate existing upward pressure on utility prices, with Democratic Senator Brian Schatz adding "we are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar." Fossil fuels advocates meanwhile were largely ebullient at the last minute changes which saw existing fossil fuel focused provisions — around issues like permitting, lease sales, and methane emissions fees — joined by some new credits for these producers including for coal. Senate Republicans say the bill will generate over $15 billion in new federal revenue through expanded oil, gas, and coal leasing with leaders with Senator John Barasso of Wyoming saying "America is an energy superpower and once again, we are going to act like it." The bill is also set to be even more expensive after weeks of negotiations saw expensive compromises on issues like state and local tax (SALT) deductions, more generous business tax credits, and the adjustment of some cost savings around Medicaid. The fullest accounting came over the weekend when the CBO estimated the Senate bill would increase the debt by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. The analysis also found that 11.8 million additional Americans would become uninsured by 2034 because of the health care provisions — an increase over the findings for the House-passed version that tallied that 10.9 million people would be without health coverage of that version passed. The bill is projected to be even more expensive after things like interest costs are included, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget protecting the current total tally as in the neighborhood of $3.5 to $4.2 trillion over the next decade. "The debt impact could rise as high as $4.5 trillion if various rumored adjustments are made," the group added of potential additional changes still to come. The findings also come as Senate Republicans push forward on a budget gimmick that is set to hide $3.8 trillion in red ink using a "current policy baseline" that Democrats say violated Senate rules but appears set to proceed. Either way the sky-high debt findings could imperil the bill politically, with two GOP senators already likely to vote no and others not yet saying they will back Trump's effort to get this over the line in the coming hours. The bill will also need to be approved by the House if the amended package advances and is then considered by a bloc of fiscal conservatives there who say they barely voted in May for that less expensive version. One initial comment from the House Freedom Caucus was negative, with the group writing that the new tally was above "our agreed budget framework." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AbbVie to buy Capstan Therapeutics for up to $2.1 billion
(Reuters) -AbbVie said on Monday it will acquire Capstan Therapeutics in a deal worth up to $2.1 billion, adding experimental treatments for autoimmune diseases to its portfolio.
