French woman who burned bedridden grandfather alive gets 5-year sentence
In October 2024, a court handed Emilie G., 33, a five-year suspended sentence after she admitted to killing her grandfather, describing it as "an act of love" to end his suffering.
Prosecutors appealed the ruling, arguing she killed the 95-year-old as frustrations piled up in her personal life and requested a 15-year jail term -- the same sentence sought in the first trial.
But the court stopped short on Wednesday, sentencing her this time to five years in prison, with four years suspended. The remaining year will be served under house arrest with an electronic tag rather than in prison.
During the trial, prosecutor Eric Mazaud argued that killing her grandfather was "not an act of love", as she described it.
"When you love someone, you don't burn them," he said at the court in the eastern town of Bourg-en-Bresse.
The victim was found dead from severe burns and smoke inhalation in his bed in August 2020.
His granddaughter expressed regret during the appeal hearings which opened on Monday but was unable to explain why she chose to burn him alive.
"He did not have a death worthy of his life... fire is atrocious, it is inhuman," she said on Tuesday.
During the first trial, Emilie G., who experts said suffered from depression, said she was overwhelmed by caring for her grandfather while raising her children and dealing with a faltering romantic relationship.
On the day her partner revealed he had been unfaithful, she poured gasoline on her grandfather's mattress and threw a burning sheet of paper on the bed before fleeing the room.
Prosecutor Romain Ducrocq during the first trial argued that Emilie G. killed her grandfather to "exorcise her frustration and multiple failures".
But the defendant said that she acted to end her grandfather's suffering, someone she had cared for and viewed as a father figure.
She insisted her grandfather asked her to kill him several times including in the month before his death after she found him lying in his own excrement. She said she did not tell other family members.
The court said it acknowledged the man's "weariness", but concluded that at no point "did he express an explicit request for active assistance in dying".
The presiding judge Raphael Vincent said he considered the "extremely serious" acts to be "in no way a reasoned act of euthanasia".
According to a psychiatric report, she was in a "dissociative state" at the time, which was said to "impair her judgement".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Making undertrials stand with raised arms is not legal'
Days after four undertrials were held guilty of contempt of court and given a bizarre punishment of standing with their hands raised in the air, a sessions court has called the action illegal, asking the magistrate to first understand legal provisions before using its discretionary powers. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) Additional sessions judge Anju Bajaj Chandna of Dwarka court passed the order on Friday. The judge set aside the July 15 order passed by judicial magistrate first class Saurabh Goyal. Magistrate Goyal, who was presiding over a complaint case of alleged land grab and forgery in Dwarka's Palam village, had held the four guilty of contempt of court for wasting the court's time and causing delay in payment of bail bonds. The judge made them stand with their hands raised up in the air till noon. Two of the accused, Kuldeep and Rakesh, moved the sessions court, seeking setting aside of the previous order on grounds that it was a gross misuse of law and an act of judicial overreach. Terming the punishment as illegal, the court said, 'The order cannot qualify the test legality and propriety. The order passed by Ld. Magistrate is not only illegal but even the legal procedure has not been adopted'. The court observed that non-furnishing of bail bonds by the accused persons cannot be termed as a contemptuous by any stretch of interpretation. The court observed that the magistrate had failed to take note of the fact that new criminal laws had come into effect from July 1, 2024, and proceedings conducted under the older IPC was an 'incorrect application of law'. The judge added that even if the proceedings are viewed through the IPC and CrPC sections, the order passed is 'absolutely against the substantive and procedural law'. The court said that the accused persons not furnishing the bail bonds did not fall within the ambit of IPC Section 228 (intentional insult or interruption to a public servant sitting in judicial proceedings) and in no manner be taken as an insult or interruption. 'It is also clear that the magistrate did not afford any opportunity to the accused persons to show cause as to why they should not be proceeded against…without hearing, the accused were asked to stand in the court till the rising of the court with their hands straight in the air. The kind of sentence is not contemplated in law,' the court remarked. Explaining that it was the duty of the court to ensure that no person can be detained without proper legal justification, the court said that the Magistrate completely failed in his duty and responsibility to conduct judicial proceedings legally and properly. 'The order is not sustainable…the Ld. Magistrate is advised to properly read and understand the legal provisions before using his discretionary powers,' the court observed.
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC dismisses bail plea of main accused in removing national flag from a Gurugram mosque
The Punjab and Haryana high court has denied anticipatory bail to a Gurugram man who allegedly replaced the national flag atop a mosque with saffron flag observing that conduct of the petitioner had 'serious communal and constitutional implications'. He had argued that was falsely implicated in this case and had no role to play in the entire incident. (Getty Images/iStockphoto) 'The allegations against the petitioner are not vague or general in nature but are specific and substantiated by initial investigation, including purported conversations between the petitioner and the co-accused during the commission of the alleged act. The gravity of the offence and its potential impact on public order and communal peace cannot be overlooked at this stage,' the bench of justice Manisha Batra observed while dismissing the plea from one Vikas Tomar from Gurugram. He had approached high court seeking pre-arrest bail in an FIR registered on July 7 this year under Sections 299,3(5),61(2)AND 2 of Prevention of Insult to National Honours Act, 1971 and causing disappearance of evidence at Bilaspur police station in Gurugram. He had argued that was falsely implicated in this case and had no role to play in the entire incident. Allegations were that on July 7 police received information that the national flag being hoisted on a mosque was replaced with another flag in a Bilaspur locality by unsocial elements. The complainant gave three names to the police and also provided an audio and video recording. During the probe petitioner's role had surfaced, the police had told the court. State's counsel had told the court that there are serious and specific allegations against the petitioner who with an intent to create communal tension in the vicinity, had got the national flag hoisted in the mosque of village Uton removed and instead unfurled a saffron flag in place of the same with an intent to cause hurt to religious feelings of the members of Muslim community. For conducting a deeper probe, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is must. Hence, pre-arrest bail be not allowed, the state's counsel had told the court. The court observed that no extraordinary or exceptional circumstance has been brought on record by the petitioner that would warrant court's interference in his favour. '…in light of the serious communal and constitutional implications of the alleged conduct. …custodial interrogation of a suspected person is qualitatively more elicitation oriented than questioning a suspect …(on anticipatory bail). Many useful information can be disinterred during custodial interrogation,' the bench said dismissing the plea and adding that a deeper and proper probe is required and the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is 'must'.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Achraf Hakimi rape trial: Was the PSG star framed? New French reports uncover disturbing messages from the accuser
Achraf Hakimi, one of PSG's top stars and a Champions League winner, is facing trial over allegations of rape stemming from an incident in 2023. French prosecutors have moved ahead, officially pushing for a criminal case that could see the 26-year-old sentenced to up to 15 years in prison if found guilty. But in a stunning twist, French outlet L'Equipe has now reported that Hakimi may have actually been the target of an attempted robbery, fraud, and extortion, all allegedly orchestrated by his accuser and her friend, as revealed through disturbing private messages uncovered during the investigation. French investigators discover shocking private chats between Achraf Hakimi's accuser and her friend. According to L'Equipe, French investigators discovered WhatsApp exchanges that imply the accuser and her friend were planning to seduce and rob Hakimi. Messages like 'We're going to rob him blind,' 'Come in femme fatale mode,' and 'We're street girls' were found on Nadia's phone. 🚨NEW NEWS IN THE HAKIMI CASE:In the Hakimi case, investigators uncovered troubling messages between Amélie (the accuser) and her friend Nadia, including: 'We're going to rob him blind' and 'We're street girls.'When questioned, they claimed it was just dark humor and jokes.… One text from Amelie before meeting Hakimi read, 'I'm gonna f*** him,' followed by Nadia responding, 'LMAO dirty sl*t.' These messages paint a very different picture from the image Amelie reportedly gave police, one of a shy, nervous girl unfamiliar with casual encounters. When questioned, both women claimed they were just joking. Real Madrid star Kylian Mbappe defends Achraf Hakimi's character Achraf Hakimi's close friend and Real Madrid star, Kylian Mbappe, has publicly come to his defence. Speaking to the French media, Mbappe said, 'Hakimi is respectful with women. Even when drunk, I've never seen him behave inappropriately. We're not savages, and we've been prepared for this since the start of our careers.' His statement adds to a growing number of voices questioning the integrity of the accusations. The original allegation against Achraf Hakimi: What happened in 2023? The alleged incident dates back to February 2023. Amelie, a 24-year-old woman, claimed she met Hakimi through Instagram and that after weeks of chatting, he invited her to his home near Paris while the football star's wife Hiba Abouk and children were away. She alleged that he assaulted her after kissing her without consent. The woman later reported the encounter to police but initially refused to file a formal complaint. She eventually submitted messages to investigators and officially pressed charges. On March 3, 2023, Hakimi was formally indicted by an investigating judge. Prosecution wants a trial, but the Defence calls it 'senseless' French prosecutors have now recommended that Hakimi's case go to trial, with the footballer potentially facing up to 15 years in prison. A spokesperson from the Nanterre prosecutor's office confirmed their intent to proceed. Meanwhile, Hakimi's lawyer Fanny Colin criticised the move, stating: 'These requisitions are incomprehensible and senseless in light of the evidence… particularly the psychological assessments.' Achraf Hakimi, who has consistently denied the allegations, remains free on bail. Achraf Hakimi: 'They tried to blackmail me' In a previous interview with the French media, Hakimi claimed there was a plot against him. 'When you are successful and things are going well, you become an easy target… They wanted to blackmail me, and that's why we filed a complaint,' he said. 🚨Hakimi Case – What the Police FoundWhile reviewing the complainant Amélie's phone, police discovered messages she hadn't disclosed, including one where her friend urges her to act in 'femme fatale mode,' saying: 'Try to get the codes… we're gonna rob him… we're street… The defence maintains that the case is built on falsehoods and intends to appeal any decision that leads to a criminal trial. What happens next in the Achraf Hakimi rape case? The decision now lies with the investigating judge, who will determine whether Hakimi will face trial in a criminal court. While the prosecution pushes forward, L'Equipe's revelations have added a new layer of doubt to a case already surrounded by media scrutiny and public speculation.
