logo
Holt Liberals prepare first budget amid economic uncertainty

Holt Liberals prepare first budget amid economic uncertainty

CBC18-03-2025
Social Sharing
The Holt government tables its first budget today, a document the Liberals once confidently predicted would feature campaign promises fulfilled, combined with a modest fiscal surplus.
Instead, with economic uncertainty from the threat of U.S. tariffs on Canadian exports, the question is how big the budget deficit might be.
Finance Minister René Legacy warned last month that a deficit appeared unavoidable in the upcoming 2025-26 fiscal year.
"I would say it's getting obvious that it's highly likely," he said at the time.
In a social media video last Friday, Premier Susan Holt said her government "cannot keep kicking the can down the road" and would bring "transformational change" to some government services, including the delivery of primary care.
"That means the services we deliver won't look the way they did in the past," she said.
It was not clear whether that meant an even larger infusion of spending, or potentially controversial cuts designed to avoid a deeper deficit.
The centrepiece of Holt's campaign commitment to improve primary care was a promise to open 30 collaborative care clinics by 2028, including 10 in the coming year.
According to Liberal platform documents, that promise would cost only $3.8 million in 2025-26, an amount that would not include, for example, what doctors and nurse practitioners in those clinics would bill to Medicare.
Holt said in her state of the province speech in January that the threat of U.S. tariffs by President Donald Trump was already slowing down the pace of hiring and investment in the province.
The Liberal premier promised balanced budgets in every year of her mandate but has said the current year's projected deficit of $398.9 million doesn't count against that commitment because the budget had been set by the previous Progressive Conservative government.
Some of the spending contributing to that deficit this year, however, is the result of Liberal choices, including an additional $60 million for nurse bonuses and $32 million in sales-tax rebates on N.B. Power bills.
Holt's video said the province's dire fiscal situation was unforeseeable.
"The financial conditions in front of us are more difficult than anyone could have anticipated," she said.
"This is not the situation we expected, but it is the one in front of us, and we have hard decisions to make. But we will not waver in our commitment to help New Brunswickers today."
The Opposition Progressive Conservatives say there were ample warnings that the rapid growth in population, tax revenue and federal transfers in the previous four years were unlikely to continue.
"It's starting to slow down," Ernie Steeves, the PC finance minister at the time, warned last September, just before the election campaign began.
The PCs also accused the Liberals of a major accounting error in the costing of their election platform, saying they double-counted $450 million in harmonized sales tax revenue when they said they'd be able to fund their promises.
The Liberal campaign team responded that a PC promise to cut the HST appeared to be based on an expected major influx of tax revenue — a "surplus surprise" the Liberals said would also cover their commitments.
That hasn't materialized.
"They're either going to break their promises, or they're going to break the province keeping their promises, and that's for them to decide," PC Leader Glen Savoie said.
"They're going to have to be the ones to face New Brunswickers and say, 'We couldn't keep our promises because we over-promised,' or they're going to have to say to New Brunswickers, 'You're going to have to pay more to get less because we kept our promises."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Canadian researcher was 'indispensible' to helping Trump dismantle climate action
A Canadian researcher was 'indispensible' to helping Trump dismantle climate action

National Observer

time4 hours ago

  • National Observer

A Canadian researcher was 'indispensible' to helping Trump dismantle climate action

A Canadian economist and conservative columnist who recently called Prime Minister Mark Carney a "climate zealot" played a critical role in the Trump administration's push to eradicate US climate rules. Ross McKitrick, an associate professor at the University of Guelph and a senior fellow at libertarian thinktank the Fraser Institute, was one of five co-authors recruited by US Energy Secretary Christ Wright to author a 150-page US Department of Energy (DOE) report that undermined the US government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. He was "indispensible" to the project, wrote co-author and climate denier Roy Spencer in his blog. The report argues "CO2-induced warming appears to be less economically damaging than commonly believed," and "mitigation policies could prove more detrimental than beneficial." The report was published last week as part of the Trump administration's proposal to repeal the Environmental Protection Agency's Endangerment Finding — the legal mechanism underpinning most US climate legislation. Eliminating the finding, a longstanding goal of climate deniers, lets the government undermine standards that limit emissions, including from oil and gas operations, power plants and landfills. There is a widespread scientific consensus that human activity, mostly burning fossil fuels, is the main driver of climate change. That finding was backed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the European Climate Risk Assessment, and the US's Fifth National Climate Risk Assessment, published during the Biden era. Bill McKibben, the prominent climate scientist, journalist, climate advocate and co-founder of told Canada's National Observer McKitrick's involvement is a rare example of climate denial flowing from Canada to the US. "I suppose it's proof that once in a while the damage goes the other way across the border," he said. If the Trump administration successfully eradicates all US climate measures, the country is projected to emit an extra seven billion tons of greenhouse gases between now and 2030 — like adding an additional 10 Canadas to the world's emissions. A Canadian economist and conservative columnist who recently called Prime Minister Mark Carney a "climate zealot" played a critical role in the Trump administration's push to eradicate US climate rules. McKitrick has been downplaying the impacts of climate change and bolstering the fossil fuel industry for decades. As far back as 2000, he joined a briefing by the so-called "Cooler Heads Coalition," a group with close ties to the oil industry, to criticize the IPCC's Third Assessment Report. "The inclusion of Ross McKitrick, whose work is widely debunked and who isn't even American, tells you just how hard it is to find researchers who will question the overwhelming scientific consensus on carbon dioxide emissions and climate change," said Simon Donner, a climate scientist at the University of British Columbia and a lead author on the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. As the conversation continued around climate change, McKitrick continued to publicly criticize climate science and renewable energy throughout the 2000s and 2010s through his work writing reports for the Fraser Institute and other thinktanks, in news media and as a public speaker. In 2020 he published an op-ed for Troy Media that claims we must ' fight climate extremists before they upend society" and slammed Canada's then-proposed plastic pollution rules for imposing " costs and inconvenience … while doing nothing to fix the [pollution] problem." He remains a prominent voice against climate action, contributing climate-skeptical columns to the Financial Post, the National Post and the oil and gas outlet Energy Now. He also continues to write for conservative thinktanks, including a 2025 report for the Fraser Institute that concludes achieving Canada's net zero goals isn't worth the economic and social cost. A spokesperson for the US DOE said in an emailed statement that McKitrick and his co-authors, the prominent climate contrarians John Christy, Judith Curry, Steve Koonin and Roy Spencer, "represent diverse viewpoints and political backgrounds." Wright, the US energy secretary, wrote in the report's preface that "media coverage often distorts the science" on climate, pushing "many people [to] walk away with a view of climate change that is exaggerated or incomplete. To provide clarity and balance, I asked a diverse team of independent experts to critically review the current state of climate science. "I've reviewed the report carefully, and I believe it faithfully represents the state of climate science today. Still, many readers may be surprised by its conclusions — which differ in important ways from the mainstream narrative," Wright, a former oil and gas executive, continued. In February, Wright described the global effort against climate change as "sinister" and a "tool used to grow government power [and], top-down control, and shrink human freedom' while speaking at Jordan Peterson's Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference. A few weeks later, he attacked Biden-era climate measures as a "quasi-religious' agenda 'that imposed endless sacrifices on our citizens.' Climate experts have slammed the new DOE report. Ben Sanderson, senior researcher on climate mitigation at the Centre for International Climate Research (CICERO) in Oslo, dismantled the paper in a thread on Bluesky. The "tiny" list of authors and lack of external peer-review undermines the report's credibility, he wrote. (Reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change usually contain contributions from hundreds of authors.) McKitrick and his co-authors presented "minority contrarian viewpoints" by "isolating specific talking points and presenting them as a comprehensive assessment. "Each chapter follows the same pattern. Establish a contrarian position, cherry-pick evidence to support that position, then claim that this position is under-represented in climate literature and the IPCC in particular. Include a bunch of references, most of which don't support the central argument," he wrote. In a Tuesday post on X, McKitrick claimed that he and his co-authors weren't involved in designing the government's push to repeal the Endangerment Finding and "only knew what was in the news." However, the post links to blog posts by his co-authors Curry and Spencer where they address the key policy head-on: Spencer wrote that the group"suspected the Endangerment Finding would be the topic of greatest interest" to the Trump administration when they were commissioned to write the report. Curry wrote that "the looming US policy issue is the EPA Endangerment Finding" and that she hopes the report will break "Breaking the link between energy policy and human-caused climate change".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store