Most Gulf markets in red as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected U.S. President Donald Trump's demand for unconditional surrender on Wednesday, as Iranians jammed the highways out of Tehran fleeing from intensified Israeli airstrikes.
Saudi Arabia's benchmark index declined 1.2%, weighed down by a 3.3% slide in ACWA Power Company and a 2% drop in Saudi Arabian Mining Company.
Among other losers, Prince Waleed bin Talal-backed airline Flynas Company closed 3.4% lower in debut trade.
Elsewhere, oil giant Saudi Aramco eased 0.3%.
Additionally, investor uncertainty surrounding today's U.S. Federal Reserve meeting is contributing to the cautious mood, with most market participants expecting the central bank to hold interest rates steady, said Joseph Dahrieh, managing principal at Tickmill.
Dubai's main share index finished 1.2% lower, with blue-chip developer Emaar Properties losing 1.2%.
Most Gulf markets in red over Israel-Iran conflict worries
In Abu Dhabi, the index was down 0.4%.
Oil prices steadied, after a gain of 4% in the previous session, as markets weighed up the chance of supply disruptions from the Iran-Israel conflict and as they ponder a direct U.S. involvement.
The Qatari index lost 0.6%, with Qatar Gas Transport Nakilat falling 3.8%.
Outside the Gulf, Egypt's blue-chip index added 0.4%, helped by a 4.1% jump in Fawry for Banking Technology and Electronic Payment.
------------------------------------------ SAUDI ARABIA lost 1.2% to 10,591 Abu Dhabi down 0.4% to 9,496 Dubai dropped 1.2% to 5,306 QATAR fell 0.6% to 10,348 EGYPT rose 0.4% to 30,839 BAHRAIN declined 1.1% to 1,889 OMAN was flat at 4,520 KUWAIT retreated 1.6% to 8,544 ------------------------------------------
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
24 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan condemns Israel's attempt to annex West Bank
Pakistan on Friday unequivocally condemned the Israeli parliament's unlawful attempt to assert "sovereignty" over the occupied West Bank, calling it a grave violation of international law reflecting Israel's persistent disregard for Palestinian rights and established international norms. Moreover, the Senate, in a unanimous resolution, strongly condemning the decision of the Israeli Parliament (Knesset). "Such deliberate and provocative actions highlight the occupying power's systematic attempts to undermine efforts for peace and entrench its illegal occupation. These unilateral measures represent a dangerous escalation that jeopardizes regional stability and prospects for a just and lasting settlement," Foreign Office spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said in a statement. He called upon the international community to take swift and decisive action to hold Israel accountable for its violations of United Nations Security Council resolutions and international humanitarian law. These measures will neither be recognized nor alter the internationally acknowledged status of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, he added. Senate The Senate resolution was moved by Senator Palwasha Mohammad Zai Khan on behalf of entire house. The resolution recalled that the West Bank is internationally recognised as occupied territory and that any unilateral annexation or claim of sovereignty is a clear affront to the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people. The house affirmed the government and people of Pakistan's unwavering support for the just cause of Palestine and the establishment of an independent and sovereign Palestinian State, in line with the relevant UN resolutions and the Arab Peace Initiative.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Belated but bold
Listen to article France's decision to formally recognise the State of Palestine is a seismic diplomatic shift in Europe's approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While long overdue, this step by President Emmanuel Macron — set to be formalised at the UN General Assembly in September — could prove pivotal for Palestine's position in the international arena. With this announcement, France becomes the most influential European power to break with the Western bloc's longstanding hesitation. While over 140 UN member states already recognise Palestine, key global actors including the US, the UK and Germany continue to withhold recognition, tying it to a final negotiated settlement with Israel — one that grows more elusive by the day. France's move breaks that inertia, foreshadowing that the international community can no longer turn a blind eye to the lopsided nature of the so-called peace process. This recognition also arrives at a time of unprecedented carnage in Gaza. Nearly 60,000 Palestinians have been killed and millions displaced in Israel's relentless assault, while hunger and disease ravage a besieged population. The growing chorus of condemnation, including from Western allies, is a turning tide in international opinion. Critics will rightly say this step comes too late — after decades of occupation, failed negotiations, and now, one of the deadliest conflicts in modern times. But the belated nature of the decision does not diminish its significance. France's stance may spur others, especially within the EU and possibly beyond, to follow suit, bringing greater pressure on Israel to end its genocide. France's step, however delayed, must now become a catalyst for real, sustained international engagement. But recognition must be followed by concrete diplomatic action and, most importantly, an insistence on an immediate ceasefire and unfettered humanitarian access to Gaza.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
LNG deal: game-changer or financial curse?
Listen to article Few decisions have cast as dark and enduring shadows on Pakistan's economy as the power sector — electricity and gas. The 2016 LNG deal stands out as one of the contributors to this adversity. Shahid Khaqan Abbasi had, as petroleum minister, led the country into this contract with Qatar and touted it as a game-changer for the country's energy crisis. Nearly a decade on, one wonders if it was a game-changer or a fiscal disaster. It now appears as a carelessly designed deal more to serve personal interests of the few than ensuring long-term energy interests of the country. The LNG deal, say critics, locked Pakistan into a rigid fifteen-year arrangement which is now turning into a financial liability. The country is now awash in imported LNG it cannot afford to consume. As of late July, three fully-loaded Qatari cargoes sat idle, while authorities scramble to offload gas on the international market. What was intended to be a lifeline has become a bleeding artery, draining precious resources from an already battered national exchequer. By late July, the circular debt linked directly to the LNG deal had exceeded $11 billion. The LNG-fired power plants, constructed then as "symbols of technological progress", have become monuments of economic ruin, according to some experts. Built at over $4 billion, including the grid infrastructure, these plants now produce some of the most expensive electricity in the country. Instead of powering growth, they are weighing down whatever little economic progress the country is making and contributing to the financial crisis. Technical experts familiar with the business reckon that the LNG strategy may have entailed a staggering $21 billion cost to the nation so far. Does this merit a debate as to whether Pakistan is now hostage to a single policy blunder — rooted not in misfortune but in apparent self-interest and willful pretense of ignorance? Why the call for debate? Because even the current minister for petroleum, Ali Pervaiz Malik, recently admitted to the bitter truth. Had the 2015 LNG agreement not been signed, Pakistan might have been spared the scale of financial devastation it endures today — a tragically honest moment of rare clarity indeed, Malik said in an interview early July 2025. This is not merely a story of bureaucratic error or policy miscalculation but a tragedy authored by a minister who preferred personal over national interest. Why is Mr Abbasi being accused of designing contracts that are now bleeding the national kitty? The question arises because a professional entrepreneur usually thinks through before venturing into a new business. Did he and his team deliberately ignore the long-term massive financial implications of imported gas and committing the country into long-term fixed cost contracts? And worse still, isn't it a tragedy made possible by the silence and connivance of key bureaucrats of the ministry? Under the original 2015 contracts, Pakistan committed to importing 3.75 million metric tons of LNG annually from Qatar at 13.37% of the Brent crude oil benchmark. Prior to the signing, the minister and his ministerial minions peddled a narrative across media and policy platforms that the global price of LNG would never fall below 18% of Brent — this projecting the deal as a masterstroke in energy diplomacy. But not everyone was convinced. Engineer Arshad H Abbasi, an independent energy expert, raised alarm bells early on. He questioned the minister's pricing logic, the contract's length, and the outdated model of pegging LNG to crude oil rather than opting for more modern gas-to-gas indexation. He had warned then that global energy markets were shifting rapidly — shale gas production in the US was accelerating, and Australia was on the cusp of becoming a major LNG exporter. Oversupply was imminent, he warned, and locking Pakistan into a long-term contract would spell disaster. Ensuing developments and the data associated with it suggest Arshad Abbasi had a point; by 2024, the US had become the world's largest LNG exporter, triggering a global LNG glut. Apparent public pressure forced the minister to negotiate the contract's rate down — from 18% to 13.37% of Brent, yet ministry sources insist he refused to consider short-term contracts or switch to gas-indexed pricing. As the eventual burgeoning costs off fixed-price LNG contracts proved, it was a financial tragedy in the making. Done. The vested interest eventually turned Engineer Abbasi literally into a persona non grata and managed to muzzle debates in the parliament and the media. Neither the minister nor the technocrats around him considered looking into the 2014 revised India-Qatar LNG deal, which was far more favourable than between Qatar and Pakistan. Instead they went about silencing and demonising critical voices. The magnitude of Pakistan's LNG blunder prompted even Daron Acemoglu and James A Robinson — authors of the seminal work Why Nations Fail — to use Pakistan's case (in the revised edition) as a painful example of how self-serving politicians and bureaucracy exploit extractive institutions for personal gains and go on to sabotage national interest. The 2015 LNG contracts offer a case study in how possible personal ambition of a few can condemn generations into financial servitude. The deal has turned into a festering wound, inflicted not by a foreign enemy but by those entrusted with serving and protecting the public good.
