US envoy says satisfied with Lebanese response on disarming of Hezbollah
Lebanese leaders who took office in the aftermath of more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah have vowed a state monopoly on bearing arms, while demanding Israel comply with a November ceasefire.
Israel has warned it will continue to strike until Hezbollah has been disarmed, while the movement's leader Naim Qassem said Sunday his group would not surrender or lay down its weapons in response to Israeli threats.
"I'm unbelievably satisfied with the response," Barrack, Washington's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy to Syria, told a press conference after meeting President Joseph Aoun.
"It's thoughtful, it's considered. We're creating a go-forward plan," he said.
"Now what it takes is a... thrust to the details, which we're going to do. We're both committed to get to the details and get a resolution," he said, adding: "I'm very, very hopeful."
Lebanon's health ministry said two people were killed in Israeli strikes in the country's south on Monday, the latest report of deadly raids despite the ceasefire.
- 'Future for them' -
Last month, Barrack asked Lebanese leaders to formally commit to disarming Hezbollah, the only group that retained its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, doing so in the name of "resistance" against Israel which occupied southern Lebanon at the time.
Hezbollah was heavily weakened in the latest conflict, with Israel battering the group's arsenal of missiles and rockets and killing senior commanders including longtime chief Hassan Nasrallah.
The presidency said on X that Aoun handed Barrack "ideas for a comprehensive solution".
Parliament speaker Nabih Berri, a Hezbollah ally, said his own meeting with Barrack was constructive and "considered Lebanon's interest and sovereignty... and the demands of Hezbollah", according to a statement.
Barrack said that Hezbollah "needs to see that there's a future for them, that that road is not harnessed just solely against them."
He warned that "the rest of the region is moving at Mach speed, and you will be left behind", adding that "dialogue has started between Syria and Israel, just as the dialogue needs to be reinvented by Lebanon."
On Friday, Syria said it was willing to cooperate with the United States to reimplement a 1974 disengagement agreement with Israel, nearly seven months after Islamists ousted longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad, a Hezbollah ally who was also backed by Iran.
Syria has also admitted to holding indirect talks with Israel to reduce tensions.
- Strikes -
A Lebanese official told AFP on condition of anonymity that late last week, Beirut submitted an initial response to Washington, which requested modifications, then officials worked through the weekend to develop the final version.
Under the ceasefire, Hezbollah was to pull its fighters back north of the Litani river, some 30 kilometres (20 miles) from the Israeli frontier.
Israel was to withdraw its troops from Lebanon, but has kept them deployed in five areas that it deemed strategic.
The truce was based on a United Nations Security Council resolution that says only Lebanese troops and UN peacekeepers should bear arms in south Lebanon, and calls for the disarmament of all non-state groups.
Lebanese authorities say they have been dismantling Hezbollah's military infrastructure in the south near the Israeli border.
Hezbollah's Qassem said Sunday that Israel needed to abide by the ceasefire agreement, "withdraw from the occupied territories, stop its aggression... release the prisoners" detained during last year's war, and that reconstruction in Lebanon must begin.
Only then "will we be ready for the second stage, which is to discuss the national security and defence strategy" which includes the issue of the group's disarmament, he added.
bur-lg/dcp
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
39 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Death of Five Israeli Soldiers Fuels Debate Over Ending Gaza War
TEL AVIV—Five Israeli soldiers were killed in a Hamas ambush in northern Gaza, Israel's military said Tuesday, adding to a string of deadly incidents for Israeli troops that are fueling a debate over ending the war. Since the end of Israel and Iran's 12-day conflict in late June, at least 17 Israeli soldiers have been killed in the Gaza Strip, one of the deadliest periods since the fighting began after a Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. The deaths show that even 21 months into the war, Hamas is still able to carry out a guerrilla warfare campaign.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US only has 25% of all Patriot missile interceptors needed for Pentagon's military plans
The United States only has about 25% of the Patriot missile interceptors it needs for all of the Pentagon's military plans after burning through stockpiles in the Middle East in recent months, an alarming depletion that led to the Trump administration freezing the latest transfer of munitions to Ukraine. The stockpile of the Patriot missiles has fallen so low that it raised concern inside the Pentagon that it could jeopardize potential US military operations, and deputy defense secretary, Stephen Feinberg, authorized the transfer to be halted while they reviewed where weapons were being sent. Donald Trump appeared to reverse at least part of that decision on Monday when he told reporters in advance of a dinner at the White House with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he would 'send some more weapons' to Ukraine, although he did not disclose whether that would include Patriot systems. Trump also told Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in a phone call that he was not responsible for the halt in weapons shipments and that he had directed a review of US weapons stockpiles but didn't order the freeze, according to people briefed on the conversation. Related: Trump has 'good conversation' with Zelenskyy after heavy bombardment of Ukraine by Russia But the determination last month to halt the transfer, as described by four people directly familiar with the matter, was based in large part on the Pentagon's global munitions tracker, which is used to generate the minimum level of munitions required to carry out the US military's operations plans. According to the tracker, which is managed by the joint chiefs of staff and the Pentagon's defense security cooperation agency, the stockpiles of a number of critical munitions have been below that floor for several years since the Biden administration started sending military aid to Ukraine. The Trump administration started a review of the depleted level of Patriot missiles and other munitions around February, the people said. Deliberations accelerated after the US deployed more of the interceptors in the Middle East to support the Houthi campaign and to Israel. The situation also became more acute following Trump's move to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities last month, the people said, when the US fired close to 30 Patriot missiles to intercept Iranian ballistic missiles fired in performative retaliation at the Al Udeid base in Qatar. The recent depletion of Patriot missiles and other munitions formed part of the basis of a 'recommendation memo' by Elbridge Colby, the under secretary of defense for policy, that outlined several options to conserve weapons and sent to Feinberg's office. Earlier reports said Colby, who has drawn criticism from Democrats for prioritizing shifting resources from the Ukraine conflict in preparation for a potential war with China, had paused the transfer but two of the people said the undersecretary's office lacks the power to make such a unilateral move. The decision was rather made by Feinberg, the former chief executive or Cerberus Capital Management to whom Colby reports, the people said. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth then signed off on Feinberg's determination. But the abrupt pause has come at a critical time for Ukraine, as Russia last week launched its largest aerial offensive to date and Ukraine has limited options to acquire both precision-guided and more basic weapons to hold off increasingly intense Russian attacks. Ukraine is also largely unable to directly buy weapons from defense contractors for its purposes, since a new order is estimated to take years to fulfill, and it would only be completed after the Pentagon had its own orders completed since the defense department is a higher priority customer. Trump's decision to reverse course and allow some defensive munitions to be sent to Ukraine appears to have come amid growing frustration with Russian president Vladimir Putin, who he criticized on Monday for not helping end the war. Spokespeople for the White House and the Pentagon confirmed some transfers would resume at Trump's direction but did not specify whether the weapons being sent to Ukraine would involve munitions at critically low levels. 'As Operation Midnight Hammer proved, the American military is stronger than it's ever been. President Trump wants to stop the killing and has pledged to provide Ukraine with additional defensive munitions,' said White House spokesperson Anna Kelly. While Trump has publicly complained about Ukraine aid in financial terms, Feinberg was briefed that the larger problem has been with the ability for the US to manufacture the weapons to quickly backfill the depleted stockpiles, two of the people said. The US has been transferring weapons to Ukraine using two principal channels: through a drawdown of defense department stockpiles, and through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), where the defense department pays contractors to manufacture weapons to go to Ukraine. Related: Ukraine accuses Putin of humiliating Trump with devastating attack on Kyiv Both transfer mechanisms was set to have been affected by the freeze, the people said, since the Pentagon is prioritizing replenishing its stockpiles using the same defense contractors being relied upon to build weapons for Ukraine through the USAI program. For the latest weapons shipment to Ukraine, the US had earmarked dozens of Patriot missiles among other munitions including air-to-air Sparrow missiles, Hellfire missiles, GMLRS rocket artillery and anti-tank guns. The principal concern appears to revolve around the Patriot missiles, which the US produces 600 per year but Iran alone has more than 1,000 ballistic missiles remaining it could theoretically use against US bases in the region if the ceasefire with Israel were to break down. The US has also transferred around 2,000 Stinger missiles to Ukraine, which officials estimated to be equivalent to two-and-a-half years of production, and is increasingly used by the US military for its own defense purposes against hostile drones, the people said.
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Netanyahu at the Crossroads
When Benjamin Netanyahu visited the White House on Monday for his latest meeting with his American counterpart, he found himself in a place that once seemed improbable: back in Donald Trump's good graces. Trump invited Netanyahu to Washington after a volatile four-year stretch between the two. Trump left Washington in January 2021 infuriated with Netanyahu, bitter that the Israeli leader had backed out of a planned joint operation to assassinate an Iranian general and had congratulated Joe Biden on his election victory. When Trump returned, in January 2025, he came with a top agenda item that clashed with the Israeli premier's: an end to the war in Gaza and an Iranian nuclear agreement. Despite those differences, they now appear close. After 21 months of audacious Israeli attacks on Iranian assets, decapitating its regional terrorist proxies and launching a war against Tehran that, with U.S. help, degraded their nuclear program, Netanyahu can help Trump deliver something he desperately covets: foreign policy wins. 'We're at a different moment in the Netanyahu-Trump relationship,' says Aaron David Miller, a veteran Middle East peace negotiator. On the campaign trail, Trump promised to resolve the Israel-Hamas war. Six months into his second term, the war continues. Now, he wants Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire and hostage-release deal, according to a White House official, that he could chalk up as a defining accomplishment. For Netanyahu, who resisted pressure from the Biden Administration to wind down the war, it's a hard proposition. After presiding over the worst security failure in Israel's history when Hamas fighters stormed the country and slaughtered 1,200 people, he vowed to tear the terrorist group out of Gaza root and branch. Choosing the maximalist objective of dismantling Hamas' military and governing capabilities, Netanyahu refused to scale back the Israeli bombardment of Gaza, despite the mounting civilian death toll, international condemnation, and frustration of the Jewish state's most important ally. Many in Israel and abroad have suspected that Netanyahu was reluctant to end hostilities for fear of triggering snap elections that would result in his ousting. But after engineering a new regional reality, the once vulnerable Prime Minister may now be positioned to pivot to an end game in Gaza. After Israel's successful strikes on Iran, killing the nation's military leaders and top nuclear scientists, Trump deployed B-2 bombers against three Iranian nuclear sites, providing an influential endorsement of Netanyahu's approach with an Israeli public that mistrusts its Prime Minister. 'This has been his lifelong ambition to do this,' says David Makovsky, a former State Department official in the Obama Administration. 'But you almost feel that the Iran strike erased the mark of Caine on his forehead after Oct. 7.' There's another reason why the time may be right. The Knesset, Israel's legislature, is soon to go on a three-month recess, making a two-month ceasefire more palatable to Netanyahu, who won't have to fear that any concession will lead to the hard right orchestrating his downfall. Given Netanyahu's fragile coalition, holding 64 seats in a 120-member parliament, he's beholden to far-right cabinet members, such as Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who can topple his government. The timing of Trump's request removes that threat at least in the short-term. Over the longer-term, the threat to Netanyahu may hinge on Trump's demands for post-war Gaza, what Miller calls 'Netanyahu's nightmare.' Netanyahu has said he would not allow a reformed Palestinian Authority to take control of the coastal enclave, but Persian Gulf countries who may fund the strip's reconstruction have insisted that Palestinian sovereignty would be a prerequisite for their support. Trump's insistence on an end game of any sort could provide cover for Netanyahu, argues Shira Efron, the Israel Policy Forum's research director. 'It helps to deflect political pressure domestically,' she says. It's far from clear that Netanyahu will seize the opportunity. He will also face Trump's demand to avoid escalating the conflict in Iran, not wanting to galvanize a protracted conflict with the U.S. involvement, while also working in tandem to prevent the Iranian regime from building a nuclear bomb. Still, Netanyahu has surmounted obstacles few thought possible on Oct. 8, 2023. He has stayed in office despite the catastrophe that happened on his watch, he has crippled Israel's most formidable adversary, and he has opened the door to a new Middle East. Most recently, Syria's new president, Ahmed al-Shaara, has said he wants to forge a non-belligerence agreement with Israel. 'You're dealing with the most ruthless, skillful Israeli politician,' says Miller. 'He wants to stay in power more than anyone without comparison. You put all those three things together, plus a society that's traumatized and moving to the right or center anyway, and it provides an environment in which he can survive.' Taken together, it's a complicated legacy. 'Netanyahu will be remembered as both the person responsible for Oct. 7, but also the person responsible for all these other achievements that came afterwards,' says Efron. But now, everyone from Donald Trump to the Gulf monarchs to the average Israeli is waiting to see what he will do next.
