"Go f**k yourself": Colbert responds to Trump post
Why it matters: Colbert wasn't just a vocal critic of Trump; he also criticized CBS' parent Paramount's decision to settle with him.
In his first show since CBS announced it would end the program next year, Colbert addressed Trump's Friday post, saying: "I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings. I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert!"
Zoom in: Colbert responded that the "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" host was not next and that he was the martyr.
"How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism?: "Go f**k yourself."
Catch up quick: Earlier this month, Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a voter interference lawsuit filed by Trump last year.
The settlement was criticized by press freedom advocates who believe Paramount could have won what they viewed as a frivolous lawsuit.
"I believe this kind of complicated financial settlement with a sitting government official has a technical name in legal circles: it's 'big, fat bribe,'" Colbert said on his show, days before CBS announced its cancellation.
The intrigue: CBS said last week it is pulling the show for "financial" reasons, but the timing of the announcement has drawn suspicion from media watchers and Democrats.
Colbert said Thursday he found out about the program's cancellation the day before.
David Ellison, CEO of Skydance Media, the company taking over Paramount, met with FCC chair Brendan Carr last Tuesday.
He urged the FCC's Media Bureau to "promptly grant" Paramount's applications to transfer control of its broadcast licenses to its new owners, after emphasizing "the public interest benefits" of the deal in the meeting.
State of play: Democrats were already furious about Paramount's settlement with Trump, but the Colbert situation has added to the anger.
Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Ron Wyden announced an investigation Monday into Skydance's role in a "potential secret Trump payoff connected to Paramount deal."
That "potential secret Trump payoff" refers to reports that Trump brokered a side deal with Paramount's future owners for millions of dollars' worth of public service announcements in support of conservative causes. Trump has suggested those reports were true.
The big picture: Late-night shows used to be the crown jewel of big broadcast. Now, in a hyper-partisan streaming era, they present more risks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani taps senior aide to ousted anti-Israel Rep. Jamaal Bowman as new campaign manager
Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has brought on a new campaign manager — who recently served as senior advisor to fire drill enthusiast and Israel-bashing ex-Rep. Jamaal Bowman. Maya Handa will take the reins of the socialist's bid for mayor following his stunning Dem primary win over supposed frontrunner Andrew Cuomo last month, Mamdani's campaign announced Friday. The Queens assemblyman will face Cuomo, incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and lawyer Jim Walden, all running as independents, in the November general election, along with the Republican nominee, Curtis Sliwa. 3 The socialist frontrunner for New York City mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has brought on a new campaign manager — who recently served as a top advisor to fire drill enthusiast and Israel-bashing ex-lawmaker, Jamaal Bowman. Paul Martinka Handa most recently ran the day-to-day for the mayoral primary campaign of state Sen. Zellnor Myrie, who struggled to break out from the crowded Democratic field. Before jumping into the chaotic horse race, Handa served as senior advisor to Bowman, whose last consequential act as a New York representative in DC was pulling a fire alarm to delay a key House vote. Shortly after, the 'squad' member was voted out of office. Bowman, a vocal critic of Israel who has accused the country of carrying out a genocide in Gaza, is also on Mamdani's short list for schools chancellor. Handa, a political operative with ties to the Working Families Party, has a resume packed with lefty lawmakers, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren's bid for president and Mondaire Jones' 2020 campaign for Congress. 3 Bowman is also on Mamdani's list to potentially be the next school's chancellor. Robert Miller 3 Mamdani's campaign also announced they hired Afua Atta-Mensah as senior political director and Deandra Khan as director of labor and intergovernmental affairs. Andrew Schwartz / Mamdani's campaign also noted Handa's previously worked for Queens Assemblymember Claire Valdez and Brooklyn Councilmember Shahana Hanif, but those gigs were absent from her LinkedIn resume. Other new hires announced by Mamdani's team on Friday were political strategist and progressive organizer Afua Atta-Mensah as senior political director and Deandra Khan — who recently served as top advisor to the president of the Local 32BJ SEIU union — as director of labor and intergovernmental affairs.
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
Anti-Trump DA Alvin Bragg sure acts like he has something to hide — we're suing to find out
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg holds potentially hundreds of communications appearing to link his office to senior Biden administration officials and other political actors in connection with his unprecedented criminal prosecution of then-former President Donald Trump. We've asked for those records, and he's not turning them loose. So we're taking him to court. Last September, America First Policy Institute launched a formal investigation into the people and motivations behind Bragg's decision to prosecute Trump. Advertisement Our effort had a simple goal: figuring out whether Bragg's case was a routine legal probe — or lawfare, a politically engineered hit job orchestrated to influence the 2024 election. The charges brought against Trump were extraordinary. Never before has a question of federal campaign-finance law — which the FEC declined to pursue, no less — been morphed into a state-level misdemeanor, already time-barred under New York law, then Frankensteined into a felony by alleging it was committed to conceal some other crime never defined by the prosecution, nor unanimously agreed upon by jury. Advertisement Confusing? That's the point. Bragg's office thrives on obfuscation. Public records should be accessible. Criminal prosecutions should be transparent. This case was neither — and still isn't. We were drawn to investigate because we saw just too many coincidences to ignore. Michael Colangelo, a top DOJ official with a focus on white-collar crime, left his Biden administration post to join Bragg's office just months before Trump was indicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records. Advertisement Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Bragg's prosecution, had a history of political donations to Biden and to political groups opposed to Trump, the defendant before him. He was officially 'cautioned' on that by the state ethics board. Merchan's daughter Loren worked on Kamala Harris' 2020 campaign and during Trump's trial served as president of Authentic Campaigns, a progressive political consulting firm hired by the Biden-Harris ticket. It all paints a curious picture: A DA who campaigned on a promise to take down Trump, aided by a Biden DOJ veteran, bringing legally contorted charges before a judge with clear partisan connections. Advertisement If this wasn't coordinated, it's one lucky political pile-up. The American people deserve answers. In pursuit of those answers, and in defense of the public's right to know, AFPI submitted a request to Bragg's office under New York's Freedom of Information Law in September 2024. We sought any records that could shed light on whether political influence or coordination played a role in Bragg's decision-making. Our request was specific, lawfully submitted and directly tied to one of the most consequential legal proceedings in modern American history. Ten months later, no records have been produced. None. Though they apparently exist. Instead of providing transparency, the DA's office has engaged in delay, double-talk and silence. We've asked for a list of responsive documents. They won't give one. Advertisement We've asked which of our specific requests the withheld documents pertain to. They won't say. We know, based on our investigation and his office's limited correspondence with us, that the DA possesses hundreds of records of communications with or about political agents who should have had no influence in a 'routine' prosecution, like Lauren Merchan's Authentic Campaigns. Bragg refuses to explain why the public isn't entitled to see them. There is no legal justification for this blackout. No privilege excuses total stonewalling. Advertisement There is only evasion. It's been nearly a year. The records exist, and the DA cannot explain why they remain secret. That alone should raise alarms. AFPI has now turned to the courts to compel compliance. The law does not permit selective transparency by the Manhattan DA. It does not allow politically sensitive cases to be shielded from scrutiny. Advertisement As the New York Legislature declared when it passed the state's open-records law in 1977, 'The people's right to know the process of governmental decision-making and to review the documents leading to determinations is basic to our society.' We agree. Advertisement That's why on July 17, AFPI filed its petition in New York County Superior Court requesting that Bragg's records, whatever they may reveal, be released to the public. The law demands openness, and we intend to see it enforced. Jessica Steinmann is executive general counsel and Jack Casali is an attorney at the Center for Litigation at the America First Policy Institute
Axios
a minute ago
- Axios
Scoop: Dems think they can get ahold of Epstein's birthday book
House Democrats are trying to get their hands on the now-infamous book celebrating Jeffrey Epstein's 50th birthday after it was suggested the disgraced financier's estate is in possession of it, Axios has learned. Why it matters: As the minority party in Congress, Democrats have been largely toothless in their attempts to investigate President Trump. They believe this is a rare opportunity to obtain concrete information. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who is leading the effort, told Axios it would be "very difficult" to obtain the book if it was in the hands of the Department of Justice. "In this case, you literally have a private attorney," said the California Democrat. "A private attorney is much more likely to comply. It's a much easier challenge than going after the administration." Driving the news: Khanna and House Oversight Committee ranking member Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) wrote to attorneys for the Epstein estate's executors asking for a "complete, unredacted copy" of the book, according to a copy of their letter obtained by Axios. Citing Wall Street Journal reporting that Trump submitted a poem and drawing for the book, the lawmakers wrote that it may be "essential" for a probe of the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein matter. Trump has denied the Wall Street Journal's reporting and sued the outlet for libel. What they're saying: " We write with deep concern regarding potential public corruption, abuse of power, and failures in the federal law enforcement response to the Epstein case," Khanna and Garcia wrote. They argued that members of the Oversight Committee should be permitted to review the book before deposing Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who reportedly put it together. "Information gathered from this document may also inform the development of legislative reforms addressing sex trafficking networks, financial regulation, or other critical matters," they added. State of play: Brad Edwards, a lawyer for over 200 of Epstein's victims, said in an MSNBC appearance Thursday, "I know the executors of the estate are in possession of that book." "If somebody simply called" Epstein's executors "and said, 'Give us the book,' they would probably give you the book," Edwards said. "They have attorneys, their attorneys are good people. If they didn't just voluntarily turn over the book out of fear of reprisal, Congress could just issue a subpoena to their attorneys ... they would turn the book over immediately." The three attorneys for Epstein's executors did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Axios. What's next: Khanna and Garcia asked that Epstein's estate turn over the book by August 10. Khanna told Axios: "I will make sure, if we get it, that whatever we do in terms of releasing it is what the victims want, what the victims' attorney wants, and not just trying to score partisan points." "If the victims don't want certain things, I am going to guarantee that the victims are the topmost consideration," he said. "But I do believe that they will want some of it released and once we get it, we can."
