UN criticises Starmer's welfare reforms and warns measures will 'increase poverty rates'
In an intervention likely to be seized on by MPs seeking to further water down the measures, the committee asks ministers for answers on 10 issues surrounding the benefit changes - and says the reforms risk "regression" for disabled people.
The committee, which reports to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, asks about British politicians suggesting people are defrauding the benefits system.
One point on which it wants clarification is: "Public statements by politicians and authorities portraying persons with disabilities as making profit of social benefits, making false statements to get social and disability benefits or being a burden to society."
Other questions are on the impact the measures will have on "young persons, new claimants of disability benefits, women with disabilities, persons with disabilities with high level supports" and others.
They ask ministers about what measures they have taken to address "the foreseeable risk of increasing poverty rates amongst persons with disabilities if cuts are approved" and claim the welfare bill has had "limited scrutiny".
The letter claims that the committee has "received credible information" that the Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill"will deepen the signs of regression" that the committee warned about in a report last year on the cost of living crisis and its impact on disabled people.
An intervention by the UN will be an embarrassment to the government, which has promised its welfare reforms will help disabled people into work.
4:31
Liz Kendall, the welfare secretary, was criticised heavily earlier in the year for saying some people on benefits were "taking the mickey".
After a chaotic first vote in Parliament on 1 July, in which MPs succeeded in watering down the reforms significantly, the government now says its reforms will lift 50,000 people out of poverty. The bill was backed by 335 MPs, with 260 against - a majority of 75.
The first version of the reforms would have - the government's assessment said - pushed 250,000 people into poverty.
Charities are urging MPs to continue to push for further changes - including on cuts to Universal Credit sickness payments.
1:08
A different UN committee heavily criticised benefit changes made by the Conservatives in 2016 and called on the UK to take "corrective measures" when Labour came into office.
The UN's committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) concluded that "welfare reform" measures introduced by Conservative-led governments in 2012 and 2016 had disproportionately affected disabled people, low-income families, and workers in "precarious employment".
The committee said this had led to "severe economic hardship, increased reliance on food banks, homelessness, negative impacts on mental health, and the stigmatisation of benefit claimants".
The Department for Work and Pensions has been contacted for comment.
Mikey Erhardt, policy lead at Disability Rights UK, said: "The fact that the UN has yet again felt it needs to write to the UK government about our cruel and punitive social security system should be a national shame.
"We hope this letter is a wake-up call for MPs. Despite all the chaos of the last-minute climbdowns and concessions, the Universal Credit bill remains broken.
"There are still billions of cuts on the table, and we urge MPs to approach tomorrow's proceedings with caution as their vote will have serious implications for disabled people across the country.
"If disabled people feel unable to trust the government's promises on co-production and the UN needed to raise concerns over the bill's impact, how can MPs vote this bill through?"
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The significant sum spent by Glasgow on hotels for homeless
That amounts covers April 1, 2025 to June 1, 2025, and therefore the annual sum will be significantly higher. Private companies running the hotels were paid in excess of £122 million over the last five years. The city spent £36,122,088 in the 2024-25 financial year up to February 2025, according to the Glasgow Times. That is more than double the £16,320,680 spent by council officials in 2021-22. So, what is behind the hefty cost? Read more: Simply put, Glasgow City Council does not have enough homes to use as emergency accommodation, but the authority is duty bound to help those impacted by homelessness. The council told The Herald it uses more than 50 hotels to accommodate those who fall under this criteria, while also using in excess of 2,600 places of emergency accommodation within temporary accommodation and supported accommodation. Freedom of information data requested by the Scottish Tenants' Association found that 2,117 homeless people were living in a hotel or B&B on June 9, 2025. That includes 322 women and 86 families with children. But it also includes 1,527 refugees who have been given 'leave to remain' in the UK. Leave to remain allows non-UK citizens to reside in the UK indefinitely. Read more: Local authorities across the country have faced intense housing demands in recent years following changes to the UK Government's asylum system. Once a leave to remain decision is granted to an asylum applicant, they must leave Home Office funded accommodation and must present to the council as homeless. Glasgow alone witnessed a 96% increase in homelessness applications from households granted leave, up from 1,300 in 2022-23 to 2,600 in 2023-24. However, that has a knock-on effect on housing supply, leading the local authority to rely on hotel accommodation, which can be classed as unsuitable. The use of hotels meant Glasgow City Council has breached the unsuitable accommodation order 1,465 times between January 1 2025 and June 9 2025. However the reliance on hotels more widely is caused by a shortage of housing in Scotland, with the government declaring a national housing emergency in May 2024. Guidance from Shelter Scotland suggests hotel use for homeless individuals should be limited to seven days. Unsuitable accommodation can include overcrowding or leaving residents with limited space and limited or shared access to kitchen, toilet and living space. Glasgow City Council told The Herald it was "duty bound" to provide temporary accommodation however the authority admitted that increased demand mean there "are times when we haven't been able to do so". A spokeswoman said: "This happens when there is no accommodation available despite using more than 50 hotels to accommodate those who we have a duty for. 'We purchase a high number of hotel and bed & breakfast accommodation as we attempt to meet the extraordinarily high demand for accommodation to avoid people having to sleep rough. We also use in excess of 2600 places of emergency accommodation within temporary furnished flats and supported accommodation. 'There is no quick alternative. We are in continual dialogue with both Governments about these challenges and to seek the additional resources necessary to address the challenges we are facing.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Young people don't feel part of the EU – and they're right
The former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi produced his much-awaited prescription for how to reboot Europe's economy last year. The Draghi report was rightly applauded as a rude awakening for a European Union that is far too complacent about its own obsolescence. Draghi concluded that an €800bn-a-year public spending boost would be needed to end years of stagnation. If Europe did not catch up with its rivals, he warned, it would face a 'slow and agonising' decline. And yet, one ingredient was missing from Draghi's recipe. In his nearly 400-page roadmap for rescuing the EU, the word 'democracy' is mentioned only three times (once in the bibliography). By contrast, 'integration' is used 96 times and 'defence' 391 times. It's true that Draghi's report was explicitly devoted to the future of European competitiveness (and not more widely to the Europe of the future). But if the EU can't find a way to better engage its citizens, it will be difficult to achieve any more of the integration that Draghi says is indispensable to make a still-fragmented single market more competitive and Europe more capable of defending itself. One thing is sure: the old method of decision-making that a generation of European leaders relied on is obsolete. We urgently need to reform the EU, but the top-down approach to doing so is no longer fit for purpose. True, the debate on the 'democratic deficit' is as old as the EU itself. Direct elections to the European parliament, the first and only international assembly elected in this way, were introduced in 1979 to respond to the same criticism. However, at least until the end of the last century, the discussion on European democracy was seen as a niche for thinktanks – something nice to have to complete an integration project mostly run by an enlightened elite. Today, the picture has radically changed: the European parliament's powers have increased over time, but only about half of people who are entitled to vote in European elections bother to do so. Less than 50% of those vote for the two political 'families' (centre-right and socialist) that for decades provided the consensus that the EU project required to function. And no less worryingly, according to a recent survey from Cluster17, a French polling company, the percentages of European citizens who say the EU is not democratic and instead describe it as bureaucratic and disconnected are higher among younger age groups (becoming a solid majority among those aged 34 and under). More competitiveness requires a larger EU budget (it currently stands at just 1% of GDP) and more money for European 'public goods' (goods for which there is a clear economic case for producing them at EU level, for example, satellite-based telecommunication services or trans-European high-speed trains). But you can't ask for new taxation to fund joint EU spending without more representation. More common defence should be a commonsense direction given the existential threats that Europe is facing and the inefficiencies that running 27 military budgets imply. However, it requires a sufficiently wide public perception that such spending is going to benefit every citizen of the community we want to defend. And yet, surprisingly perhaps, according to Cluster17's poll, younger people feel less European even than their parents, preferring to call themselves citizens of the world. Without a European demos, it will be difficult to create an EU army – if that is what emerges from the debates on security – but also a real European democracy. And if we have neither citizenship nor engagement, we risk a political backlash like the ones we have seen on the green deal or the austerity measures that came after the global financial crash and the eurozone crisis, even when the policies are theoretically right. Last month about 100 policymakers, politicians, journalists, academics and students from all the major European countries (EU and beyond) gathered in Siena to consider how a Europe of the future could deal with some of its biggest challenges, such as common defence, the threat posed by global trade wars and AI. The outcome is a paper that prioritises identifying ways to better engage voters in each of the big decisions. A recent European Commission initiative – a citizens' panel in which 150 randomly selected EU citizens were enlisted to help the EU decide how to spend its money in the future – was considered a good start. But the conference in Siena identified changes that will be essential if citizens' recommendations are to be included in a systematic way. In EU budgetary decision-making for example, the language must change so that citizens can understand what goal is being achieved in any spending plans. The budgetary logic must be 'zero based' (which in accountancy parlance means not decided on the basis of incremental adjustments to past spending). Such an approach could ensure that 'participatory democracy' becomes a mainstream instrument of EU policymaking. No less crucial is a set of 'positive actions' that a group led by Luca Verzichelli of the University of Siena drew up to promote the European demos. The most eye-catching proposal – and one that attracted the broadest consensus – was to make the Erasmus student programme free and mandatory for all EU students in secondary and tertiary-level education. A quarter of the money spent by the EU on farmers would be enough to cover an expanded version of Erasmus, the Vision thinktank that convened the Siena conference calculates. I have no doubt the results would be more transformational. The democracy deficit is not just a European problem. Representative institutions are suffering more broadly from what seems to be a form of technological obsolescence. The internet has massively altered the control of information, which is power. This requires a radical transformation of the mechanisms through which power is acquired, restrained and exercised; and of the instruments we use to transmit individual preferences and convert them into collective choices. The EU needs more clarity about what it is for, and it needs to go well beyond superficially involving citizens to give its messages cosmetic legitimacy. But it has the paradoxical advantage of being an unfinished project. This means it has the flexibility to experiment with new forms of participation, policymaking and citizenship. It must urgently acknowledge that the only way to protect democracy is to adapt its forms to a radically different technological context. Francesco Grillo is a visiting fellow at the European University Institute, Florence and director of the thinktank Vision
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: US resumes military supplies to Ukraine, Zelenskyy announces
The US has resumed military supplies to Ukraine and senior officials in Kyiv will work on military cooperation next week with Washington's special envoy, Keith Kellogg, the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said on Friday. He restated that Ukraine had received high-level signals from Washington and its other western allies that arms supplies, paused for a time last week, had now resumed. 'We are currently working with partners on new supplies, increased weapons production in Ukraine and better support for our army,' he said. 'Next week, we will continue working with the US side on a military level … We are also preparing new European defence packages.' Kellogg, interviewed by the Ukrainian media outlet while attending a conference about Ukraine in Rome, said: 'We'll be in Kyiv Monday. We'll be there all week.' Donald Trump confirmed he had struck a deal with Nato leaders to supply weapons to Ukraine, Andrew Roth writes. During an interview with NBC News, the US president said: 'So what we're doing is the weapons that are going out are going to Nato, and then Nato is going to be giving those weapons [to Ukraine], and Nato is paying for those weapons.' He added: 'I'm disappointed in Russia, but we'll see what happens over the next couple of weeks.' The EU's top diplomat has said the 27-nation bloc was pondering a new raft of sanctions against Moscow. 'Russia has increased its attacks against civilians to really cause as much pain … and that's unacceptable,' the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said. Brussels was considering an 18th round of sanctions against Moscow and 'we are also still in negotiations to put the oil price cap on, that would deprive Russia from the means to fund this war', she told AFP. Kallas said she was assured by Laos's top diplomat that Vientiane had 'no intention or willingness' to send military help to Russia, following claims that Moscow was planning to involve military personnel from Laos to bolster its efforts in Ukraine. 'I also expressed that it has consequences for European aid to Laos if something like this is happening,' Kallas said. 'If you [Laos] contribute to that existential threat, we can't have good cooperation,' she warned. Ukrainian drone and shelling attacks killed three people in Russia on Friday. Russian air defence systems intercepted 155 Ukrainian drones overnight, Moscow said. There was one dead in Russia's Lipetsk region and another was killed in the western Tula region from the drone attacks, local officials said. Ukrainian shelling later killed another civilian in the border region of Belgorod, the governor announced. The Russian defence ministry said out of the 155 downed Ukrainian drones, 11 were bound for Moscow. Ukraine said its drones struck a Russian fighter aircraft plant in the Moscow region and a missile production facility in the Tula region, causing explosions and fires at both. Ukraine's military said on Telegram the aviation facility in the town of Lukhovitsy, about 135km (84 miles) south-east of Moscow, produced MiG fighters. The other site was the Instrument Design Bureau, which specialised in producing anti-aircraft missiles and missile-gun systems, it said. 'Defence forces continue to take all steps to undermine the military and economic potential of the Russian occupiers,' the military said. Russian bombardments on eastern Ukraine overnight on Friday forced the evacuation of a maternity centre in Kharkiv and wounded nine people. Zelenskyy said a medical facility was hit in the attack on the country's second-largest city. 'Among the wounded are women in a maternity hospital – mothers with newborns, women recovering from surgery,' he wrote on social media. 'Fortunately, no children were injured.' He added that several other regions were attacked overnight. Nato will need more long-range missiles in its arsenal to deter Russia from attacking Europe because Moscow is expected to increase production of long-range weapons, a US army general told Reuters. 'The Russian army is bigger today than it was when they started the war in Ukraine,' Maj Gen John Rafferty said at a US military base in Wiesbaden, Germany. 'And we know that they're going to continue to invest in long-range rockets and missiles and sophisticated air defences. So more alliance capability is really, really important.' The Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Friday that wartime censorship in Russia is justified amid the conflict with Ukraine and the closure of opposition-minded media. Speaking to Russian magazine Expert, Peskov said that many media outlets have been closed, while some reporters have left the country in the past three years. 'But don't forget the situation we are in. Now is the time of military censorship, unprecedented for our country. After all, the war is going on in the information space too,' Peskov told the magazine. Russian authorities also blocked X, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. 'It would be wrong to turn a blind eye to the media that are deliberately engaged in discrediting Russia,' he said.
