Russian oil tycoon Shvidler loses Supreme Court appeal against UK sanctions
Shvidler was sanctioned in March 2022 on the grounds of his association with former Chelsea Football Club owner Roman Abramovich, plus Shvidler's former position as a director of London-listed Russian steel producer Evraz (EVRE.L), opens new tab.
He argued the decision was arbitrary, as other companies and executives involved in business which is strategically significant for Russia have not been targeted.
But Britain's Foreign Office, which has overseen the sanctioning of more than 1,700 individuals or entities since Russia's invasion, argued it was right to believe sanctioning Shvidler could secure Britain's foreign policy aims.
Shvidler – whose net worth is estimated by Forbes magazine at $1.6 billion – appealed to the UK's Supreme Court, with his lawyers arguing that others with greater involvement in business of importance to Russia were not sanctioned, citing BP's (BP.L), opens new tab previous joint venture with Rosneft (ROSN.MM), opens new tab.
The Supreme Court, however, rejected Shvidler's appeal by a four-to-one majority in a ruling that maintains Britain 100% record of defending Russian sanctions challenges in court.
Shvidler had said British sanctions have destroyed his business and disrupted his and his family's lives.
But the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that the sanctions struck a fair balance between Shvidler's rights and the aims of the sanctions regime.
Shvidler's case was heard by the Supreme Court shortly before a separate appeal brought by Russian businessman Sergei Naumenko, whose superyacht was detained in London.
Naumenko said he was targeted simply because he was a wealthy Russian, despite the fact that he had no involvement in Russian politics.
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Naumenko's appeal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Putin and Trump could now be nearing a 'head-on collision'
Has the relationship between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin gone off the rails?A popular Russian newspaper thinks so. It turned to trains to illustrate the current state of US-Russian ties."A head-on collision seems unavoidable," declared tabloid Moskovsky Komsomolets recently."The Trump locomotive and the Putin locomotive are speeding towards each other."And neither is about to turn off or stop and reverse."For the 'Putin locomotive', it's full steam ahead, with the so-called 'Special Military Operation': Russia's war in Ukraine. The Kremlin leader has shown no desire to end hostilities and declare a long-term ceasefire. Meanwhile, the 'Trump locomotive' has been accelerating efforts to pressure Moscow into ending the fighting: announcing deadlines, ultimatums, threats of additional sanctions against Russia and hefty tariffs on Russia's trading partners, like India and to all of that the two US nuclear submarines which President Trump claims he's repositioned closer to you switch from talking about locomotives to nuclear subs, you know things are does that mean the White House is really on a "collision course" with the Kremlin over Ukraine?Or is a visit to Moscow this week by Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, a sign that for all the posturing, a deal between Russia and America to end the fighting is still possible? A warm start following Trump's return In the early weeks of the second Trump presidency, Moscow and Washington appeared well on track to reboot their bilateral hint of a head-on collision. Far from it. At times it seemed as if Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump were in the same carriage, moving in the same direction. In February the United States sided with Russia at the United Nations, opposing a European-drafted resolution that had condemned Russia's "aggression" in a telephone call that month the two presidents talked about visiting each other's countries. It felt like a Putin-Trump summit could happen any day. Meanwhile the Trump administration was exerting pressure on Kyiv, not on Moscow, and picking fights with traditional US allies, such as Canada and Denmark. In speeches and TV interviews, American officials were fiercely critical of Nato and of European of this was music to the Kremlin's ears."America now has more in common with Russia than Washington does with Brussels or with Kyiv," political scientist Konstantin Blokhin from the Russian Academy of Sciences Centre for Security Studies told the Izvestia newspaper in following month the same newspaper was crowing:"The Trumpists are revolutionaries. They are wreckers of the system. They can only be supported in this. The unity of the West is no more. Geo-politically it is no longer an alliance. Trumpism has destroyed the Transatlantic consensus confidently and quickly." Meanwhile Donald Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, had become a regular visitor to Russia. He made four trips here in just over two months, spending hours in talks with Vladimir Putin. After one meeting, the Kremlin leader presented him with a portrait of Donald Trump to take back to the White Trump was said to be "clearly touched" by the President Trump was looking for more than just a painting from Moscow. He wanted President Putin to sign up to an unconditional comprehensive ceasefire in Ukraine. Trump's increasing frustration Confident that Russia holds the initiative now on the battlefield, Vladimir Putin has been reluctant to stop fighting, despite his claim that Moscow is committed to a diplomatic is why Donald Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with the recent weeks he has condemned Russia's relentless attacks on Ukrainian cities as "disgusting", "disgraceful" and accused President Putin of talking "a lot of bullshit" on Ukraine. Last month, Donald Trump announced a 50-day ultimatum to President Putin to end the war, threatening sanctions and tariffs. He subsequently reduced that to ten days. The deadline is due to expire at the end of this week. So far, there is no sign that Vladimir Putin will yield to pressure from again, how much pressure does Vladimir Putin really feel under?"Because Donald Trump has changed so many deadlines and he's twisted one way or another, I don't think Putin takes him seriously," believes Nina Khrushcheva, a professor of international affairs at The New School, a university in New York City. "Putin's going to fight for as long as he can, or, unless Ukraine says, 'We're tired, we are willing to accept your conditions.'"I think Putin sits there in the Kremlin and thinks that he's fulfilling the dreams of the Russian tsars, and then the general secretaries such as Joseph Stalin, in showing the West that Russia should not be treated with disrespect." A deal is still possible From the picture I've painted so far it may look as if a head-on collision between the Putin and Trump locomotives is Trump sees himself as a great dealmaker and, from the look of things, he hasn't given up trying to secure one with Vladimir Witkoff is due back in Russia this week for talks with the Kremlin leader. We don't know what kind of an offer he may bring with him. But some commentators in Moscow predict there will be more carrot than stick. It did not go unnoticed that on Sunday President Trump said Russia "seem to be pretty good at avoiding sanctions". On Monday, Ivan Loshkarev, associate professor of political theory at MGIMO University, Moscowtold Izvestia that to facilitate dialogue, Mr Witkoff may present "advantageous offers of cooperation [to Russia] that would open up after a deal on Ukraine".Might that be enough to persuade the Kremlin to make peace after three-and-a-half years of war?There's no all, so far in Ukraine Vladimir Putin hasn't budged from his maximalist demands on territory, Ukraine's neutrality and the future size of the Ukrainian Trump wants a deal. Vladimir Putin wants victory. BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
Schoolboy, 6, died after bumping head while racing friends in playground tragedy
A SIX-year-old boy died in his sleep after accidentally bumping his head while racing with friends at school, an inquest heard. Mohammed Yaseen Uddin, who attended Marlborough Primary School in Small Heath, Birmingham, died on December 11 last year. 3 3 He had been playing with pals during his lunch break the day before and accidentally bumped his head on a wall. The youngster told a school receptionist: 'I was running really fast, racing my friend and bumped into the wall.' As reported by Birmingham Live, an inquest heard how Yaseen picked himself up and appeared to behave normally after the fall. A paediatric school first aider applied an ice pack to a visible bump on the pupil's forehead. Yaseen's mother and sister were given a letter with medical advice upon picking him up. The inquest, held today at Birmingham Coroner's Court, heard the youngster appeared to be acting normally after going home. He had attended a local mosque after school and celebrated his sibling's birthday with cake. Later in the evening, Yaseen told his father he didn't feel well, and he was given some Ibuprofen. At around 11pm, the little boy complained about head pain "out of nowhere" and started to throw up. His family were on their way to the hospital but took him back home to change after he vomited again. The inquest heard they tried to leave again but Yaseen told them he just wanted to sleep, so they put him to bed. Dad Simriel Uddin said he looked in on his son at 3am and again at 5am when he got up for work, both times Yaseen was asleep. But the youngster was tragically found dead a few hours later. Heartbroken dad Simriel Uddin previously told the Mail: "He was a bright, joyful spirit and he was a beautiful, kind-hearted little boy. "He had a head collision in school -the school told my wife 'Oh, your son has bumped his head.' "When she asked if it was anything serious they said, 'No it's nothing serious, it's just a bump'." The inquest heard how Yaseen's brother Khalil performed CPR while waiting for an ambulance. Paramedics rushed Yaseen to hospital at around 11am but the six-year-old was pronounced dead at 12.08pm. Guirish Solanki, a consultant paediatric neurosurgeon, concluded Yaseen had suffered a "traumatic head injury when he struck his head on the wall." Yaseen's cause of death was given as a traumatic right frontal extra-axial haemorrhage, which means a bleed outside of the brain but within the skull. Louise Hunt, the Senior Coroner for Birmingham and Solihull said: "Yaseen was a six-year-old little boy who was normally fit and well. "He was described as happy and engaged when he came to school, a big character, who was always bubbly." She confirmed Yaseen had been playing with his friends before falling at around 12.29pm. The coroner was also satisfied the family had been given a letter outlining medical advice, despite the fact they previously disputed this. She said: "This was a tragic accident and I record in conclusion this was an accident. "I'd like to reiterate and offer my condolences to all the family. It must be very hard for all of you and I'm very sorry if today's inquest has made things more difficult. I'm so very sorry for your loss." Speaking after the inquest, Yaseen's sister Sumaya told BirminghamLive: "Thank you to everyone for their support." In a previous statement, Razia Ali, the executive headteacher at Marlborough, said: "Our school community has been left devastated by the tragic passing of one of our wonderful and much-loved pupils. 'Yaseen was an incredibly helpful, kind and caring pupil who brought a smile to the face of everyone who came across him. "I know I speak for everyone when I say he will be deeply missed. All our thoughts and prayers are with Yaseen's family and friends." 3
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Tighter gun restrictions make me feel hopeful', says bereaved twin
A Birmingham woman whose twin sister and two nieces were shot dead with a legally held weapon has said she believes "voices have been heard", as tighter control on firearms licensing come into law. Emma Ambler has campaigned for stricter laws around gun licensing since her sister, Kelly Fitzgibbons, and her two nieces, Ava and Lexi Needham, were murdered at their West Sussex home in 2020 by Kelly's changes include an increase in the number of references needed for shotgun certificate applications."It's the first time I've seen some changes that mean something," said Ms Ambler. "This has taken over a lot of my life for a long time," she said. "But to know that, actually, this hasn't all been wasted time and people are listening now, that the policy and the guidance isn't strong enough... it does need to be strengthened, and they're working that direction, was quite a moment actually."Robert Needham, Ms Fitzgibbons' partner and father of father of Ava and Lexi, shot dead the three of them along with the family dog, at their home in Woodmancote, before turning the gun on himself.A domestic homicide review found he had lied on his shotgun application to police about previous convictions and treatment for 5 August, people applying for shotgun certificate applications will need two referees instead of need to have known the applicant well for at least two years and will need to vouch for them - which the Home Office said would ensure there was greater opportunity for concerns to be raised or identified. "I don't want any other family to go though what we've been through ever, but particularly if it can be preventable in some way," said Ms Ambler."It's become a real mission for me to make sure that what happened to Kelly doesn't happen to anyone else."She told the BBC that she was hopeful, and the changes had made her emotional. What is changing? The rule change over the number of referees was a direct response to concerns raised by the senior coroner who held the inquests following the fatal shootings in Plymouth in 2021, the Home Office said. Jake Davison shot his mother and four others before killing himself. Under the new rules, police must now speak to partners and members of households to identify signs of domestic abuse, as well as other factors that could indicate the applicant is not suitable to have a licence. Additional checks must be carried out to ensure people with a record of violence are not allowed to access of dishonesty, as well as questions about their integrity will also have an effect - if someone lies on their application or does not disclose medical conditions, it will bring their suitability to hold a gun into Minister Dame Diana Johnson said: "Only those who meet the highest standards of safety and responsibility should be permitted to use shotguns or firearms, and it is crucial that police have full information about the suitability of all applicants for these lethal weapons." "The first thing Emma did for me, was she educated me on what the gun licensing laws were currently," said Jess Phillips, safeguarding minister and Labour MP for Birmingham Yardley."She told me that there was nothing about the issue of dishonesty... it had been proven in her sister's case that he [Robert Needham] had lied – that is another thing that we've updated in the guidance."Where there has been dishonesty in the form-filling, that should stand against you having a licence, which I think is basic."She said the updates to the guidance were a product of listening to people like Ms Ambler, and learning from the outcomes in cases like the Plymouth shootings and a series of shootings in the Scottish Highlands. Government to strengthen guidance further "Previously, even if it had been found that somebody had lied on a form, even about what their address is... that wouldn't stand against you, and now the guidance is clear in that," said Phillips."It is impossible to prove, one way or another, that he [Needham] wouldn't have gone out and found other means."But certainly, if these changes had been in place, he wouldn't have been able to hold a gun licence and he wouldn't have been able to kill so quickly and at will so many people. Of that I am sure," she Home Office said it planned to strengthen guidance further, in light of weaknesses exposed by the shootings of Juliana Falcon and two of her children in Luton in September son, Nicholas, had bought the gun fraudulently said the government would be consulting on measures to strengthen existing controls on shotguns and seeking views on ways to improve controls on the private sales of firearms. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
