‘We trusted them': East End fishmongers take on the City to save ancient markets
It is a mismatched contest: a handful of east London fishmongers taking on the phenomenally wealthy City of London Corporation.
But the market traders and a food poverty charity have teamed up to battle City of London Corporation over its plans to close the capital's ancient fish and meat markets for good.
The corporation announced the permanent closure of London's historic Smithfield meat market and Billingsgate fish market in late 2024, when it pulled the plug on a planned £1bn relocation to a new sitein the east of the capital at Dagenham. The decision means the end of centuries of meat and fish trading in the capital.
Three fishmongers from Ridley Road market in Hackney say they depend on Billingsgate for their business and will go bust if it closes down. Along with their spokesperson Alicia Weston, the founder of Bags of Taste, which teaches cooking skills to people living in poverty, they are fighting to stop parliament from rubber stamping the markets' closure.
The corporation, the governing body that runs London's Square Mile, is the owner and operator of both sites, but is not permitted to close down the markets independently.
A quirk of their long and storied pasts, the markets were established by acts of parliament that fix them to the existing sites. This means they can only be closed when parliament passes a private bill, repealing the legislation and allowing the land to be used for other purposes.
The markets have been granted a stay of execution until 2028. In the meantime, the corporation has said it is offering compensation to Smithfield and Billingsgate traders and is helping them find new locations, but is no longer planning to build a joint replacement site.
Fishmongers Waheed Aslam, Zafar Iqbal and Mohammed Amjad Choudry have objected to the bill, and they say they have the support of a small group of MPs who are opposed to the closure.
The Mediterranean fish shop on Ridley Road was started 30 years ago by Aslam's father. Aslam and his business partner Aras Swara, visit Billingsgate market, the UK's largest inland fish market, early in the morning, five days a week, to choose fresh sea bream, snapper, salmon and coley for the shop.
'At the market we can choose what we buy, if there's no market, those who are selling will have a monopoly,' said Aslam. 'If there is no Billingsgate, we can't get all this variety,' added Swara, gesturing to a chest freezer containing 13 different types of frozen prawns.
Aslam has previously tried buying from wholesalers, but said he was not able to buy the required quantity of fish, or was disappointed by the quality.
'We supply quite a few restaurants around the area, and it would affect them too if the market closes,' he added, as his two employees gutted and cleaned sea bass ordered by a local Caribbean restaurant.
The history of a food market around Smithfield – close to Farringdon train station – goes back more than 800 years. The London Museum is in the process of moving to part of the site, which is intended to become a cultural development. Billingsgate, which was moved in 1982 from a City location by the river to a building near the Canary Wharf financial district, has been earmarked for housing.
The volumes of meat and fish traded at Smithfield and Billingsgate have fallen significantly since their peak around the turn of the 20th century amid the rise of supermarkets, according to an independent report on the importance of food markets commissioned by the corporation after its decision not to build the Dagenham site.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Despite this, the report found that Smithfield and Billingsgate 'play a vital role in supporting independent retailers, such as butchers and fishmongers' and estimated Billingsgate still accounts for 9%-11% of fish consumption in London and the south-east.
The corporation scrapped plans to relocate both markets, along with the New Spitalfields fruit and vegetable market, to a purpose-built complex at Dagenham Dock, saying inflation and rising construction costs had made the project unaffordable.
The corporation manages assets worth billions of pounds, and collects £1.3bn in business rates annually, although it passes most of this to central government.
The fishmongers and Weston are calling on the corporation to find an alternative location for the markets.
'We trusted them and believed it was going to open in Dagenham, but they broke that trust,' said Weston. 'There are unintended consequences of the closure.'
A spokesperson for the City of London Corporation said the authority is 'actively supporting the traders at Billingsgate and Smithfield to find new sites for their wholesale activity within the M25. This includes practical support, such as brokering discussions with landowners and developers, and assisting a smooth transition'.
'We just want assurance that an alternative market will be opened,' said Aslam. 'We have a livelihood on the line. We are at the bottom of the chain and have not been given much thought about.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cutting personal independent payments: potentially devastating or justified?
As predicted (Starmer offers 'massive concessions' on welfare bill to Labour rebels, 26 June), an attempt has been made to salvage the welfare bill. Discontented MPs and disabled people alike will welcome the assurance that people currently receiving personal independence payments (Pip) or the health element of universal credit will be protected from changes. But the episode is damaging, has caused thousands of disabled people needless worry, and may come to be seen as pivotal in Keir Starmer's tenure. There is something deeply invidious about having two classes of benefit recipients – the protected current recipients, and those making future claims. At the same time, it is clear that the benefits system does need reform and, in particular, needs to support people into work rather than taking a punitive and brutal approach to cost saving. How Starmer has ended up in this position is fascinating, if it were not extraordinary for a government with such a majority and the potential to make radical and equitable change to be repeatedly wrongfooted. U-turns look weak and messy, and presenting them as a response to active listening is unlikely to convince anyone. Starmer claims not to be ideological, and there is the issue; policy is being shaped not by a coherent strategic vision and principle-driven aspirations for better lives, opportunities and genuine equality, but by economic necessity and caution. It's a flawed model, certain to intensify divisions between ministries, Labour members, taxpayers, benefit recipients and the wider electorate. There is major learning and reflection needed by the government; the optics have gone badly wrong, but the welfare reform chaos is a symptom of a much deeper political Melanie HenwoodHartwell, Northamptonshire I am a social worker and I support cutting Pips. I have encountered a number of young adults trapped in a cycle of welfare dependency, unemployment and chaotic lifestyles. They share a belief that the state must fund every aspect of life, and a lack of understanding that benefits come not 'from the government' but are redistributed from taxation of the population. Pip is often claimed on the basis of anxiety or depression, but the idea of working to support oneself, or seeking training or education to make work more attainable, is absent from their thinking. The answer? Probably a combination of education, early interventions and nudges towards culture change, including reducing the availability of Pip. In the long term the status quo won't help the young people I work and address supplied What is not being made clear in government statements and coverage of the cuts to disability benefits is the personal independence payment's relationship to work. Pip is paid to help with the additional costs arising from disability. It is paid to people in work and out of work. It is crucial in enabling people to stay in work, paying for technical and personal support, health needs, travel and other costs. It also enables people who cannot work full-time to work. What will happen to these working people when they can no longer afford the additional costs? It's clear the government does not understand the role of Pip in enabling BetteridgeManchester As we approach the parliamentary vote on the new welfare bill, spare a thought for the many Pip recipients who received the benefit when it was known as disability living allowance. I suspect, for many, the scars still linger from that government change to the system. What that revealed was that disability allowance was not directed to those most in need of it due to their disability. Rather, receiving the new benefit depended upon one's ability to fill out a 40-page form. Next, it depended on having the physical and mental resilience to challenge the result and take it to a tribunal. This was a protracted and stressful period of time. For many, who made it that far, the tribunal reversed the DWP scoring and people found that they had their old level of benefit reinstated. Just a shame that stress makes many medical conditions far worse for the individual. Many years ago, I believed that the DWP wanted to help those with serious disabilities. These days, I have as much faith in them as they appear to have in disabled people (DWP letters now seem to be written with a subtext of 'you're a fraud and we'll catch you').Name and address supplied Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Sun
32 minutes ago
- The Sun
Giant 90s shopping centre to be demolished ‘as soon as next year' in new plans
GIANT 90s shopping centre to be demolished to make way for new development after years of residential disputes. Developers have announced new revised plans with a scaled-back design, promising hundreds of new homes in South Bristol. 2 The plans Broadwalk Shopping Centre is set to be demolished as soon as next year after the proposed new plans were finally approved. The developers are Broadside Holdings, who are planning to knock down the centre, along with the multi-storey car park and bingo hall at the back of the centre. In its place, nearly 500 new homes will be built in the small village of Knowle, located in South West Bristol. Shops and a pedestrianised street have also been included in the plans to develop the area. Controversy around the development The journey to the sites approval has not been smooth sailing, and the new plans do not resemble the original ideas for the development. Initially, Broadside Holdings wanted to have approximately 850 new flats. In order to have this number, they would have had to build three ten-storey tower blocks overlooking Redcatch Park, which has a children's playground and community garden located inside. 2 As a result, the community in the area were unhappy with the plans. However, while Broadside did get planning permission for the more than 800 flats on the site in 2023, the controversial circumstances which led to the approval led to legal action. Local resident Laura Chapman took Bristol City Council to court over the way it granted planning permission for the original Redcatch Quarter plan. Chapman crowdfunded with residents of the Knowle Neighbourhood Planning Group and the Broadwalk Redevelopment Community Group to bring the legal action to the council. As a result of the action, the development revised its plan, compromising with the local area, so that Chapman would drop the judicial review process. Development compromise The developers compromised massively on their original idea, and recently announced the newly approved plan. Broadside has cut the number of new homes proposed from 850 to 492. Instead of flats, the development will be made up of houses to prevent the flats overlooking and impacting the park. While there will still be shops and a pedestrianised street, the size and the number of shops have been scaled back. Local services such as a new dentists surgery and library are still included. It is believed that construction on the site could start as early as next year, with plans for it to be finished by 2030. To maintain communication with the local community two drop-in sessions are being hosted at Knowle Methodist Church on Friday July 11. The first takes place between 12 noon and 3pm, and the second between 4pm and 7pm.
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: Why Premier League clubs are ready to spend big on transfers THIS WEEK - with Man United set for positive conclusion in race for Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo
The transfer window is set to hot up this week - following the arrival of the new reporting year under the Premier League 's financial rules. Mail Sport understands that a number of clubs have deals on hold until they can register the spend on 2025-26's accounts rather than 2024-25. This year's window has, so far, been slow-paced with relatively few high-profile moves aside from Liverpool 's £116m swoop for Florian Wirtz and Manchester United 's £62.5m capture of Wolves ' Matheus Cunha. Manchester City have been the most active, with Pep Guardiola undertaking a flurry of activity ahead of the Club World Cup as he seeks to rebuild his squad. However, that situation is now likely to change, with sides already at the limit on this year's Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) hanging fire until Tuesday. Many do not want to fall foul of the regulations, which can result in the ultimate sanction of points deductions. Meanwhile, sources have disclosed that United's pursuit of Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo is set to lead to a positive conclusion. United have lodged two failed bids for the Cameroonian forward, the last of which was £55m plus £7.5m in add-ons. It is understood that the Bees believe 25-year-old Mbeumo is worth more than Cunha, a theory they believe is backed up by statistics from his time in west London. Mbeumo scored 20 goals to Cunha's 15 last season, and seven assists to the Brazilian's six. United feel they have offered a fair price, but the player has told his club he wants to move to Manchester and a breakthrough is the expected outcome, according to those with knowledge of the situation.
