Private spaceflight ends with a Pacific splashdown for astronauts from India, Poland and Hungary
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A private spaceflight featuring the first astronauts in more than 40 years from India, Poland and Hungary came to a close Tuesday with a Pacific splashdown.
Their SpaceX capsule undocked from the International Space Station on Monday and parachuted into the ocean off the Southern California coast, less than 24 hours later.
The crew of four launched nearly three weeks ago on a flight chartered by the Houston company Axiom Space.
Axiom's Peggy Whitson, the most experienced U.S. astronaut, served as commander. Joining her were India's Shubhanshu Shukla, Poland's Slawosz Uznanski-Wisniewski and Hungary's Tibor Kapu, whose countries paid more than $65 million apiece for the mission.
'Thanks for the great ride and safe trip,' Whitson radioed moments after splashdown. Her record now stands at 695 days in space over five missions, longer than any other American or woman.
The visiting astronauts conducted dozens of experiments in orbit while celebrating their heritage. The last time India, Poland and Hungary put anyone in space was during the late 1970s and 1980s, launching with the Soviets. They waved and smiled as they emerged from the capsule, one by one, into the early morning darkness.
It was Axiom's fourth mission to the orbiting outpost since 2022, part of NASA's ongoing effort to open up space to more businesses and people. The company is one of several developing their own space stations to replace the current one. NASA plans to abandon the outpost in 2030, after more than 30 years of operation.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Marcia Dunn, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Colby Cosh: The lifelike nature of artificial intelligence
Article content On Tuesday a Harvard artificial-intelligence researcher, Keyon Vafa, published a short tweet-thread about a new paper looking at how some types of high-performing intelligence algorithms are behaving under the hood. If you're interested in the implications of AI progress, this paper is instructive even if you don't fully understand it, and, yes, that is tantamount to a confession on my part. (And, as the old joke goes, if you're not interested in the implications of AI progress, rest assured that AI progress is interested in you.) Article content Article content For academics like Vafa and his colleagues, AI has a pervasive 'black box' issue that is part of why it inspires fear and confusion. We have learned how to make computers mimic intelligence quite convincingly, and sooner than almost anyone imagined, by applying previously unfathomable amounts of brute computing power. But our ability to understand how these thinking objects are thinking is often limited. Article content Article content If you don't understand anything at all about the Vafa paper, the thing to notice about it is that it is fundamentally experimental. The research approach is oddly like a biologist's, like somebody who studies wombats by rounding up a bunch of wombats and observing wombat behaviour. The team 'teaches' an AI algorithm to perform intellectual task X to near-perfection by giving it verbal instructions and data (in plain English), and then has to figure out 'How did it actually do that?' using statistical inference. It's the choice of task X that makes this paper most intriguing. Anybody educated enough to still be reading a newspaper probably knows the basics of how the human understanding of planetary orbits evolved. In classical antiquity, the prevailing assumption was that the planets orbited the Earth in circular paths. Well before the birth of Jesus, astronomers were already good at predicting the movements of the planets on the basis of this false model. The planets sometimes apparently move backwards in the sky, so an unmodified 'fixed Earth' + 'perfectly circular paths' model couldn't do the job on its own: to make accurate predictions, astronomers had to add other circular motions-within-motions, called 'deferents' and 'epicycles,' to the basic circular-orbit picture. Article content Article content Well, fast-forward a dozen centuries, and along come Copernicus asking 'What if Earth isn't at the centre after all?'; Kepler asking 'What if the orbits aren't circular, but elliptical?'; and Newton, who got to the bottom of the whole thing by introducing the higher-level abstraction of gravitational force. Bye-bye epicycles. Article content None of these intellectual steps, mind you, added anything to anyone's practical ability to predict planetary motions. Copernicus's model took generations to be accepted for this reason (along with the theological/metaphysical objections to the Earth not being at the centre of the universe): it wasn't ostensibly as sophisticated or as powerful as the old reliable geocentric model. But you can't get to Newton, who found that the planets and earthbound objects are governed by the same elegant and universal laws of motion, without Copernicus and Kepler. Article content Which, in 2025, raises the question: could a computer do what Newton did? Vafa's research group fed orbital data to AIs and found that they could correctly behave like ancient astronomers: make dependable extrapolations about the future movements of real planets, including the Earth. This raises the question whether the algorithms in question generate their successful orbital forecasts by somehow inferring the existence of Newtonian force-abstractions. We know that 'false,' overfitted models and heuristics can work for practical purposes, but we would like AIs to be automated Newtons if we are going to live with them. We would like AIs to discover new laws and scientific principles of very high generality and robustness that we filthy meatbags haven't noticed yet.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
How will the proposed NASA budget cuts impact Canada?
York University's Paul Delaney breaks down how $6-billion in cuts to NASA's funding may pave the way for China to dominate the space race. As NASA faces the threat of US$6 billion in cuts under U.S. President Donald Trump's budget request, one astronomy expert says Canada will certainly feel the impact if the drastic financial reductions go through. Paul Delaney, former director of the Allan I. Carswell Astronomical Observatory, told CTV Your Morning on Thursday the budget cuts will severely impact every single program in NASA, making it the largest financial assault on the space agency in history. In turn, it could position other countries, namely China, to take the lead in space exploration. China is swiftly pushing forward in space exploration, with plans to put humans on the moon by early 2030. 'There is little doubt that…(NASA) will take second place,' Delaney said. He also expects that the financial threat to the space agency will lead to more privatization in the sector. Delaney said the cuts to NASA's budget will directly impact not just the Canadian Space Agency, but all researchers that are involved in space science. One item that Delaney says may be on the chopping block is the latest version of the Canada Arm, or Canadarm3, which is the country's contribution to the U.S.-led Gateway project, a space station in lunar orbit. 'The impact on Canada, in terms of both hardware generation, as well as research, could be extremely significant, forcing us of course to go elsewhere to lend our expertise,' he said. Delaney adds that the fall out from the budget cuts will run deeper than putting 'boots on Mars'. 'Your cellphone technology has been powered in very large measure by the types of activities we've developed going into space,' he said. 'The spin-offs are almost incalculable.' CNN reported on Thursday that more than 2,000 agency employees are set to voluntarily leave NASA in the coming months under the Trump administration's 'deferred resignation' program, introduced by former Trump ally Elon Musk, who is CEO of NASA's largest contractor, SpaceX.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Anyone could forget a kid in a hot car, research shows
No parent thinks they'd forget their child in a hot car. But the tragic truth is that it can happen to anyone. Since 1998, about 1,024 children have died in hot cars—and more than half of them were left behind unknowingly by their caregiver, according to There have already been 14 hot car deaths among children in the U.S. in 2025 so far, with eight occurring in June alone, the organization says. But recent research highlights that the daily stresses parents face can make these memory lapses more likely. Forgetting a child isn't a negligence problem but a working memory problem, says David Diamond, PhD, a professor of psychology at the University of South Florida in Tampa. Diamond, a leading expert in cognitive neuroscience, has studied the role of memory in such tragedies. 'The most common response is that only bad or negligent parents forget kids in cars,' Diamond says. 'It's a matter of circumstances. It can happen to everyone.' During the summer, many families change their daily routines because of vacations or other reasons, and that disruption is a common factor in these tragic incidents, Diamond's research has found. Janette Fennell, founder and president of Kids and Car Safety, a group that tracks these incidents, says, 'The worst thing any parent or caregiver can ever do is to think that something like this could never happen to them or someone in their family.' These tragedies occur at an alarming rate, and they involve a range of circumstances. reports that deaths have spanned from 5-day-old babies to 14-year-olds. And deaths from heatstroke can happen any time of year, even as early as February and as late as November. Kids and Car Safety's heatstroke fact sheet highlights that caregivers involved in these incidents come from many walks of life. They include teachers, dentists, social workers, law enforcement officers, nurses, clergymen, military officers, and even a rocket scientist. These tragic cases can happen to anyone, regardless of their education or socioeconomic status. And it's not just a summertime problem. Even on days with mild temperatures, the heat inside a closed vehicle can reach dangerous levels within an hour, posing major health risks to small children or pets left inside, Consumer Reports' testing shows. When working memory fails Diamond says the problem involves two parts of a person's working memory: prospective and semantic. Prospective memory helps us remember to do something in the future, while semantic memory allows drivers to make the trip from work to home on autopilot, where they arrive without remembering clear details of how they got there. Prospective and semantic memories work together to help us make changes to our routines; these changes can include things such as 'drop off the baby at daycare' or 'stop for groceries on the way home.' When our working memory fails, such as when we're distracted or stressed, there can be catastrophic implications, Diamond says. He gave examples of situations where critical safety steps were overlooked, such as a surgeon leaving tools in a patient, a pilot not setting the wing flaps for landing, and caregivers forgetting that there's a baby in the car. 'The habit brain system is a great convenience that allows us to go into autopilot,' Diamond says. 'The beauty of it is that we don't have to remember every turn, but the problem is that it's actually guiding our behavior. When it guides our behavior, it suppresses the other part of the brain that is supposed to remind us of additional information.' 'We have to accept the fact that our brain multitasks. And as a part of that multitasking, the awareness of a child can be lost,' Diamond says. 'We have to accept that the human memory is flawed. That includes when loving, attentive parents lose awareness of their children when they are in a car.' Diamond has studied many heatstroke cases and points to common factors: stress, sleep deprivation, and change in routine. Many times when a child died in this situation, there was a change in the day's routine, Diamond says. For example, a parent who wouldn't usually be responsible for day-care drop-off may have had the task that day. Because our brains recognize a pattern for the day, this person would drive to work as usual, even though the baby was along for the ride. And unless there was an external cue, such as seeing the diaper bag or hearing the baby, the parent's brain would continue on autopilot and could even create a false memory that the child is safely at daycare, Diamond found. Sleep deprivation and stress can also increase the potential for a working-memory failure. Conflicts between semantic and prospective memory are typical, Diamond says. His research has found that they happen to everyone—not just parents and caregivers—on almost a daily basis. The added stress, distraction, and sleep deprivation that parents often face can contribute to tragic situations. What you can do to prevent a hot car tragedy The first step is for parents and caregivers to understand that human memory is faulty and that these memory failures can happen to anyone. The key to avoiding such incidents is to use strategies aimed at overcoming memory lapses. 'The strategies need to be child-specific,' Diamond says. 'When you have a child in the car, do something unique.' Here are six tips from the expert team that tests car seats for CR. Create safeguards. Set up an agreement with child-care providers where you promise to notify them if your child is going to be late or absent. In return, they pledge to notify you if your child doesn't arrive at the usual drop-off time. Set up an agreement with child-care providers where you promise to notify them if your child is going to be late or absent. In return, they pledge to notify you if your child doesn't arrive at the usual drop-off time. Set reminders on your phone to check with your spouse or partner to make sure they have dropped the child off. to check with your spouse or partner to make sure they have dropped the child off. Always keep vehicles locked and keys out of reach from little hands. and keys out of reach from little hands. Create visual reminders. Place the child's diaper bag, jacket, or hat in the front passenger seat. Place the child's diaper bag, jacket, or hat in the front passenger seat. Force yourself to go to the back seat. Keep your backpack, lunch box, or briefcase there every day. Keep your backpack, lunch box, or briefcase there every day. Never leave a child unattended in a vehicle for any length of time, regardless of the outside temperature. Vehicles can quickly heat up to potentially fatal levels on even mild-temperature days. 'Education is very important, but education alone won't end these tragedies,' says Fennell at Kids and Cars Safety. 'It's going to take education along with technology to help our imperfect brains.' You can also invest in a vehicle or child car seat with integrated reminder technology. Consumer Reports' experts have evaluated these technologies and found that integrated systems that default to On, rather than needing to be activated by the driver, are the most beneficial. (The concern is that most parents don't think a hot car tragedy could happen to them and therefore might not turn on a protective feature.) 'When my college-aged son was an infant, this almost happened to us,' says Jennifer Stockburger, director of operations at CR's Auto Test Center. 'My husband was responsible for dropping our son at daycare one day, which was not his normal routine. He drove far past the daycare, and only when our son made some noise did he realize his mistake. Even if you can't imagine making such an error, I encourage parents to use the tips we provide to safeguard their children.' By Emily A. Thomas, PhD, Consumer Reports associate director, auto safety
