logo
Two men and woman denied child sex abuse allegations in Garda interview, trial hears

Two men and woman denied child sex abuse allegations in Garda interview, trial hears

Two men and a woman denied allegations of sexually assaulting and raping a young girl when interviewed by gardaí, the Central Criminal Court has heard.
Memos from the three defendants' separate Garda interviews were read to the jury on Thursday.
Advertisement
The three defendants cannot be named for legal reasons. They deny wrongdoing and have pleaded not guilty to all charges.
The woman, who is in her 50s and the complainant's mother, has pleaded not guilty to 13 counts of sexual assault on dates between 2000 and 2009, and between 2012 and 2014, primarily at the family home.
She also pleaded not guilty to one count of rape, in that she facilitated the rape of the complainant by her uncle.
Gardaí asked her to comment on the allegation that she sexually assaulted her daughter for the first time before she was four. The woman replied 'that never happened or anything like it as far as I'm concerned'.
Advertisement
She said she felt 'very upset, slightly sick', adding 'I don't understand how anyone would do that, I certainly didn't'.
She denied sexually assaulting her daughter on other occasions, including during a holiday to a family-owned holiday home. She said she didn't believe she had gone on that holiday.
The woman further said 'that didn't happen' when asked if she allegedly sexually assaulted her daughter for a final time when the girl was 15.
In direct evidence earlier in the trial, the complainant said her mother was present while the girl's uncle raped her.
Advertisement
The woman denied facilitating this or being present, 'that never happened either', she told gardaí.
She was also asked about the complainant's allegation that she saw her mother and uncle engage in sex with each other while she was present in a room.
The woman denied having had sex with her brother. 'That's very vicious. I don't understand that at all,' she said.
She denied having issues with alcohol. When gardaí suggested that her alcohol dependency may be greater than she wanted to acknowledge, the woman said she only drank at weekends and had worked full-time until the mid 2010s.
Advertisement
She might drink a bottle of wine on a night off she said, but rejected the suggestion she became aggressive when drunk.
Gardaí suggested that the complainant had described a household of 'total chaos' when she was a child. 'This didn't happen, it's very upsetting,' the woman replied.
When an extract from the complainant's statement referring to her drinking was read, the woman said these were 'very hurtful and upsetting', adding that she didn't understand why her daughter would make these allegations.
Gardaí asked her about the allegation that she bit her daughter. The woman replied: 'I don't know what to say to that, I don't remember any occasion like that'. She later added that other adult relatives in the house would have 'tackled me if I did'.
Advertisement
The woman was also asked to comment on her daughter's allegation that another man orally raped her.
The complainant gave evidence during the trial that this man – a friend of her mother's then partner - orally raped her, during which he told her 'Your mother knows'. The woman denied any knowledge of this.
She confirmed that her daughter went to live with two female friends and later moved to the family owned holiday home. She said she tried to get the complainant to move back but has had 'pretty much no contact' with her daughter since.
The woman was asked if her daughter was a liar. 'I haven't spoken to [the complainant] in a long time, I never thought she was'.
'Do you think she is now?' gardaí asked. 'Yes,' the woman replied.
When asked how she feels about the complainant, the woman said: 'hurt, distressed, and confused. I'm anxious about her and I'm worried about her'.
She said she didn't know why her daughter would make these allegations, but suggested the complainant might have felt 'shoved out' after moving in with the two female family friends.
In his Garda interviews, the complainant's uncle denied raping the complainant.
This man, who is in his 40s, has pleaded not guilty to five counts of rape and one of oral rape on dates between 2003 and 2012, all at the family home.
He described the allegations as 'mindboggling' and later said he didn't know why his niece would make them.
He further denied raping the girl in his bedroom while her mother was present, saying 'that never happened'.
This man also denied ever engaging in sex with his sister, the complainant's mother.
When asked if the complainant was a liar, he said 'I would have said no, until this. I thought she was always telling the truth, but not after this'.
The complainant's uncle denied that there was alcohol dependency in the house.
A second man said he thought the allegation made against him was 'outrageous' when he was interviewed by gardai.
This second man, aged in his 50s, has pleaded not guilty to one count of oral rape between 2008 and 2009 at the same address. The jury has heard he was a friend of the accused woman's then partner.
The court heard that he replied 'I've nothing to hide' after caution.
During his Garda interview, he said, 'I never touched that lady'.
He said he didn't want to say more, adding 'I never went near that girl and I swear it on my mother's and father's grave.'
In other evidence, a garda said that the complainant did not make allegations of a sexual nature when she spoke to him in 2015 about a separate matter.
Two female family friends also told the jury that the complainant moved to their home when she was about 18 and again during the second Covid-19 lockdown.
These women, who are sisters, said the complainant was neglected as a child and that the household was chaotic. They also said the adults in the complainant's home when she was a child all had issues with alcohol.
The first woman gave direct evidence that 'alcohol had a place in their house that a cup of tea would have in someone else's'.
Both women confirmed that a family-owned holiday house was left in trust to one sister for the benefit of the complainant following the death of an adult relative.
Defence counsel put extracts to them from the complainant's counselling records which referred to these two women. They both agreed with defence counsel that there had been arguments while the complainant stayed with them during the second Covid-19 lockdown.
One witness said she could not explain the meaning of these notes, adding that they related to the complainant.
The first female family friend denied a suggestion from Desmond Dockery SC, representing the complainant's mother, that she pushed the complainant to make sexual allegations against her mother.
During re-examination, this witness said she and her sister 'absolutely' did not put pressure on the complainant to make allegations against her mother.
Her sister told Mr Dockery that the atmosphere turned 'septic' while the complainant was living with them during the second Covid-19 lockdown. She said there were arguments and that she had been 'terrified' for the complainant's mental health.
Ireland
Child sexual abuse trial of mother, uncle and fami...
Read More
She denied a suggestion from Mr Dockery that she or her sister put pressure on the complainant to make allegations against her mother. 'Absolutely not. I find what [the complainant] said about [her mother] appalling.'
'Why would I want her to make up a story about my friend,' she said. 'I never heard of a mom abusing her kid, I never heard of a story like that'.
The trial at the Central Criminal Court continues.
If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at
1800 77 8888
, access text service and webchat options at
drcc.ie/services/helpline
or visit
Rape Crisis Help
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sports star used iPhone cord to pretend he had cancer to scam thousands of people
Sports star used iPhone cord to pretend he had cancer to scam thousands of people

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Sports star used iPhone cord to pretend he had cancer to scam thousands of people

With a 'tube' up his nose and lying on a 'hospital bed', the photo appears to be of Ireland's most famous sports stars being treated for cancer. There is one problem – he didn't have cancer. DJ Carey, seen as one of the greatest hurlers of all time, has pleaded guilty to pretending to have cancer to trick people into giving him money. The sports legend even conned Irish billionaire Denis O'Brien into giving him money to fund cancer treatment. Carey, 54, pleaded guilty to 10 counts related to defrauding people out of money while pretending to have cancer at the Circuit Court in Dublin's Criminal Courts of Justice on Wednesday. The sportsman won five All-Ireland titles and nine All-Star awards in hurling. Hurling is a stick-and-ball field game of ancient Gaelic Irish origin played by men and women. Carey has been described as the sport's 'first superstar' and a 'hurling legend'. However, he was said to have tricked his victims into making a monetary payment to him between 2014 and 2022 after saying he needed money to fund cancer treatment. Since pleading guilty, an image of Carey with 'tubes' up his nose and lying on a 'hospital bed' has resurfaced. The image, thought to have been sent to his victims, appears to show an iPhone cable taped to his face. Carey was charged with inducing him to make a payment to him between January 2014 and late 2022. Carey's defence team told the court that while cancer was referred to in the indictment, the sports star 'does have very genuine health conditions' which required surgery for a heart condition last year. They told the court he must attend check-ups periodically and that evidence from his surgeons can be provided. Despite his legendary status after he retired from hurling, Carey publicly battled financial problems. In May 2011, Allied Irish Bank (AIB) secured an initial debt repayment court order for about £7.3million. However, this debt was then reduced from nearly £8.2million to £51,000 in a settlement with AIB in 2018. In 2015, speaking on RTE's Ray D'Arcy radio show, Carey said: 'I am not one of those who would say 'I don't care' about repaying debt.' 'You borrow money, it should be paid back.' Carey appeared in court in late 2023 charged with 21 counts under the Theft and Fraud Offences Act, with a four-week trial expected to take place this year. He was due to stand trial on deception charges at the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court. About 28 witnesses were expected to give evidence for the prosecution at trial. But the prosecutor told the court that Carey would be entering guilty pleas, with a sentencing date now set for October 29. Carey has been remanded on bail until then. The hurling star's fall from grace follows a period of celebrity status after retiring from hurling in 2006. Carey's family members are also well-known in the world of Irish sport. His sister, Catriona, was a member of the Ireland women's field hockey team, while his brother Martin was also a hurler. One of the most high-profile cancer-faking scandals unfolded a decade ago with influencer Belle Gibson. In 2015, it was uncovered that the Australian wellness influencer, who had built an online community and profited off the back of selling a story about being diagnosed with cancer, was a fraud. The author of The Whole Pantry mobile app and cookbook claimed to have had malignant brain cancer that she managed through diet, exercise, natural medicine, and alternative medicine therapies. More Trending After an investigation regarding the legitimacy of Gibson's claims that she was donating a sizeable amount of her income to charities, it was discovered she'd lied about her age, personal life and actually having cancer at all. She eventually confessed, admitting that 'none of it's true'. Gibson was convicted in 2017 of engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct and fined $410,000 (£211,000) for breaching consumer laws. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: 'Beautiful and much-loved' mum and daughter, 6, killed in car crash named MORE: The origin story of Baby Guinness reveals you've been doing the shots all wrong MORE: Irish musician and comedian cancels all of his gigs for the year

Kneecap suggested as ‘secret set' to replace Bob Vylan at Manchester festival
Kneecap suggested as ‘secret set' to replace Bob Vylan at Manchester festival

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Kneecap suggested as ‘secret set' to replace Bob Vylan at Manchester festival

Kneecap were suggested as a replacement for Bob Vylan by organisers of a festival who dropped the punk duo after Glastonbury. Bob Vylan's performance at Radar festival in Manchester was cancelled after singer Bobby Vylan, whose real name is reportedly Pascal Robinson-Foster, 34, led crowds in chants of 'death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)' during their Saturday afternoon set at Glastonbury. Advertisement Speaking on the 2 Promoters, 1 Pod podcast, Radar organiser Catherine Jackson-Smith said the festival was 'forced into a position' they did not want to take in dropping the band from their upcoming headline slot this Saturday. On acts that could replace Bob Vylan, Ms Jackson-Smith said her colleague Joe had suggested a Kneecap 'secret set' in order to 'make a statement'. 'You can say nothing publicly but if you go and book, and as I did mention, Joe's first response was, 'What if we did Kneecap as a secret set?' because that makes a statement, and it makes a statement without having to make a statement and that is what we wanted to do so we are going through options,' she said. Kneecap performed on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury after Bob Vylan (Yui Mok/PA) 'We might end up with somebody that has no discernible political opinion in any manner at this point because if they're free and they could play on Saturday, maybe that is the criteria that we're looking for at this stage.' Advertisement Irish rap trio Kneecap, whose member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, also known as Mo Chara, appeared in court in June charged with a terror offence, performed on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury after Bob Vylan. As of Friday afternoon, Radar has not announced a replacement for Bob Vylan and the festival's website lists the Saturday line up as 'headliner TBA (to be announced)'. Of the conversation Radar organisers had with Bob Vylan, Ms Jackson-Smith said it was 'one of the most horrendous professional discussions' she has ever had. 'I cannot express clearly enough that I wanted Bob Vylan to perform at our festival,' she said. Advertisement 'Bob Vylan know that we wanted to book them. Why else would we have booked them?' she added. Radar organiser Catherine Jackson-Smith said the festival did not want to pull Bob Vylan from its lineup (Yui Mok/PA) 'And Bob Vylan also know that we didn't want to pull them, because we tried our hardest not to do that… but ultimately, it still ends at the same point the headlines will be 'Radar festival pulled Bob Vylan'.' Bob Vylan issued a statement on Tuesday claiming they were being 'targeted for speaking up'. It has emerged that Bob Vylan were already under investigation by police for comments made at a performance one month before Glastonbury. Advertisement Video footage appears to show Bobby Vylan at Alexandra Palace telling crowds: 'Death to every single IDF soldier out there as an agent of terror for Israel. Death to the IDF.' The duo have had their US visas revoked before their tour later this year and have been pulled from an upcoming performance at a German music festival, following their appearance at Glastonbury. They are currently expected to perform at the Boardmasters surfing and music festival in Newquay, Cornwall, in August. The group was formed in Ipswich in 2017, and are known for addressing political issues in their albums including racism, masculinity and class. Advertisement

Sally Rooney will remain ‘committed supporter of Palestine Action', court told
Sally Rooney will remain ‘committed supporter of Palestine Action', court told

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Sally Rooney will remain ‘committed supporter of Palestine Action', court told

Sally Rooney has told the London High Court she is 'and will continue to be a committed supporter' of Palestine Action, which failed to secure a temporary block on it being banned as a terrorist group on Friday. The Irish author said in court documents that the ban would prevent her from speaking at future public events as she 'could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles' if it comes into effect at 12.01am on Saturday as planned. Advertisement If the ban does come into effect, it would make membership of, or support for, Palestine Action a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Rooney has provided support for a legal claim by Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, against the Home Office, over the decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. Ms Ammori asked a High Court judge on Friday to temporarily block the move from becoming law over the weekend, ahead of a bid to be given the green light to challenge the Government's decision later this month. But in a ruling, Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to block the ban, stating that any harm caused is 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'. Advertisement Barristers for Ms Ammori are seeking to appeal against the ruling on Friday evening. In her witness statement, cited in Mr Justice Chamberlain's judgment, Rooney said the 'cultural effects' of Palestine Action becoming proscribed 'could not be easily mended'. She said: 'Though I am based in Ireland, my work is published in the UK. My novels regularly appear in bestseller lists, and I often travel to Britain to speak in public about my work. 'I am and will continue to be a committed supporter of Palestine Action. Advertisement 'If… that support is criminalised, I will effectively be prevented from speaking at any future public events in the UK, since I could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles in public. 'If I continue to voice support for Palestine Action from my home in Ireland, what are the likely consequences? Will I be denounced publicly by the Prime Minister? 'Will bookshops go on stocking the work of an author the Home Secretary has branded a 'terrorist' simply for supporting a protest group? 'The BBC has adapted two of my books for television; both series are presently promoted on the iPlayer service. Normal People, which I co-wrote and produced, was the BBC's most-streamed series in 2020, with over 62 million views. Advertisement 'My beliefs have not changed since the making of that series, and I have done nothing but continue to express them. 'If the expression of those beliefs becomes a terror offence under UK law, would the BBC continue to screen and promote my work? 'Is it likely that I could ever again collaborate with British public institutions like the BBC as I have done in the past? 'The cultural effects of proscription could not be easily mended, even if the Home Secretary later changed her mind. Advertisement 'For any public figure to be labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' by the state would have serious consequences. If Palestine Action loses its bid to temporarily block the move, it is due to become a terrorist organisation on Saturday after the order was signed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. Photo: PA. 'It would likely end or severely restrict the careers of many emerging artists. ''Terrorism' is not a trivial word.' In written submissions for Friday's hearing, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said that Rooney 'will continue to voice her support from Ireland' for the group. He said: 'Given her public support for Palestine Action… she is concerned that being labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' would have serious impacts on her ability to collaborate and publicise her work.' He continued: 'Ms Rooney notes that 'countless artists, writers and members of the public support direct action against complicity in what Israel is doing in Palestine', including Juliet Stevenson, Paul Weller, Tilda Swinton, Brian Eno, and other signatories to an open letter dated 30 June 2025.' If Palestine Action loses its bid to temporarily block the move, it is due to become a terrorist organisation on Saturday, after the order was signed by the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe the direct action group last month, after two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an action claimed by Palestine Action.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store