East Kilbride MP blasted for 'leaving disabled in limbo' following Commons welfare vote
Joani Reid MP has again come under fire for voting in favour of Labour's Welfare Bill which her opposers say will leave her disabled constituents in limbo.
The Bill had initially proposed to slash eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) - a move which the government's own analysis showed would remove support from 800,000 people by the end of the decade – but now promises a 'review' of PIP at the end of 2026.
In Scotland, the SNP Government had committed to protect disabled people from these cuts by protecting the Adult Disability Payment, Scotland's equivalent of PIP, from any reductions – though Labour's cut would have had a knock-on impact on Scotland's budget.
After months of backlash from disability and anti-poverty groups, an eleventh-hour change to the bill threw the vote into 'chaos and confusion', and resulted in The UK Government promising a review of PIP to be concluded by autumn 2026, which East Kilbride SNP MSP Collette Stevenson says is leaving disabled people in limbo.
A revolt by Labour MPs led to 49 of them voting against the motion but that number would have been far higher but for the government making a number of eleventh-hour adjustments to gain support for the Bill.
East Kilbride SNP claimed the Labour cuts would push hundreds of thousands of disabled people into poverty, hitting the most vulnerable hardest.
Collette Stevenson has said Labour must now apologise to disabled people for keeping them in limbo.
The MSP said: "This Welfare Bill has been a disaster from the start – Labour have gone from ignoring disabled people to changing the Bill minutes before the vote – that is a total joke, and no way to run a country.
'But by voting for this bill in its amended form, Ms Reid is only making that uncertainty for disabled people worse, by delaying any clarity on PIP until the end of 2026.
"Labour have shown their true colours here - any cut to PIP will be devastating for disabled people who rely on these payments to live and work – which is why the SNP pledged to protect these payments here in Scotland.
'With the limited powers of the Scottish Parliament, we can step in to protect disabled people here in East Kilbride and across Scotland – just imagine what we could do with the full powers of independence.'
In response, Joani Reid said that reforming welfare to help people "who can and should work" into jobs while protecting those who need help is all part of turning the economy around.
'With Labour the minimum wage is rising, the economy is growing and families can start to see the light at the end of the tunnel on the cost of living crisis as energy costs come down", she said.
"Reforming welfare to help people who can and should work into jobs while protecting those who need help is all part of turning the economy around and I am proud of the work Labour is doing.
'But under the SNP government, slavishly supported by Collette Stevenson, the NHS is getting worse, schools are falling behind and promise after promise is being abandoned.
'Now she wants to plunge Scotland back into the chaos and division of another referendum on independence, as though that answers any of the problems our country faces. Nobody outside the SNP wants or needs that. What a colossal waste of time, energy and money that would be.'
In a scathing open letter to the MP, East Kilbride South SNP Councillor Geri Gray spoke of her "disgust" at the decision by the granddaughter of veteran trade unionist and socialist Jimmy Reid who led the Upper Clyde Shipbuilders' work-ins during the 1970s.
She wrote: "I am disgusted that the granddaughter of the late and legendary Jimmy Reid could vote for the welfare cuts to the sickest and most vulnerable in our society. I have worked in Welfare Rights since before you left high school, and have seen the attacks on disabled people first by the Tories and now by your government.
"Have you spoken to any disabled charities or Welfare Rights organisations before you took this decision? Having recently attended a Welfare Rights Conference where Sir Stephen Timms was in attendance via video link, appears there was no discussion at all.
"No one is saying that people who are disabled shouldn't be assisted to work, and many do. However where are all these dream jobs? How many employers are going to realistically take on a disabled person who wakes up that morning in pain or with poor mental health and is unable to attend work that day? Employers are running a business, they need their staff. They can only be sympathetic to a point.
"So in conclusion Joani Reid, you are using disabled people as an easy source to save money. There are many other sources of income you could have looked at.
"Labour were always the party of the 'working class', no longer is this true. And why my previous Labour voting family turned to the SNP over 20 years ago. How a society treats its most vulnerable is always the measure of its humanity."
A Labour source said: 'Councillor Gray does herself and her party no favours with her bad tempered and inaccurate and personal attack on Joani Reid.
"Spending to assist disabled people is rising substantially, something you would expect someone who claims to be an expert on the subject to know, but instead Councillor Gray claims it is being cut. She can do better.
'Nor are the measures she attacks in the Bill.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
43 minutes ago
- Times
SNP transition fund spends £43m on just 110 jobs for oil workers
A fund designed to protect North Sea oil and gas workers from the SNP's net zero drive created just 110 new jobs despite spending £43 million, a new report has found. An analysis of the first two years of the Scottish government's Just Transition Fund, which is set to cost taxpayers half a billion pounds over a decade, found that it had 'safeguarded' only another 120 further existing roles. The policy, announced by Nicola Sturgeon in 2021, was intended to ensure that new green jobs are created for workers whose livelihoods depend on fossil fuel industries. A report commissioned by the Scottish government found the scheme, which backed 24 projects such as a 'sustainable' whisky distillery, an eco-tourism firm and new tidal energy research projects, could be 'a successful catalyst for economic and environmental change'. However, critics claimed that it had delivered only a 'paltry return' after the SNP repeatedly vowed that it would ensure that North Sea workers do not end up on the scrapheap as part of its plans to wind down the oil and gas industry and replace it with clean energy industries. The North Sea oil and gas industry is estimated to directly employ around 30,000 people and supports a further 100,000 indirectly. The Scottish government has said it wants to hit net zero by 2045 — five years ahead of the rest of the UK — and is sticking to the target despite repeatedly failing to hit, and then scrapping, interim targets. The analysis, carried out by the research firm Blake Stevenson Ltd, found that 47 jobs had been created through the Social Enterprise Just Transition Fund, which include positions in 'green skills training'. A handful of others were created through a nature restoration project based around the River Findhorn and an 'adventure tourism' firm. However, the report warned that many of the roles were 'temporary, project-based, or contingent on further investment' and 'may not transition into lasting opportunities'. Douglas Lumsden, the Scottish Tory net zero spokesman, said: 'This paltry return will do nothing to allay the fears of tens of thousands of highly skilled workers in Scotland's oil and gas sector. 'They know the SNP and Labour are taking a wrecking ball to their industry and this report confirms they have not got a clue how to properly protect jobs for the future. 'Taxpayers will be rightly thinking their money has typically been squandered by the SNP who must urgently shift from their current reckless approach if we are to achieve an affordable transition.' The fund was created as a counter to claims that the SNP's net zero policies, which were enthusiastically championed under Sturgeon, would cost thousands of jobs and cause devastation to the north east economy. The SNP has repeatedly claimed that it will ensure the push to net zero does not mean that communities suffer in the same way as others did under deindustrialisation under Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. When the just transition fund was announced, ministers said they would target investment to help create 'good, green jobs' to replace those that would be lost in the North East and Moray. According to the report, the fund has also helped to leverage £30 million in private sector investment and £4.7 million from the public sector or charities. It claimed that initiatives funded by the scheme were also responsible for the training of 750 people. The report said that while the fund 'has been a successful catalyst for economic and environmental change' in the area, 'several administrative and logistical challenges have emerged'. These include uncertainty over long-term funding, confusion over the application process and a lack of clarity over funding criteria. The report said: 'Many projects remain in early stages, making it difficult to fully assess employment outcomes, carbon savings, and long-term economic benefits.' Gillian Martin, the climate action secretary, said: 'This independent report demonstrates our Just Transition Fund is a catalyst for economic growth. With £75 million allocated to the fund since 2022, the expert report makes clear it has supported job creation and re-skilling, empowered communities, catalysed private investment and initiated innovation in green technologies. 'Thanks to the Just Transition Fund, more than 230 jobs have been created and safeguarded, 750 training places opened up and over £34 million in additional investment secured in its first two years. These are the initial impacts of the fund and we are confident that job numbers, investment leveraged and other key outputs will increase as projects continue. 'This is just one example of how this government is supporting Scotland's valued and highly skilled oil and gas workers, who are at the very heart of the just transition to net zero — despite the fact that decisions on offshore oil and gas licensing, consenting and the associated fiscal regime, are all matters that are currently reserved to the UK government.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Ian Blackford: SNP must offer Scots a bold economic plan
Mr Blackford warned that the dire state of the UK's public finances would have direct consequences for Holyrood, whose budget is heavily dependent on decisions taken at Westminster. Read more: 'For the SNP Government, whose budget is largely based on Barnett consequentials, it means an ongoing squeeze on real-terms spending,' he wrote. 'The 2026 election will largely focus on devolved responsibilities, but the capacity to deliver over the next Parliament will be constrained by the UK financial settlement.' Mr Blackford said the scale of the UK's fiscal challenge was stark. The tax burden continues to rise, with the UK Government's own forecasts suggesting the tax-to-GDP ratio will hit 37.7% by 2027–28 — the highest level seen in peacetime Britain. The Office for Budget Responsibility has said this could rise to 38% later in the decade. Yet despite the record tax take, the UK Government is still struggling to balance the books. Public sector net debt now stands at £2.87 trillion — around 96.4% of GDP — the highest May debt-to-GDP ratio in modern times. Servicing that debt costs more than £100 billion a year, or roughly 3.9% of GDP. All of this is adding to the pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has committed to not borrowing to fund day-to-day public spending, and to get debt falling as a share of GDP by 2029–30. She has limited choices following last week's U-turn on the welfare bill, which wiped out a projected £5bn saving. Labour has insisted it will keep its election promises not to increase income tax, National Insurance or VAT, but Ms Reeves has reportedly told Cabinet colleagues further hike may now be necessary in the Autumn Budget. According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the Chancellor may ultimately need to find an additional £25bn to £30bn by 2028 to avoid imposing deep cuts to public spending. Mr Blackford said there little chance of Ms Reeves scrapping her fiscal rules, and borrowing more. 'The financial markets will punish the Chancellor if she tries to increase borrowing, and she knows this,' he wrote. 'Put simply, the financial markets will largely determine the fate of the Chancellor and our fiscal future.' The prospect of a new Chancellor who might change the borrowing rules has already spooked the markets. When Ms Reeves was seen crying in the Commons at Prime Minister's Questions — after Sir Keir Starmer refused to back her — the pound fell against the dollar and the euro, while gilt yields soared. Rachel Reeves wipes away a tear during PMQsMr Blackford, a former investment banker, said: 'International comparisons make clear that investors impose a risk premium on UK debt. The current 10-year UK Government gilt yield is 4.5%. In Germany, it is 2.6%. In Switzerland, a modest 0.4%. Our neighbour Ireland has a rate of 2.8%. 'We are paying a price for the perception of investors of a lack of financial competence. We make jokes about Liz Truss and her cataclysmic approach to financial management, but her predecessors and successors hardly earn an A-plus.' Mr Blackford said the result would be a period of sustained pressure on public services across the UK, including in Scotland. 'For the public, the catastrophic failure to deliver an economic policy that supports sustainable growth has meant declining living standards,' he wrote. 'The last Westminster Parliament was the first in the post-war period during which living standards fell. I would not bet on this Parliament delivering a different outcome.' He also warned of the UK's limited ability to cope with any future economic shocks. 'Heaven help us if we face another external shock, given UK PLC's balance sheet. I shudder to think how the UK could finance another Covid-style crisis.' However, the bleak picture, he said, presented the SNP with an opportunity. 'Politics ought to be about hope. The SNP can seize the opportunity to paint a landscape showing how things could be different in Scotland,' he wrote. 'I have previously argued for the establishment of an industrial council. It is much needed. Or, if one is not to be established, the SNP at the very least needs to set out how it will drive a step change in investment, jobs and growth. 'We have the opportunity to drive economic opportunity from our massive potential in green energy — not green energy in itself, but using that power to create a sustainable green industrial future, building on our strategic opportunity to create a competitive advantage from affordable green energy. 'Doing our bit for net zero while creating the circumstances for a sustainable increase in economic growth.' Ian Blackford called on the SNP to look at establishing an Industrial CouncilMr Blackford argued that Scotland's ability to achieve this economic renewal was inextricably linked to the case for independence. 'When we talk about independence, it is not about an abstract concept. It is about transforming life chances. More of the same within the UK — low growth and public services under pressure — can be broken. 'The SNP needs to spell out how it can change the landscape and unlock economic growth by harnessing our natural resources and, of course, our human capital. There is a better way. It is up to our leaders to chart it.' Read more: Currently, around one-third of Scotland's budget comes via the Barnett formula, meaning UK Government spending decisions directly influence Holyrood's funding envelope. Last month, Ms Reeves set out her spending plans for the next three years, with the Scottish Government due to see a £9.1bn increase in funding during that period. A breakdown of the spending, released yesterday by the UK Government, showed that included a £5.8bn rise in health spending. Education consequentials were worth £2.1bn, while justice spending added £451m, housing and local government £380m, and transport £807m. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray hailed the increase, saying: 'The UK Government's Plan for Change has delivered the largest real terms settlement for the Scottish Government since devolution began in 1999, and ensured a definitive end to austerity in Scotland with £9.1bn more for the Scottish Government until the end of the decade. 'That's £9.1bn over and above record real terms budgets. 'That's more money than ever before for the Scottish Government to invest in Scottish public services like our NHS, police, housing and schools. 'It is for the Scottish Government to determine how it spends this money. 'It is notable, however, that almost £6bn of additional funding has been generated by health spending, and over £2bn has been generated by spending on education. 'Many Scots will expect to see better outcomes in their schools and hospitals given this record funding.' However, Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the settlement still left Scotland short-changed. 'The UK Spending Review document sets out in black and white that our funding for day-to-day spending is set to grow by only 0.8% over the next three years, compared with 1.2% average growth for UK Government departments,' she said. 'This will short-change us by £1.1bn. 'What's more, we face an estimated £400m shortfall from the UK Government's failure to fully fund their employer National Insurance increase.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Here's what we learned from a new poll of 7000 UK voters
Research involving more than 7000 UK voters, conducted by More in Common and the UCL Policy Lab and published to coincide with the anniversary of Labour's 2024 General Election victory, will be stark reading for the Prime Minister. It found: Two-thirds of Britons (63%) do not think Starmer respects 'people like them', up from 32% in June 2024. More UK voters think now is a 'time for change' of government than they did before the Tories lost power (77% now vs 73% in June 2024). Four in 10 people who voted Labour in the last General Election say they would not do so again. One in five of the people (22%) who have voted Labour in every election since 2010 now say they would not do so again. The biggest reason people give for turning away from Labour is broken promises and U-turns on previous commitments (36%). Marc Stears, the director of the UCL Policy Lab and former chief speechwriter for UK Labour, said: 'What voters want to know most of all is: Who does this government stand for? 'What kind of people does it most respect? Whose interests does it put first? 'A lot of the electorate thought they knew the answer to that one year ago. Now they're not so sure.' Labour's leaving voters The research found that, in the year since taking power, Labour have lost the majority of the new voters they won over in 2024. In total, 60% of people who voted Labour last year said they would do so again, meaning the party has lost some four in 10 voters. This includes 'loyal, long-term voters' who had backed Labour at every Westminster election for the last 15 years – 22% of whom said they would not vote for the party again. Starmer's government was found to be losing support to Reform on the right, and the LibDems and Greens on the left. More in Common said Labour's voters 'are defecting in every direction'. (Image: More in Common) Of the 11% of Labour 2024 voters who would now back Reform, 44% said it was Starmer's Government had failed to get immigration under control. Of the 12% of Labour 2024 voters who would now back the LibDems or Greens, More in Common reported they had changed their views because of a perception that the UK Government is too right wing, and an unhappiness about changes to welfare. Across all groups, the biggest reason people gave for turning away from Labour was the party having 'broken/U-turned on too many of their promises' (36%), followed by failing to reduce the cost of living (31%), and the cuts to the Winter Fuel Payment (27%). A little respect The new polling has shown a collapse in the respect the public feel from Labour or Starmer. Ahead of the 2024 General Election, 41% of people said Starmer respected people like them, while 40% said Labour did. However, this has dropped to just 24% and 22% respectively. (Image: More in Common)Before the 2024 vote, 32% of people said Starmer did not respect people like them, while 34% said Labour did not. Now, this has risen to 63% for the Prime Minister, while 65% of UK voters say the Labour Party does not respect people like them. The numbers for Starmer compare poorly to Reform UK leader Nigel Farage. In total, 33% of UK voters said Farage respected people like them, while 50% said he did not, for a net rating of -17 against Starmer's -39. More in Common said the results show that Starmer's government 'needs to respect ordinary people if it is to rebuild support and deliver on its change message'. Time for 'change' In the 2024 General Election, Labour ran on a slogan saying it was 'time for change'. Asked in June 2024, 73% of the public said this aligned with their feelings on the General Election. However, asked in June 2025, 77% said they felt it was 'time for change' in how 'the country is being run at the moment', up four points. Asked what's changed in the year since Labour entered government, by far the most popular answer given was 'nothing'. The second most popular answer, in more damaging news for Labour, was 'worse'. (Image: More in Common) Other top answered words included 'cost of living', 'costs', 'increased', 'prices', 'taxes', 'immigration', and 'economy'. Asked what they consider Labour's greatest success since entering government, and given a list of options, the most popular response was 'none of these' (23%). Second was raising the minimum wage (20%), followed by giving NHS staff pay rises and ending strikes (16%).
