PBS disputes Trump's claims of ‘bias' following his executive order targeting the network
During a conversation with Katie Couric, Paula Kerger, the CEO and president of PBS, was asked about Trump's opposition to her outlet and the executive order ending federal funding for the outlets.
"The White House released a document accompanying the executive order criticizing PBS and NPR's coverage of the pandemic and Hunter Biden, among other things," Couric said. "To say that this, you know, that the information that you all are disseminating on PBS and NPR is basically biased. And I'm curious to hear your response to that."
Pbs, Npr Blast 'Blatantly Unlawful' Trump Executive Order Halting Public Funding, Vow Challenges
Kerger responded saying that she doesn't "understand" the accusations of bias.
"In terms of the you know, the COVID origins, we actually did fairly extensive coverage of, you know, the various theories, including the Wuhan lab theory," Kerger said. "So that I don't understand the criticism and always when people say we see bias in your programs and by the way we get that on both sides. You know, I get as many calls from people on the more progressive side as on the conservative side that have issues every night with every night's broadcast. You know, I see this or I see that."
Read On The Fox News App
She also insisted that confirmation bias is to blame in the current media cycle.
"We're in a difficult time right now in our country around news coverage where people forget that news is news and it is not about hearing information that is reaffirming what you think you know," Kerger said.
Npr Sues Trump White House Over Executive Order Targeting Public Media
Trump's executive order, entitled "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization Of Biased Media," criticized the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funnels taxpayer money to PBS and NPR.
"Unlike in 1967, when the CPB was established, today the media landscape is filled with abundant, diverse, and innovative news options," the executive order reads. "Government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence."
On Tuesday, NPR and three Colorado public radio stations sued the Trump administration over the executive order defunding PBS and NPR.
"It is not always obvious when the government has acted with a retaliatory purpose in violation of the First Amendment. 'But this wolf comes as a wolf,'" the legal brief for the public broadcasters reads. "The Order targets NPR and PBS expressly because, in the President's view, their news and other content is not 'fair, accurate, or unbiased'."
PBS is reportedly not part of the lawsuit, but in a statement Tuesday said that the "President's blatantly unlawful Executive Order, issued in the middle of the night, threatens our ability to serve the American public with educational programming, as we have for the past 50-plus years. We are currently exploring all options to allow PBS to continue to serve our member stations and all Americans."
Fox News Digital reached out to PBS for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.Original article source: PBS disputes Trump's claims of 'bias' following his executive order targeting the network
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge rejects Trump administration effort to unseal Epstein grand jury records
A US judge has rejected a Trump administration request to unseal transcripts from grand jury investigations of Jeffrey Epstein years ago in Florida. A similar records request is pending in New York. District judge Robin Rosenberg in West Palm Beach, Florida said the request to release grand jury documents from 2005 and 2007 did not meet any of the extraordinary exceptions under US law that could make them public. The Justice Department last week asked the judge to release records to quell a storm among supporters of US President Donald Trump who believe there was a conspiracy to protect Epstein's clients, conceal videos of crimes being committed and other evidence. In 2008, Epstein cut a deal with prosecutors in Florida that allowed him to escape more severe federal charges and instead plead guilty to state charges of procuring a person under 18 for prostitution and solicitation of prostitution. The wealthy financier was later arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. His former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was charged with helping him abuse teenage girls. Epstein was found dead in his cell at a jail in New York City about a month after he was arrested. Investigators concluded he killed himself. Maxwell later was convicted at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison. The case attracted attention because of Epstein and Maxwell's links to famous people, including royals, presidents and billionaires. It also led to some of the biggest conspiracy theories animating Mr Trump's base.
Time Magazine
13 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Why Ground Beef Prices Are Hitting Record-Highs in the U.S.
For many Americans, the cost of ground beef is starting to weigh down their weekly shopping baskets. Ground beef prices rose by 10.3% in June, when compared to the same time last year, surpassing $6 per pound. The price of steak rose by 12.4% within this period. 'Egg prices have been through a rollercoaster ride. And now with beef, we're seeing quite a significant price rise,' says David Ortega, a food economist and professor at Michigan State University. Earlier this year, egg prices skyrocketed, more than doubling in price in April when compared to March 2024. The sharp increase was caused by bird influenza outbreaks on American farms, which infected over 23 million birds that had to be culled. As of early July, egg prices have since fallen back down to $3.78 per dozen from $6.23 in April. Over the past 12 months, food prices as a whole have only risen by 2.7%, so what is causing this sharp increase in the price of ground beef? Here's a breakdown of what's behind the soaring prices: Cattle herd sizes are at a record low Although the demand for ground beef products remains high in the U.S., the supply is facing a squeeze. Cattle herd sizes are at the lowest they have been for almost 75 years, with just under 87 million cattle and calves recorded across the country at the start of 2025, according to the American Farmers Bureau Federation (AFBF). AFBF economist Bernt Nelson has said that prices for feed steers (cattle bred for slaughter) have reached record highs, encouraging farmers to sell their cattle for meat production instead of breeding. 'High cattle prices combined with the unpredictability of future prices and profitability could compel farmers to continue marketing a higher percentage of females for beef rather than breeding,' he said in a February blog post. And as farmers still struggle to make profit despite high prices, they may decide to sell off their remaining cattle due to slim margins. 'Even with these record high prices, margins for cattle farmers and ranchers are razor-thin thanks to continued elevated supply costs,' Nelson said in May. One of the main high costs getting in the way of sustainable profit for cattle ranchers is that of feed for their herds, and this links back to adverse weather conditions brought on by climate change. Read More: Why Were Eggs So Expensive in April? Drought driven by climate change 'One of the main drivers has been the effects of climate change on beef production in the U.S. This is something that doesn't cause prices to rise overnight, so there's a considerable lag involved,' says Ortega. A significant drought took place across the Great Plain states in 2022, forcing a lot of cattle farms to sell their livestock. 'What that [drought] does is erases feed for producers. There's less forage availability, so they sell a lot of their animals, because it becomes very costly to hold on to them,' Ortega notes. A lot of the sold livestock, often slaughtered and turned into beef products, includes 'breeding stock,' meaning that in the long-term there is less capacity to breed new cows to keep up with consumer demand. 'If you couple that with the strong demand for beef, and there has been strong demand in particular for ground beef, because it is a very familiar product to consumers, it really puts a lot of pressure on prices, and that's why we've seen the increases,' says Ortega. Uncertainty due to tariffs and concern over what might happen in the future Ortega says he believes that tariffs 'are starting to play a role' in the rise of beef prices. Despite a lot of domestic production, the U.S. still imports significant amounts of beef, particularly more lean trimmings. These trimmings are important for ground beef products. 'We import a lot of lean trimmings from countries like South Africa and Brazil, and that is in order to be able to blend this with our beef that tends to be fattier, and so we can make the proper blends in terms of fat content,' Ortega says. President Donald Trump threatened earlier this month to install a 50% tariff against Brazil for what he described as a 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing allegations that he planned to stay in power despite losing the 2022 Brazilian election. 'If these do go into effect, or even higher tariffs [are implemented], then I think we're going to see a notable further increase on things like ground beef and hamburger meat,' Ortega says. Brazil, the world's largest exporter of beef, saw a rise in sales of meat to the U.S. this year after a trade war between Washington, D.C., and Beijing escalated. In May, Brazilian exports to the U.S. rose by 20%, and current imports from the country are almost double what they were in June 2024, according to the USDA. With beef imports rising by 10% over the past year, a higher U.S. dependency on the product from abroad puts it more at risk should tariffs increase, particularly on top exporters to the U.S., the largest being Canada. The U.S and Canada are currently in the midst of trade negotiations, with Trump most recently threatening a 35% tariff on all Canadian goods starting Aug. 1. Global supply chains of beef have already been disrupted as a result of looming trade wars. 'There is a tremendous amount of uncertainty on the policy and trade front,' Ortega says, arguing that it has contributed to such price increases. According to experts, even the slightest change within the beef market, as a result of tariffs, could further impact prices. 'Tariff-induced trade wars are sowing uncertainty for both ranchers and consumers alike. This has the potential to impact demand for beef, and even small changes in demand with such tight supplies could have a big impact on prices,' said Nelson. Read More: Why Tomatoes Are Becoming a Lot More Expensive How long will consumers feel the impact of these price increases? When asked about when grocery shoppers could see prices start to fall, Ortega calls this the 'million dollar question.' 'Our research shows that it could be four years or so before prices for the consumer start to stabilize,' Ortega says. Other price fluctuations, such as when eggs were reaching record-high prices earlier this year, were more 'predictable' as they were due to bird influenza outbreaks. But as there's more at play regarding the ground beef price hikes, it's harder to know when things will settle.
Buzz Feed
14 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Math Fail Sparks Massive Online Trolling
President Donald Trump is getting heat on social media for making a claim on Tuesday about cutting drug prices that's essentially mathematically impossible. Trump began promisingly enough with a complaint shared by Democrats and Republicans alike: the high cost of medication, and how much more Americans pay for some medications than patients in other countries. He promised to reduce those costs ― but to a very unlikely degree. 'We're gonna get the drug prices down. Not 30% or 40%, which would be great. Not 50% or 60%. No, we're gonna get them down 1,000%, 600%, 500%, 1,500%,' Trump said at a Republican dinner. 'Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable.' Critics quickly pointed out the reason those numbers are not thought to be achievable: reducing the price by 100% would make the drugs free. Reducing it by '1,000%, 600%, 500%, 1,500%,' as Trump said, would make the cost negative dollars ― with the drug company essentially paying people to take the medication. Trump: This is somebody nobody else can do. I can get the drug prices down… 1000% 600% 500% 1500%. Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable. — Acyn (@Acyn) July 23, 2025 @acyn/ C-SPAN / Via Twitter: @Acyn Several users asked Grok, the AI chatbot on X, if Trump's numbers made sense. Grok called Trump's claim ' mathematically impossible,' ' hyperbolic and not literal ' and ' total bullshit.' But Trump insisted he could use 'a certain talent that I have' to convince pharmaceutical companies that they have no choice but to reduce their prices. Trump also mentioned an executive order he signed in May to invoke 'most-favored nation' status in drug costs, which he says would ensure that drug companies can't charge Americans any more than what they charge patients in other nations. However, the details of that plan remain hazy, and at least one pharmaceutical CEO said discussions with the White House are ongoing and expected to take time. Trump on Tuesday insisted that his order will lead to those price cuts. 'We will have reduced drug prices by 1,000%, by 1,100, 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 700, 600,' he said. 'Not 30 or 40 or 50%, but numbers the likes of which you've never even dreamed of before.' Trump's critics offered some free math lessons: As someone who graduated from first grade, this is not how numbers work. — Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) July 23, 2025 @hemantmehta/ C-SPAN Thank goodness this guy isn't negotiating the percentages we pay in tariffs. — Justin Wolfers (@JustinWolfers) July 23, 2025 @justinwolfers / C-SPAN Quite a trick if he can do it. Are we going into negative numbers where big Pharma pays me to take their drugs? — Dj Omega Mvp (@DjOmegaMVP) July 23, 2025 @DJOmegaMVP/ C-SPAN Hard to imagine this guy was found liable of fraud for making up numbers — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) July 23, 2025 @meidastouch/ C-SPAN So the drug companies are going to pay us to take their drugs? Dumbest President EVER. — SickoftheCrap (@SickoftheC) July 23, 2025 @SickoftheC The economics department at Wharton must be incredibly proud of this man's fundamental understanding of basic math. — Franklin Leonard (@franklinleonard) July 23, 2025 @franklinleonard/ C-SPAN Cant wait fill my next zpack at cvs and leave with a stack of their money — Ronnie (@Gem_Mint_Cards_) July 23, 2025 @gem_mint_cards_/ C-SPAN I feel like a requirement of being president should be understanding basic math. — Jared Ryan Sears (@JaredRyanSears) July 23, 2025 @JaredRyanSears So medicines would be free and pharmaceutical companies would pay us? — Bru🔮 💉🗣 (@brwninh4) July 23, 2025 @brwninh4 Getting paid to take drugs sounds awesome where do I sign up — TCL (@TitleTalkTCL) July 23, 2025 @titletalkTCL / C-SPAN Universal Prescription Income. Your move, Yang — Roger Sollenberger (@SollenbergerRC) July 23, 2025 @SollenbergerRC/ C-SPAN What kind of math is this? — Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) July 23, 2025 @WuTangKids/ C-SPAN And people wonder how this idiot bankrupted casinos. — Jo (@JoJoFromJerz) July 23, 2025 @JoJoFromJerz/ C-SPAN Negative drug prices are on the way ! 🤣🇺🇸 — Christopher Schultz (@nalyticsatwork) July 23, 2025 @nalyticsatwork/ C-SPAN This is the fucking genius. — Fred Wellman (@FPWellman) July 23, 2025 @FPWellman/ C-SPAN — Dave Itzkoff (@ditzkoff) July 23, 2025 @DaveItzkoff/ C-SPAN @realDonaldTrump is out here pitching drug deals like it's Shark Tank for Cartels: 'I'm offering insulin for negative $300 and a lifetime supply of bleach injections… but only if you call in the next 15 minutes.' This QVC for crackheads. — Frank C (@FrankC164) July 23, 2025 @FrankC164/ C-SPAN
