
Don't look away as Islamist regime in Syria allows slaughter of Christians and Druze
As a Syrian-American, my heart aches for what has become of my ancestral homeland. As a physician, I cannot detach myself from the human suffering behind each headline. And as someone who has spent decades warning of the rising threat of Islamism, I am sounding the alarm: a new tyranny is taking root in Syria, cloaked in religious language, but every bit as dangerous and destructive as the last. The importance of exposing, understanding and confronting early inflection points in Syria towards yet another tyranny after over 55 years of Ba'athist military dictatorship cannot be overstated.
The world has grown tragically used to Syrian suffering. Since the Assad regime began its campaign of terror in 2011, against the long-overdue revolution of anti-government protests, the country has become synonymous with war, displacement and loss. More than half a million people have been killed. Over 13 million have been displaced. Cities, like my ancestral hometown of Aleppo, have been reduced to rubble. And yet, from the ashes of Bashar al-Assad's family reign, a new authoritarianism is emerging, this time driven not by secular fascism, but by religious supremacism.
The reports we are now receiving point to sectarian violence targeting Syria's religious minorities, specifically Christians and the Druze. These are communities that have existed in Syria for centuries, long before the rise of Islam, and that have weathered waves of persecution. Now they are being targeted again, this time by groups sympathetic to the new regime whose leaders adhere to an Islamist interpretation of Sunni Islam, and who view theological difference not as a reality of pluralism but as a crime worthy of death.
This is not Islam. This is Islamism.
Islamism is a doctrinal interpretation that promotes a rigid, theocratic vision of Islam as a political system. It seeks to implement sharia, or Islamic law, not simply as a personal or spiritual guide, but as the governing authority over every aspect of public and private life. Islamists see the rights of citizens coming not from God but from their theocratic version of Islam. Islamists believe their political power is divinely mandated and dissent is heretical and treasonous. This is not faith. It is fascism wrapped in the language of God.
For years, Islamists have falsely presented themselves as the antidote to Assad's tyranny. They have told the world they are fighting for freedom, justice and democracy. But let's be clear: the Islamists now in power are no different from Assad. Their language and methods may differ, but their goals are the same: absolute control, achieved through fear, violence and repression.
Where the Assads used torture chambers and chemical weapons, the Islamists use a cult-like religious identity as both sword and shield. Where the Assads sowed sectarianism in order to then crush dissent in the name of national unity, the Islamists now do the same in the name of their version of "divine truth."
And the result is the same: bodies in the streets, families torn apart and the suffocation of any future for liberty.
At the heart of this struggle is a principle that we, in America, hold dear — but that is increasingly endangered across the globe: religious freedom. It is not just one right among many. It is the foundation of all others. As I have said many times: religious liberty is the tip of the spear of all freedoms. It is the "First Liberty." When it flourishes, society flourishes. When it is crushed, all other freedoms fall.
This is not abstract philosophy. This is the lived reality of millions. When people are denied the freedom to worship and believe — or not believe — according to their conscience, it is only a matter of time before they are also denied the freedom to speak, to assemble, to vote, to live without fear. Syria is a tragic case study in what happens when religious liberty is replaced by ideological authoritarianism, whether secular or theocratic.
At the CLARITy Coalition, we are committed to shining a light on the threats posed by both political Islam and authoritarian regimes. We are a network of Muslims, ex-Muslims and allies from across the ideological spectrum who believe that liberty is not just a Western value. It is a human one. We believe in the dignity of every person, the equality of all before the law and the essential truth that no government has the right to tell you what to believe.
We call on the international community not just to condemn the latest atrocities in Syria but to act. That means demanding investigations into the massacres now being reported. It means holding the government in Damascus accountable and demanding transparency in how their nascent government protects every minority and every citizen.
It means withholding recognition and support from any regime that commits or enables such crimes. It means recognizing Islamism as the dangerous political ideology that it is, not a legitimate expression of religious faith, but an extremist perversion of it.
In 2013, the Obama administration enabled, empowered and celebrated the "democratically" elected Islamist regime of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, laying the groundwork for the return of yet another military regime in current leader Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi. Syria's profound religious diversity can be a bulwark against these dueling fascisms and Game of Thrones.
But this means standing with the Syrian people: Christians, Druze, Sunnis, Shi'a, Alawites, Kurds, atheists, everyone who yearns for a Syria where they can live in peace, worship freely, assemble and speak their minds without fear.
President Donald Trump should immediately call for a full accountability and transparency from Damascus on Sharaa's government's treatment of minorities and his direct responsibility for the freedom of religious minorities under his rule.
The Syrian people deserve better than a choice between Assad and al-Golani. They deserve a future rooted not in sectarianism and violence, but in liberty and dignity.
The world ignored Syria once before, and the price was horrific. We cannot afford to ignore it again.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Gabbard's claims of an anti-Trump conspiracy are not supported by declassified documents
Advertisement Those investigations either concluded — or accepted the conclusion — that Russia embarked on a campaign to interfere in the election through the use of social media and hacked material. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The House-led probe, conducted by Trump allies, also concurred that Russia ran an election interference campaign but said the purpose was to sow chaos in the U.S. rather than boost Trump. Several of the reports criticize the actions of Obama administration officials, particularly at the FBI, but do not dispute the fundamental findings that Moscow sought to interfere in the election. The Associated Press has reviewed those reports to evaluate how Gabbard's claims stack up: Russian election interference CLAIM: 'The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. Advertisement The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude that Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems. President Barack Obama's administration never alleged that voting infrastructure was tampered with. Rather, the administration said Russia ran a covert influence campaign using hacked and stolen material from prominent Democrats. Russian operatives then used that information as part of state-funded media and social media operations to inflame U.S. public opinion. More than two dozen Russians were indicted in 2018 in connection with those efforts. Republican-led investigations in Congress have affirmed that conclusion, and the emails that Gabbard released do not contradict that finding. Shift in assessment? CLAIM: 'There was a shift, a 180-degree shift, from the intelligence community's assessment leading up to the election to the one that President Obama directed be produced after Donald Trump won the election that completely contradicted those assessments that had come previously.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. There was no shift. The emails Gabbard released show that a Department of Homeland Security official in August 2016 told then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper there was 'no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.' The public assessment the Obama administration made public in January 2017 reached the same conclusion: 'DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.' Putin's intent CLAIM: The Obama administration 'manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.' — Gabbard on Truth Social Wednesday. Advertisement The material declassified this week reveals some dissent within the intelligence community about whether Putin wanted to help Trump or simply inflame the U.S. public. That same question led to a partisan divide on the House Intelligence panel when it examined the matter several years later. Gabbard's memo released last week cites a 'whistleblower' who she says served in the intelligence community at the time and who is quoted as saying that he could not 'concur in good conscience' with the intelligence community's judgment that Russia had a 'decisive preference' for Trump. Such dissent and debate are not unusual in the drafting of intelligence reports. The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee examined whether there was any political interference in the Obama administration's conclusions and reported that 'all analysts expressed that they were free to debate, object to content, and assess confidence levels, as is normal and proper.' In 2018, Putin directly addressed the question of whether he preferred Trump at a press conference in Helsinki even as he sidestepped a question about whether he directed any of his subordinates to help Trump. 'Yes, I did,' Putin said. 'Because he talked about bringing the U.S.-Russia relationship back to normal.' Steele dossier CLAIM: 'They used already discredited information like the Steele dossier — they knew it was discredited at the time.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. The dossier refers to a collection of opposition research files compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, whose work was funded by Democrats during the 2016 election. Those files included uncorroborated tips and salacious gossip about Trump's ties to Russia, but the importance to the Russia investigation has sometimes been overstated. Advertisement It was not the basis for the FBI's decision to open an investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, the Justice Department's inspector general found. Some of the records released by Gabbard this week also reveal that it was a Central Intelligence Agency human source close to the Kremlin that the agency primarily relied on for its conclusion that Putin wanted to help Trump and hurt Clinton, not the Steele dossier. FBI agents on the case didn't even come to possess the dossier until weeks into their inquiry. Even so, Trump supporters have seized on the unverified innuendo in the document to undercut the broader Russia investigation. Many of Steele's claims have since been discredited or denied. It is true, however, that the FBI and Justice Department relied in part on the Steele dossier to obtain surveillance warrants to eavesdrop on the communications of a former Trump campaign adviser, the inspector general found. FBI agents continued to pursue those warrants even after questions arose about the credibility of Steele's reporting. The dossier was also summarized — over the objections of then-CIA Director John Brennan, he has said — in a two-page annex to the classified version of the intelligence community assessment.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's longtime rage at Obama roars back amid Epstein furor
President Donald Trump and his predecessor Barack Obama have met for a substantive conversation exactly once: November 10, 2016, two days after Trump won his first election. It was Trump's first time in the Oval Office. By most accounts, it was a little awkward. Eight years and eight months later, the meeting cropped up again this week in a very different context. On Sunday, Trump posted an AI-generated video using footage from the session to depict FBI agents bursting into the office, pulling Obama from his chair and handcuffing him as he falls to his knees. In the video, Trump watches on with a grin. His campaign anthem 'Y.M.C.A.' blares in the background. For years — since well before he launched a bid to become president himself — Trump has marinated in a singular fixation on the 44th president, whom he almost always refers to as 'Barack Hussein Obama.' This week, Trump's preoccupation with Obama — and specifically his role in probing Russia's role in the 2016 election — reemerged in dramatic fashion, drawing a rare rebuke from Obama's office and reigniting the bitterest feud inside the rarified club of presidents. The temperature ratcheted up Wednesday when Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard came to the White House briefing room to directly accuse Obama of 'leading the manufacturing' of an intelligence assessment she said was designed to undermine Trump. She said criminal referrals had been made to the Justice Department. 'There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact,' she said, adding the actions 'can only be described as a years-long coup and a treasonous conspiracy against the American people, our republic and an attempt to undermine President Trump's administration.' Trump revived his old — but never forgotten — grievance as questions swirl about his own handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, pivoting quickly from a reporter's question Tuesday about an Epstein associate to a lengthy diatribe in which accused his predecessor of treason. Critics saw in Trump's response a clear attempt to divert attention from a controversy that has put him at odds with influential members of his own base. Yet his resentments toward Obama predate any one effort at deflection, and aides say Trump has been as animated about his new accusations in private as he's been this week in front of cameras. His enmity has alternated between strategic attempts to erode Obama's legacy and what advisers have described as more visceral disdain for someone Trump views as both unwarrantedly popular and the root of many of his troubles since entering politics a decade ago. 'Whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people,' Trump said from the Oval Office on Tuesday. 'Obama's been caught directly.' Both Gabbard and press secretary Karoline Leavitt dodged questions at the press briefing Wednesday about Obama having immunity as a former president. During his first term, Trump's gripes ran the gamut, from complaints about Obama's handling of foreign policy to outlandish accusations he spied on Trump Tower. Since retaking office in January, however, Trump had mostly been directing his ire toward his more immediate predecessor, Joe Biden, whom he portrays as a largely comatose bystander to his Democratic advisers' radical agenda. Obama and Trump even appeared to have a friendly conversation in the pews at Washington National Cathedral in January when they both attended the late President Jimmy Carter's funeral. Trump invited Obama for a round of golf at one of his clubs, a person familiar with the conversation said. 'Boy, they look like two people [who] like each other,' Trump said a few days later when asked about the footage. 'And we probably do.' Now, probably not. 'He's guilty,' Trump said Tuesday of Obama, sitting alongside the Philippine president. 'This was treason. This was every word you can think of.' The basis for Trump's claims came via a report, issued last week by Gabbard, that sought to undermine an assessment made in 2017 that Russia sought to influence the election the year earlier in favor of Trump. That assessment was later backed up by a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report that was endorsed by every Republican on the panel, including then-Sen. Marco Rubio, who is now Trump's Secretary of State and acting national security adviser. But Gabbard and Trump came to a different conclusion, and have accused Obama and top officials in his administration of manipulating intelligence to support a theory that Russia swung the results of the election. Their findings appear to conflate Russia's attempts to sow dissent through leaks and social media campaigns with efforts to hack election infrastructure and change vote totals, which intelligence officials have said did not happen in the 2016 contest. Nonetheless, Trump framed the new report Tuesday as the 'biggest scandal in the history of our country.' 'Obama was trying to lead a coup,' Trump said. 'And it was with Hillary Clinton.' A few hours later, a spokesman for Obama dismissed the accusations, making sure to note that ordinarily the former president ignores Trump's 'constant nonsense and misinformation' but could not, in this case, remain silent. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' said the spokesman, Patrick Rodenbush. Trump has long viewed the Russia investigation as a cloud over his first presidency, one cooked up by his political rivals to subvert his legitimacy and undermine his ability to win an election. In his second term, Trump has prioritized retribution against those who led investigations into him — and, in his mind, made his first term miserable. Even though Obama was out of power by the time a special counsel was appointed and Congress began probing, Trump has singled out the former president as the 'ringleader' of the effort. 'This is, like, proof — irrefutable proof — that Obama was seditious,' Trump said, adding a few seconds later that assigning blame on lower-level officials was a mistake: 'I get a kick when I hear everyone talks about people I never even heard of,' he said. 'No, no, it was Obama. He headed it up. And it says so right in the papers.' Trump initially launched into the lengthy screed when asked a question about the Justice Department's plans to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, the Epstein associate who is serving a 20-year sentence in federal prison for conspiring with the late sex offender to sexually abuse minors. That Trump pivoted almost immediately — and without a great deal of explanation — from answering the Epstein question to his diatribe on Obama did little to dispel the impression he was using the issue to deflect from a scandal now entering its third week. Trump has been explicit that he believes the Epstein case is getting too much attention. 'We had the Greatest Six Months of any President in the History of our Country, and all the Fake News wants to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax!' he wrote on social media Tuesday. But his anger toward Obama, voiced repeatedly over the course of his meeting, spoke to something deeper than a diversion tactic. It was a glimpse into a lingering grudge that appears unlikely to ever entirely disappear. The resentments stretch back more than a decade, to the 'birther' conspiracy Trump fueled years before vying for the presidency himself. His indignation appeared to deepen when Obama made fun of him during a 2011 White House Correspondents' Dinner speech and television cameras found Trump scowling in the audience. By the time Obama was handing off power to Trump, the seeds of suspicion had been planted, even if the two men put on a show of comity in the Oval Office. Trump's aides now look back on that period as a moment of deception. 'I watched a clip of (Obama) this weekend saying, you know, I'm going to do everything I can to help Donald Trump come in. That's how our country will be successful. He said that to President Trump's face in the Oval Office during that transition period,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said this week on the 'Ruthless Podcast.' 'Meanwhile, he was holding secret meetings in the White House with top law enforcement and intelligence officials to put out this fake intelligence and mislead the American public,' she went on. It's all a distant cry from the mostly cordial — at least in public — relations between presidents that had been the norm for decades. That standard mostly died during Trump's first term. Since their single meeting in 2016, Trump and Obama have barely spoken, except for pleasantries at state occasions. Former first lady Michelle Obama has taken to skipping any event where Trump might also appear. This story has been updated with additional developments.


Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Saudi-Syrian Pacts Will Amount to $6 Billion, Minister Says
A Saudi-Syrian investment forum in Damascus will include the signing of 44 pacts worth about $6 billion, said Syria's Information Minister Hamza al-Mustafa, as the war-ravaged country tries to revitalize its devastated economy through cooperation with the Gulf kingdom. A 150-person Saudi delegation consisting of businessmen and government officials arrived in Syria on Wednesday to complete the agreements, most of which are expected to be memorandums of understanding and joint projects, according to Saudi media.