IIT Delhi awards 2,764 degrees at 56th convocation, highest number of PhDs conferred this year
IIT-Delhi scholarships for engineering students, here's list of institute and donor-sponsored financial assistance
According to a statement, chief guest, Dr Thomas addressed the graduating batch, urging students to contribute to areas such as decarbonisation, digital equity, bio-innovation, and water conservation as the world undergoes technological shifts.
A total of 2,764 students received degrees and diplomas at the ceremony. This included 530 doctoral degrees—the highest number of PhDs awarded by the institute in a single year. The graduating cohort also comprised 735 female students and 43 international students from around 20 countries.
IIT Delhi New Courses: Five new offerings beyond traditional degrees
Among the graduating students, 1,048 completed their BTech degrees and 488 completed their MTech degrees. The institute also awarded 62 Master of Science (Research), 218 Master of Science, and 172 MBA degrees. Other programmes included Master of Public Policy, Master of Design, Dual Degrees (BTech + MTech), and various postgraduate and undergraduate diplomas.
Missed meals at IIT-Delhi student mess? University wants to know if you are okay
This convocation also marked the graduation of the first batch of B.Tech. students in Energy Engineering. In the postgraduate category, the first cohort from three new programmes—M.Tech. in Robotics, M.S. (Research) in VLSI Design, Tools and Technology, and M.S. (Research) in Artificial Intelligence—received their degrees.
Twenty-year-old Chandan Godara, a BTech graduate in Civil Engineering, was the youngest recipient of a degree, while Gopal Krishan Taneja, aged 63, received a PhD, making him the oldest graduate this year.
Additionally, two students, Shreyansh Gupta (MTech in Thermal Engineering) and Soumili Chakraborti (MTech in Polymer Science and Technology), received the Perfect Ten Gold Medals for scoring a CGPA of 10 out of 10 in their respective programmes. Additionally, Institute Silver Medals were awarded to 16 students for securing the highest CGPA in their courses.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
AI, But Verify: Navigating Future Of Learning
New Delhi: At a time when artificial intelligence is reshaping how we learn, teach and think, IIT Delhi took a leap into the future . Last year, IIT Delhi formed a dedicated committee to explore how generative AI tools could be ethically and effectively integrated into teaching, research and examinations. After months of collecting detailed feedback from both students and faculty, the committee released a comprehensive report covering short-term goals that revealed some eye-opening trends. A significant 80% of students reported using generative AI (GenAI) tools, with 81% of them engaging with these technologies several times a week. Around 10% of the respondents have even invested in paid subscriptions, citing the limitations and inaccuracy of free versions as a major concern. Based on these insights, the institute released a set of guidelines. A cornerstone of these new rules is the mandatory disclosure of any content generated or assisted by GenAI tools for transparency and academic integrity. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi "We mandated that all academic programmes include exposure to artificial intelligence and machine learning. Most departments have already incorporated the elements, ensuring that all graduates from IIT Delhi will soon possess strong proficiency in AI. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo This committee was formed on April 9, 2024, to guide this transition and determine the best approach for integrating AI," said Rangan Banerjee, director of IIT Delhi. In the long term, the committee was tasked with providing clear guidance on the use of GenAI tools while monitoring advancements in the field, identifying the necessary training and support infrastructure to ensure their effective and equitable use, and recommending a governance structure and AI policies that align with the existing policy framework. The report states, "While generative AI tools offer potential benefits—such as personalised, real-time feedback and customized learning experiences—they also raise significant concerns. These tools can produce inaccurate or misleading responses, and excessive reliance on them may undermine essential learning outcomes, particularly the development of critical thinking skills. It is imperative for educational institutions to establish clear guidelines that educate and sensitise both students and faculty". The genesis of this initiative reflects the growing recognition that GenAI tools are no longer futuristic concepts but active collaborators in academic life. They offer undeniable benefits—personalised, real-time feedback, efficient writing assistance, and novel ways to visualise and explore complex topics. Yet, their rapid adoption has also brought challenges and concerns that the committee sought to understand firsthand by engaging with the campus community. A survey circulated among faculty and students revealed a nuanced picture of AI's current role at IIT Delhi. According to the feedback of 427 student respondents, AI facilitated their learning by simplifying concepts, creating mind maps, and simulating scenarios to deepen understanding. However, they also identified significant limitations: inaccuracies in AI responses, difficulties with complex or context-specific questions, and poor performance in mathematical reasoning and code debugging. Some students even voiced concerns about data privacy and unequal access to paid AI subscriptions, highlighting the socio-economic dimensions of AI equity. When it came to ethics, the students were divided—just over half saw no professional ethical issues with AI use, while others worried about risks to intellectual integrity and the potential erosion of critical thinking skills. This group cautioned that overreliance on AI might stifle personal agency and authentic engagement with learning, thereby impeding intellectual growth. Faculty responses, drawn from 88 participants, echoed many of these insights. Around 77% of faculty members use GenAI tools, with half doing so regularly, reflecting a broad acceptance of AI's utility in academic workflows. Faculty members harness these tools for writing assistance, summarising research literature, preparing instructional materials, and streamlining administrative tasks, thereby enhancing productivity. However, they also raised serious concerns about intellectual integrity, the impact on students' critical thinking development, and the challenges of fair grading when AI-generated content is involved. The lack of reliable detection tools for AI-authored work further complicates assessment fairness. Recognising these complexities, the committee's recommendations offer a balanced framework designed to harness AI's benefits while safeguarding academic values. At the individual level, students, researchers, and faculty are urged to disclose AI use transparently—whether in text, images, or data visualisations—to uphold academic integrity. They must take full responsibility for verifying and fact-checking AI-generated content, ensuring it is original and free from plagiarism. Users are also advised to protect privacy by avoiding the input of sensitive or personally identifiable information into AI tools. For the institution, the committee recommends regular workshops developed in collaboration with academic units to educate and sensitise both students and faculty on ethical, responsible, and effective AI use. Faculty development programmes should include dedicated modules on AI's applications and implications. Additionally, the institute is encouraged to secure campus-wide licences for premium AI tools, ensuring equitable access and levelling the playing field for all departments and users. Specific guidance for academic units stresses the need to embed AI education into core curricula, including professional ethics and domain-specific GenAI applications. Learning outcomes—both at the programme and course level—should be redesigned to reflect AI's transformative impact, emphasising skills like critical thinking, original analysis and knowledge application beyond AI's reach. A curated and regularly updated resource compendium on ethical and constructive AI use should be developed to support students and faculty alike. Acknowledging that outright bans on AI use are impractical, the committee advises that plagiarism policies be revised to explicitly address these tools. These policies should encourage transparency and responsible use, penalise unethical behaviour, such as submitting AI-generated work without meaningful personal input, and reward honest engagement with AI technologies. Faculty members are also urged to review assessment outcomes where AI tools are involved, to refine assignments, identify academic dishonesty and raise awareness of AI's role in education. The path forward involves not only adapting to technological change but doing so thoughtfully—ensuring that AI enhances the critical thinking, creativity and integrity at the heart of learning and discovery. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
BHU meet stresses application of geospatial tech in rural devt
Varanasi: To equip participants with practical knowledge and skills to utilise geospatial tools in planning and implementation of rural development initiatives, the Centre for Integrated Rural Development of the Faculty of Social Sciences at BHU organised a day-long workshop on Saturday focusing on 'Application of GIS, GPS, and Remote Sensing in Rural Development'. The workshop drew around 60 participants from diverse academic backgrounds including Economics, Geography, Agriculture, Political Science, and Rural Development. Attendees represented reputed institutions such as the University of Allahabad, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University Amarkantak, Rajarshi Tandon Open University, Purvanchal University, DDU Gorakhpur University, HNB Garhwal University, IIT-BHU, and BHU itself. Experts conducted technical training sessions on Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Global Positioning System (GPS), and Remote Sensing technologies, illustrating their applications in field-level data collection, planning, and monitoring of rural development programmes. The workshop featured hands-on sessions led by Prof Amit Kumar from Institute of Science, BHU; Vinod Kumar Tripathi Institute of Agricultural Sciences, BHU; and Shubham Dixit from IIT-BHU. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
The Hindu
21 hours ago
- The Hindu
A new district flood severity index factors in flood impact on people
Despite several places that get flooded repeatedly, adversely impacting people in terms of displacements, injury and even deaths, India lacks a comprehensive data-based flood severity index. To address this lacuna, researchers from IIT Delhi and IIT Gandhinagar have come up with a District Flood Severity Index (DFSI) that takes into account the mean duration in days of all flooding events in a district, percentage of area that is historically flooded, total number of deaths, number of people injured, and the population in the district. Though an entire district rarely gets flooded at any one point of time, according to the researchers, the need for creating a flood severity index at the district level was felt according to the researchers is because districts are the basic administrative and planning units in India, and most flood management-related measures are implemented with districts as a unit. But fundamentally, the data used in the study have been collected every year since 1967 by the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD). IMD collects and publishes data of disastrous weather events, wherein mainly riverine floods, and floods that inundate large areas get counted. Due to practical reasons, small flooding events or small cities that get flooded may be overlooked. Addressing the shortcomings 'But the salient point about various indices that already exist is that they concentrate on the magnitude of the floods or the inundation caused by the floods. They don't really account for the impact of the flooding events,' says Dr. Manabendra Saharia from the Department of Civil Engineering at IIT Delhi and the corresponding author of a study published in the journal Natural Hazards. To address these shortcomings, the authors have developed a more comprehensive index to identify districts that experience severe floods and where the severity is defined not only by the magnitude of the floods but also by their impacts on people, Dr. Saharia says. A first-cut measure 'Even if a district experiences a large number of flooding events, the entirety of the district is typically not flooded. In that case, we can find out what percentage of that district is historically flooded as we have a 40-year dataset developed and curated at IIT Delhi. This allows us to compute the percentage of flooded areas,' he says. 'We have used all available data, including district population, to get a first-cut measure of how severe a flood is in an area.' Dr. Saharia is quick to point out that what they have developed is an index and there is always room to improve it. For instance, the flood severity index in its current form does not take into account the aerial extent of agricultural fields that have been flooded as data on this are either not available or hard to access. 'When more information becomes available, we will refine the index. But we wanted to go ahead with the datasets that we already have, either from IMD or things that we have developed ourselves,' he says. Pointing out the fundamental difference between flooding of say the Indo-Gangetic Plain and urban areas, Dr. Sharad K. Jain from the Department of Civil Engineering at IIT Gandhinagar and a coauthor of the paper says that urban flooding occurs partly because of hydrometeorological reasons and also due to unwise urban development. 'If the water management in urban areas improves, then some of these flood events may no longer happen,' says Dr. Jain. Besides heavy rainfall, unplanned development may be one of the reasons why Thiruvananthapuram district has experienced the greatest number of flooding events — more than 231, or more than four events per year on an average. Dhemaji, Kamrup, and Nagaon districts in Assam are three of the five districts in India that have experienced over 178 flooding events, or more than three events per year on an average. Explaining why Thiruvananthapuram district has recorded the greatest number of flooding events, much higher than even districts in Assam and in States along the Indo-Gangetic Plain, Dr. Saharia says it is probably because of data collection protocols at that place. How flood impact is measured 'There are certain limitations in the base data and that's also the reason why we are not using the number of flooding events as the only factor for arriving at the district flood severity index,' clarifies Dr. Saharia. 'Though Thiruvananthapuram is number one in terms of flooding events, it is absent in the top 30 districts in the flood severity index. Patna turns out to be number one on the index followed by many districts in the Indo-Gangetic Plain and in Assam.' Besides the number of flood events, we take into account the aerial spread of the flooding, the number of people who actually live in that area and the impact of the flood on people, besides other factors. 'So, if a relatively less populated district experiences a greater number of floods, it may be counted as a less severe flood-impacted district based on the parameters used to calculate the district flood severity index,' clarifies Dr. Jain. 'Since the index is now available, we hope that this will motivate collection and use of data of more variables at finer spatial resolution.'
