
I've stopped life-saving medication says man exhausted by fight for NHS care
In February, he stopped taking the medication that prevents his kidneys from failing. They are now beginning to give up and he knows he has months, if not weeks, to live."I don't feel that things are going to get any better than this," he tells BBC News. "I just feel [ending my life] would be a better option than lying in bed 24 hours a day."Tim's neurological condition is rare, however, many of the difficulties he has faced feel familiar to many.Over the past two years, BBC News has been contacted by the families of more than 250 people with serious disabilities or illnesses about their struggles to access health and care services. Many described the impact of very long waits for assessments, appointments, and for vital equipment that can help them cope at home. They also highlighted the frustrations of trying to get someone to signpost the right services, being passed from department to department, and the feeling that they were only listened to when they reached a crisis. For some there were also lengthy arguments over whether their care should be paid for by the NHS or local councils.
Tim, who lives on his own in Worcester, first went to his GP in 2022 because he started stumbling while walking.He was referred to a rheumatologist. He waited a year for the appointment only to be told it was the wrong specialism.He then waited several months to see a local neurologist, then several more months to see a more senior neurologist in Birmingham. In the two years this took, he lost the ability to walk and had to use a wheelchair.Tim was eventually diagnosed with a rare neurological condition, Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP), which causes spasms and muscle weakness. Pain, fatigue and depression are also common symptoms.It is incurable, but according to the NHS website, it does not usually affect life expectancy. There are more than 80 variants, but Tim says he has yet to be told which he has. Physiotherapy and drugs are generally used to manage the symptoms, but Tim felt after being diagnosed he was just expected to "get on with it".In 2024, he spent two months in hospital. While there, regular physio helped him regain some mobility, but after he was discharged there was no ongoing support. His case was referred back to Worcester and its neurology therapy team.Tim received a letter dated 10 July 2024 welcoming him and saying he was on the waiting list for an assessment. Despite chasing for an appointment, he says he heard nothing. A year later, on 15 July 2025, he got another almost identical letter. It says welcome, you are on a waiting list. This time it included an information leaflet.
When Tim has asked his GP for help, he says he has often been told his case is too specialist and he should call 111.Tim's height has added to his difficulties. Getting the basics right for someone who is 6ft 10in (2.08m) has seemingly been impossible.He used all his savings to adapt his home and buy equipment so he could live downstairs, but spent two years in a standard hospital bed, provided by the NHS, which was too small for him. He describes it as "hideously uncomfortable" and like "torture". Three months ago, he was finally given a new, longer bed, but that causes him to sit up in a position that he says led to a major choking incident one mealtime. He now mostly has meal-substitute drinks.Finding a hoist to lift him in and out of bed has also been a major problem. The first two tried by the NHS were too small to be used safely.At the end of April, there was discussion about putting in a ceiling hoist. Two-and-a-half months on they are still waiting. It means Tim has not been able to leave his bed since February this year.He is also waiting to be fitted for a wheelchair that can cope with his height, but that cannot happen until there is a hoist to lift him out of bed."Life is just lying in a bed on a day-to-day basis, feeling very uncomfortable, fighting to get support," says Tim. "Above a certain height, you don't exist."I'd had enough of living the way I was. I couldn't see myself getting any better and decided I didn't want to be here anymore," he says. The health and care system, he adds, "hasn't worked. There's no joined-up thinking. Nobody cares."Authorities responsible for Tim's care say they cannot comment on individual cases but that they regularly review how care is delivered to meet each person's "unique needs".Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust says that "where equipment, home adaptations or community nursing support are required, we aim to have these in place [before discharge] to ensure a safe, well supported transition from hospital to home".
Tim has a separate, hereditary kidney condition, called polycystic kidney disease. His twin Andy, their father Alan and sister Sue were also born with the condition.Twenty years ago, Tim had a kidney transplant from his older brother, Richard. Tim's twice-daily tablets are supposed to stop the kidney from failing.Without them Tim knows he has months, if not weeks, left to live. He feels he has little choice but to stop taking the tablets.Sue, a retired children's social worker, says she is devastated by Tim's decision."He doesn't need to be lying here dying. He's got so much more to give," she says. "And I just feel that he's been completely abandoned."She spends nearly every day caring for him and has made endless calls to try to get him the support he needs.In February, Sue made urgent calls to Tim's GP, local mental health services and adult social services because he was so low. Again, she says she was passed from pillar to post, and that getting help was a fight. There was "no joined-up thinking", she says.Six months after stopping the tablets, Tim says he does not regret it.But pressed on what would make a difference, he says: "If I could be hoisted out [of bed] and sat up to have dinner, if I could be wheeled out into the garden just to get a change of scenery, that could help a lot."A friend suggested Sue should contact the local hospice. It has now become the central point of advice, support and information that Tim desperately needed two years ago. It manages his pain medication and has helped him get NHS funding for four care visits a day. It also arranged for a psychologist to check he had capacity to make his end-of-life decision.He says he's been asked that question by clinicians several times, but no-one has ever asked what can be done to make him rethink.The tragic irony that it took the move to end-of-life care to get them more joined-up help is not lost on Sue, but she says it is still not enough to provide the level of support he really needs."I feel absolutely heartbroken by the situation," she says. "I think I've gone beyond anger. I just can't believe that the UK would allow this to happen.
Tim's local NHS Trust says "we work in close partnership with other health and care organisations to make sure patients experience joined‑up care. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) bring together professionals from different specialisms to regularly review each patient's needs".NHS Herefordshire and Worcestershire Integrated Care Board (ICB) says it regularly reviews how care is delivered to "make sure it meets the needs of patients and is both safe and effective". It also says it has "clear systems in place to respond to any concerns, learn from incidents, and continuously improve care across the whole system".The ICB says it aims to "ensure everyone feels seen, heard, and supported – no matter their individual circumstances".The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) says "it is unacceptable that Mr Hull has not received the care he deserves" and that it is working to ensure everyone has access to high-quality care.The DHSC says its 10-year health plan will "shift healthcare out of hospitals into the community, to ensure patients and their families receive personalised care in the right place, at the right time". It also says it is investing an additional £100m into hospices and end-of-life care.Tim is now much frailer, and on very strong painkillers. He says in the time he has left he wants to be "as comfortable and supported as possible," adding that "there's a lot of fear of the unknown with the decisions I've made".If you are suffering distress or despair, details of help and support in the UK are available at BBC Action Line.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The story of NHS Fife's legal fees in Sandie Peggie tribunal
However, the case is complex and NHS Fife do not actually pay the full costs. The taxpayers most likely will. Shared legal team Crucially, NHS Fife is sharing a legal team with Dr Upton, the transgender medic at the forefront of the case. This may sound odd but it is actually standard in NHS legal cases. It is argued that the staff member may only have become exposed to any risk of liability after being sued while doing their job. However, NHS Fife must weigh up the risks in sharing a legal team, including whether there could be any "conflicts of interest". Ms Peggie is suing her employer and Dr Upton after she objected to the trans medic's use of the female changing room on Christmas Eve in 2023 at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy. She also made reference to the situation being similar to men being housed in the female prison estate. The nurse was placed on special leave in December 2023 and suspended in January 2024. She was cleared of all misconduct allegations on July 15 2025, including two patient safety complaints. NHS Fife legal team It is important to note that health boards in Scotland do not directly employ their own solicitors. Solicitors in the Central Legal Office (CLO) act exclusively for the NHS. However, the CLO then appointed Jane Russell KC, from the Essex Court of Chambers in London, to represent the case in court. Silks - or King's Counsel (KC) barristers - typically charge between £500 and £1,500 per hour. Given Ms Russell had been at Dundee Tribunal Hearing Centre over 10 days from July 16, with court sitting approximately between 10am and 4pm each day, the recent sessions could have cost the health board in the region of £30,000. However, NHS Fife is a member of the Clinical Negligence and Other Risks Indemnity Scheme (CNORIS). This is a pooling arrangement between Scottish health boards and means NHS Fife will only be required to meet the first £25,000 of the cost. The remaining bill is covered by the scheme, which is paid for through the Scottish Government's Health and Social Care Directorate that underwrites the scheme. Costs so far As of June 30, NHS Fife have accrued £258,831.31 in legal costs associated with the Sandie Peggie case. But the costs are undoubtably set to rise. Research by Murray Blackburn Mackenzie policy collective states: "The decisions which have driven the cost of this case rest formally with NHS Fife, but in practice the CLO also appears to be a relevant decision-maker of some sort, but to what extent and with what oversight from its own senior management, is very difficult to say. "Perhaps the only place it will ever be possible to unpick the full story of who decided what, when and how, will be in front of a parliamentary committee, with the questions asked direct of senior staff and board members for NHS Fife, National Services Scotland and the Scottish Government itself." In a statement published on July 18, NHS Fife said: "As of 30 June 2025, £258,831.31 in legal costs have been recorded as expenditure related to the legal services associated with this case. "NHS Fife is liable for the first £25,000 of costs associated with defending the case." Earlier this year, NHS Fife did not reveal the legal costs, stating that the health board "believed that it did not hold the figures requested as the legal fees were managed through the Central Legal Office (CLO) and National Services Scotland (NSS) who administered the CNORIS Indemnity scheme". Following criticism from the Scottish Information Commissioner, NHS Fife revealed the costs amounted to £220,465.93 up to May 2025.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Thanks to the Instagram algorithm I'm convinced I have ADHD
An anatomy drawing of a person doing a plank: 'How it feels like for ADHD people to listen to someone finish a sentence they understood within the first few seconds'. 'We all have the same 24 hours.' 'Well I have ADHD so I only have two.' Two Spider-Man figures pointing at each other: 'Not getting anything done because I'm too overwhelmed'. 'Being overwhelmed because I haven't gotten anything done.' Though I have never been diagnosed with ADHD (or autism, another strand of neurodivergent memes beloved by my Explore page), social media has convinced me that I have it. I've always thought of myself as an impulsive, overthinking space cadet who gets easily overwhelmed. I always viewed these as flaws in my personality, something I alone should remedy. But these internet jokes unexpectedly made me feel seen, part of a community of people with a shared experience. Something we could affectionately laugh about and accept. Nearly every peer I speak to is 'convinced' they have adult ADHD. Is it because of the deluge of online content? Or are we just becoming more aware of it? Are all of these #ADHD traits even related to ADHD? Or just part of the human condition? It becomes easy to laugh off the frenetic way I clean my house or how I just can't stop procrastinating when I really need to get something done. There is a chance that we are over-pathologising very normal behaviours. It is incredibly difficult to get diagnosed with ADHD in Scotland unless you have a bulging wallet. To be assessed through the NHS takes years (waiting time data is patchy at best). Waiting lists have become so demanding in some areas that they have ceased assessment services altogether. Earlier this year, Aberdeenshire HSCP and NHS Forth Valley both announced they were closing their Adult Autism Assessment teams (who were also responsible for ADHD Assessments). NHS Tayside stopped taking referrals for children unless they have a pre-existing mental health condition. To be diagnosed privately can cost anywhere from £600 to £1600, depending on the type of assessment and whether it includes follow-up appointments. At ADHD Scotland in Glasgow, a pre-assessment session is £120 and an ADHD assessment is £850. If you are diagnosed privately, you could end up having to foot the bill for your own Ritalin. Now, we must think of the children because they are the ones who are truly getting the short end of the stick here. Children languishing on a waiting list for diagnosis can cause untold distress for families. In childhood, a diagnosis means schools have a better understanding of the child's needs. It is also the first step towards possible medication to help with symptoms (another seemingly endless waiting list), as The Herald reported this week. An ADHD diagnosis can also help parents better understand what their child is experiencing. Failing the mental health of children in this country is awful. This is not to point the finger. Money is tight, resources are few and far between, and demand for mental health treatment is soaring. I draw a line between children and adults when it comes to the conversation about neurodevelopmental disorders. He has claimed that ADHD diagnosis "doesn't mean anything', referring to the circular logic that symptoms (impulsivity, absent-mindedness, hyperactivity) lead to diagnosis and then diagnosis explains the symptoms. 'It's not an explanation, it's a description,' he says. Perhaps you recognise him from diagnosing Prince Harry with ADHD in a 2023 live TV interview. Everyone is different. Me? I'm with Maté on this one. I don't need to be diagnosed with ADHD. I perhaps need to stop trying to do too much, putting so much pressure on myself to be perfect, and stop doomscrolling during every free moment that I have to avoid the terrifying prospect of being alone with my thoughts for five minutes. I would not want to take up a precious diagnosis waiting list spot simply because an algorithm made me laugh with an 'ADHD people doing anything other than they should be doing' meme. I think Maté is right about taking a holistic approach to better mind health: having self-compassion, developing a consistent routine, seeking connection with other people, and avoiding stress and overstimulation from your surroundings. I've noticed one recurring comorbidity with all the ADHD content that I am fed – farm content. As if the antidote to the stresses of city life and always-on culture that plagues us is to leave it all behind and #FarmLife. If so many adults are convinced that they have a neurological disorder these days, that says a lot more about our society than it does the individual. Aldous Huxley put it best when he wrote that the real victims of mental illness are the ones who appear to be normal: 'Their perfect adjustment to that abnormal society is a measure of their mental sickness.' Marissa MacWhirter is a columnist and feature writer at The Herald, and the editor of The Glasgow Wrap. The newsletter is curated between 5-7am each morning, bringing the best of local news to your inbox each morning without ads, clickbait, or hyperbole. Oh, and it's free. She can be found on X @marissaamayy1


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Will the junior doctors regret picking a fight with Wes?
The dispute between the British Medical Association (BMA) – a trade union for doctors – and the government continues, following the five-day strike by junior doctors. Doctors argue that pay is still far below relative levels from almost two decades ago, combined with the cost of study, the cost of living and housing crises, as well as challenging conditions within the NHS. Nevertheless, with an average pay rise of 5.4% for resident doctors this year, support for the strikes appears to be falling – both with the public at large, and within the BMA. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has hit back at the BMA and said they 'will not win a war with this government'. Tim Shipman and Lucy Dunn join Natasha Feroze to discuss whether the junior doctors are wise to pick a fight with Wes. First though they talk about the fallout from Keir Starmer's announcement of that the UK could recognise Palestinian statehood in September. Given the recognition is conditional, is Starmer's position the worst of both worlds? Produced by Patrick Gibbons and Natasha Feroze.