
In some Jewish families, speaking up for Palestine stirs discontent
He was there to pick up her stepsister, who had joined Sarig's family on vacation.
She was convinced it would be her last meeting with her father, as their political differences were about to come to a head.
'I said goodbye. I hugged him,' she told Al Jazeera. 'When I said goodbye, I said goodbye knowing that maybe I will not see him any more.'
Tensions with her Jewish family had been building for years. At 56, Sarig, a pro-Palestine activist, is at odds with most of her relatives.
Her parents adhere to Zionism, the nationalist political ideology that called for the creation of a Jewish state and is seen by Palestinians and their supporters as the system that underpins their suffering.
Sarig knew during that December meeting with her father that she intended to stage a pro-Palestine demonstration outside parliament in January that would be filmed by a local television station. The activist group she was a part of had put her forward for a broadcast interview. Appalled by Israel's genocide against Palestinians in Gaza and determined to speak up, she went ahead with it.
'The interview was broadcast and it immediately went to my family.'
She later heard that her father, who also lives in the Austrian capital, had told friends that 'to him, I died'.
'But he never talked about it with me, he never reached out to me to tell me something like this. [He] just cut the relation.'
Her 77-year-old mother, who lives in Germany, messaged her a week later.
'I still have it here in my phone, saying, you know, 'I will not accept your political activism. You're a traitor, you are dirtying the nest … and should you change your political views, we can return to normal. Stay healthy.''
She has not spoken with her parents since.
Family divides are not uncommon among Jewish families from the United States to Israel, but have become more entrenched since October 7, 2023.
On that day, Hamas, the group that governs the Gaza Strip, led an incursion into southern Israel during which 1,139 people were killed and more than 200 were taken captive. Since then, Israeli bombardments have killed more than 61,700 people in the enclave.
'I think one of the most interesting phenomena among the liberal Zionists is the fact, while the majority moved to the right because of October 7, a minority became even more disenchanted with Israel and Zionism,' the author and academic Ilan Pappe, a prominent critic of Zionism, told Al Jazeera.
Sarig's ancestors fled Austria in 1938, the year of annexation by Nazi Germany, for Serbia. They later settled in Palestine under the British Mandate in what is now present-day Israel. But by the 1950s, most of her relatives had returned to Austria, where she was born.
As a child, she celebrated Jewish holidays while learning about Zionism from elders.
She was also told that Palestinians 'are the enemies, they want to kill all the Jews … that the Jews living there [in Israel] wanted peace, but the Arabs did not'.
At 18, she moved to Israel, where, at her parents' encouragement, she joined a leftist Zionist youth movement.
Over 13 years in Israel, she joined a kibbutz, served in the Israeli army in an office role, and married. But it was as she studied politics and Middle East history at Haifa University that her worldview began to change.
That's where she met a Palestinian professor and later became an activist for Palestinian rights.
'It began on a lawn in an evening together with my Palestinian teacher, when he told me the story of his family that was displaced from a small village.
'I understood that what I have been told, the Zionist narrative, is wrong,' she said. 'I started to think how he might feel, how he's feeling, or how I might feel as a Palestinian living in a Jewish state where my ancestors were expelled.'
Back in Austria, her family would argue with her at gatherings, agree never to speak again on Palestine and Israeli politics, break their promises, and clash once again.
In 2015, she renounced her Israeli citizenship as a gesture against Zionism.
'It makes my activism easier,' Sarig said, on being disowned by some of her family. 'I lost my Jewish community because I was considered at best, strange and weird, and at worst, a traitor.'
But being cut off from one's family can take a toll on mental health, say experts.
According to Faissal Sharif, a neuroscientist and doctoral student at the University of Oxford, brain imaging studies have shown that 'the experience of social isolation triggers activity in areas that would otherwise light up in response to physical pain'.
'In other words, social pain is not metaphorical – it is biologically real,' he told Al Jazeera.
Families, he said, often form 'microcultures' with their own rules and positions on political issues.
'The betrayal felt when love and acceptance are made conditional upon silence or complicity in the genocide can be deeply wounding. In the context of Gaza, it adds an additional layer of trauma: not only is one bearing witness to mass suffering, but also paying a personal price for refusing to look away,' he said. 'This leads to long-lasting stress and anxiety, which can reach clinical levels.'
To preserve relationships, he said families need to lead with 'curiosity, not confrontation'.
'Especially when the topic is something as painful as war or genocide, facts alone won't move people – naming the emotions underneath, like fear, guilt, or grief, often opens more space for real dialogue.'
Having such conversations isn't easy.
Jonathan Ofir, a musician who was born in an Israeli kibbutz and emigrated to Denmark in the late 1990s, said that it was in 2009 that he realised he had 'actually been indoctrinated into a propaganda that omitted a whole Palestinian viewpoint'. He read Pappe's book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, describing that experience as a 'turning point' for him.
Around the same time, he read other Jewish and Palestinian writers who 'challenged the Zionist narrative'.
'[But] I didn't share this publicly and I didn't share it with my family either.'
In 2014, though, during Israel's war on Gaza – the third within seven years – he said he felt confident enough to express his critical views 'outwards and publicly'.
More than 2,000 Palestinians – including 551 children – were killed during the 50-day conflict.
He took to Facebook to post an image of Israelis gathered on a hilltop near Sderot watching on as Gaza burned, a photograph that was featured in The New York Times.
A relative soon wrote him an email that concluded by recommending that Ofir 'stop posting on the internet'.
'It became this heated debate, but it very, very quickly stopped.'
Years later, he learned that his family in Israel had decided to avoid talking about politics around him 'so as to not legitimise my political views', he said.
After the October 7 attack, he checked on his extended family who lived near the site of the assault. But the incursion did not alter his position.
'My outlook hasn't significantly changed. But something changed in the Israeli society. And in that sense, you could say we might be more distant politically.'
Netherlands-based Daniel Friedman, 44, was raised in South Africa by his father, Steven, an academic and vocal critic of Zionism, and his mother, who was part of a circle of anti-Apartheid activists.
While his father remains an anti-Zionist, Friedman said that he and his mother have increasingly been clashing over Israel's genocide in Gaza since late 2023.
'This is really the only issue nowadays' affecting the conversations and bonds within some Jewish communities, he said.
One of their earlier arguments regarded the debunked claims that Palestinian fighters raped women during the October 7 incursion. After several uneasy disputes, often battled out by ping-ponging various newspaper links to support their arguments on WhatsApp, they have agreed to stop talking about politics.
'I love her, but what I struggle with is that I've lost a lot of trust for her,' said Friedman.
During a previous Israeli war on Gaza, his mother had signed a petition calling for a ceasefire, a move which saw her rejected by some family members. 'I think that had quite a big effect,' he said. 'She kind of went to the right.'
He said that he understands that for some, taking a stand means risking losing the support of a close community. He, however, chose to 'cut a lot of people out of my life on purpose' after October 7, he said.
Back in Vienna, Sarig is busy organising a conference of Jewish anti-Zionists in June, featuring speakers such as Stephen Kapos, a UK-based Holocaust survivor, the American podcaster and commentator Katie Halper and Ronnie Barkan, a Jewish Israeli activist. Pappe too is expected to attend.
As the killings in Gaza continue, her focus, she said, is on the Palestinians trying to survive Israeli fire.
'I'm not the victim,' Sarig said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
21 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump orders nuclear submarines closer to Russia in escalating war of words
United States President Donald Trump has ordered two nuclear submarines to travel closer to Russia, in his latest tit-for-tat with Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev. On Friday, Trump posted on his platform Truth Social that the submarine movements came in response to the 'highly provocative statements' Medvedev, a former Russian president, made this week. A day earlier, Medvedev had warned that Trump should be mindful of 'how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be', a reference to Russia's Cold War-era nuclear weapons system. 'I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump wrote. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' In recent weeks, Trump has been enmeshed in an escalating war of words with Medvedev, who currently serves as the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council under current President Vladimir Putin. Medvedev and Putin have a close relationship: When Medvedev served as president from 2008 to 2012, Putin was his prime minister. Afterwards, when Putin returned to the presidency, Medvedev served as his prime minister from 2012 to 2020. But as Trump voices increasing frustration with Russia's ongoing invasion of Ukraine, he has increasingly singled out Medvedev, a noted war hawk, as a target for his anger. Both men have hinted at their countries' nuclear capabilities, and their public exchanges have grown increasingly tense. A war of words In a social media post earlier this week, Trump pivoted from a discussion of trade between India and Russia to an attack on Medvedev for his sabre-rattling remarks. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' Trump wrote. 'Russia and the USA do almost no business together. Let's keep it that way, and tell Medvedev, the failed former President of Russia, who thinks he's still President, to watch his words. He's entering very dangerous territory!' Medvedev, meanwhile, has appeared to relish how his words provoke the US president. 'If some words from the former president of Russia trigger such a nervous reaction from the high-and-mighty president of the United States, then Russia is doing everything right and will continue to proceed along its own path,' Medvedev responded in a post on Telegram. Medvedev then proceeded to reference the zombie apocalypse series The Walking Dead, in an apparent nod to the devastation Russia has the power to cause. 'And as for the 'dead economy' of India and Russia and 'entering dangerous territory' — well, let Trump remember his favourite films about the 'Walking Dead'.' This week is not the first time Trump and Medvedev have taken their beef online. In late June, the two men likewise sparred and flexed their nuclear arsenals. 'Did I hear Former President Medvedev, from Russia, casually throwing around the 'N word' (Nuclear!), and saying that he and other Countries would supply Nuclear Warheads to Iran?' Trump wrote on June 23. He then pointed to the recent US attack on Iran as an example of how the country might respond to other threats. 'If anyone thinks our 'hardware' was great over the weekend, far and away the strongest and best equipment we have, 20 years advanced over the pack, is our Nuclear Submarines,' Trump wrote. 'They are the most powerful and lethal weapons ever built.' He also took a jab at Medvedev's position under Putin, suggesting that Medvedev's threats were irresponsible. 'I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS',' Trump quipped. Frustrations over Ukraine war The high-stakes back-and-forth comes as Trump becomes increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress towards peace in Ukraine. Since February 2022, a slow-grinding war has unfolded in the country, as Ukraine attempts to repel a full-scale invasion from Russia. Trump entered his second term as president pledging to be a global 'peacemaker and unifier', and his administration has openly advocated for the Republican leader to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. But his efforts to resolve the dispute between Ukraine and Russia have stalled. Early in his second term, Trump himself faced criticism for appearing to undermine Ukraine's cause, accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of being a 'dictator' and appearing to offer Russia concessions, including annexed Ukrainian territory. By contrast, Trump initially took a warm approach to Putin, telling Zelenskyy in a fiery Oval Office meeting, 'Putin went through a hell of a lot with me.' But in recent months, that relationship appears to have cooled, with Trump threatening Russia with sanctions as the war grinds on. On July 28, he announced that Russia would have '10 or 12 days' to stop its offensive, or else the economic penalties would take effect. Then, on Thursday, as Russia shelled the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, Trump slammed its continued military action. 'Russia — I think it's disgusting what they're doing. I think it's disgusting,' he said. But Medvedev has previously described Trump's deadlines as 'theatrical' and said that 'Russia didn't care' about the threats. He also warned that Trump's aggressive foreign policy stance may backfire with his 'America First' base. 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia,' Medvedev wrote on the social media platform X earlier this week. 'He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.'


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Switzerland says ‘disappointed' by Trump tariffs, will try to negotiate
Switzerland says it will try to negotiate its way out of stiff United States tariffs, hours after US President Donald Trump's administration shocked the European country by announcing plans to impose a 39-percent tariff rate on Swiss goods. The Swiss government said on Friday that it was 'disappointed' and would decide how to proceed after Trump unveiled the 39-percent rate, more than double the 15 percent being applied for most European Union imports into the US. The new tariffs, which are set to go into effect on August 7, would prove painful for several key Swiss industries, including manufacturing and watchmaking. The Swiss government said in a statement on social media that it remains in contact with US authorities and 'still hopes to find a negotiated solution'. 'The Federal Council notes with great regret the intention of the US to unilaterally burden Swiss imports with considerable import duties despite the progress made in bilateral talks and Switzerland's very constructive position,' it added. The Trump administration unveiled a range of new tariffs on many US trading partners on Thursday, saying the move aimed to address a 'continued lack of reciprocity in our bilateral trade relationships'. Nearly 70 countries now face import duties that were due to come into force on Friday. But most will now begin on August 7, giving countries a few days to try to reach an agreement with Washington to stave off or reduce their respective tariff rate. 'Everyone had been focused on August 1 … and now there is a new deadline,' Al Jazeera's Kimberly Halkett reported from the White House on Friday morning. 'The reason is so that there can be a little bit more time and breathing space to get some more deals done. There were a few that were very close but didn't quite make the deadline, and so the White House [said] this will allow … for these final agreements to be worked out.' Trump negotiated trade frameworks over the past few weeks with the EU, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and the Philippines — allowing the US president to claim victories as other nations sought to limit his threat of charging even higher tariff rates. He said on Thursday there were agreements with other countries, but he declined to name them. Asked on Friday if countries were happy with the rates set by Trump, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said, 'A lot of them are.' The new tariffs also include a 35-percent duty on many goods from Canada, 50 percent for Brazil, and 20 percent for Taiwan. Taiwan said its rate was 'temporary' and it expected to reach a lower figure. The Trump administration said it decided to impose 39-percent tariffs on Switzerland because of what it called the European country's refusal to make 'meaningful concessions' by dropping trade barriers. 'Switzerland, being one of the wealthiest, highest-income countries on Earth, cannot expect the United States to tolerate a one-sided trade relationship,' a White House official said on Friday. Swissmem, a group representing the mechanical and electrical engineering industries, said it was 'really stunned' by the US move. 'It's a massive shock for the export industry and for the whole country,' said Deputy Director Jean-Philippe Kohl. 'The tariffs are not based on any rational basis and are totally arbitrary … This tariff will hit Swiss industry very hard, especially as our competitors in the European Union, Britain and Japan have much lower tariffs.' Stock market tumbles But Trump's new tariffs have created yet more uncertainty, with many details unclear. Global stock markets stumbled on Friday, with Europe's STOXX 600 down 1.8 percent on the day and 2.5 percent on the week, on track for its biggest weekly drop since Trump announced his first major wave of tariffs on April 2. Wall Street also opened sharply lower on Friday. Reporting from the New York Stock Exchange, Al Jazeera's Kristen Saloomey explained that US markets were 'definitely down' following the tariffs announcement, but the drop was not as bad as what was seen after the first round of tariffs in April. 'When the first round of tariffs were enacted, the market did drop substantially, but then clawed back a lot of the losses about a month later as deals were worked out. A lot of economists are saying that this time around, the market has priced in tariffs,' Saloomey said. Still, she said, 'the concern is still that the underlying fundamentals of the economy are under strain and the full weight of the tariffs' has yet to be seen.


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Top EU court strikes a blow against Italy's Albania migrant camps scheme
The European Union's top court has backed Italian judges who questioned a list of 'safe countries' drawn up by Rome, as it prepares to deport migrants to detention centres in Albania. The hard-right government of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni denounced the European Court of Justice's (ECJ) ruling and said it 'weakens policies to combat mass illegal immigration'. Meloni's plan to outsource migrant processing to a non-EU country and speed up repatriations of failed asylum seekers has been followed closely by others in the bloc. The costly scheme has been frozen for months by legal challenges. Italian magistrates have cited the European court's decision that EU states cannot designate an entire country as 'safe' when certain regions are not. On Friday, in a long-awaited judgement, the Luxembourg-based ECJ said Italy is free to decide which countries are 'safe', but warned that such a designation should meet strict legal standards and allow applicants and courts to access and challenge the supporting evidence. In its statement, the ECJ said a Rome court had turned to EU judges, citing the impossibility of accessing such information and thus preventing it from 'challenging and reviewing the lawfulness of such a presumption of safety'. The ECJ also said a country might not be classified 'safe' if it does not offer adequate protection to its entire population, agreeing with Italian judges that had raised this issue last year. Meloni and her Albanian counterpart, Edi Rama, had signed a migration deal in November 2023, and last year, Rome opened two centres in Albania, where it planned to process up to 36,000 asylum seekers per year. The detention facilities have, however, been empty for months, due to the judicial obstacles. Last week, a report found that their construction cost was seven times more than that of an equivalent centre in Italy. Government's approach 'dismantled'? The European court made its judgement considering a case of two Bangladeshi nationals who were rescued at sea by Italian authorities and taken to Albania, where their asylum claims were rejected based on Italy's classification of Bangladesh as a 'safe' country. Dario Belluccio, a lawyer who represented one of the Bangladeshi asylum seekers at the ECJ on Friday, said the Albanian migrant camps scheme had been killed off. 'It will not be possible to continue with what the Italian government had envisioned before this decision … Technically, it seems to me that the government's approach has been completely dismantled,' he told the Reuters news agency. Meloni's office complained that the EU judgement allows national judges to dictate policy on migration, 'further reduc(ing) the already limited' capacity of parliament and government to take decisions on the matter. 'This is a development that should concern everybody,' it said. Meanwhile, though the Albanian scheme is stuck in legal limbo, Italy's overall effort to curb undocumented migration by sea has been successful. There have been 36,557 such migrant arrivals in the year to date, slightly up from the same period of 2024, but far below the 89,165 recorded over the same time span in 2023.