logo
The complex history of Australian rum—and the best places to find it

The complex history of Australian rum—and the best places to find it

During the 18th century, England sought out remote locations to house prisoners as a solution to its overcrowded jails. In 1788, England's First Fleet arrived in the Eora nation—now known as Sydney, Australia—with 11 ships of convicts and officers. For this long voyage, they packed two years' worth of food and four years' worth of rum.
The nation was founded without any formal currency except a limited supply of coins, because it was meant to be a convict colony. However, it soon became clear they would need more structure, so they put their bountiful supply of rum to practical use.
Rum became intertwined with the history of Australia. It was the original currency, the spirit of rebellion, and a powerful political tool.
(Take a mangrove foraging tour with Broome's Aboriginal custodians.) This postcard is part of a series titled 'The Growth of our Empire beyond the Seas,' of the British Empire extending its colonial ambitions across the globe. British soldiers are seen inspecting convict settlers in 1788. Photograph By Look and Learn / Elgar Collection / Bridgeman Images The role of rum in colonial Australia
'Rum was a currency because everyone was addicted to it,' says Matt Murphy, author of the book Rum: A Distilled History of Colonial Australia. This meant that whoever controlled the supply of rum also controlled the colony.
After the British landed in Australia, the New South Wales Corps had a monopoly on rum production, which earned them the nickname, the 'Rum Corps.' When Governor Bligh arrived in Australia with a strong will, the order to control the alcohol supply, and other conflicting political views, he was eventually deposed by the Rum Corps in what later became known as the "Rum Rebellion."
This was the first and only military coup in the country's history. According to Murphy, the Rum Rebellion was 'the defining moment between Australia being just a convict colony and becoming a place of commercial interest.'
Rum became a part of daily life and was used to pay for major land purchases. In the early 1800s, the government had no funds to build a hospital, so it contracted the construction to three entrepreneurs in return for a short-term monopoly on the distribution of 60,000 gallons of rum. This site became known as the 'Rum Hospital,' and it eventually became the New South Wales Parliament House.
In the 1840s, an economic depression hit Australia, and people could no longer afford rum, decreasing consumption substantially. By the late 1850s, Australia's gold rush and an influx of male migrants made alcohol more appealing.
However, it was around this time that a technological development made beer cheaper and easier to produce than other spirits. Beer gradually became the drink of choice, and the country replaced its beloved rum.
( See Australia's wild beauty—and dark history—on its newest Great Walk .) The Sydney Mint was built between 1811 and 1816 as the southern wing of the Sydney Hospital, also known as the Rum Hospital for convicts. It is the oldest surviving public building in the city's central business district. Photograph By Maurizio De Mattei, Shutterstock A propaganda sketch portrays Governor William Bligh as a coward after his arrest in 1808. Bligh served as the Governor of New South Wales in Australia from 1806 to 1808. He's known for being the captain of the HMS Bounty during the Mutiny on the Bounty, and for his controversial time as governor, which ended with the Rum Rebellion, and armed takeover by the New South Wales Corps. Illustration By William Minchin, Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales / Bridgeman Images The impact of rum on First Nations Australians
Throughout Australian history, rum and other alcohol were also used to extort, control, and oppress First Nations groups. The First Nations people, also known as the Aboriginal Australians and Torres Strait Islander people, are made up of hundreds of groups and have lived on this land for thousands of years.
Before the First Fleet landed, the local Gadigal people had rarely, if ever, encountered alcohol. In 'Rum, Seduction and Death: 'Aboriginality' and Alcohol,' First Nations anthropologist Marcia Langton details the ways that colonial Australians introduced rum, enabled the Aboriginal people until they were addicted, and then provided them with no means to legally obtain it.
Langton writes that, 'From the first settlement and throughout the frontier period, alcohol was used to engage Aboriginal people in discourse, attract Aboriginal people into settlements, in barter for sexual favors from Aboriginal women, as payment for Aboriginal labor and to incite Aboriginal people to fight as street entertainment.'
Overuse of alcohol leaves people vulnerable to manipulation and abuse, and rum has been continuously and effectively used to maintain the political narrative of the 'drunk Aboriginal.' These racist stereotypes continue to impact modern-day Australia.
Langton says, '[The 'drunk Aboriginal stereotype'] remains the background and popular explanation for the extraordinary arrest rates of Aboriginal people, for the continuing removal of Aboriginal children and the continuing exclusion of Aboriginal people from employment.'
(In Australia, Aboriginal rangers race to save the last sawfish.) Just north of Byron Bay, Husk Farm Distillers is known as one of the best craft rum brands in Australia. Photograph Courtesy Husk Distillers Craft rum distilleries represent modern Australia
Today's craft rum distillers are working diligently and thoughtfully to properly acknowledge and honor First Nations groups in their production processes and storytelling.
According to Mindy Woods, a proud Bundjalung woman best known for championing First Nations cooking on MasterChef Australia, 'When we are sourcing food from Country, that's a direct connection to Country and culture–particularly when it comes to native foods. A lot of the time, First Nations people aren't included in that narrative.'
Birds of Isle co-founders Chanel Melani and Sally Carter appointed Woods as their First Nations advisor for product development. This ensured that they were informed of the cultural significance of native Australian botanicals before using them in their rums. In early discussions, Woods encouraged them to source their products in a way that was aligned with First Nations groups, including opting for hyperlocal seasonal products, working with First Nations suppliers, and only taking what they needed.
When they created their Bunya Nut Rum, Woods showed them how to use the shells in addition to the nuts, allowing them to use both parts of the plant without wasting valuable resources. To respect and care for the native land, they have also made their labels out of sugarcane waste pulp rather than paper.
Native plants play an important role in many craft rum companies. 'We wanted to use local and native ingredients in our spiced rum to represent Australia,' shares Brix Distillers co-founder James Christopher. They get many of their native ingredients from an Indigenous-led company that forages herbs in South Australia.
'Embracing our ingredients comes with a responsibility for them to be educated, for them to respect those ingredients, and for them to give back to First Nations communities where they originate from,' says Woods.
Craft distillers like Brix and Birds of Isle also use locally grown sugar cane and barrels from nearby wine regions. That allows these rums to be Australian through and through–made up of barrels aged by Australian winemakers, sugarcane grown along the East Coast, and native ingredients that have been cultivated by First Nations groups for thousands of years.
Rum remains more than just a drink to today's distillers. It's a source of pride, a celebration of local flavors, and an homage to the country's history. The Australian rum industry is banding together to tell a story that is hundreds of years in the making, and that's something worth drinking to. The Harwood Sugar Mill sits amongst sugar cane fields on the banks of the Clarence River in Harwood, New South Wales, Australia. The mill has been crushing sugar cane since 1874. Photograph By Harley Kingston / Alamy Best places to try Australian rum
To drink a bit of Australian history, travelers will have to plan a trip Down Under because very few distilleries export their products out of the country. Craft rum brands like Birds of Isle can be found in most pubs and liquor stores around Australia. You can also visit tasting rooms and distilleries like Brix in Surry Hills, Sydney, and Husk Farm just north of Byron Bay.
(8 unique experiences in Australia, from sailing in the Whitsundays to aurora hunting.) Acacia Gabriel is a freelance journalist who covers responsible ecotourism, cultural experiences, and the intersection of outdoor adventure and luxury. Follow along on her website and Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wells Fargo Raises Arm Holdings (ARM) Price Target on AI Growth Momentum
Wells Fargo Raises Arm Holdings (ARM) Price Target on AI Growth Momentum

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Wells Fargo Raises Arm Holdings (ARM) Price Target on AI Growth Momentum

Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) ranks among the . On July 21, Wells Fargo maintained its Overweight rating on Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) and increased its price target from $145 to $175. With recent statistics indicating Arm-based server CPU shipments rose 104% year-over-year in the first calendar quarter of 2025, the firm attributed ongoing momentum in artificial intelligence data centers as a major factor in Arm's anticipated growth in royalty revenue in fiscal 2026. Despite not releasing an official fiscal 2026 forecast owing to tariff uncertainties, Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) had previously predicted that royalty revenue would increase by a percentage range of the high teens to low twenties year-over-year. Wells Fargo anticipates that Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) will continue to maintain an above-target annual contract value and licensing revenue growth at 20% year-over-year, owing to the growing demand for licenses related to AI computing requirements. Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) is British software design and semiconductor company. The company provides microprocessors, graphics processing units, systems intellectual property (IPs), and other associated services. While we acknowledge the potential of ARM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None.

UK top court to rule on multi-billion pound car loan scandal
UK top court to rule on multi-billion pound car loan scandal

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

UK top court to rule on multi-billion pound car loan scandal

Britain's highest court will Friday determine whether controversial car loans were unlawful, which could pave the way for millions of motorists to claim billions of pounds in compensation from banks. The loans, made available for 14 years from 2007, incentivised car dealers to offer higher interest rates in return for a bigger commission from banks. The Supreme Court will determine whether to uphold a judgment by the Court of Appeal last year that ruled it was unlawful for car dealers to receive a commission on loans without sufficiently informing borrowers. It is estimated that millions of drivers would be eligible for compensation should the Supreme Court side with borrowers, following its three-day hearing in April. One case involves Marcus Johnson -- who in 2017 bought a Suzuki Swift from a car dealer in Cardiff for £6,500 ($8,560 today) including loan costs -- unaware that interest paid on the loan amount would fund commission of more than £1,600. When the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Johnson, ordering South African lender FirstRand Bank to refund the commission plus interest, it sparked panic across the finance sector. British banks have set aside considerable sums in preparation for the ruling, including Lloyds, which has earmarked nearly £1.2 billion. The total estimated cost for banks varies, but HSBC bank analysts suggested before the trial that it could come to £44 billion. Since then, analysts have revised down the potential exposure of banks, British media reports suggesting a figure of around £11 billion. In the three cases being judged by the Supreme Court, consumers are also facing off against British bank Close Brothers. The Financial Conduct Authority, which banned undisclosed commissions in 2021, could mandate a collective automatic compensation programme should the court sides with borrowers. Analysts said that Britain's Labour government may be concerned about the impact on banks' willingness to provide credit amid economic uncertainty caused by US tariffs and geopolitical unrest. Finance minister Rachel Reeves is reportedly considering changes to the law to limit the banks' exposure. ode-ajb/bcp/jj Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

What you need to know about the car finance scandal
What you need to know about the car finance scandal

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What you need to know about the car finance scandal

A scandal over how consumers have been sold car loans has unfolded in recent months. A crucial Supreme Court ruling issued on Friday, however, overturned a court of appeal finding that hidden commissions paid to car dealers by lenders were unlawful. The ruling means that lenders have potentially avoided paying compensation to millions of drivers, although they will likely still have to pay some customers. Analysts previously said the scandal could cost lenders from £30bn to £44bn. The UK's chancellor Rachel Reeves had attempted to intervene in the Supreme Court case on the matter, though judges rejected this application. When issuing its full-year results in February, Lloyds Banking Group (LLOY.L) said it had put a further £700m aside for potential motor finance commission remediation costs. Read more: The 'cheapest' stocks on FTSE 100 as UK blue-chip index trades at record high The saga has weighed heavily on the stocks of the most exposed players, which includes Lloyds and fellow British lender Close Brothers (CBG.L). Earlier this month, Lloyds unveiled a higher-than-expected profit for the first half of 2025, as it benefited from a jump in lending and savings balances. Now that the Supreme Court has given its verdict, it's unclear how much lenders are still on the hook for in terms of compensation. Here's more detail on what you need to know about the scandal. How did it come about? The City watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), started looking into commissions in the motor finance industry in 2017. The FCA then launched a consultation on the use of discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) in 2019. DCAs were a type of commission model received by some car retailers and motor finance brokers, which was linked to the interest rate that customers pay. This meant that the broker could effectively set the interest rate and the FCA said this created an incentive to sell more expensive credit to some customers, acting against their interests. As a result, the FCA banned DCAs in 2021, a move which it said would save customers £165m a year. In January 2024, the FCA then launched a review of historical motor finance DCAs, to understand if there was any misconduct related to this type of commission before the 2021 ban. In addition, the review has also sought to understand if consumers have lost out and if so, what the best way would be to ensure they receive appropriate compensation. However, a Court of Appeal ruling in October broadened the scope of the issue to any car finance commissions. The court found it illegal for dealerships to receive commissions on car finance deals without securing 'fully informed consent' from buyers. It is feared that the landmark ruling has paved the way for a multi-billion-pound redress scheme. Read more: Europe's most expensive city revealed, as living costs near £3,500 per month Following the ruling, the FCA said in December that it was extending the time firms have to respond to complaints not involving DCAs, with a new deadline of 4 December 2025. The FCA's general counsel Stephen Braviner-Roman told MPs in a Treasury committee hearing in December that the regulator had previously said that "looking at DCAs alone we do not think it is at the scale of PPI." "That was when we were looking at DCAs alone, so it would be premature to say it is definitely not at the scale of PPI now," he said. In December, the Supreme Court granted Close Brothers (CBG.L) and South African financial services firm FirstRand ( permission to appeal the October ruling. The Financial Times reported in January that the Treasury had submitted an application to intervene in the case, saying in a letter that it had the "potential to cause considerable economic harm and could impact the availability and cost of motor finance for consumers." However, the Supreme Court said it had refused the Treasury's application to intervene. The appeals of cases involving Close Brothers (CBG.L) and FirstRand ( are listing for hearings on 1-3 April. The FCA plans to set out the next steps in its review into DCAs in May, as well as potentially providing an update on non-DCA complaints, but had already warned lenders to keep some money aside to potentially resolve complaints. Lenders set aside costs Providers that could be impacted by the launch of compensation scheme have already started to set funds aside. Close Brothers has said it was setting aside up to £165m in the first half of its financial year in relation to potential motor commissions costs. "There remains significant uncertainty as to the range of outcomes from the motor commissions appeals and the FCA's ongoing review of motor commissions and, therefore, the ultimate cost to the group could be materially higher or lower than the estimated provision," Close Brothers said. Read more: Did the Genius Act just kill the UK's crypto dreams? Defence companies post strong results as UK investors back the sector over AI The most affordable market towns for first-time buyersError in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store