Meeting India's EV needs: Prioritising practical range, price parity, and locally relevant features
This change is being driven by a shifting landscape, represented by technological progress, improved infrastructure, and an informed consumer base. Today, more buyers are now open to alternatives to traditional vehicles, as long as they meet key needs. As this trend continues, it's important to focus on what Indian consumers really care about: price, practical range, how well the EV fits into their daily lives with its features, and compatibility with charging infrastructure.
Prioritising range for practical performance
Not long ago, range anxiety was the biggest hurdle for anyone thinking about switching to an EV. But things have changed—dramatically. Today, the focus has shifted from lab-tested figures to what really matters: how far your EV takes you in the real world. Modern electric vehicles are designed with Indian roads, traffic, weather, and travel patterns in mind. Whether it's a quick city errand or a regular drive between towns, today's EVs are built to go the distance—reliably and consistently.
Meanwhile, charging infrastructure is growing fast. From metro cities to highways, charging stations are popping up everywhere—thanks to efforts from both the public and private sectors. Fast-charging hubs are making it easy to top up multiple vehicles at once, and smart apps now let you check charger availability in real-time, so planning your journey feels effortless.
Technology is also doing its bit behind the scenes. From more efficient motors to better battery cooling and regenerative braking, every innovation is helping you squeeze more kilometres out of every charge.
The result? A driving experience that's not just electric—but easy, practical, and confidently future-ready.
The new reality for EV buyers
When India's EV revolution began, affordability was the key factor in the consumers' purchase decision. As more manufacturers enter the market with EVs that have a higher value proposition, the key qualifier in the purchase decision has moved from affordability to value. Furthermore, with benefits from high level localisation, combined with helpful, robust government subsidies, EVs today have successfully crossed the frontier of price parity with ICE-powered vehicles, while also surpassing them in performance, capability, technology, and safety.
Built for Bharat: Prioritizing features that fit Indian lifestyles
India's diverse terrain, culture, and road conditions demand EVs designed specifically for local conditions. Indian consumers need to go beyond performance or price. Capabilities that in an urban setting would be deemed minimum, like strong air conditioning, compatibility with smartphone apps, voice operation in local languages, and ground clearance to deal with bad roads, play a significant role in broader adoption. Friendly and tactile infotainment systems and in-built connectivity are no longer optional but essential.
Aligning with consumer needs, manufacturers are responding with meaningful upgrades, offering a lifetime warranty on the HV battery pack, coupled with tangible updates like ADAS level 2, immersive music systems, and even connected-car technologies that allow for convenient in-car payments. What's most encouraging is that EVs are no longer just green symbols of sustainability. They are becoming practical, durable, and tailored products – made for India, and ready for Bharat.
The market for EVs in India is expanding in the right way. The combination of improved affordability brought about by policy and technology, a practical driving range that fits with daily routines, and a concentrated focus on location-specific features is making EVs a viable choice for millions of people. Charging infrastructure is steadily improving, the technology behind EVs is getting smarter and more dependable, and the vehicles themselves are evolving – not just as substitutes to ICE, but as better, smarter, and more future-ready mobility solutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
26 minutes ago
- The Star
PAS still not aligned with non-Muslims
Big challenge: PAS' ideological stance has made it difficult for it to win the trust of Chinese and Indian voters. —The Star
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sell only Swadeshi goods, PM Modi exhorts Indian traders amid ‘global economic uncertainty'
Asserting that India is on the path to becoming the world's third-largest economy, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Saturday that the country must remain alert to its own economic priorities amid the instability and uncertainty facing the world economy. PM Modi's remarks came just days after U.S. President Donald Trump called India a "dead economy" after announcing a 25% tariff on the import of Indian goods along with an unspecified "penalty" for buying Russian military equipment and crude oil. Addressing a public meeting in his parliamentary constituency Varanasi on Saturday (August 2, 2025), Mr. Modi said, "As we talk about economic progress, I want to draw your attention to the current global scenario. "The world economy is facing instability and uncertainty. In such times, countries are focusing solely on their own interests. India, too, is on the path to becoming the world's third-largest economy and must remain alert to its own economic priorities." The prime minister also made a renewed push for 'Swadeshi', stressing that every party, leader and citizen must work to promote indigenous goods if "we want India to become the third-largest economy". 'Sell only Swadeshi goods' Making a special appeal to traders and shopkeepers, the prime minister said, "At a time when the world is going through uncertainty, let us take a pledge to sell only Swadeshi goods from our shops and markets. Promoting made in India goods will be the truest service to the country." He also urged people to be conscious consumers, saying, "Whatever we buy, we should ask ourselves — has an Indian toiled to make this? If it has been made by the sweat of our people, with their skills, that product is Swadeshi for us. We must adopt the mantra of 'Vocal for Local'." "The feeling of Swadeshi in every action will define our future. This will also be a true tribute to Mahatma Gandhi. Only through collective effort can we fulfil the dream of a developed India," Mr. Modi said. The prime minister, who was addressing a massive public gathering on Saturday in Banauli village, highlighted the government's farmer-centric policies in detail. He said the government is constantly working for the well-being of farmers. Calling for a national movement to support local products, the prime minister said, "This is not just about Modi saying it, every Indian should say this — if we want India to become the third-largest economy, every political party and every leader, keeping aside their hesitations, must work in the nation's interest and awaken the spirit of Swadeshi among the people." Demands made by U.S. The U.S. tariff action is being seen as a pressure tactic to get New Delhi to agree to demands made by the U.S., which has, in recent days, got favourable trade deals with major partners like Japan, the UK and the European Union. India has especially toughened its stance on extending duty concessions on agri products, dairy and GM foods in the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the U.S. With the U.S. not able to finalise a deal with India so far, Mr. Trump on Thursday announced the imposition of an additional 25% import duty on Indian goods entering American markets from August 7. Earlier, this duty was to be imposed from August 1. The President has also not specified the penalty that he announced against India for buying crude oil and military equipment from Russia. 'Fastest growing major economy' In the backdrop of Mr. Trump's "dead economy" barb at India, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal had told Parliament on Thursday that India is the world's fastest-growing major economy and widely expected to be the "third largest economy" in a few years. Mr. Goyal also said India will take all necessary steps to safeguard and promote national interest and that the implications of the US tariffs are being examined. In a post on Truth Social, Mr. Trump had said, "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. "We have done very little business with India, their Tariffs are too high, among the highest in the World." His remarks were echoed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi who said President Trump has stated a "fact", prompting a strong condemnation from the BJP. While announcing the tariff, Trump described India's trade policies as "most strenuous and obnoxious".
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Where does disciplining end and abuse begin?
In more conservative cultures, corporal punishment is more likely to be heralded as a parenting technique honed and perfected through the passage of time, with each generation passing it down as if it were a family heirloom. 'This is how we were raised, and we turned out completely fine,' continues to be a classic fallback, words that seem perfectly routine to Indian adults and children alike. Some independent surveys conducted in India reflect a pervasiveness of corporal punishment; one nationwide study finds that nearly 77.5% of parents resort to hitting their children to discipline them. The persistence of this parenting practice calls for a re-evaluation of the undisputed cultural legitimacy of physical punishment in India. Corporal punishment has long evaded its classification as abuse because the focus has long been on intent rather than impact. Moreover, the bridge between physical discipline and abuse is often culturally constructed, with some societies more accepting of it than others. But when the paradigm shifts to a focus on impact, the distinction between the two quickly starts to fade. A large body of research, and especially across different country contexts, has established a strong link between corporal punishment and increased behavioural and emotional problems in children — issues that often persist into adulthood as depression and low self-esteem, blurring the line between what is considered discipline and what is, in effect, harm. These effects were further confirmed when researchers observed the brains of affected children: a landmark 2021 study showed that children who were spanked can have unusual brain responses in the same areas affected by more severe types of abuse. At the cost of these detrimental impacts, physical disciplining doesn't even achieve what it sets out to achieve. While it may achieve short term obedience, there are no persistent positive outcomes observed in the longer term. Nevertheless, proponents of moderate and 'reasonable' corporal punishment may still find comfort in the vague causality of various studies. The empirical link between corporal punishment and child outcomes can be difficult to unpack and communicate, as child outcomes — both short- and long-term — can be complex and induced by various social phenomena. But this misses the larger point: even with sheer majority of studies striving for methodological rigour and establishing a highly likely link between corporal punishment and negative child outcomes, is it still defensible to lean on uncertainty as justification? Moreover, the consistent failure of corporal punishment further reinforces the question: are we truly willing to gamble with children's well-being for a practice that is, at best, ineffective? The effects of corporal punishment is also not confined to the child who experiences it but can set off a continuous cycle of inter-generational trauma. Further research shows that adults who were subjected to physical punishment in childhood are more likely to use the same methods when parenting. Crucially, this also the blurs the line between the cultural norms and the transmission of trauma: is corporal punishment truly a widespread and passed-down parenting tradition, or is it trauma masquerading as culture? Given the impact of corporal punishment, it may be tempting to resort to vilification of the parents who turn to such disciplining methods. But such vilification is not only counter-productive but refuses to address the sheer influence of the social and psychological circumstances — be it culture or trauma — that shape an individual's parenting habits. Economic hardship adds yet another layer of complexity. Amidst infinite economic and social burdens, a disciplinary method that appears to offer quick results without immediate visible harm can seem like a practical, and even necessary, choice. Against these challenges, a flat ban on all forms of corporal punishment — especially within households where it often persists despite existing school bans — may seem like the panacea. With evidence pointing towards the efficacy of bans in other developed and developing countries, this is certainly a critical first step, but far from a sufficient one. The rule of law can only go so far in a country where social norms, beliefs, and informal institutions have the final say, especially within the confines of individual households. Change must occur from within, as much as it needs to be urged externally. Legal reform without a transformation in cultural attitudes and beliefs risks leaving corporal punishment lurking beneath the surface. After all, the inefficacy of coercion in bringing about lasting behavioural change is echoed within the practice of corporal punishment itself. A lasting solution will require a combination of legal reform, public education, and behavioural nudges that work together to shift social norms and equip caregivers with non-violent tools for discipline. Changing rigid cultural patterns associated with corporal punishment is no doubt going to be a difficult task, requiring a range of psychological, social, and institutional interventions. But we can first start by acknowledging that a problem exists in the first place. In the case of corporal punishment, the lasting harm it inflicts far outweighs — and ultimately transcends — cultural preferences. Perhaps the real question is not where the line lies between corporal punishment and abuse, but whether such a line exists at all. getmanickamnow@
