'A kick in the guts': Minister has final say on housing density rules for Christchurch
The Government has issued its final decisions on a number of matters referred to it as part of the planning process for greater housing density in Christchurch.
Minister for RMA Reform Chris Bishop has given Christchurch City Council his decisions on 20 alternative recommendations put forward by the council for its Housing and Business Choice Plan Change (Plan Change 14).
Of those 20 alternative recommendations, Bishop has accepted three and deferred three, meaning the remaining 14 decisions default to the original recommendations made last year by the plan change's Independent Hearings Panel.
The decisions take immediate effect. For example, the high-density zoning for Hornby, Riccarton and Linwood will now come in line with the IHP's recommendations.
The minister also rejected the council's biggest recommendation, which sought to apply a special city-wide restriction to high-density developments, to provide greater sunlight access than is currently allowed for in Christchurch under the national Medium-Density Residential Standards (MDRS).
This was a key concern of the council given its concerns over the shading effects of development on neighbours.
Mayor Phil Mauger says the minister's response is incredibly disappointing for our city.
'In putting these decisions forward to the Government, we obviously wanted to get all of our alternative recommendations approved. So, to only have three of them get the tick is a kick in the guts.
'This plan change has been a huge undertaking for our city, and we've said right the way through that we want to get the best outcome we possibly can. This doesn't feel like the best outcome.
'To that end, we'll keep working hard as a council, and there are still major decisions yet to be made when it comes to housing density and planning across much of Christchurch, so watch this space.'
To date, the council has only made decisions on Plan Change 14 that relate to policies 3 and 4 of the Government's National Policy Statement on Urban Development, which require greater building development within and around the central city, suburban commercial centres, and planned high-frequency and high-capacity public transport routes.
Decisions have also been made on financial contributions for tree canopy cover and select other zonings.
That means the council is yet to decide what housing intensification will look like for the rest of the city, which needs to be completed by the Government's deadline of December 12 this year, along with the balance of Plan Change 14's decisions.
The Government has also proposed a Bill to modify the Resource Management Act to allow councils to withdraw undecided parts of Intensification Planning Instruments, such as Plan Change 14.
That Bill is expected to become law in August and may allow the Council to limit the extent of where MDRS – which allows up to three dwellings of up to three storeys to be developed without resource consent – applies across the city.
The council is waiting on further information from the Government's Select Committee on the Bill, which is expected to come later this month.
Read the minister's letter here Plan Change 14 alternative recommendations
Accepted:
An increased building height overlay (to 36m) for the former Stockyards salesyards at 25 Deans Avenue
Aligning the High Density Residential zoning for 231 Milton Street and 12 Johnson Street to parcel boundaries
Local Centre Intensification Precinct around 8 of the commercial centres across the city e.g. Barrington, Prestons, Wigram.
Rejected:
Limiting High Density residential zoning around Riccarton, Hornby and Linwood, including any modification of associated height controls
Restricting the commercial Town Centre Zone building height and any other modification of standards for Hornby and Linwood
Not applying Medium Density Residential zone around the Peer Street Local Centre
Changing the zoning for 20 Deans Avenue from Residential Medium Density to Mixed Use zone
Greater consideration of Papanui War Memorial Avenues
Applying the City Spine qualifying matter
Sunlight access qualifying matter
Riccarton Bush Interface Area qualifying matter
Decreasing the threshold of consent within the Airport Noise Influence Area and removal of the a clause requiring notification clause to Christchurch International Airport.
Deferred:
Removal of the heritage listing and setting for Antonio Hall (265 Riccarton Road) and Daresbury House
Removal of Piko Residential Character Area qualifying matter
The Minister will make decisions on the council's remaining three alternative recommendations – related to Daresbury House, Antonio Hall, and the Piko Residential Character Area – after the balance of Plan Change 14 has been decided by the council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Pōmare Power Fuels Stinging Health Blast
A century after he was Minister of Health Sir Māui Pōmare remained politically potent at Waitara's Ōwae marae on the weekend, inspiring outright rejection of Government policy on Māori health. Standing for the Crown, New Plymouth MP David MacLeod bore the stinging criticism with obvious discomfort – like Pōmare he is a son of Ngāti Mutunga iwi. Te Rā o Tā Māui Pōmare (Sir Māui Pōmare Day) each year celebrates the first Māori medical doctor and health minister, with kōrero about uplifting Māori health. On Saturday Pōmare's great-granddaughter Miria gave the whānau address, condemning health policy changes for Māori. 'Hard-fought, hard-won gains for Māori health over the last 125 years have now been seriously undermined by the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority – a move that has been severely criticized for discouraging Māori initiatives and disregarding the principle of tino rangatiratanga: self-determination.' Her tupuna embraced scientific medical advances, but Miria Pōmare said he also pushed for a systematic Māori health focus. Reforms were underpinned by Maori leadership, culturally-appropriate interventions, and commitment to self-determination: principles derived from Te Tiriti o Waitangi, she said. 'He knew the issues were not medical alone – they were political and economic and spiritual.' As New Zealand's first statistics minister Tā Māui knew accurate data was crucial to win resources for Māori health equity. Two weeks ago the Government canned the regular census and will instead collate data already gathered by state agencies. 'It appears to be a sinister reversion back to an assimilationist approach of former times,' said Miria Pōmare. Her address drew vocal assent and applause. In Te Ikaroa a Māui – the wharenui built and named to honour Tā Māui – Te Ātiawa and Taranaki leader Wharehoka Wano acknowledged David MacLeod's whakapapa with Pōmare. But Wano told the National Party MP that tribal leaders on the paepae agreed with Miria Pōmare. 'Haere mai ki te Paremata o Tā Māui Pōmare (Welcome to Sir Maui Pōmare's Parliament).' 'And this is the opposition!' 'Forever!' someone called from the floor. MacLeod stood in place of Māori-Crown relations minister Tama Potaka, who was at MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp's tangihanga. 'I'm here for the Crown. It's not David McLeod, it's not myself, but it is the Crown that I'm representing today.' He delivered Potaka's message of hope: health spending rises, hospital upgrades including in New Plymouth, funding for Māori wardens, Kāinga Ora working with iwi housing providers, support for Kura Kaupapa Māori. MacLeod said Pōmare worked with fellow Māori MPs from different parties. 'Today, we have Maori MPs in all political parties,' said MacLeod. 'We are mainly focused on common goals, just like Māui and Apirana [Ngata] back in the day.' There was no applause. Kaumātua Peter Moeahu was glad for the MP's clarity about representing the Crown. 'I don't think a helluva lot of the Crown at the moment, David.' Moeahu said Māori were threatened 'every single day' by laws like the Treaty Principles Bill, the Regulatory Standards Bill and changes to resource management and local government. 'We know what you're doing, David,' said Moeahu 'But you are demonising us Māori as you do it, so that everybody's attention is focused on Māori … while you dismantle the environmental protections of this nation.' Moeahu's son, New Plymouth District councillor Dinnie Moeahu, took his turn at MacLeod and his Government. 'Since you've been in office… I have been more frustrated, angry, mamae - in pain - than ever before,' he told MacLeod. 'You speak with a forked tongue. I don't believe everything that you said today and I don't even think you believe it.' A dozen young Māori doctors at Ōwae to honour Tā Māui told the hui a wave of hundreds more was in the pipeline. Acclaimed Te Ātiawa brain scientist Professor Sir Richard Faull said his childhood heroes were Pōmare and fellow Ngāti Mutunga doctor and MP Te Rangi Hīroa (Sir Peter Buck). Faull said Te Tiriti set the gold standard for Māori health and wasn't about one partner being dominant. 'We have to have our Māori doctors to look after our Māori people and that is non-negotiable. 'Māui Pōmare knew that.'
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Real Life: Forest and Bird CEO Nicola Toki slams ‘sneaky' conservation reforms
'Really concerning ' and 'sneaky' reforms by the coalition Government are stripping back protections for nature so fast that 'no New Zealander can keep up', Forest and Bird 's CEO says. Nicola Toki raised the alarm in an interview on Newstalk ZB's Real Life with John Cowan
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Flooding Demonstrates Danger In Govt ‘Growth At Any Cost' Ideological Agenda
Flooding in the top of the South Island, and the threat of more to come later this week, demonstrates the dangers of the Government pushing ahead with policy changes based on narrow ideological grounds and a 'growth at any cost' agenda, say freshwater campaigners. Tom Kay, spokesperson for the campaign group Choose Clean Water, says the Coalition Government's proposed resource management reforms, with an ideological focus on 'the enjoyment of property rights', will inevitably leave communities more vulnerable to the impacts of flooding. 'The Coalition Government has demonstrated across its resource management reform that they care more about the profits of commercial players than good governance for the health and stability of our communities. Their 'growth at any cost' agenda is not only thoughtless but downright dangerous.' Kay, a strong advocate for the idea of Making Room for Rivers as a strategy to keep communities and infrastructure safe from flooding while restoring the health of our rivers, says while many communities, councils, and insurance companies are ready for action to avoid hazards and widen allowed floodplains, the Government must not put growth and development on par with community safety and environmental health if they want to meaningfully reduce the risk to communities. 'We've just seen yet another example of devastating flooding following back-to-back experiences in Otago in October, the West Coast in November, and Canterbury in May. The costs are incredibly serious, including people losing their lives. 'We know our rivers need more space to carry floodwater safely, especially with the more extreme weather we're getting as the climate continues to warm. But the Government's narrow focus on growth and private property rights through their resource management reform risks undermining progress towards this.' Kay says international evidence and case studies show the best option for keeping communities and infrastructure safe from flooding is to avoid development in high-risk locations, and to incentivise and fund planned relocation from places already at high risk. This approach also provides the best opportunity for restoration of rivers and their floodplains, whilst increasing community wellbeing, amenity values, and resilience. However, he says the Government's focus on growth and property rights is inconsistent with this. 'Documents continue to highlight the Coalition Government's obsession with growth, and the misplaced idea that somehow we can continue to grow anywhere, with few restrictions, and still somehow mitigate the consequences. We can't. 'While we support the introduction of a National Policy Statement for Natural Hazards, for some reason it is less-developed now than it was last year, and drafted provisions that would have prioritised using nature-based solutions to reduce flood risk—such as making room for rivers, and to direct councils to avoid development in high risk locations, are gone.' 'The proposed provisions direct councils to 'consider' risk and act 'proportionately', leaving plenty of room for vested commercial interests to push councils into continuing to allow development, including homes, in high-risk locations. 'Not to mention that the proposal doesn't apply to the development of infrastructure, which is one of the main and most expensive assets hit during flooding; or to aquaculture, agricultural, pastoral, horticultural, mining, quarrying, or forestry activities and the land and buildings they use.' Kay says proposed changes to weaken the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management will also undermine the need to keep people out of harm's way, and to maintain sufficient river health and width to safely carry floodwaters. 'We have a requirement to prioritise the health of water bodies and communities in the management of our freshwater under the idea of Te Mana o te Wai. Flood managers have supported this idea as a way to help communities reconsider how they live with rivers, including their associated risks and hazards, and to make changes that increase flood resilience and river health together. 'But the Coalition Government wants to get rid of this prioritisation.' 'We also have no idea what the Government wants to do with an existing provision in the policy that prevents the 'loss of river extent', and thereby maintains wider flood corridors, for example; or whether they want to remove a provision that requires water to be managed as part of an 'integrated response to climate change'.' 'Our rivers and wider catchments need to be healthy and resilient if our communities are going to be safe from the worst harms of flooding. This Government needs to understand that private property rights and growth-at-all-costs won't enable that. It will cost us all in the long-run.' The Government's consultation on freshwater and natural hazard policies, as well as related policies, is open for submissions until 27 July.
