logo
Breakingviews - Political meddling changes euro-bank M&A playbook

Breakingviews - Political meddling changes euro-bank M&A playbook

Reuters8 hours ago

LONDON, June 30 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Is major bank M&A politically possible in Europe? That's what dealmakers and CEOs across the continent are wondering after politicians in Berlin, Madrid and Rome erected obstacles to some 60 billion euros ($70 billion) worth of possible deals. The takeaway from the recent flurry of activity is that bank takeovers can still happen, but dealmakers and bidders may need to refine their tactics.
After a quiet decade for tie-ups between European lenders, BBVA (BBVA.MC), opens new tab Chair Carlos Torres Vila fired the starting gun last April with a share-based bid for 14-billion-euro Banco de Sabadell (SABE.MC), opens new tab. Then, in September, UniCredit (CRDI.MI), opens new tab CEO Andrea Orcel snapped up a stake in 30-billion-euro Commerzbank (CBKG.DE), opens new tab as a prelude to a possible takeover, before launching an unsolicited all-share offer for Banco BPM (BAMI.MI), opens new tab, currently worth 15 billion euros.
All three situations were effectively hostile, and at least two of them now seem likely to go nowhere. Orcel has accepted that his BPM hunt may have ended, after Rome handed down painful conditions, including selling his Russian business and maintaining the target's loan-to-deposit ratio. Equally, his Commerzbank tilt seems over for now after Chancellor Friedrich Merz's recent criticism of what many in Germany saw as a hostile raid.
BBVA's planned takeover of Sabadell, meanwhile, is looking increasingly complicated. The Spanish government, ostensibly fearing job losses and fewer small-business loans, last week said, opens new tab 70-billion-euro BBVA could not integrate its target for three to five years if it goes ahead with a deal. That pushes out some of the 850 million euros in planned cost savings, making it harder for Torres to raise his bid, which seems necessary since the current offer looks low.
It would be rash, however, to conclude that governments simply don't want bank deals to happen. Some tie-ups are proceeding without drama, including BPCE's recent purchase of 6-billion-euro Novo Banco. That deal, with a French buyer, works for Portugal because Lisbon is worried about Spanish dominance of its financial system and has no reason to fear the Gallic interloper. And Italy's government seems to have no issue with Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena's (BMPS.MI), opens new tab hostile 15-billion-euro Mediobanca (MDBI.MI), opens new tab play, made in January. That may be because it aligns with Rome's mission of creating a third major bank to rival twin 90-billion-euro giants Intesa Sanpaolo (ISP.MI), opens new tab and UniCredit. The common thread is that the deals that seem more probable also seem to fit a pre-existing government agenda.
Some deals will always be politically tricky. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, for example, relies on support from politicians in the Catalan region, where Sabadell has a deep history. That made it unlikely that his government would look kindly on a takeover of the smaller lender. Rome, meanwhile, doesn't seem to want either of its banking behemoths to get bigger domestically. And Berlin has always been sensitive about the perceived risk of its banks being infected by supposedly riskier southern European rivals stuffed with Mediterranean government bonds. Those aren't necessarily good reasons to oppose M&A, but for dealmakers they're a fact of life.
Still, some of the bidders' tactics haven't always helped. Orcel continued upping his exposure to Commerzbank, through derivatives, even after his initial approach met opposition. That gave German politicians an easy way to kick a potential deal without even debating its merits.
And both Orcel and Torres adopted a hard-nosed approach to valuation and returns which, while justifiable from their own shareholders' perspective, made it easier for their targets to resist. UniCredit's BPM offer came with a scant 0.5% premium. Meanwhile Torres, for now, is sticking with a price that represents effectively no premium after accounting for the overall rise in Spanish bank shares since last April, even though the target's earnings forecasts have risen more than its rivals. BPM and Sabadell are trading some 1% and 6% respectively above the offers, suggesting that investors either expect a bump or judge the targets' standalone prospects to be more valuable than the bids.
The charitable telling is that BBVA and UniCredit had to force the issue to get a hearing, given the target boards' likely recalcitrance. Yet from governments' perspective, hostile campaigns can seem destabilising in a highly sensitive sector, raising the odds of intervention. Rome, Berlin and Madrid would probably be less likely to meddle in deals that both acquirer and target have already agreed. Having a relatively low bid on the table, or none at all in the case of Commerzbank, also means the targets' boards don't have to worry about angry phone calls from investors eager to get their hands on a juicy premium.
So one lesson for future would-be acquirers, like 60-billion-euro Dutch lender ING (INGA.AS), opens new tab, is that hostile deals should only be a very last resort – and may even be more hassle than they're worth. The alternative is to try harder to offer to share more of the merger goodies upfront to win target boards over, with a higher price. That may ultimately mean lower returns than the 15% or so that Orcel was targeting in his deals. The good news, however, is that bank takeovers typically generate larger synergies than bidders typically expect. Intesa, for example, initially pencilled in about 700 million euros of annual cost savings from buying UBI Banca, but raised that number to over 1 billion euros in 2021.
Of course, a more generous approach does not guarantee that politicians will stay out of the picture. Dealmakers may simply need to learn to live with a more interventionist state. From now on, getting deals done will require more diplomacy – and financial generosity.
Follow Liam Proud on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spain's BBVA to proceed with takeover bid for Sabadell
Spain's BBVA to proceed with takeover bid for Sabadell

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Spain's BBVA to proceed with takeover bid for Sabadell

MADRID, June 30 (Reuters) - Spain's BBVA ( opens new tab said on Monday it would move ahead with its hostile takeover bid for smaller rival Sabadell ( opens new tab despite the government effectively blocking it from fully merging with its smaller rival for at least three years. The government said on June 24 BBVA would not be allowed to integrate its operations with Sabadell for at least three years as one of the conditions imposed on the more than 14 billion-euro ($16 billion) bid. The cabinet could extend this condition for another two years, it said. "After reviewing (the government) resolution BBVA has decided not to withdraw the offer and, therefore, it remains in effect in accordance with the applicable regulations," it said in a filing with the stock market supervisor. Proceeding with the offer means BBVA must comply with the requirements set by the government on grounds of common interest such as protecting workers, protecting companies and protecting financial customers. Following Madrid's decision, BBVA said it was reassessing the impact on the expected 850 million euros in cost savings it had previously announced. On Monday, it did not disclose any details.

US dollar heads for worst first half in more than 50 years amid Trump tariffs
US dollar heads for worst first half in more than 50 years amid Trump tariffs

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

US dollar heads for worst first half in more than 50 years amid Trump tariffs

The US dollar is on track for its worst first half-year in more than 50 years, after six months in which financial markets were dominated by geopolitical crises and Donald Trump's trade war. The dollar has fallen by more than 10% against a basket of currencies since the start of 2025. That is its worst performance over the first six months of any year since 1973, and the worst half-year since the second half of 1991. This sell-off has pulled the dollar index down to its lowest level since March 2022, and lifted the pound to a three-year high of $1.37, up from $1.25 at the start of the year. Investors have been selling the US currency due to concerns Trump's economic policies threaten the safe-haven role of US dollar-denominated assets, with economists predicting that the president's 'big beautiful' budget bill will drive the US national debt even higher. 'The US dollar is the most notable loser so far this year, as it has lost 10% against other currencies, with investor concerns regarding Trump's policies having weighed on the greenback. On the other hand, the euro has risen by 5%,' analysts at Unicredit said. David Morrison, a senior market analyst at the financial services company Trade Nation, said: 'Trump's tariffs, the fact that many investors view his administration as somewhat chaotic, along with concerns over US national debt have seen the dollar fall out of favour.' Rising expectations of US interest rate cuts have also hurt the dollar, as Trump repeatedly criticised the Federal Reserve chair, Jerome Powell, for not lowering borrowing costs, and hinted that Powell's replacement would push for rate reductions and could be named early. Chris Iggo, the chair of the Axa IM Investment Institute, said broader market returns had been strong in the first half of 2025. 'Any sell-off in risky assets has been quickly reversed. Even measures of implied volatility have moved lower. Traders are betting more heavily on multiple US interest rate cuts,' he said. Stock markets have had a turbulent 2025 so far – most have posted gains over the last six months but getting there was a bumpy journey. Carsten Brzeski, the global head of macro at ING Research, said it had been an 'action-packed' first six months of the year, with key developments including 'tariffs, market volatility, questions about Fed independence, a US credit downgrade, fiscal stimulus on steroids, rising debt, deportations, visa restrictions for foreign students, the war in Ukraine entering its fourth year, and Germany doing a fiscal U-turn with a likely doubling of defence spending'. US and European markets weakened through March, as Trump sparred with China, Mexico and Canada over trade deals, before a global sell-off in early April after his announcement of hefty 'Liberation Day' tariffs alarmed investors. That tumble – the worst week for the US stock market since 2020 – appeared to alarm the White House, prompting a 90-day pause to tariffs and claims of 'Taco' – Trump always chickens out. So although the US has only signed a single trade deal so far, with the UK, hopes of further progress – or a further pause to tariffs – triggered a historic rebound that lifted the S&P 500 index of US stocks to a record high by the end of June. According to Bloomberg, it was only the third time in the last 100 years that the S&P 500 has dropped 10% and rebounded to a gain within the same calendar quarter. Ipek Ozkardeskaya, a senior analyst at Swissquote Bank, said US equities had 'fully brushed off' the sell-off led by the trade war. 'Funny enough, the rally was not necessarily backed by material progress in trade negotiations, but rather by the so-called Taco trade and Fomo – with Taco standing for 'Trump always chickens out' and Fomo standing for 'fear of missing out' on the chickening out,' she said. 'There's also the conviction that the Federal Reserve will cut rates sooner rather than later, that earnings growth will remain strong despite trade uncertainties, and that AI will eventually boost productivity and reduce costs.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Even so, US markets have lagged behind some European markets. The S&P 500 has only gained 5% during 2025 so far, slower than the pan-European Stoxx 600 (+7%), the UK's FTSE 100 (up 7.6%), or Germany's Dax (up 20%). The UK has been one of the best performing regions globally for investors in the first half of 2025. 'Tariffs, downgrades to earnings and economic forecasts and geopolitical conflict were the defining factors for markets in the first half of 2025,' said Dan Coatsworth, an investment analyst at AJ Bell. 'They've caused considerable uncertainty which has affected asset prices, as well as business and consumer confidence. It's led to one of the biggest shifts in investor preferences for years, with certain parts of the market coming to life and previous winners losing their crown. We're now seeing the great big asset allocation reset and the US is no longer top choice for many investor portfolios.' Technology stocks have had a mixed half-year. Shares in Facebook's owner, Meta, had a strong six months, up 25%, as its artificial intelligence investments have driven revenue growth. Apple, though, has lost almost 20%, due to fears tariffs on imports from China will hurt its US operations and that it has fallen behind in the AI race. Dean Turner, an economist at UBS, said it had been an 'interesting' time for investors. 'Optimism at the start of the year, driven by solid growth and earnings, was eviscerated as markets digested the 'Liberation Day' tariff announcements, which triggered the steepest equity correction since the pandemic – the S&P 500 fell 10.5% in two days, volatility spiked, and the dollar weakened. Since then, markets have rebounded quickly as some tariffs were paused and strong AI earnings supported a recovery,' he said. 2025 has also been another strong year for gold. Its price has jumped by 25% as investors have sought out safe-haven assets.

Foxes arrive as unannounced visitors at Google's splashy new U.K. headquarters
Foxes arrive as unannounced visitors at Google's splashy new U.K. headquarters

NBC News

time4 hours ago

  • NBC News

Foxes arrive as unannounced visitors at Google's splashy new U.K. headquarters

LONDON — Google's much-hyped new U.K. headquarters in London's King's Cross neighborhood hasn't opened yet, but it's already drawn some unexpected attention from locals. Local foxes, that is. The building, which is under construction, has been nicknamed the "landscraper" because it spans 1,082 feet wide and 11 floors tall. Created by British designer Thomas Heatherwick, it will reportedly be completed later this year and cost the tech giant upwards of £1 billion ($1.3 billion). Construction began in 2017. It is anticipated to eventually house up to 7,000 Google employees. For now, however, some of the more frequent visitors might be the foxes that have been digging burrows in the manicured grounds and leaving their droppings behind on the building's nearly 1,000-foot-long rooftop garden. 'Fox sightings at construction sites are pretty common, and our King's Cross development is no exception,' a Google spokesperson told NBC News. But, the person added, 'While foxes have been occasionally spotted at the site, their appearances have been brief and have had minimal impact on the ongoing construction.' NBC News spoke to nearly two dozen construction workers at the construction site, where a cacophony of noise from the drilling and hammering filled the streets as dust dispersed into the air. But when asked whether they had seen any foxes, most refused to comment, citing nondisclosure agreements. One worker, who requested anonymity due to the NDA, told NBC News, 'Personally, I haven't seen one, but there are so many open entrances to the building I wouldn't be surprised if it had gotten inside.' Still, Kareen Mascerenhas, 25, who works at a store directly across from the construction site, said she had spotted a fox last winter. 'I was shutting the store when I saw one just run past that side and in there,' she said, pointing to Google's construction. But any sightings of the bushy-tailed vulpines feel neither rare nor unique in a city where the number of foxes soars between 10,000 and 15,000, accounting for nearly 16 foxes per square mile. Around the country, their population ebbs and flows depending on the season, from 150,000 in the winter to around 400,000 during cub season, according to Terry Woods, who founded the fox removal company Fox-a-Gon, which advocates for the humane treatment of the animals. For decades, foxes have also captured the British imagination, appearing as the sly character Mr. Tod in Beatrix Potter's novels, and in Roald Dahl's"Fantastic Mr. Fox." And most recently, one even served as a memorable symbol for the 'hot priest' in the hit television show "Fleabag" by Phoebe Waller-Bridge. Though they are often seen boldly trotting along sidewalks and rummaging through residential bins, foxes have also roused strong reactions from onlookers, ranging from adoration to outright resentment. 'They may appear cuddly and romantic, but foxes are also a pest and a menace, particularly in our cities,' former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson told BBC News in 2013, then as the mayor of London, when a fox horrified the British public after biting off a baby's finger. For years, foxes perfectly concealed their identity as the main culprits behind hundreds of cat mutilations in the south London suburb of Croydon, where the grisly carcasses strewn across streets and backyards led distressed residents to suspect that a deranged cat killer was on the loose until police realized what was happening in 2018. While some residents cherish their presence, hoping to charm the typically contact-averse creatures by trying to feed them, a series of British wildlife laws also gives foxes the protection and freedom to roam the United Kingdom's cities endlessly. 'Foxes are quite popular around this area; they are just virtually everywhere,' said 31-year-old Ode Tomitoba, who works at the King's Cross Visitors Center. For Hanei Mokenen, 23, who manages a restaurant in King's Cross, news of the latest fox incursion came by way of a TikTok video. 'It's King's Cross, anything can happen here,' he said about the bustling commercial neighborhood in Central London, adding that he had occasionally seen a fox running around the area. But their stealth around the giant Google edifice had nonetheless taken Mokenen by surprise. 'How the hell did they get inside? Security is strong in this area; it's not a place where you can just walk around,' he said. The foxes' newfound home at Google's offices isn't the first time the animals have made themselves comfortable in London's skyscrapers. In 2011, a fox called Romeo was discovered living in The Shard, surviving on the food scraps left by construction workers. 'It is a fairly common occurrence with the creatures being so adaptable,' said Woods from Fox-a-Gon, who helped remove Romeo from the site by capturing him safely and releasing him back into the urban jungle. 'They are such an adaptable animal that they can survive almost anywhere and overcome great hardships,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store