
What Is Financing For Development?
22 June 2025
These are part of 17 goals agreed by nearly every country, called the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The plan is to hit these targets by 2030.
But we're falling behind. One big reason? There just isn't enough consistent funding to make real progress.
That's why world leaders, economists, and other decision-makers are meeting at the end of this month in Sevilla, Spain, for a major event called the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development. It's being called a 'once-in-a-decade opportunity' to rethink how the world pays for sustainable development.
What is financing for development?
At its core, financing for development works to answer a simple question – how does the world pay for a fairer and more balanced system of aid, trade and development?
The answer from the global community has been to create a system which mobilizes the entire international financial architecture – taxes, subsidies, trade, financial and monetary policies — towards the development agenda.
The architecture aspires to be as inclusive as possible, engaging a wide array of funding sources empowering countries to become more self-sufficient so their citizens can lead healthy, productive, prosperous and peaceful lives.
Financing for development is basically about 'changing the way the system works to make it so that developing countries are able to…actually invest in their futures,' Shari Spiegel, Director of Financing for Sustainable Development at the UN's Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), told UN News.
Among these sources of financing are multilateral development banks that provide financial and technical support to developing countries. Revised international and national trade and tax policies also work to jump-start developing economies.
And, official development assistance (ODA) creates a channel through which aid from developed countries can flow directly to developing countries.
Why is financing for development important?
From rising debt and falling investment to shrinking aid and missed development goals, the current system is failing the people it is meant to serve.
People everywhere are paying the price:
Debt is rising, investment is falling, and donor aid is shrinking.
600 million people could still be living in extreme poverty by 2030 if we don't change course and it will take many more decades to reach the SDGs.
Today, 3.3 billion people live in countries that spend more on paying off debt than on health or education.
Moreover, billions of people will continue to live in countries which must prioritize debt payments over development.
That means less money for schools, hospitals, clean water, and jobs – the basics that people need to thrive.
And for the people who face the consequences of the world's inaction, this is an unacceptable timeline.
What systemic changes need to be made?
With trade barriers growing and official development assistance decreasing annually, a business-as-usual approach to financing for development is unsustainable.
The upcoming conference in Sevilla provides an opportunity to change course, to mobilize finance at scale and reform the rules of the system to put people's needs at the centre.
The conference will bring together countries, civil society representatives and financial experts to discuss new approaches to financing for development.
Crucially, this conference will also give developing countries a seat at the table, so their needs are addressed in international financial decision-making.
What role does debt play?
In the current financing system, developing countries continue to pay exorbitant amounts to service their debt while also facing borrowing costs which can be as much as two or four times higher than their developed counterparts.
These costs tend to rise especially during or directly after times of crisis, creating a feedback loop through which developing countries cannot afford to develop the very structures which would enable them to pay these costs.
'Faced with sky-high debt burdens and cost of capital, developing countries have limited prospects of financing the sustainable development goals,' the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres said.
What can be expected from the conference?
The Secretary-General has said that it will take 'big ideas' and 'ambitious reforms' to get back on track to ending poverty, hunger and inequality.
'[The conference] presents a unique opportunity to reform an international financial system that is outdated, dysfunctional and unfair,' UN chief António Guterres has said.
Member States reached agreement on a draft which will launch an ambitious package of reforms and actions countries need to take to close the $4 trillion financing gap.
The United States pulled out of the conference process on Tuesday during final negotiations over the outcome document, saying that it couldn't get on board with the draft.
Reform will come in part from effectively mobilizing all stakeholders – private and public, formal and informal, developing and developed – and aligning their incentives and commitments towards a sustainable future.
This includes emphasising multilateralism as the foundation of all development, increasing taxes which directs public funds towards international development goals, lowering the cost of capital for developing countries, restructuring existing debt and searching for even more innovative methods of finance.
'Sevilla is a moment in time. It's really the beginning, not the end of the process. So now the question is, how do we implement the commitments?' said Ms. Spiegel.
Reforming a broken financing system is challenging but Ms. Spiegel is optimistic that multilateralism is up to the task.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Guterres Calls For Immediate Gaza Ceasefire As Humanitarian Crisis Reaches ‘Horrific Proportions'
Speaking to reporters at UN Headquarters ahead of his departure to Spain for the International Conference on Financing for Development, the Secretary-General said that while the Israel-Iran conflict had dominated recent headlines, the plight of civilians in Gaza remained urgent and dire. ' Families have been displaced again and again – and are now confined to less than one-fifth of Gaza's land,' he said. ' Even these shrinking spaces are under threat. Bombs are falling – on tents, on families, on those with nowhere left to run. ' Search for food must never be a death sentence Mr. Guterres described the situation as the most severe since the onset of the war, citing acute shortages of food, fuel, medicine and shelter. ' The search for food must never be a death sentence,' he said, highlighting the danger faced by Palestinians simply trying to survive. He has repeatedly called for three urgent steps: an immediate ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages, and full, unimpeded humanitarian access. On Friday, he again pressed for these demands, emphasising that aid workers are starving, hospitals are rationing life-saving supplies and civilians are trapped in unsafe zones. Surge in aid urgently needed 'What's needed now is a surge – the trickle must become an ocean,' he said. The UN chief stressed that Israel, as the occupying power, is legally obliged to facilitate humanitarian relief. 'To those in power, I say: enable our operations as international humanitarian law demands. To those with influence, I say: use it,' he added. Earlier this week, a small convoy of UN medical supplies entered Gaza for the first time in months, Mr. Guterres noted, adding that it only underscored the overwhelming scale of the need. He also also cautioned that any aid delivery method must ensure civilian safety, stressing that 'operations which place desperate people in or near militarized areas are inherently unsafe.' ' We have the solution – a detailed plan grounded in the humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence,' he said. ' It worked during the last ceasefire. So it must be allowed to work again. ' Two-State solution critical Mr. Guterres concluded with a broader political appeal: ''


Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium: Hegseth
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme during the weekend. US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities early on Sunday (local time) using more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth told an often fiery news conference. US President Donald Trump, who watched the exchange with reporters, echoed his defense secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything. "The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of (the) facility," Trump wrote on his social media platform, without providing evidence. Several experts have cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes, and could be hiding it in locations unknown to Israel, the US and UN nuclear inspectors. They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the attack. WHEREABOUTS OF URANIUM The Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at Fordow. Hegseth's comments denying such claims came at the news briefing where he also accused journalists of downplaying the success of the US strikes following a leaked preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months. He said the assessment was "low confidence", and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear programme was severely damaged and would take years to rebuild. Ratcliffe, Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held a classified briefing on the strikes on Thursday for all 100 members of the US Senate. Tulsi Gabbard, who normally would conduct such briefings as director of national intelligence, was not scheduled to participate. Trump said last week that she was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran was building a nuclear weapon. The Senate briefing had been scheduled for Tuesday, but was postponed. Senators are expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval for strikes against Iran, although the measure is not expected to be enacted. At the Pentagon news conference, Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful." His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East. Khamenei claimed victory after 12 days of war, and promised Iran would not surrender despite Trump's calls. MEDIA 'HATRED' During the news conference, Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias. "It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," Hegseth said. "There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he said. Trump praised Hegseth's news conference as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!" On X, Hegseth thanked Trump for his praise. During the press conference, Caine, the top US general largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used. Caine showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on Sunday. Caine declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the US strikes. He also said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice. "I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," he said.


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
DR Congo: Conflict's Survivors Have Been Through Hell, Says UN Aid Chief
26 June 2025 Speaking from the Goma region, whose main city was overrun by Rwanda-backed M23 rebels in January, UN Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher explained that people had suffered 'decades of trauma'. The last few months have been 'particularly horrific for so many', he added, referring to the lawless fall-out from heavy fighting this year between the rebel fighters and the regular DRC army that has been linked to serious human rights abuses, including potential war crimes. 'Most striking today and yesterday has been the stories of sexual violence, and sitting with women who tell horrific stories which are too horrific for me to tell here and who are trying to find the courage to rebuild their lives,' the UN relief chief said. ' We're there providing that support to them, trying to help them rebuild, but they have been through hell.' Peace call All those newly displaced by the M23 rebel advance are in addition to thefive million people already living in displacement campsin eastern DRC. Today, more than 20 million people need relief assistance. ' They are desperate for this conflict to end, ' Mr. Fletcher continued. A day after NATO Member States agreed to a five per cent increase in funding for their collective defence, investment in the humanitarian work of the UN and its partners is at rock bottom. In DRC, a full 70 per cent of UN aid programmes was historically funded by the United States – 'amazing generosity over decades' – Mr. Fletcher noted. But today 'we're seeing most of that disappearing', he insisted, forcing the humanitarian community to make 'brutal choices, life-and-death choices' about who receives help. 'For these women - the survivors of sexual violence, for the kids who told me they needed water, for the communities that told me they needed shelter, medicine, these cuts are real right now and people are dying because of the cuts,' the top UN official explained. Aid teams haven't stopped Despite the difficulties linked to the protracted nature of the conflict in DRC and the massive needs, UN aid teams and their partners are 'working hard to get access to those communities,' Mr. Fletcher insisted - 'trying to get the airport back open, trying to get roads open, trying to unblock checkpoints that are impeding our aid from getting through'. In an attempt to square the circle of the steadily diminishing amount of aid funding provided globally, Mr. Fletcher recently announced a 'hyper-prioritized' plan to save 114 million lives this year. But that is dependent on receiving the necessary funding. ' All we're asking for to do that is one per cent of what the world spent on defence last year,' he continued. After visiting and connecting with communities impacted time and again by the fighting, the top UN official insisted that they should not be forgotten. 'They are the frontlines of the humanitarian effort,' he said. Communities on front line 'I suppose the glimmer of hope in all of this is, yes, we can work in that more efficient and prioritized way and will do that; but also, the communities here who are - basically – they've come through so much and they are determined to support each other.' And despite rising antipathy in some countries towards international cooperation including the work and peace-promoting efforts of the United Nations, Mr. Fletcher insisted that reasons for optimism remain. 'I really strongly believe there is a movement out there that will back this work, that will support this work,' he told UN News. 'We've got to find them. We've got to enlist them, and we've got to show them that we can deliver for them. 'And, you know, I have not given up on human kindness and human solidarity. I have not given up on the UN Charter for a second. And this work is at the heart of it.'