logo
Trump's shift on Ukraine has been dramatic – but will it change the war?

Trump's shift on Ukraine has been dramatic – but will it change the war?

The Guardiana day ago
Donald Trump presents himself as a peerless president, an unrivaled negotiator, even a 'genius'. So it's a unique moment when he comes close – I emphasize the qualifier –to conceding that another leader has outfoxed him. Trump suggested as much recently when characterizing Vladimir Putin's modus operandi. 'Putin,' he told reporters on 13 July, 'really surprised a lot of people. He talks nice and then bombs everybody in the evening.' Melania Trump may have contributed to this reassessment. As Trump recounted recently, when he told her about a 'wonderful conversation' with the Russian leader, she responded, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit.'
Trump's new take on Putin is a break with the past. His esteem for Putin–whose decisions he has described as 'savvy' and 'genius' – has contrasted starkly with his derisive comments about the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, whom he memorably disrespected during a White House meeting and even blamed for starting the war.
As recently as February, he declared that Russia's invasion didn't matter to the United States because, unlike Europe, it was separated from Ukraine by 'a big, big beautiful ocean'. He criticized Joe Biden's assistance to Ukraine as a waste of taxpayers' money.
Now, Trump has not only changed his view of Putin, stunning many within his 'America First' MagaA movement; he's decided to start arming Ukraine. Well, sort of.
Trump has gone beyond effectively conceding that Putin has played him. He has decided to sell military equipment to individual European countries so that they can supply Ukraine and restock their arsenals with purchases from the United States. The president formally announced the change during his 14 July meeting with Mark Rutte, Nato's secretary general.
There was more. Trump warned Putin that if he did not accept a ceasefire – which he has steadfastly refused, just as he has ignored Trump's demand to stop bombing Ukraine's cities – within 50 days, Russia would be slammed with tariffs as high as 100%, as would countries that continued to trade with it after the deadline.
Two things are clear. First, Trump's perspective on Putin has changed, unexpectedly and dramatically. Second, a war that Trump once said was none of America's business now apparently matters. The president said European countries would buy 'top of the line' American military equipment worth 'billions of dollars' to arm Ukraine. According to one report citing 'a source familiar with the plan', the total will be $10bn.
This all sounds like a very big deal. But here's where it becomes important to go beyond the headlines and sound bites and delve into the details.
Take the $10bn figure. That's certainly not chump change. Moreover, the main piece of equipment specified so far, the Patriot 'long range, high altitude, all weather' missile defense system, will provide desperately needed relief to Ukrainian city dwellers, who have endured relentless waves of drone attacks – several hundred a night – followed by missiles that slice through overwhelmed defenses. Ukraine has some Patriots but needs more: it's a vast country with a dozen cities whose populations exceed 400,000.
However, a Patriot battery (launchers, missiles, a radar system, a control center, antenna masts, and a power generator) costs $1bn, the missiles alone $4m apiece. Ukraine may not need 10 Patriot batteries, but even a smaller number will consume a large proportion of the $10bn package. The other system that has been mentioned is the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (Jassm), which combines stealth technology and GPS guidance with a 230-mile range. Ukraine will be able to use its American-made F-16 jets to fire Jassms into Russia from positions beyond the reach of Russian air defense systems. But a single Jassm costs around $1.5m, so the costs will add up quickly. Additional items have been mentioned but only generically; still, their price must also be figured in, bearing in mind that the war could drag on. So, $10bn could be depleted quickly.
Moreover, beyond a certain point the US cannot sell equipment from its own stocks without regard to its military readiness requirements. Precisely for that reason, the defense department recently declined to send Ukraine some of the equipment promised under Joe Biden.
And Trump has not said that there will be follow-on sales to benefit Ukraine once the $10bn mark is reached. Even if he were to change his mind, individual European countries would be able to buy only so much American weaponry without straining their finances, especially because France and Italy have opted out of the arrangement. Trump has been uninterested in joining the recent move by the UK and the EU to impose a $47.60 per barrel price cap on Russian oil sales, toughening the $60 limit the west enacted in 2022. Finally, Trump isn't going to resume Biden's multi-billion-dollar military assistance packages – 70-plus tranches of equipment, according to the DoD.
Trump's 50-day tariff deadline permits Putin to continue his summer offensive, and may even provide an incentive to accelerate it. Russia has already shrugged off Trump's tariff threat. Its exports to the US in 2024 amounted to $526m, a tiny fraction of its global sales.
By contrast, Trump's secondary tariffs will hurt Russia, which earned $192bn in 2024 from its global exports of oil and related products, much of that sum from India and China. If the president follows through with his threat, Beijing will surely retaliate, and the consequence will be painful: the United States exports to China totaled $144bn last year. Will Trump proceed anyway, and during his ongoing trade wars, which have already started increasing prices in the US? His track record on tariff threats leaves room for doubt.
Ukraine's leaders are understandably elated by Trump's reappraisal of Putin. But it's premature to conclude that it's a turning point that could change the war's trajectory. Washington's new policy may prove far less momentous than Maga critics fear and not quite as transformative as Kyiv and its western supporters hope for.
Rajan Menon is a professor emeritus of international relations at the City College of New York and a senior research scholar at Columbia University's Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Current Toyota RAV4 Prices Will Make You Think Twice
Current Toyota RAV4 Prices Will Make You Think Twice

Auto Blog

time25 minutes ago

  • Auto Blog

Current Toyota RAV4 Prices Will Make You Think Twice

By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. America's Best-Seller is Getting a New-Generation Revamp The RAV4 is more than just Toyota's cash cow – it's the world's best-selling nameplate and the best-selling passenger vehicle in the US for 2024, even eclipsing the mighty Ford F‑150. With sales nearing 475,000 units, the compact SUV continues to dominate driveways nationwide. Needless to say, the revamped version is just as important as the outgoing model for the automaker. And yet, there aren't any changes on the prices of current stock, even with a new-generation 2026 RAV4 on the horizon. 0:00 / 0:09 Nissan's revolutionary self-driving tech hits Japan's streets Watch More Given its popularity, Toyota dealers appear content to maintain stability in RAV4 pricing rather than capitalize on anticipation. If you're in the market for one, there's a huge chance that you're facing a dilemma between settling for the outgoing version or waiting patiently for the new version to arrive. Outgoing 2025 Inventory Holds Its Value A snapshot of the inventory through reveals that the 2025 RAV4 LE is listed between $30,880 and $34,263, while the Hybrid XLE sits solidly in the high-$30,000 range. Earlier in 2025, dealers offered minor price adjustments, like a $500-$800 discount on LE trims, but nothing dramatic. Even the plug-in hybrid variants, which will be replaced by a significantly better system in 2026, aren't getting any discounts – at least for now. Overall, prices align closely with MSRP, signaling that demand remains robust even as the next generation looms. There's no significant markdown pressure, and current hybrid variants continue to hold strong in the showroom. Toyota has yet to officially release the 2026 RAV4 pricing, but it's expected to increase to reflect the improvements. It will be offered with an all-hybrid lineup, so we expect the base hybrid models to start $34,000, roughly $1,400 more than today's hybrid MSRP, while the top-tier Limited and GR-Sport PHEV trims climb toward $42,000-$50,000. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. What Buyers Should Know – and Do As expected, the 2026 RAV4 comes with a suite of improvements, which buyers should consider. These include electrified drivetrains (HEV and PHEV), increased power (226–236 hp for the HEV; 320 hp for the PHEV), up to 50 miles of EV range for PHEV, competitive towing capacity (3,500 lb for AWD), and significantly updated in-cabin tech. Inside, buyers get a 12.3‑inch digital gauge cluster, a 12.9‑inch infotainment screen, Toyota's new Arene software, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, digital climate controls, and standard Safety Sense 4.0. Styling gets sharper too, with LED taillights, larger grilles, bold fascia, and three design personas: Core, Rugged, and Sport. The biggest question is: should you buy now or wait? If your priority is value, immediate availability, and proven performance, the outgoing 2025 models, specifically the hybrids, remain a strong choice. On the other hand, if you're drawn to the newest offering, waiting pays off. Especially for those eyeing the new PHEV or loftier trims, the additional premium seems justified. There's no rush to buy, but no harm either. With steady prices on outgoing models and the 2026 lineup arriving late 2025, your decision hinges on whether the new tech and styling are worth the wait – and extra price. About the Author Jacob Oliva View Profile

Faroe Islands introduce self-navigating cars to take tourists off the beaten track
Faroe Islands introduce self-navigating cars to take tourists off the beaten track

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Faroe Islands introduce self-navigating cars to take tourists off the beaten track

The Faroe Islands have introduced a fleet of self-navigating, speaking cars in a bid to tackle 'predictable experiences' and expose visitors to undiscovered destinations on the archipelago. A video introducing the scheme shows visitors hiring a car before following navigation instructions to lesser-known places. Along the way, the car 'narrates' information about the surprise route. A statement from the Faroe Islands explains that tourists' tendency to gather around 'the same iconic hotspots' creates a 'closed ecosystem where images from popular places attract even more people to those very locations.' It adds that the result is overtourism and 'predictable experiences'. After booking with 62N car rental, a partner of Visit Faroe Islands, travellers scan a QR code which activates one of 30 itineraries curated from a locals' perspective. These include a visit to Europe's tallest sea cliffs, hikes to breathtaking fjords and a trip to a roadside fish-and-chips stand. 'There's just one catch: you have to surrender control,' reads the statement. 'When you rent one of these cars, you sign an agreement to follow its directions, with no clue where you're headed.' Visit Faroe Islands CEO Guðrið Højgaard said: 'We set out to explore how technology and creativity could offer a new way for travellers to discover the Faroes – one that leads them into places they might never find on their own. 'This is a more thoughtful kind of journey, designed to both protect what's most beloved and reveal spots often overlooked. 'With this initiative, we hope to lead by example, demonstrating how destinations can embrace innovation to spread tourism more responsibly and meaningfully.' The new fleet of cars can be booked on the Visit Faroe Islands website, with rates starting from around £74 per day.

Tulsi Gabbard says ‘further documents' to be released today proving ‘Obama coup'
Tulsi Gabbard says ‘further documents' to be released today proving ‘Obama coup'

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tulsi Gabbard says ‘further documents' to be released today proving ‘Obama coup'

U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has promised that more documents will be released on Wednesday to substantiate her allegation that former President Barack Obama 'manufactured' evidence to suggest Russia helped Donald Trump win the 2016 presidential election. Gabbard announced on Friday that she was referring Obama administration officials – including ex-FBI director James Comey, ex-CIA director John Brennan, and her own predecessor James Clapper – to the Justice Department over their roles in the alleged plot to undermine Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton. She subsequently accused the Democrat of orchestrating a 'yearslong coup' against Trump during an interview with Maria Bartiromo on Fox News 's Sunday Morning Futures. Central to her claim is a National Security Council (NSC) meeting held on December 9, 2016, at which, she alleges, the 44th president ordered a new report be compiled detailing 'the tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election' in the Republican's favor, overruling an earlier, less certain assessment. The report in question was duly published in January 2017. A spokesperson for Obama said on Tuesday: 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee led by then-chairman [and now U.S. Secretary of State] Marco Rubio.' Speaking to Newsmax last night, Gabbard was confronted with Obama's rebuttal by host Rob Schmitt and responded: 'We will be releasing further documents tomorrow that will refute that statement. 'We will be pulling a whole host of statements that were made by the Obama administration, by Hillary Clinton, by senior Democrat officials, by their friends in the media that state, over and over again, after this January 2017 manufactured intelligence document was created, that repeat the narrative.' Asked what quotes she had gathered, she answered: 'John Brennan says there is strong consensus among us to support the CIA claim Russian hackers aided Donald Trump's election; Hillary Clinton said, 'I would be president if not for the Russian hackers supporting Donald Trump.' 'There is a vast body of evidence and intelligence that debunks and refutes this statement you've just read and others coming from some of the Democrat leaders in Congress today.' Gabbard also claimed that new whistleblowers had come forward since her initial announcement and added: 'The legal path forward will be up to the Department of Justice to determine. However, I will say how essential it is as an American that we hold people accountable, no matter how powerful they are, no matter what position they have held. 'It is essential that for the future of our nation and our democratic republic, that accountability must occur.' In a second interview with Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law, again on Fox, Gabbard once more refuted Obama's denial and said it was he, not her, that was engaged in 'the art of deflection.' She insisted that, in late 2016, 'the intelligence community had one assessment, that Russia did not have the intent or capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election' but that verdict abruptly changed after the NSC meeting at which Clapper was ordered to issue a new version detailing 'how, not if' Moscow had meddled. Gabbard also accused Obama's intelligence officials of using 'already discredited information like the Steele dossier' to stand up their argument. Trump himself has latched onto her claims, posting about them multiple times over the weekend on social media, on one occasion circulating an AI TikTok meme imagining Obama being arrested in the Oval Office and sent to jail. However, his critics have, like Obama, argued that the whole story is just an attempt to distract from the ongoing furore over his administration's failure to release its files on Jeffrey Epstein. On Tuesday's instalment of MSNBC's Morning Joe, host Joe Scarborough presented a 14-point 'laundry list' of subjects raised in the last two weeks to distract from the Epstein case, with the Obama conspiracy appearing alongside such issues as expat comedian Rosie O'Donnell's citizenship status and the potential renaming of the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians. Connecticut Democratic Rep. Jim Himes told the same network yesterday: 'When people like Tulsi Gabbard and Donald Trump accuse an ex-president of a capital crime that is punishable by death, who is going to die? Who is going to die because they've decided that they need a distraction away from the Epstein calamity.' 'Gabbard nonsense' was cooked up 'purely as a distraction from Epstein,' an opinion shared by ex-Republican congressman Denver Riggleman. Democratic National Committee delegate Kaivan Shroff went further, lashing out at the intelligence chief on Newsmax by saying that Gabbard 'has built her career as a stooge for dictators and that is why Donald Trump picked her… [The president] is embroiled in so many scandals dividing his base that he wants to distract with this.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store