logo
Kerala Congress issues open warning to Shashi Tharoor, says 'won't cooperate' with him

Kerala Congress issues open warning to Shashi Tharoor, says 'won't cooperate' with him

Time of India3 days ago
Congress MP from Thiruvananthapuram
Shashi Tharoor
continues to face detractors withing his own party after he advocated a "nation first" stance in context of
Operation Sindoor
. Senior Congress leader
K Muraleedharan
on Monday said that the party was not ready to cooperate with Tharoor in Kerala.
He said to ANI, "The final authority will be the
Congress high command
, which will decide whether to take action against him or allow him to remain in the party. We are not ready to cooperate with him in Kerala because he always keeps attacking the Congress and Indira Gandhi. In the last one year, PM Modi did not say a single word about Sanjay Gandhi but he accused Sanjay Gandhi. He always opposes Rahul Gandhi's statement."
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
MBA
Public Policy
Project Management
Degree
Cybersecurity
Product Management
Finance
healthcare
Data Science
Data Science
MCA
PGDM
Artificial Intelligence
Others
CXO
Design Thinking
Data Analytics
Leadership
others
Technology
Operations Management
Management
Healthcare
Digital Marketing
Skills you'll gain:
Financial Management
Team Leadership & Collaboration
Financial Reporting & Analysis
Advocacy Strategies for Leadership
Duration:
18 Months
UMass Global
Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Starts on
May 13, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Analytical Skills
Financial Literacy
Leadership and Management Skills
Strategic Thinking
Duration:
24 Months
Vellore Institute of Technology
VIT Online MBA
Starts on
Aug 14, 2024
Get Details
K Muraleedharan added, "We are upset with his performance in Kerala. He is no longer coming to his parliamentary constituency...We have decided that we will not cooperate with him in the upcoming local body elections. We will follow the instructions given by the high command..."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Seniors in the Philippines Can Enjoy Affordable Private Health Insurance! (See List)
Health Insurance | Search Ads
Search Now
Undo
Recently, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, while addressing the issues related to party high command, stated that sometimes it is necessary to cooperate with other parties in the interest of
national security
.
Tharoor while speaking during an event in Kochi, was answering a student's query related to his relations with the
Congress party
leadership.
Live Events
The Congress MP emphasised that, for him, national security will always come first. According to him, the main perspective of any political party is to make a better India.
"Politics is unfortunately or otherwise in any democracy is about competition. As a result when people like me say it that we respect our parties we have certain values and convictions which keep us in our parties. But we need to cooperate with other parties in the interest of national security the question you asked. Sometimes the parties feel that is disloyal to them and that becomes a big problem which is your first loyalty? To my mind the nation comes first", he said.
"Parties are a means of making the nation better. So to my mind whichever party you belong to the objective of that party is to create a better India in it's own way. The parties have the right to disagree about the best way of doing that, the best way of making a better India", Tharoor said during the event.
Tharoor stressed that his commitment is towards a better and safe India whose borders are secure.
"Some of us may say, let's say, more capitalism. Some may say more socialism. Some may be in favour of certain kinds of regulatory controls. Some may be against too much regulation. So you have different points of view. That's fine. But ultimately, we must all be committed to a better India, a safer India, an India whose borders are protected, whose territory is safe, whose people's well-being can be nurtured. And that is my commitment", he said.
The Congress MP further urged all the political parties to stay united when the nation is "imperiled". He quoted former India PM Jawaharlal Nehru famous quote, "Who lives if India dies? And that's a question to which there is no answer. India must come first, and then only can we all live."
"I'm saying it to all parties. Put your differences aside when the nation is imperiled. Because if there is no India, there's a very famous line of Nehru's, which I am very fond of quoting. Who lives if India dies? And that's a question to which there is no answer. India must come first, and then only can we all live," he said.
On Sunday, Revolutionary Socialist Party MP, N K Premachandran in an abrasive response to Tharoor's "nation first" stance, stated that all political parties aim for betterment of the country and none act against national interests.
Premachandran, the Lok Sabha MP from Kollam when asked about Tharoor's remarks responded that the latter "should understand one thing that the party is for the betterment of the people and the nation."
"It can never be against the nation's interest. How can you distinguish between the party's interest and the national interest? All parties under the representation of the People's Act, the Indian National Congress, as well as my party, RSP, all the political parties are for the betterment of the people. Can he say that the Congress Party is standing against the national interest?," the RSP leader said.
He added, "None of the parties are standing against the interests of the nation. We will have a difference of opinion. So the distinction between the party's interest and the nation's interest is not correct..."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defamation case against Rahul Gandhi: Hearing deferred to Aug 8
Defamation case against Rahul Gandhi: Hearing deferred to Aug 8

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Defamation case against Rahul Gandhi: Hearing deferred to Aug 8

The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi was adjourned in the MP-MLA court due to lawyers' abstention, rescheduling the hearing for August 8. BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed the suit in 2018, alleging objectionable remarks against Amit Shah during the Karnataka elections. Gandhi, who surrendered and received bail earlier this year, recently claimed innocence, alleging a political conspiracy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The hearing in a defamation case against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was adjourned on Thursday in the MP-MLA court due to lawyers abstaining from court has now fixed August 8 as the next date of case dates back to 2018, when BJP leader Vijay Mishra filed a defamation suit against Gandhi, alleging that the Congress leader had made objectionable remarks against Union Home Minister Amit Shah during the Karnataka Assembly election Santosh Kumar Pandey, appearing on behalf of Vijay Mishra, said the court was the hearing had to be deferred due to lawyers asbstaining from work due to Bar association MP-MLA court had issued a warrant against Rahul Gandhi in December February 2024, Gandhi surrendered before the court and was granted bail on two sureties of Rs 25,000 July 26, 2024, Gandhi recorded his statement in court, claiming innocence and stating that the case was part of a political conspiracy against him.

India-UK FTA: Three year exemption from social security contribution in UK major breakthrough, says Piyush Goyal
India-UK FTA: Three year exemption from social security contribution in UK major breakthrough, says Piyush Goyal

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India-UK FTA: Three year exemption from social security contribution in UK major breakthrough, says Piyush Goyal

The three-year exemption from social security contributions in UK as part of the Double Contribution Convention is a "significant breakthrough" for Indian workers and their employers, Union Minister Piyush Goyal said on Thursday. Goyal further said India's talent in IT, services and education will gain from easier access to the UK's high-value markets with the two sides signing the "landmark" trade deal. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Artificial Intelligence Leadership Management Product Management Data Analytics Healthcare Data Science Digital Marketing Others Public Policy others Project Management Technology PGDM Degree Data Science CXO Design Thinking Operations Management Cybersecurity healthcare MCA MBA Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details India and the UK have inked a free trade agreement (FTA) that will slash tariffs on British whisky, cars and an array of items, besides help double bilateral trade by 2030, from USD 56 billion currently. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Paul Gascoigne's Actual House Left Us With No Words - Take A Look Ohi Blog Undo The deal was signed by Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal and his British counterpart Jonathan Reynold in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his British counterpart Keir Starmer. Taking to X, Goyal said: "India's talent in IT, services, and education will gain from easier access to the UK's high-value markets." Live Events He described the three-year exemption from social security contributions in the UK (as part of the Double Contribution Convention) as a significant breakthrough for Indian workers and their employers. "The #IndiaUKFTA will open doors to UK customers, investors, and innovation hubs for our startups, helping them expand their global footprint," according to Goyal. The India-UK FTA is also poised to supercharge India's electronics exports. Zero-duty access is expected to accelerate exports of electronic products with optical fiber cables and inverters set to strengthen India's foothold in the UK market. It would also spur software services growth , as ambitious UK commitments for software and IT-enabled services are seen unlocking new markets, driving job creation, and enhancing opportunities for Indian software firms. Competitive access for software development and network infrastructure is also expected to fuel growth in digital trade.

Elon Musk tweeted (and deleted) Donald Trump was in Epstein files
Elon Musk tweeted (and deleted) Donald Trump was in Epstein files

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Elon Musk tweeted (and deleted) Donald Trump was in Epstein files

He helped him get elected, got a cabinet post, donated $300 million, and even let his son attend White House dinners. Then came the breakup—and the tweet Musk later deleted: Donald Trump was in the Epstein files. And now we know—he was right. Pam Bondi privately told Trump in May that his name appeared in the DOJ's Epstein document review. Trump denied it. The Justice Department buried it. And Musk—who'd already torched the bromance—turned out to be the one telling the truth. TL;DR In June 2025, Elon Musk posted (then deleted) a tweet suggesting Donald Trump's name was in the unreleased Epstein files. On July 23, it was confirmed that Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy privately briefed Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the DOJ's Epstein-related documents. The DOJ declined to release the full files, citing the presence of child pornography and sensitive victim information. Trump had publicly denied being informed; Bondi's private briefing contradicts that. The incident has deepened the rift between Musk and Trump, further fracturing the Republican base. The Deleted Tweet Was Right When Elon Musk posted a cryptic tweet in June implying Donald Trump might be named in the unreleased Epstein files, it was quickly dismissed by Trump allies as conspiratorial innuendo. Musk later deleted the tweet. Now it's official: the deleted tweet wasn't a tantrum—it was a tip-off. Musk was right. According to senior administration officials, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy informed President Trump in May 2025 that his name appeared multiple times in the Justice Department's trove of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. The White House briefing reportedly included mentions of many prominent individuals, not just Trump. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Do you have a mouse? Play this for 1 minute and see why everyone is crazy about it. Play Game Undo Bondi characterised the references as unverified hearsay and said no evidence of criminal wrongdoing was found. Despite this, the Justice Department chose not to release the remaining files. In a statement published on July 7, the department said much of the unreleased material contained child pornography or sensitive victim information that would be sealed in court. The memo also stated no 'client list' was discovered and that the files included no basis for further investigations into uncharged third parties. But once it became clear that Trump's name was in fact among the documents, the decision to withhold them has come under fresh scrutiny. Trump Denies, DOJ Contradicts On July 15, when asked by an ABC News journalist whether Pam Bondi had informed him about his name appearing in the Epstein files, Trump replied: 'No, no, she's—she's given us just a very quick briefing.' That denial doesn't hold up. Senior officials now confirm Trump was explicitly told about the mentions during the May meeting at the White House—contradicting his public claim. The revelation has triggered political fallout—not just for Trump but also for Bondi and the Justice Department. Critics from across the spectrum have accused the administration of suppressing information for political reasons, especially given Trump's 2024 campaign pledge to declassify all Epstein-related documents in full. The Bromance That Blew Up The confirmation also marks the sharpest rupture yet in Musk's once-close relationship with Trump. After endorsing him in 2024, Musk donated $300 million to GOP operations and was appointed head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). He was frequently spotted at fundraisers and high-level events, with his son even attending White House dinners. But by early 2025, the alliance soured. Musk criticised Trump's tariffs, immigration policy, and his flagship 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which gutted EV subsidies. In May, Musk resigned from DOGE. Weeks later came the Epstein tweet—short-lived but, as it turns out, accurate. Trump retaliated by threatening federal contracts with Musk's companies. MAGA influencers turned on him. But the facts now suggest the real betrayal wasn't the tweet—it was the administration's silence. No Charges, Just Chaos To be clear, DOJ officials continue to assert that Trump is not under investigation. Mentions in the Epstein files, they say, do not amount to criminal evidence. The materials reportedly include guest lists, correspondence, and unverifiable claims—nothing actionable. Still, the political cost is high. A 2023 Journal of Interpersonal Violence study found that 78% of Americans believe the Epstein case involved a cover-up to shield powerful figures. The decision to suppress more files, coupled with Trump's denial, has only intensified that perception. Cover-Up or Cleanup? DOJ Faces Heat The fallout has reached inside the administration itself. Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino reportedly clashed with Bondi behind closed doors, accusing her of eroding public trust. Bondi, for her part, denies any wrongdoing and maintains the DOJ acted to protect victims and follow federal law. The DOJ has since petitioned a federal court to consider releasing limited grand jury testimony, but officials admit the odds of approval are low. Meanwhile, Musk has not commented publicly since the WSJ's July report—but he hasn't needed to. The facts have done the talking. FAQ Was Trump named in the Epstein files? Yes. Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy briefed Trump in May 2025 that his name appeared multiple times in DOJ-reviewed Epstein-related materials. Is Donald Trump under investigation? No. The DOJ has made clear that mentions in the files were not treated as criminal evidence and do not indicate wrongdoing. Why didn't the DOJ release the full Epstein files? The department cited the presence of child pornography and the need to protect victims' identities. A memo released on July 7 stated there was no Epstein 'client list' and no further files merited public disclosure. Did Trump publicly deny being told his name appeared in the documents? Yes. On July 15, Trump told ABC News he had only received a 'quick briefing' and was not told about any references to himself. Did Elon Musk make this claim before it was confirmed? Yes. In early June, Musk posted a tweet suggesting Trump was named in the Epstein files. He later deleted it. The claim was confirmed weeks later. Is Musk facing legal action for the post? No. Trump has not taken any legal action against Musk over the tweet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store