logo
This Agency Fights Corruption. New York City Leaders Have Weakened It.

This Agency Fights Corruption. New York City Leaders Have Weakened It.

New York Times06-04-2025
In recent months, New York City's government has been rocked by corruption scandals at a pace not seen in nearly a century.
Yet over the past few years, New York's leaders have presided over a gradual weakening of the city's No. 1 corruption-fighting agency, the Department of Investigation, records and interviews show.
As caseloads have risen, they have stood by while dozens of positions within the department have gone unfilled, allowing the agency to lose more than a quarter of its employees over the past six years.
And they have funded the department unevenly, allocating fewer dollars for salaries for investigators, auditors and other personnel in the department's current budget than it received during a high-water mark in 2019.
In recent months, the agency has been so strapped for funds that it has tapped millions of dollars forfeited by people convicted of crimes to cover basic operating costs.
This has occurred not because the department has failed to ask for more funding. Last fall, its commissioner, Jocelyn Strauber, sought permission from the city's Office of Management and Budget to hire 23 staff members at a cost of $1.4 million.
The City Council supported the request, but the budget office rejected it. Soon after, Gale Brewer, the chairwoman of the Council's Oversight and Investigations Committee, said in a letter to city budget leaders that because of staffing issues the department had experienced significant disruptions whenever employees went on vacation. In January, the budget office said it would pay for 10 additional hires.
In a statement, Ms. Strauber said that the department's 'staffing challenges' had led to delays in issuing reports and sometimes caused investigators and other workers to juggle complex inquiries.
'Over the last three years, we have asked them to take on more work and more responsibility, often for no additional compensation,' she said, 'and every time they have stepped up and have served the city admirably under very challenging conditions.'
The pressures on the department have only increased under the administration of Mayor Eric Adams. Hiring constraints implemented by Mr. Adams have made it more difficult for the agency to add staffing. And corruption inquiries involving the mayor and members of his administration have contributed heavily to the increased workload.
Last year, Mr. Adams became the first sitting mayor in the city's modern history to be indicted on federal corruption charges. His chief adviser was also charged in state court with taking part in a separate bribery scheme. And a close aide was charged with witness tampering and destroying evidence in the investigation into the mayor.
A dozen other aides — including Mr. Adams's schools chancellor, first deputy mayor, deputy mayor for public safety and two successive police commissioners — have resigned after having their devices seized or homes searched in state or federal corruption inquiries.
The Department of Investigation worked with the F.B.I. and federal prosecutors to build the case against the mayor, and it has played an important role in the other inquiries.
But after Mr. Adams assiduously courted the Trump administration, the president's Justice Department took the extraordinary step of asking the judge in the mayor's case to dismiss the charges.
On Wednesday, the judge, Dale E. Ho, granted the request, capping a saga that had seen federal prosecutors clash bitterly with Justice Department officials. Some of the prosecutors resigned in protest over what they described as a corrupt deal to secure Mr. Adams's cooperation with President Trump's immigration agenda.
The situation has focused renewed attention on the Department of Investigation, which is also empowered to build cases against public officials in state courts. (There has been no indication that New York prosecutors might seek to file state charges against Mr. Adams.)
The move to drop the Adams case has also led to calls by some New York officials, including Gov. Kathy Hochul, to insulate the department from potential interference by the mayor and other city officials.
Under its current structure, the department's commissioner serves at the pleasure of the mayor, and at times that has created a complicated dynamic.
Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's commissioner was a close friend whose agency regularly briefed Mr. Giuliani on investigations and sometimes investigated news leaks and sought political intelligence.
Under Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Rose Gill Hearn became the city's longest serving investigation commissioner, with a reputation for focusing on low- and midlevel city employees and contractors.
And during the administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio, two successive commissioners oversaw an agency that issued a series of reports criticizing the mayor himself, including for his use of a security detail for trips during his failed presidential campaign and to move his daughter to Gracie Mansion.
After clashing with his first commissioner, Mark G. Peters, Mr. de Blasio fired him, citing a report by an independent investigator that said Mr. Peters had abused his power and mistreated subordinates. Mr. Peters disputed the findings and said the mayor had forced him out to stop him from completing inquiries that might have reflected poorly on Mr. de Blasio — a claim the former mayor has denied.
'Government integrity is absolutely dependent on a robust inspector general system,' Mr. Peters said in an interview, 'and you can't have that system without sufficient staffing.'
A spokeswoman for Mayor Adams, Liz Garcia, said that the department's budget was higher today than it was when he took office.
'The Adams administration remains committed to supporting the important work that the New York City Department of Investigation does to ensure accountability and transparency in government,' Ms. Garcia said.
The administration has worked with the department to address retention issues and adjust the pay scale for investigators.
After Mr. Adams became mayor, he selected Ms. Strauber — a former federal prosecutor with the U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York — to burnish his public safety and anti-corruption credentials, according to a person familiar with his thinking at the time.
Less than three years later, she stood beside Damian Williams, then the U.S. attorney in Manhattan, as the charges against Mr. Adams were announced — a move that was seen by some in his orbit as a personal slight, the person said.
In February, Ms. Hochul proposed changes to the law that would bar the mayor from firing the investigation commissioner without the approval of the state inspector general.
At a recent preliminary budget hearing, Ms. Strauber told City Council members that her agency had not been the target of retaliation during her tenure.
'At the same time,' she added, 'our budgetary needs do not seem to be a key priority for this administration.'
Stretched Thin
The Department of Investigation, formerly known as the Office of the Commissioner of Accounts, is one of the oldest law enforcement agencies in the United States. It was created in 1873 after the fall of the Tammany Hall boss William M. Tweed, who had mastered the art of enriching himself with city funds.
Over the years, the agency has regularly rooted out corruption schemes, fraud and abuse in the Police Department, city jails and other agencies.
Under Mayor de Blasio, the agency had a staff of more than 550 investigators, lawyers, auditors and other employees. It issued a series of hard-nosed reports that exposed failures of the city's Housing Authority and a highly critical report on the Police Department's sex crimes unit.
In the 2017 fiscal year alone, the agency made over 800 arrests — the highest in nearly a decade.
Then Mr. Adams became mayor. His administration instituted a hiring freeze, citing the rising costs of the migrant crisis, slowing tax revenues and the ending of federal pandemic aid. When the freeze was lifted, he imposed restrictions on hiring across all city departments, requiring two employees to leave their jobs for every one hired into a vacant position.
The budget constraints affected hiring citywide, and agencies have also struggled to recruit and retain employees since the coronavirus pandemic upended life in New York. But the restrictions have hit the Department of Investigation especially hard, records and interviews show.
In the most recent fiscal year, the department received nearly as many corruption complaints — 14,600 — as it got when its staffing was at a high point under Mr. de Blasio.
Fewer cases have been referred for criminal prosecution or civil and administrative action. Arrests are down, too, by 58 percent from 2017, according to management reports filed by the mayor's office. Department officials say that is not necessarily a reflection of staffing shortages.
The department has also been hampered in its hiring because it offers lower pay compared with what investigators and lawyers might make in the private sector — or even at other public agencies.
'It was common for us to lose talented young investigators,' said Margaret M. Garnett, who served as the department's commissioner for the last three years of the de Blasio administration. 'They can go to the frauds department at American Express and triple their salary. It is hard to tell someone making $60,000 a year at 27 that they shouldn't take a job paying them $150,000 a year.'
Now the department has about 70 administrative and operations employees and more than 330 investigators spread across 10 squads.
More than half of the investigators are on loan from other agencies, such as the Department of Correction or the Housing Authority. It is a staffing practice that has allowed the office to take on more cases and employ investigators with firsthand knowledge of the institutions they are investigating.
At times, however, the arrangement has presented problems. In 2023, The New York Times found that at least two investigators on loan from the Correction Department had been tasked with rooting out sick-leave fraud while abusing sick-leave policies themselves.
Limited room for upward mobility has also made hiring and retaining qualified people a challenge, current and former officials have said.
When Ms. Garnett led the office under the de Blasio administration, she wanted to address the agency's staffing issues in part by hiring retired city police detectives, she said.
But state laws restrict such practices, in order to keep city employees from drawing a pension while also earning a city salary. Agencies who want to hire city retirees have to obtain a waiver from the Civil Service Commission, and even then there are constraints on how much the retired employee can earn.
The waivers are approved for two years at a time and granted only to fill vacancies temporarily and under certain conditions.
Ms. Garnett said the Department of Investigation would likely benefit from bringing on retired detectives with practical experience investigating crimes to fill some of the agency's positions.
Instead, she said, it has often been forced to bring on candidates with no experience at all.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C. Housing vacancies raise concern for Fort St. John, B.C. councillor after release of FOI docs
B.C. Housing vacancies raise concern for Fort St. John, B.C. councillor after release of FOI docs

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

B.C. Housing vacancies raise concern for Fort St. John, B.C. councillor after release of FOI docs

A Fort St. John city councillor is raising concern about the number of B.C. Housing units sitting empty as demand for housing grows across the community. He's also frustrated the city had to file a freedom of information (FOI) request to get an answer about vacancy rates from the housing agency. Documents the city obtained last month show 24 out of 164 homes managed by B.C. Housing were vacant as of June 30. That amounts to a 15 per cent vacancy rate, three times higher than that of private rentals in the city. Coun. Trevor Bolin says the information only came after six months of unanswered questions from the city's housing and emergency shelter committee, a group formed last year to address homelessness and housing issues in the city of 24,000 people. "The biggest shocker was the fact we had to do an FOI… the second surprise was finding out they have a 15 per cent vacancy," said Bolin, who raised the issue during a July 28 council meeting, in an interview. "The committee just got tired of asking, we got tired of waiting," he said. "FOI's are there to ensure that accountability and transparency are upheld." When asked about the vacancies, B.C. Housing told CBC News they're common but usually temporary and are due to turnover, cleaning or maintenance. Fort St. John is the largest city in northeastern B.C., and a key service hub for the province's oil and gas industry. The city's population has grown 27 per cent over the past 15 years, and B.C. Stats projects at least another six per cent growth over the next decade. That's driving demand for housing, especially rentals. Assessment finds growing waitlists Nearly half of households in Fort St. John are renters, according to the city's 2024 housing needs assessment, which found long wait lists for seniors housing, co-ops, and homes for people with disabilities and Indigenous residents. One co-operative housing provider had more than 100 people on its wait list. Over 100 seniors were waiting to get into supportive housing. WATCH | Christine Boyle steps into new role as B.C.'s minister of housing: Since 2015, Fort St. John's rental vacancy rate has typically stayed above the three per cent mark considered healthy, but has declined considerably since peaking at over 30 per cent in 2016 during a downturn in the economy, according to the assessment. Bolin says the local rate now sits around 4.8 per cent. While the housing assessment says supply isn't yet a crisis, it does note that many renters are facing affordability challenges, especially families needing two- or three-bedroom units. As the city grows, up to 44 per cent of future demand for housing will be for rentals, and up to 15 per cent of new units will need to be at below-market rents, the report says. "As industry gets busier and the town gets busier, we're going to see more pressure on the housing market," Bolin said. "If we've got 15, 16 [B.C. Housing] units that are back on the market and being lived in, that, in the community the size of Fort St. John, is huge." Maintenance and repairs In a statement, B.C. Housing said vacancies are common but often temporary due to turnover and maintenance, and it acknowledged the challenges the city had accessing vacancy data. The agency said it's working to fill vacant units as soon as possible. Eight are currently being filled, while 16 others need repairs and are expected to be ready throughout the fall. "When partners let us know they have ongoing data needs, we work with them to set up information sharing agreements," a spokesperson said. "B.C. Housing's northern operations team will be reaching out to the City of Fort St. John to explore setting up an information sharing agreement to provide data on a scheduled basis." While B.C. Housing directly manages 164 units, it says others in Fort St. John are operated by non-profits, which track and report their own vacancy numbers. Bolin says B.C. Housing vacancies should be benchmarked, and kept no higher than the local average. He also wants to see the agency start to report vacancy numbers quarterly. The city, province, and B.C. Housing must share data more readily and plan proactively to ensure supply meets demand, so no one falls through the cracks, he said. "Really, if we don't get a handle of it and get a hold of it, it could continue to get worse," Bolin said.

EFF councillor Banzi Dambuza details being strangled by law enforcement
EFF councillor Banzi Dambuza details being strangled by law enforcement

News24

time6 hours ago

  • News24

EFF councillor Banzi Dambuza details being strangled by law enforcement

Facebook A contentious incident unfolded during a councillor's meeting on Wednesday, July 30, 2025, at the Cape Town City Council chambers, involving EFF party council leader, Banzi Dambuza, and law enforcement officers, as seen in the widely circulating video online, where EFF council leader Banzi Dambuza is seen allegedly being choked by another man. The meeting, which included representatives from the DA, Good Party and many others, took a dramatic turn when EFF whip Ntsikelelo Tyandela was cut off by Speaker Felicity Purchase while posing a question to the City's mayor regarding the violent riots in Happy Valley, Blue Downs, related to service delivery. Read more | WATCH | EFF councillor 'choked' during ejection from Cape Town City Council chambers When Ntsikelelo was denied the opportunity to express himself fully, Banzi intervened, prompting the Speaker to call out his name multiple times, leading to her calling the 'Peace officers' to escort the EFF councillors out of the chambers. Speaking to Drum, Dambuza recalled the moments before the incident unfolded. 'I am the party leader, and Mr Tyandelo is the whip, so when the speaker was done speaking, she opened the floor to questions, and the five parties in attendance had to ask questions. My whip, Ntsikelelo, asked questions, and while he was doing so, there was a scuffle happening in the background from the DA councillors, and I asked why people are making a noise when the EFF is taking the floor,' he says. 'The speaker got upset and said she's kicking me out, and after that she said I must leave the council chambers, which I refused because she was not utilising the rules correctly as she was protecting DA councillors, and she called the peace officers who, in this case, were not peaceful at all,' he exclaimed. Read more | EFF celebrates 12th birthday in Cape Town with more than 10k supporters He added that while he was being escorted out, the EFF members built a protective layer around him, and that's when the violence from the officers started. 'They then started pushing, shouting, beating, and assaulting women and I was underneath a table grabbing onto the arms of it, and they came under to drag me out, but upon realising that I'm holding on, then this one officer who's a SWAT trainer strangled me and when I started grabbing his arm with my right arm to stop him his colleague reached out for my hand, and I passed out for a minute, and they were also beating me, I eventually gained consciousness but he choked me even more,' he said. 'The executive director, Vincent Botto, eventually stopped the situation after watching the situation unfold in front of him, doing nothing.' 'It has always been said that councillor Dambuza is problematic and there's an element of that was done to ensure that I don't challenge the Speaker again, I'm saying this because one of the DA councillors after the whole incident came to me directly and said; 'I hope you've learned your lesson and you'll never challenge the speaker again,' he mentioned. A case of attempted murder has been opened by the EFF party to the South African Police Services (SAPS), but Dambuza says he's not confident in them bringing him the justice he deserves. 'We've opened an attempted murder case with SAPS at the Cape Town police station, but we believe that there's an element of politics playing a role here as the detective handling the case told us they can't detain him unless they interview him, whereas we've been arrested before without being asked any questions and we'd be told we'll present our arguments in court in front of a judge, so why can't the same happen to him? And we've also been told that this is not attempted murder but just an assault, hence we say there's an element of politics involved,' he says. 'It's the DA making sure it protects the person they had sent to do their job,' he claimed. Dambuza also concluded by saying he has been to a doctor to tend to the injuries he suffered during the incident. 'My body is in total pain, and I'm struggling to move my neck around. I am at the doctors' as we speak.' A video of the incident, which includes disturbing footage of Banzi Dambuza being physically restrained and allegedly strangled by the law enforcement officer, can be viewed below. Trigger Warning: The footage may be distressing to some viewers, and we advise readers to proceed with caution. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Ntsikelelo Tyandela (@ntsido) Drum reached out to the Cape Town police station where the case was opened for a comment, and the media liaison officer, Captain F.C. Van Wyk, confirmed that indeed a case of assault has been opened. 'This office can confirm that an assault common case was registered at Cape Town Central SAPS for investigation following an altercation between security personnel and the victim, yesterday, Wednesday, 30 July 2025. Investigations continue, no arrest has been made,' he told Drum. Furthermore, Drum reached out to Speaker Felicity Purchase for a comment, but no response has been received at the time of publication.

NYC would lose 300,000 parking spots and $3B under this lefty City Council plan
NYC would lose 300,000 parking spots and $3B under this lefty City Council plan

New York Post

time6 hours ago

  • New York Post

NYC would lose 300,000 parking spots and $3B under this lefty City Council plan

NYC drivers would lose roughly 300,000 parking spots and taxpayers would be in the hole for $3 billion under a bill being fast-tracked by far-left City Council members. The NYC Council's Progressive Caucus announced this week that it plans to push the full Council to approve legislation by year's end requiring the city to remove all parking spaces located within 20 feet of crosswalks — and replace them with bike racks, bollards and other structures that block vehicles. Proponents of the so-called 'Universal Daylighting' bill, introduced in December by Councilwoman Julie Won (D-Queens), say it would increase road visibility at intersections, cut down on traffic-related deaths and put the city in compliance with an existing state law banning parking within 20 feet of intersections that the Big Apple has long been exempted from. Advertisement 'This bill will make our streets exponentially safer for all: drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists,' said Won, a caucus member whose district includes parking-challenged Long Island City. 4 The NYC Council's Progressive Caucus announced this week that it plans to push the full Council to approve legislation by year's end requiring the city to remove all parking spaces located within 20 feet of crosswalks — and replace them with bike racks, bollards and other structures that block vehicles. Helayne Seidman But the bill faces fierce opposition, including from the unlikeliest of sources: transportation honchos in Mayor Eric Adams' administration who've also long been pushing an anti-car agenda. Advertisement During an April hearing on the legislation, city DOT officials cited an agency study that found increased visibility at intersections could encourage speeding and sharper turns. 4 NYC drivers would lose roughly 300,000 parking spots and taxpayers would be in the hole for $3 billion under the bill being fast-tracked by far-left City Council members. DOT 'If this … were implemented citywide, we think we could expect an increase of up to 15,000 injuries in a year,' DOT Deputy Commissioner Eric Beaton told Council members. He also said installing bollards or other infrastructure blocking parking spaces at each of the city's roughly 40,000 intersections would cost $3 billion. Advertisement Won's bill doesn't include a timeline for when such a project must be finished, but it would require the DOT to install such infrastructure on at least 1,000 corners a year. 4 The Department of Transportation, which opposes the 'Universal Daylighting' legislation because it believes it could cause more traffic accidents, has already updated several hundred intersections over the past few years through redesigns aimed at reducing traffic. DOT The agency has already made such changes near several hundred intersections over the past few years through redesigns aimed at reducing traffic, and parking is already restricted near many other intersections, including corners with bus lanes. Twenty-seven of the City Council's 51 members — including the 18 caucus members — have signed onto the bill as sponsors. Advertisement Although the legislation already has a majority needed to pass, an additional seven votes would be needed to override a mayoral veto. 'This bill is so bad that even the inept DOT is against it, which tells you just how radical it is,' said Councilman Robert Holden (D-Queens). 'Daylighting should be applied based on data and safety studies at busy and dangerous intersections — not imposed as a blanket policy pushed by a progressive caucus that isn't serious about governing.' Councilwoman Inna Vernikov, a Republican who successfully lobbied the city earlier this year to retain precious parking spaces in Sheepshead Bay and other parts of southern Brooklyn, agreed, saying 'when even the anti-car woke activists at DOT are raising red flags, you know this bill is a problem.' 'This universal daylighting mandate is a reckless, one-size-fits-all proposal that would eliminate hundreds of thousands of parking spots and hurt everyday New Yorkers — particularly seniors, families, and small business owners — without making our streets meaningfully safer,' she said. 4 Proponents of the bill, introduced in December by Councilwoman Julie Won (D-Queens), say it would increase road visibility at intersections, cut down on traffic-related deaths and put the city in compliance with an existing state law banning parking within 20 feet of intersections that the Big Apple has long been exempted from. DOT 'The progressives in the Council should stop trying to play urban planner and start listening to the people who actually live here.' Advertisement Shannon Phipps, a North Brooklyn activist and founder of the Berry Street Alliance, also blasted the bill, saying she believes it will encourage reckless riding by cyclists and is being driven behind the scenes by lobbyists pushing an anti-car agenda on New Yorkers. 'The city's taken away so many parking spots already,' she said. '[City officials] don't seem to care about seniors and people with disabilities who need to get around by car.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store