logo
Surprising Gender Parity Trends Uncovered in Fatal Crash Rates Across Ten States

Surprising Gender Parity Trends Uncovered in Fatal Crash Rates Across Ten States

Dallas, Texas — July 2025 New findings from The Texas Law Dog reveal that gender disparities in fatal car crashes are narrowing in specific states across the country. While men still account for the majority of driver deaths, a five-year review shows that women in certain regions are approaching comparable fatality rates behind the wheel.
Using data from 2018 through 2022, researchers at The Texas Law Dog analyzed crash statistics provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Fatality Analysis Reporting System. By pairing those with licensing figures from the Federal Highway Administration, the team calculated average annual driver fatalities per 100,000 licensed male and female drivers. Their goal was to identify states where women are more likely than average to be involved in deadly traffic incidents.
Alaska led the rankings with a male-to-female fatality ratio of 2.79. That means men were just under three times more likely to die in fatal crashes than women. Male drivers in Alaska averaged 11.80 fatalities annually, while women averaged 4.23. Idaho followed as the second most balanced state, with a ratio of 2.93 and fatality averages of 19.08 for men and 6.52 for women.
New Hampshire placed third with a ratio of 2.97, based on annual fatality rates of 11.45 for men and 3.85 for women per 100,000 licensed drivers. Oklahoma took the fourth spot with a flat 3.00 ratio, despite having one of the highest male driver fatality rates among the top ten, at 27.95. Female drivers in Oklahoma had an average of 9.31 fatalities, pointing to elevated risk for both genders.
Montana, Mississippi, Delaware, Kansas, Nebraska, and Alabama round out the top ten. Each state shows a male-to-female fatality ratio between 3.06 and 3.21. Despite these tighter gaps compared to national averages, male drivers in all ten states remain substantially more vulnerable to fatal crashes than women.
Alabama holds the tenth position with a ratio of 3.21. Over the five-year period, Alabama recorded 25.68 annual male fatalities per 100,000 licensed drivers, compared to 7.99 for female drivers. Although the gap is narrower here than in most other states, the disparity still points to a persistent pattern.
Delaware and Mississippi share a ratio of 3.12, but Mississippi stands out with exceptionally high overall fatality figures. Male drivers in Mississippi averaged 36.14 fatalities annually, nearly three times the rate seen among female drivers at 11.59.
In Kansas, the average was 21.90 male fatalities and 7.01 female fatalities, leading to a 3.13 ratio. Nebraska came in ninth with rates of 17.77 for men and 5.58 for women. These figures position the state just ahead of Alabama in terms of gender parity.
Texas, the home state of The Texas Law Dog, did not place among the top ten. Instead, it ranks 30th, with a higher male-to-female fatality ratio of 3.62. In Texas, the annual average fatality rate stands at 21.70 for male drivers and 6.00 for female drivers, indicating that men are more than three and a half times as likely to be involved in fatal collisions.
Researchers at The Texas Law Dog emphasize that these findings should not be misinterpreted as a sign of safety improvements for male drivers. Rather, the closer fatality rates suggest that female drivers in these regions may be exposed to increasing risk. Several factors could be influencing these shifts, including differences in vehicle usage, road conditions, commuting patterns, and regional enforcement strategies.
The data highlights an urgent need for targeted interventions. Public officials can use this information to develop focused education campaigns, traffic enforcement policies, and driver safety programs that consider gender differences and local risk profiles. States showing narrower gaps may benefit from enhanced public safety tools that are reaching both male and female audiences more effectively.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Feds Issue Urgent Warning To Volvo Owners With Hybrids And EVs From 2020-2026
Feds Issue Urgent Warning To Volvo Owners With Hybrids And EVs From 2020-2026

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Feds Issue Urgent Warning To Volvo Owners With Hybrids And EVs From 2020-2026

Feds Issue Urgent Warning To Volvo Owners With Hybrids And EVs From 2020-2026 originally appeared on Autoblog. Electrified Volvos Don't Stop As They Should Safety issues stemming from recalls are not uncommon, and even the company that invented the seatbelt occasionally has to improve on things that it didn't get right, like the common rearview camera issue plaguing many. Thanks to over-the-air software updates, many of these issues can often be resolved without a trip to the dealership. But there's only so much one can do when the owners themselves don't take advantage, and that's why the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is issuing an urgent warning to Volvo owners after the majority of them impacted by a recall last month have still not availed themselves of the fix. If you have a hybrid or all-electric Volvo and haven't already done so, please stop driving until you've downloaded the update. Complete Loss Of Braking Could Occur The NHTSA says that Volvo issued recall 25V-392 on June 12, with the goal of addressing a regenerative braking issue that, left unchecked, could cause an affected vehicle to "completely lose its ability to brake while going downhill." Volvo advised owners to turn off regenerative braking and avoid driving their cars until the recall was downloaded, but of the 11,469 vehicles impacted by this recall, approximately 1,000 still hadn't performed the update by July 15. The affected vehicles, including some of the latest 2026 models, are listed below: 2023 C40 BEV 2025 EC40 BEV 2025-2026 EX40 PHEV 2023-2025 S60 PHEV 2025 S90 PHEV 2024-2025 V60 PHEV 2023-2024 XC40 BEV 2022-2026 XC60 PHEV 2020-2026 XC90 PHEV One Incident Captured On Video Reveals The Danger To highlight just how important this recall is, the NHTSA has uploaded a dashcam clip of an owner experiencing the issue, which nearly resulted in a severe crash. Fortunately, nobody was injured, but had this happened after dark or in another place, or with cyclists or pedestrians nearby, things could have been a lot worse, especially given the weight of cars with charging ports. Unfortunately for Volvo, alongside the rearview camera issue mentioned at the outset, owner reports of glitches in other areas have some buyers reconsidering. Worse still, the automaker has been forced to drastically cut its U.S. lineup because of the impact of tariffs. Feds Issue Urgent Warning To Volvo Owners With Hybrids And EVs From 2020-2026 first appeared on Autoblog on Jul 19, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Jul 19, 2025, where it first appeared.

Tesla Robotaxi riders raise red flags after experiencing concerning safety issues: 'The car didn't behave correctly'
Tesla Robotaxi riders raise red flags after experiencing concerning safety issues: 'The car didn't behave correctly'

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla Robotaxi riders raise red flags after experiencing concerning safety issues: 'The car didn't behave correctly'

Tesla launched its much-anticipated Robotaxi in Austin, Texas, last month, but early footage of the autonomous vehicle suggests it has a long way to go to catch up to a competitor, Waymo. Videos revealing operational glitches are also putting some residents on edge, prompting a new investigation from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. What's happening? Two days after Tesla's Robotaxi began offering rides on a limited basis in Austin, The Register was quick to compile and publish footage shared by influencers invited to try the service. While enthusiasm for the Robotaxi has been high among consumers and investors, it was dampened by a series of mishaps. YouTuber Dirty Tesla (@DirtyTesla) saw his ride pull over in the middle of the street with its hazard lights on — not exactly a safe location for a drop-off. "Should I actually get out?" Dirty Tesla asks the safety monitor in the front passenger seat. Traffic continues to flow while the Robotaxi is at a standstill, before a remote operator intervenes to resume the ride (the incident begins at around the 9:30 mark). YouTuber Farzad (@FarzadMediaINC) also had his Robotaxi stop at an unfortunate spot: the tail end of an intersection and partially in a crosswalk (roughly the 38-minute mark). The footage prompted a flurry of criticism from worried viewers, to which Farzad responded: "Fully agree with everyone that the car didn't behave correctly." Rob Mauer, who hosts the "Tesla Podcast," witnessed his Robotaxi abort a left turn and drive on the wrong side of the street for several moments before getting back on course. He posted footage of his journey (around the 7:20 mark) on the social platform X. Why is this important? Tesla experienced a record decline in global sales over the first two quarters of 2025, per CNN, while its stocks have been on a roller coaster. A successful Robotaxi launch was supposed to help turn the tide. Consumers across political lines report viewing the brand through a less favorable lens, per an Electric Vehicle Intelligence Report poll, with CEO Elon Musk's political activities and public feuds negatively impacting public perception and worrying investors. While this may sound dire for consumers interested in EVs, given that Tesla is one of the most recognizable EV brands worldwide, it isn't all bad news. That's because increased market competition is one of the factors impacting Tesla's EV delivery numbers. Would you trust a self-driving car on a busy city street? Definitely No way Depends on the brand Depends on the situation Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. With consumers having more options to choose from, the upfront cost of EVs has dropped, making the vehicles — coveted for their lower maintenance and energy costs, along with their contribution to healthier air quality with zero tailpipe pollution — accessible to more people. What is being done about robotaxi mistakes? Safety data from Waymo reveals that autonomous EV services can boost public safety, with the Tesla competitor revealing a 93% crash reduction involving pedestrians compared to the average human driver, as aligned with NHTSA's Standing General Order reporting timelines. While Waymo isn't immune to complaints from riders and isn't perfect, as The Register noted, it has seen an 88% reduction in crashes with serious injuries or worse (compared to human drivers). Previously, Musk delayed the Robotaxi launch, stating on X that Tesla was "being super paranoid about safety." The early Robotaxi returns suggest the company has more to do to live up to those promises. Meanwhile, the NHTSA is investigating Tesla's Robotaxi after opening a separate inquiry into its Smart Summon software. "Following an assessment of those reports and other relevant information, NHTSA will take any necessary actions to protect road safety," the organization said in a statement to The Register. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Ford's recall problem keeps getting worse—and this one could start fires
Ford's recall problem keeps getting worse—and this one could start fires

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Ford's recall problem keeps getting worse—and this one could start fires

Ford is setting records in 2025, but not in a good way. The automaker has already blown by the previous record for having the most safety recalls in a calendar year, and now another major round of recalls is calling the brand's reliability into question. This new tax deduction in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' lets people cash in on charitable donations up to $2,000. Here's what to know The Platinum Card is about to change. Amex's new fast-format airport lounge might be a sneak preview Southwest Florida's housing market is undergoing a material home price correction—here's why Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service On Wednesday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced that Ford will recall 694,271 crossover SUVs due to a fuel leak problem that could cause a fire under the hood. Ford's 2021-2024 Bronco Sport and 2020-2022 Escape models with a 1.5-liter engine were named over concerns that their fuel injectors could crack, leaking fuel into the engine compartment, where it could then catch fire. Ongoing concerns The latest recall is the result of a yearlong investigation, and Ford told Reuters that it will cost an estimated $570 million for the company to resolve, a loss that would be reflected in its second-quarter earnings report. Recalls in 2022 and 2024 addressed the same concerns with software updates, but didn't swap out the fuel injectors. The price of Ford shares dipped on the news Wednesday. The NHTSA opened a query into the issue in 2024, prompting the company to reevaluate its recall plan and eventually leading to the broader recall to deal with the injectors themselves, which have been linked to fires even in vehicles with the updated software, Reuters reports. At the time of the prior recalls, Ford said that it was confident the lesser fixes would 'prevent the failure from occurring and protect the customer.' To deal with a separate safety concern, Ford recalled more than 850,000 vehicles earlier in July over worries about the low-pressure fuel pumps in some models, including the Bronco, Explorer, and Lincoln Aviator. The recall notice noted concerns that a loss of fuel pressure and flow could dangerously cause affected vehicles to stall out. Those worries were especially pronounced in warm weather and 'low fuel conditions, and reduced fuel pump internal clearances that result in an increase of internal friction and sensitivity to vapor lock.' Why so many recalls? While going public with vehicle problems certainly makes for bad headlines, Ford's chief operating officer Kumar Galhotra defended the company's unprecedented flurry of recalls in comments to The Wall Street Journal. 'The increase in recalls reflects our intensive strategy to quickly find and fix any hardware and software issues and to go the extra mile to protect customers,' Galhotra said. Last year, Ford CEO Jim Farley said that the company hopes to trim its recall track record by keeping redesigned models for up to six weeks for additional extensive quality checks. That move was expected to put a dent into business in the short term, Farley warned, but the long-term benefits would balance out. 'What we're going to see long term is fewer recalls and lower warranty costs because of this new process,' Farley said in a 2024 earnings call. Since joining Ford in 2020, after two decades at Toyota—a car brand synonymous with reliability—Farley has reportedly crusaded to up the automaker's quality game. Ford test-drove the new process with a redesigned version of its best-selling model, the F-150 pickup. After holding onto 60,000 fully built vehicles for weeks, the company rooted out issues that would have led to 12 recalls, including assembly problems and software bugs. The company followed suit with updated versions of the Explorer, Bronco, and Maverick. 'We are somewhere in the middle of the pack, and obviously we're not happy with being in the middle of the pack,' Galhotra told Bloomberg last year. 'The goal is to move very rapidly to catch Toyota.' If all goes as planned, Ford's new process will reduce recalls for new models as they hit the streets. Ford vehicles already on the road won't benefit from the additional testing period and are still leading to costly recalls, as recent headlines make clear. Vehicle recalls have been on the rise in recent years. Between 2013 and 2023, recalls shot up by 43%, according to data from the NHTSA. The increased technological complexity in modern cars means that more things can go wrong, but automakers are also being more proactive in recalling vehicles over potential problems before they can become serious down the road. Even with recalls rising across the board, Ford still stands out. Since 2020, the company has held the ignominious title of being the most-recalled car manufacturer in the U.S. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store