Why Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO) Is Among the Best Food Stocks to Buy Under $30
Consumer Defensive Sector: Trends and Outlook
On April 25, Shana Sissel, Founder & CEO of Banrion Capital Mgmt, appeared on CNBC to talk about the struggles in the consumer staple sector and investor caution due to tariffs and 'Trump exhaustion.' She said the consumer defensive stocks are going on a downward trend, which makes sense to her, especially if you look at how the market's momentum flows. The concern about a recession and potential economic downturn might be too aggressive. She opined that she wouldn't take it as much of a point right now because even if we are going to see any economic slowdown from tariffs, one thing is certain: consumers do not tend to cut back on staples. The sector includes the types of companies and consumer goods that people cannot and will not live without.
However, even in this sector, there are some unusual economic indicators that may reflect signs of an economic recession. This includes the snack indicator, where people tend to cut back on snacks in tough times instead of staple food items and other more essential nutrition types. While this is something to keep in mind about the sector, Sissel said that how the consumer staples are performing reflects the momentum swing we have seen in the market. The outlook is, of course, concerning, as it is necessary to look at how people are thinking about the market conditions and the effects of tariff impacts.
JP Morgan also recently gave a market outlook amid tariffs, saying that the market is very bearish, especially in the macro community. It further said that:
'Most are disregarding the latest trade developments, partly due to 'Trump exhaustion.' We observe that many prefer to stay in cash and maintain lower leverage in their books.'
Talking about this outlook, Sissel said that one of the triggers that one must look out for a potential change in sentiment is the fact that there is a contrarian sentiment, where we have seen a lot of investors buying the dip. A whole generation of investors has learned to buy the dip because, most of the time, the market recovers quickly.
She also said that the Trump exhaustion appears to be very real, as continuous policy changes have created uncertainty in the market, especially regarding tariffs. While it looks like things are calming down, investors are going to be cautious about jumping in too quickly because of the continuous policy changes. She thus opined that we might see cash staying on the sideline a little bit longer, which meant that we have not seen enough change to indicate that any market gains we are seeing right now are sustainable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House officials defend Trump's firing of BLS chief
White House officials on Sunday defended President Trump's decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) following a weak jobs report, a move that has sparked broad criticism. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable,' Kevin Hassett, chair of the National Economic Council, said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Hassett said in another interview on 'Fox News Sunday' that the BLS commissioner has a responsibility to explain major revisions such as the one seen in Friday's jobs report, which showed 258,000 fewer jobs for prior months than initially reported. 'The big downward revision is something of a puzzle. I don't think it was explained very well. And I think that markets might be as much unsettled by the fact that the data are so noisy,' Hassett said. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, one of Trump's top tariff negotiators, said in an interview that aired on CBS's 'Face the Nation' Sunday that the president has 'real concerns' about the jobs numbers reported by the Labor Department. 'Even last year during the campaign, there were enormous swings in the jobs numbers, and so sounds to me like the president has real concerns. You know, not just based on today's, but everything we saw last year,' Greer said in the interview taped on Friday. 'You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' he added. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways. And it's, you know, the president is the president. He can choose who works in the executive branch.' Trump on Friday directed his team to fire BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after the latest jobs report showed the country only adding 73,000 jobs in July, and major revisions for jobs added in May and June. The move prompted immediate outcry from Democrats and a handful of Republicans, with some calling for an investigation. McEntarfer was nominated by former President Biden and overwhelmingly confirmed by the GOP-led Senate early last year in an 86-8 vote. Trump's advisers underscored the president's concerns about revisions to the labor data while defending McEntarfer's firing. Hassett noted that jobs data reported by the government has seen major swings since the COVID-19 pandemic. 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers. In fact, they were extremely reliable, the kind of numbers that you want to guide policy decisions and markets, through COVID. And then when COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed. So the typical monthly revision often was bigger than the number itself,' Hassett said on NBC. Trump, in axing the BLS chief, claimed without evidence that McEntarfer 'faked the Jobs Numbers' before the 2024 election in order to boost former Vice President Kamala Harris's White House bid, citing labor statistics revisions during the Biden administration that boosted job numbers ahead of the election. The president accused her of manipulating data to make him and Republicans look bad, writing on Truth Social on Friday, 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' McEntarfer reacted to Trump's firing of her in a social media post over the weekend, saying it was the 'honor of my life' to serve in the role and hailing the 'vital and important work' carried out by civil servants at the agency.
Politico
15 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP privacy hawks wage quiet battle with TSA over face recognition bill
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the bill's champion, in an interview compared the TSA's increasing use of facial recognition capabilities to similar apparatuses used by authoritarian countries like China and Hungary to conduct massive citizen surveillance. 'It's been used to intimidate, to track and to intimidate freedom of expression and freedom of assembly,' Merkley said. Merkley tried to shoehorn the legislation into last year's reauthorization of Federal Aviation Administration programs. But associations representing airlines, airport employees and other travel-related businesses fiercely opposed it, arguing it would allow bad actors to opt for manual ID checks and significantly increase wait times at airport security checkpoints. Industry backlash against the proposal is well enough known that it might have been the reason lobbyists weren't given an advance heads-up about the Commerce committee's plans to mark up the measure, Ryan Propis, vice president of security and facilitation at the U.S. Travel Association, intimated. 'The discussion at the time was that there's going to be more transparency, more hearings … around the use of biometrics,' said Propis in an interview about assurances the industry received at the time of Merkley's efforts to get the bill included in the FAA reauthorization. 'And unfortunately none of that has happened.' But lawmakers who have been trying to push the bill forward are saying that TSA was the real driving force behind the legislation's withdrawal, with the agency using industry lobbyists as conduits to relay dissatisfaction and mar the measure's chances. When asked Thursday whether he believed TSA itself was raising concerns about the bill, Cruz replied, 'undoubtedly.' The burgeoning industry tasked with supplying technologies that use sophisticated biometric data for identity verification, and which are increasingly powered by AI algorithms, have also arrived on the scene to tank the bill. Two of the sector's top associations, the Security Industry Association and the International Biometrics and Identity Association, sent a letter on the eve of the scheduled markup to Cruz and the top Commerce Committee Democrat, Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington. In the missive, they contended that the bill was 'completely out of line with the Trump Administration's stated priorities for federal agencies to increasingly incorporate advanced technologies and limit unnecessary personnel costs.' Since the start of Trump's second term, the administration has been pushing for federal agencies to slash budgets and reduce personnel, touting technological advances like artificial intelligence as a cheaper, more efficient backfill. Testifying before House appropriators in May on the Trump administration's proposed $247 million cut to the TSA budget, McNeill also noted that her agency has been deploying state-of-the-art screening technology to airports around the globe, adding that 'a commitment to continually embracing new and emerging technology is urgently needed.' Following the postponement of the bill's consideration in committee, Cruz and other members of the panel said they were confident differences could be resolved in time to bring it up at a subsequent business meeting — and gave no indication they were planning to stand down despite administration opposition. 'I think the bill will get marked up,' said Cruz, 'and it's going to pass.'
Business Wire
44 minutes ago
- Business Wire
LINE Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Lineage, Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit with the Schall Law Firm
LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit against Lineage, Inc. ('Lineage' or 'the Company') (NASDAQ: LINE) for violations of the federal securities laws. Investors who purchased the Company's securities pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's Offering Documents issued in connection with its initial public offering ('IPO') conducted in July 2024, are encouraged to contact the firm before September 30, 2025. If you are a shareholder who suffered a loss, click here to participate. We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm's website at or by email at bschall@ The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by an attorney. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. According to the Complaint, the Company made false and misleading statements to the market. Lineage suffered a weakening of demand as customers destocked excessive inventory and adjusted their businesses to changing consumer trends. The Company raised prices leading up to the IPO in an unsustainable manner. The Company failed to counteract its demand problems through marketing or its supposed competitive advantages. Based on these facts, the Company's public statements were false and materially misleading throughout the class period. When the market learned the truth about Lineage, investors suffered damages. Join the case to recover your losses. The Schall Law Firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class action lawsuits and shareholder rights litigation. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and rules of ethics.
