Application 39 (for the 2048 Gaza Summer Olympics) / Return to Palestine review – witness more than theatre
Staged as part of PalArt festival and Shubbak festival, they deploy absurdism, satire and radical joy, swerving between the horrors to capture immense human resilience in the face of unspeakable suffering.
Ahmed Masoud's futuristic play Application 39 (for the 2048 Gaza Summer Olympics) imagines Gaza in the year 2040. An online prank by two siblings (Joe Haddad and Sara Masry) has resulted in Gaza winning the Olympic bid. A political crisis ensues in a land which is now entirely controlled by Israel – they can turn the food 'on and off' we hear, which contains clear echoes of the current blockage of aid by Israel, resulting in the starvation of civilians. This future world is still only in the first phase of a ceasefire and rubble from the 2025 conflict is still lying untouched.
Adapted by the Palestinian playwright from a short story he wrote in 2018, and directed by Cressida Brown, it blends satire with discussions on how to live under occupation, to resist or submit, and the possibility of peace. Alongside this are dramatic accounts of the horrors on the ground in Gaza which chime loudly with the present day; the siblings enact their memories of 2025 – lying under rubble as petrified children whose family is dead, homes razed, and the land turned into a godforsaken place.
There is little need to suspend disbelief as they recount what they see and experience: hospitals and ambulances destroyed, mothers scrambling in panic down flattened streets with their children, hospital directors arrested and detained without charge. Given Israel's ban on allowing journalists into Gaza, these seem like the closest thing to witness testimonies, all the more so because Masoud, whose own family members have been killed in Gaza by Israeli forces, has collected real-life accounts and threaded his play through with those words. There are deeply poetic and reflective moments but also a prevailing sense of a play performed in real time, its suffering contemporaneous, its story real and raw.
The Freedom Theatre's Return to Palestine has had a far longer gestation period – it was devised almost a decade ago, although this is its UK premiere. The company's general manager, Mustafa Sheta, was until recently held without charge by Israeli authorities and the theatre in Jenin, in the West Bank, is no longer accessible to its artists. Still they have produced a finessed and exquisitely tragicomic piece of physical theatre, with magnificent clowning.
Directed by Micaela Miranda and based on real stories collected from across Palestine, it follows Jad, a Palestinian-American, on his first visit to the homeland. He is naive, excited to see his family, and wants a tour of the territory. Together, the superb six-strong cast (Motaz Malhees, Amir Abu Alrob, Ameena Adileh, Sofia Asir, Alaa Shehadeh and Osama Alazzeh) twist or stretch to become hooting cars, beds, tables, chairs, and the Statue of Liberty. It is visually poetic in the shapes and shadows they create, and both deadly serious and gloriously silly in tone.
Just as in Masoud's play, there is minimal staging, constrained this time to a narrow white rectangle on a black stage – a metaphor for the confined yet still contested land left for Palestinians in the region? Everyone is satirised, from Israeli officials at the airport who are horrified by Jad's Muslim surname to Americans boasting freedom (while aiding occupation) and comically garrulous Arabs.
Sudden moments of pain inject a drama that moves through trauma and into a joy that feels deeply radical, heartwarming and filled with love. As Jad travels across the West Bank, he witnesses the dead-eyed administrative implacability of the checkpoint guards, the stark contrast between cramped Palestinian camps and the world of the settlers, as well as violence and death. An oud player and percussionist are sensational, heightening the comedy and tension.
Both shows give the current state of conflict its historical context: they speak of the Nakba, violent occupation, illegal settlements, daily injustices and casual daily killings of Palestinian civilians. This is more than just theatre. It is art, activism, political resistance and storytelling – painful, joyous, elemental and essential.
At Theatro Technis, London, until 1 June
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
MPs urge UK to immediately recognise Palestinian state
The UK should immediately recognise the state of Palestine, a majority of MPs on the Commons foreign affairs committee have said. It comes as Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer faces fresh calls from within Labour's ranks to make the move, amid warnings of mass starvation in Gaza, and after France indicated it would be doing so within months. In a new report, the Labour and Lib Dem MPs on the select committee argue that statehood is an "inalienable right" that should "not be made conditional".But their two Tory colleagues said a state of Palestine should only be recognised as part of a long-term political solution to the conflict in the Middle East, echoing the Labour government's position. French President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday evening that his country would officially recognise a Palestinian state at a UN meeting in Keir has previously said the UK should reserve recognition of Palestinian statehood for when it would have the "greatest impact" - without specifying when this would in a report published on Friday, the committee said the government should make the move "while there is still a state to recognise". "An inalienable right should not be made conditional," the report adds."The government cannot continue to wait for the perfect time because experience shows that there will never be a perfect time."That section of the report was backed by all six Labour MPs who voted, including chairwoman Dame Emily Thornberry, and the two Lib Dems on the was not endorsed by its two Conservative members, Aphra Brandreth and Sir John Whittingdale, who said the UK should only back the move as part of a wider two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian is not unusual for select committees to be split on controversial issues but they will normally try to speak with one Tory MPs on the foreign affairs committee made an unsuccessful attempt to change the report to reflect their views, arguing that recognition should accompany the release of hostages taken by Hamas in October 2023, and the creation of Palestinian authorities without Hamas 60 MPs reportedly called for the UK to immediately recognise Palestine in a letter earlier this month, with London major Sir Sadiq Khan also making the call on Wednesday. In a statement on Thursday evening condemning "unspeakable and indefensible" conditions in Gaza, Sir Keir said statehood was an "inalienable right".He reiterated his call for a ceasefire in the conflict, adding this would "put us on a path" towards recognising a Palestinian Secretary Jonathan Reynolds had earlier said Labour ministers were "deeply committed" to recognition, but they wanted it to be "meaningful," adding: "At the minute, there is not a Palestinian state there". 'Not listening' Most countries - about 139 in all - formally recognise a Palestinian state, although many European nations - and the United States - say they will only do so as part of moves towards a long-term resolution to the Ireland and Norway formally took the step last year, hoping to exert diplomatic pressure to secure a ceasefire in currently has limited rights to participate in the work of the UN, and is also recognised by various international organisations, including the Arab argue recognition would largely be a symbolic gesture unless questions over the leadership and extent of a Palestine state are addressed their report, the MPs acknowledged that the Israeli government "is not listening to the UK," and was only "sporadically" listening to the United States, by far its most significant military to the BBC on Tuesday, former UK Foreign Office boss Lord McDonald argued recognition itself "doesn't really amount to very much," adding that a Palestine state lacked defined borders or an "agreed government". Aid distribution call The report comes after the UK and 27 other countries condemned the "drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians" seeking food and water in foreign ministry rejected the countries' statement, saying it was "disconnected from reality and sends the wrong message to Hamas".In the rest of their report, which was endorsed unanimously, the MPs called for a UN-led system to distribute aid in Gaza, replacing the controversial US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in place since also said the UK should justify how "allowing indirect exports" of British parts for F-35 fighter jets used by Israel complies with the UK's obligations under international UK says it does not export the parts directly to Israel, but rather to manufacturing centres abroad as part of a global programme, and it cannot prevent Israel from obtaining the components. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
There is a dangerous disconnect: on Gaza, politics no longer speaks for the people
It was meant to be a cosy conversation about cooking and new motherhood. But BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour took an unexpectedly bleak turn on Thursday morning, when the chef Yasmin Khan turned suddenly tearful in the middle of promoting her new cookbook, saying she couldn't talk about her own struggles to breastfeed without mentioning the mothers in Gaza unable to provide for their literally starving babies. It was a striking illustration of how far this medieval horror has broken through, bleeding across the everyday lives even of people who don't usually follow politics. You don't have to know anything about the Middle East to understand what those newspaper pictures of emaciated children, with their drawn little faces and heartbreakingly visible ribs, mean. This is what famine looks like, right down to the return of Bob Geldof, begging the world to act just as he did 40 years ago at Live Aid. Except this time it's no natural disaster, but what the World Health Organization calls a man-made mass starvation: the chillingly avoidable consequence of an aid system forcing people to choose between risking their lives for a bag of flour, or dying for lack of one. More than 1,000 people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking food in Gaza since May, according to the UN. Médecins Sans Frontières says even its staff, lucky enough still to be earning salaries, are now going hungry: there's almost nothing left to buy in the markets. The newswire Agence France-Presse spoke of watching helplessly as its Palestinian freelancers, who have risked everything to get news out of Gaza when foreign journalists can't get in, become too weak to work. Meanwhile, back in Britain, people who want to see arrests for war crimes read instead about clampdowns on pro-Palestine activists. That ministers have been quick to empathise with the frustrations of a very different crowd protesting at the housing of asylum seekers in hotels merely adds salt to the wounds. Labour MPs are openly desperate now for their government to do something more than issue dramatically worded threats of future action that never quite materialises. Even cabinet ministers are publicly lobbying for the formal recognition of Palestinian statehood while (in the words of Wes Streeting, who could easily lose his marginal Ilford North seat over this war) there's still a Palestine left. Recognition would be a largely symbolic act of solidarity, which in itself would do little to fill hungry bellies in Gaza. But ministers' problem is that there seems increasingly little reason for not doing it now: the longstanding argument that this prize should be saved for the right moment, to help unlock progress towards a two-state solution, made more sense when the two-state dream wasn't being actively crushed in front of us. But perhaps the real plea here is for Keir Starmer to recognise the country he actually leads. After the horrors of the 7 October 2023 massacre, there was broad acceptance that Israel could not be expected simply to sit back and do nothing. Even a year into what was by then a highly divisive war, YouGov found that more than half of Britons still felt Israel had been justified in going into Gaza. But critically, only 14% felt its use of force there was proportionate. Sympathy has drained away as Israel's war of self-defence began to resemble first one of vengeance, and then something darker. In language no former Israeli prime minister uses lightly, Ehud Olmert has described a proposal to corral Palestinians into a settlement on the ruins of Rafah and prevent them leaving as in effect a 'concentration camp'. More than half of Britons now favour financial sanctions like those slapped on prominent Russians over Ukraine, or suspending arms sales. These arguments are now mainstream, cross-party – the veteran Tory MPs Kit Malthouse and Edward Leigh made passionate cases in parliament this week for recognising Palestine – and driven not by the kind of creeping antisemitism Starmer was quite right to confront in his own party, but by what people see every morning, scrolling through their phones. David Lammy's rhetoric is already about as strong as a foreign secretary's can get – this week he condemned Israel's 'inhumane' and 'dangerous' new aid system, and what he called 'settler terrorism' in the West Bank – and many Labour MPs suspect he'd privately like to go further than the sanctions and restrictions on arms sales he listed. But Downing Street is said to be wary of getting ahead of Donald Trump at a crucial stage in ceasefire negotiations (with Israel's parliament going into summer recess, relieving some pressure on the minority government of its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, it's hoped there is a window for a deal). Britain has always argued that our influence over Israel is best magnified by synchronising efforts with the US, and though the chaos of this White House makes that harder, Trump's is still the only voice Netanyahu really hears. Yet while everyone prays for that ceasefire deal to be done, a dangerous gap is opening in Britain between parliament and people. A year into power, Starmer is increasingly adept at foreign policy, but much less so at handling the emotive domestic blowback from it. Without seeing the intelligence reports crossing the desk of the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, I wouldn't second-guess her decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terror group. A breach of security at RAF Brize Norton was never going to be taken lightly. But, inevitably, the process of police officers trying to figure out in real time what elderly vicars can or can't now say in public about Palestine has caused its share of farce and fury. After a retired teacher was arrested for allegedly holding a sign featuring a Private Eye cartoon about the proscription, West Yorkshire police issued an unusual statement saying they were sorry if he was 'unhappy with the circumstances' of his arrest. As with this summer's other prospective powder keg, the protests building up outside some asylum seeker accommodation, doubtless everyone is learning as they go. There is, however, only so much policing can do to resolve what are really political conflicts, born in both cases of frustration with what both sets of protesters (in their very different ways) see as political failure to act. To hold together all these volatile, mutually hostile parts of a fractured society through a hot and angry summer will be head-spinningly complicated, a daunting ask even for an experienced government. Yet that's the nature of the job Starmer applied for last July. A year on, we must all hope he is equal to it. Gaby Hinsliff is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kiss rocker Gene Simmons has two strict rules for buyer of his lavish $28 million home
Kiss co-founder Gene Simmons had a message for potential buyers of his Beverly Hills mansion: He didn't want them to rock and roll all night and party every day. 'You have such wonderful times there, you don't want some schmuck in the place you call home,' Simmons, 75, in April told The Wall Street Journal as he sought to sell the opulent Southern California abode. Simmons, who played bass and shared vocals with Stanley in the iconic band, laid forth specific rules for the type of buyer he preferred to sell to. 'No drugs, no alcoholics,' the Haifa, Israel-born musician. 'I don't want anybody coming in there who is going to destroy the place. The I Was Made For Lovin' You artist - who performed in the famed heavy metal band and merchandising juggernaut with Paul Stanley, Ace Frehley, and Peter Criss - was able to sell the Beverly Hills abode for double the $14 million asking price, according to The 7,741 square foot Beverly Hills home has four bedrooms and five bathrooms, and was built in 2017. It is located in the luxe Los Angeles enclave on a hill that provides views of neighboring areas such as Century City, Coldwater Canyon and the Pacific Ocean. 'Family is forever,' Simmons told WSJ of the home while it was on the market. The Forever artist continued, 'You want someplace that can be your business center, close to everything that you need in L.A., but also a place where your kids want to come over and hang with you.' Simmons told WSJ he and his spouse Shannon Tweed Simmons had long resided in Beverly Hills, and picked up the pad home in 2021 amid a planned move to Las Vegas, as a way to maintain a presence in the City of Angels. But the Hide Your Heart artist and his wife found the desert heat of Las Vegas punishing, and relocated back to the Beverly Hills home, putting the Sin City abode on the real estate market. Simmons told WSJ that for 'privacy, views and location near movie studios, business partners, and his children' were all factors in the selection of the Beverly Hills home. The listing was held by Compass agents Lisa Young, Kennon Earl and Thomas Davila.
