
UK government could force Google to make changes - what are they?
If you found this article via a search engine, it was probably Google.
In the UK, 90% of general search queries use the search engine, and more than 200,000 businesses rely on its advertising.
Now, the UK government has given an update in their investigation into whether Google has too much power, saying it is a 'key gateway to the internet' and may need to loosen its control.
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said today that it is minded to give the tech firm 'strategic market status', after starting to look into this in January.
This would require Google to follow certain rules around competition with other search engines and ad providers.
At the moment, Google is the default search engine for Apple and Samsung phones in the UK after making deals with their makers, but in future this may have to change.
Users could be given a 'choice screen' to pick between search engines, in case they want DuckDuckGo, Bing, Ecosia, or something else instead.
It could be forced to introduce new 'fair ranking' measures for its search results, and avoid giving its own products preferential billing (such as YouTube or Google Maps).
Advertising costs might indirectly become lower: the government said that the amount spent by UK business entitites for search advertising was equivelent to over £33,000 per advertiser and 'if competition was working well, we would expect these costs to be lower.'
News publishers might get more control of how their content appears in search results and AI summaries, such as potentially more credit and direct links, as well as more extensive previews.
It might also become easier to port search data to another provider. The government said: 'Innovative businesses struggle to compete as people can't easily share their search data with firms developing innovative new services which could benefit them.'
The particular investigation by the CMA is, but there have been similar actions in other jurisdictions too.
In the US, Google may be forced to sell off part of its ad business after it was found to be too dominant, violating antitrust law.
Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater said: 'The Court's ruling is clear: Google is a monopolist and has abused its monopoly power.
'Google's unlawful dominance allows them to censor and even deplatform American voices. And at the same time, Google destroyed and hid information that exposed its illegal conduct. Today's opinion confirms Google's controlling hand over online advertising and, increasingly, the internet itself.'
The EU has also taken action to regulate Google under competition law.
Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy, said: 'Online search engines are the door through which users discover and find information, products and services.
'Our initial view is that Alphabet, in the ranking of Google Search results, gives more prominence and treats its services, like shopping or travel, more favourably than similar services of third parties.
'We also initially found that Alphabet was not enabling free offers and choice for developers and users on its Google Play app store, even though it is required to do so under the Digital Markets Act.
'Both practices negatively impact many European and non-European businesses that rely on Google Search or Google Play to reach their users in the EU.'
Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: 'Google search has delivered tremendous benefits – but our investigation so far suggests there are ways to make these markets more open, competitive and innovative.
'Today marks an important milestone in our implementation of the new Digital Markets Competition Regime in the UK.
'Alongside our proposed designation of Google's search activities, we have set out a roadmap of possible future action to improve outcomes for people and businesses in the UK.
'These targeted and proportionate actions would give UK businesses and consumers more choice and control over how they interact with Google's search services – as well as unlocking greater opportunities for innovation across the UK tech sector and broader economy.'
A final decision on giving Google strategic market status in the UK is due to be made by October following a consultation process.
In a blog post today, Oliver Bethell, then company's senior director of competition, said: 'The outcome could have significant implications for businesses and consumers in the UK.
'The positive impact of Google Search on the UK is undeniable. Our tools and services contribute billions of pounds a year to the UK — £118 billion in 2023 alone. More Trending
'The CMA has today reiterated that 'strategic market status' does not imply that anti-competitive behaviour has taken place — yet this announcement presents clear challenges to critical areas of our business in the UK. We're concerned that the scope of the CMA's considerations remains broad and unfocused, with a range of interventions being considered before any evidence has been provided.
'Delivering certainty matters to businesses like ours that relentlessly invest in innovation. It also matters to every UK business that benefits from services like Search to reach customers — and to every user that relies on Search to get things done.
'The UK has historically benefitted from early access to our latest innovations, but punitive regulations could change that. Proportionate, evidence-based regulation will be essential to preventing the CMA's roadmap from becoming a roadblock to growth in the UK.
'As we move into the next phase of this process, we will continue working constructively with the CMA to avoid measures that would limit opportunities for UK businesses and consumers.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Keir Starmer makes new promise to spend billions extra on defence after Iran strikes
MORE: Victory for Metro after grassroots venues handed £30,000,000 in support
MORE: 'I was the only out lesbian MP for 13 years – here's how Parliament has changed'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ITV News
18 minutes ago
- ITV News
'Very wealthy group of people' poised to buy TikTok, Trump says
US President Donald Trump has said a "very wealthy group of people" have agreed to buy social media app TikTok from its Chinese owners. Hinting at a deal which could safeguard the future of the app, Trump said specific details on the buyer will be revealed in two weeks and offered little further detail. He said: 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need, probably, China approval, and I think President Xi will probably do it.' Earlier in June, Trump signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the US for a further 90 days, while his administration worked to make a deal to bring the app under American ownership. It marked the third deadline extension, and came after the Supreme Court upheld a law banning TikTok in January - causing the platform to breifly go dark. TikTok is owned by Bytedance, and boasts around 170 million users in the US. The Supreme Court said the ban was necessary to deal with the "well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok's data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary'. The US is concerned vast swathes of user data, including sensitive information on viewing habits could be obtained by the Chinese government. Officials have also warned the algorithm that fuels what users see on the app is vulnerable to manipulation by Chinese authorities, who can use it to shape content on the platform in a way that's difficult to detect. TikTok, which sued the government last year over the law, has long denied it could be used as a tool of Beijing.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump says the administration is working on a 'temporary pass' for immigrants in certain industries
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump said in an interview on Fox News that the administration is working to develop a temporary pass for immigrants who work in certain industries, which would mark the latest shift in the administration's approach to immigration enforcement for farmworkers. 'We're working on it right now. We're going to work it so that some kind of a temporary pass where people pay taxes, where the farmer can have a little control, as opposed to you walk in and take everybody away,' Trump said in an interview that taped Friday and aired Sunday on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures.' The president referenced authorities going to farms and taking 'away people that have been working there for 15 and 20 years, who are good, who possibly came in incorrectly.' 'What we're going to do is we're going to do something for farmers, where we can let the farmer sort of be in charge. The farmer knows. He's not going to hire a murderer,' Trump said. 'When you go into a farm and he's had somebody working with him for nine years doing this kind of work, which is hard work to do, and a lot of people aren't going to do it, and you end up destroying a farmer because you took all the people away. It's a problem.' Reached for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security provided the same comment given by the department earlier this month after the White House reversed a plan to limit immigration enforcement activity at certain industry workplaces. "The President has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts," the statement read. "Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safeguard public safety, national security and economic stability. These operations target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation," the statement continued. A White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for further details on Trump's plan and whether DHS' response conflicted with the temporary pass plan. The move marks the latest shift in the administration's handling of immigrant farmworkers. The White House has waffled in recent weeks on whether to exempt certain worksites from Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Trump said in a post to Truth Social on June 12 that farmers and people in the hotel and leisure industries said that the administration's immigration policy 'is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.' The president said that 'we must protect our Farmers,' adding that 'changes are coming.' NBC News previously reported that at around the same time, ICE paused worksite arrests at agriculture, restaurant and hotel industries. But just days later, the administration reopened arrests of immigrant workers in these industries. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at DHS, provided the same statement then as the DHS statement on Sunday. 'The President has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts,' McLaughlin said after DHS reversed the pause earlier this month. A White House spokesperson said after the pause reversal that Trump 'remains committed to enforcing federal immigration law — anyone present in the United States illegally is at risk of deportation.' Trump in April previously floated the idea that undocumented people working at farms and hotels could be allowed to leave the country and return legally. NBC News previously reported that an administration official said Trump wanted to improve H-2A and H-2B programs, which allow employers to temporarily hire migrant workers.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Hall of Fame horse trainer D. Wayne Lukas, a winner of 15 Triple Crown races, dies at 89
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.