PIC's Daybreak disaster shows that remedies without accountability won't work
The PIC's 2024 integrated annual report paints a picture of an organisation committed to transformation and social impact through responsible investing. It boasts that R2.369-trillion of its assets come from the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), and another R149.6-billion and R59-billion from the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) and Compensation Fund, respectively.
Counting eggs
But behind the glossy values and ESG buzzwords lies a troubling pattern: heavy exposure to politically connected individuals and underperforming entities. The Mpati Commission, formally known as the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of Impropriety at the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), was established in 2018 to investigate claims of corruption, political interference and governance failures at the PIC.
Chaired by former Supreme Court of Appeal president Justice Lex Mpati, the inquiry exposed a pattern of dubious investments, poor oversight and undue influence over decisions involving billions in public funds.
Most alarming, according to the commission, was the PIC's R1.85-billion exposure to Matome Maponya-linked businesses – including a R1.2-billion deal in 2015 to fund the Afpo Consortium's acquisition of Afgri Poultry, later renamed Daybreak Foods. The commission's final report, delivered in 2020, made 243 recommendations to clean up the institution and restore accountability.
That poultry business is now close to going bust.
Early rot
By 2016, a PIC-seconded CEO described Daybreak as 'technically insolvent' and flagged that the R1.2-billion paid for the business was likely to be a dramatic overvaluation. Despite this, the PIC continued to inject support over the years – even as internal tensions, mismanagement and poor financial oversight persisted.
Fast forward to 2023: a new CEO, Richard Manzini, launches a restructuring plan, aims to boost controls and secures PIC approval for a R250-million facility to upgrade infrastructure and stabilise operations. But in a twist emblematic of public sector inefficiency, the PIC delayed the disbursement.
By early 2025, only R176-million had trickled in – too little, too late. Manzini and other executives resigned in protest. By April, the situation had become catastrophic: salaries went unpaid, feed deliveries stopped and thousands of chickens starved to death.
Chairperson payout as Daybreak burns
Bojane Segooa, the now-former board chair of Daybreak Farms, exited the crisis-hit company in a blaze of scandal last weekend. After reportedly demanding R1.2-million in board fees – and allegedly clashing with CFO Aubrey Dali, who refused to authorise the payment – Segooa walked away with a R625,000 golden handshake.
What other positions has Segooa held?
Segooa is no corporate novice. Her track record includes significant roles in both public and private sector boardrooms. She holds or has held influential board seats at some of South Africa's largest investment and infrastructure entities:
RH Bophelo (JSE-listed healthcare investment firm): Oversaw a cross-listing on the Rwanda Stock Exchange, helped grow NAV from R647-million to R863-million, and drove a 79% increase in investment income. Pushed for gender pay equity and elevated BEE status from level 6 to level 1.
PereSec Prime Brokers (Pty) Ltd (SA's largest stockbroking firm): First chairperson of the Audit and Risk Committee, established governance frameworks aligned with King IV, and initiated transformation measures, including the appointment of African female ARC members.
Broadband Infraco (state-owned broadband operator): Contributed to a strategy securing a R2-billion strategic asset, oversaw R500-million in infrastructure upgrades and ring-fenced R100-million in procurement spend for African female entrepreneurs.
Sources describe her exit as 'strategic abandonment.' She left a gutted company where some 3,400 employees have not been paid, retirement contributions are missing and starving chickens made headlines after the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Johannesburg ordered an immediate halt to their mistreatment.
As of May 2025, more than R1.44-billion in public funds are at risk in Daybreak alone.
The 2024 annual report shows the PIC's portfolio delivered a modest 3.6% growth, with assets under management rising from R2.6-trillion to R2.69 trillion. But, these aggregate numbers mask serious exposure risks.
Risky business
PIC's portfolio is fraught with risks. The top 10 investments, when scrutinised for transparency and risk profile, reveal significant vulnerabilities.
Among the disclosed investments, Eskom bonds top the list with an exposure estimate of R83-billion. This high-risk investment is plagued by Eskom's ongoing debt crisis. Similarly, Transnet debt, once in default and now recently settled, stands at R4.7-billion, with future re-entry anticipated.
Daybreak Foods, currently in turmoil, represents an unlisted equity exposure of R1.44-billion, exacerbated by an additional R250-million in emergency funds. Investments in African Bank and the SA SME Fund also present their own challenges, with exposure estimates of approximately R3.6-billion and R2-billion, respectively.
Undisclosed, not unnoticed
The undisclosed exposures, based on estimates or incomplete public information, add another layer of uncertainty. Investments such as Lanseria Airport, undergoing performance review, and flagship assets like the V&A Waterfront and Mall of Cyprus (via Pareto), remain opaque.
Stakes in venture capital firms such as IDF Capital and Fireball Capital, estimated at R175-million and R250-million, respectively, target high-growth tech sectors but also come with substantial risk.
A hard limit to assessing risk is that the PIC has been less transparent about its private equity and offshore real estate investments compared with its bond and infrastructure holdings. This lack of disclosure makes it susceptible to political influence and instability.
Redemption deferred
PIC CEO Abel Sithole and board chair David Masondo have been quick to affirm that the state asset manager has turned a corner. Of the 243 recommendations handed down by the Mpati Commission, 242 have reportedly been implemented. Governance structures have been reinforced, risk committees recalibrated and the PIC even posted a R141-million dividend to the state – evidence, say executives, of an institution on the mend.
That leadership baton is now being passed on. On 15 May 2025, the PIC confirmed the appointment of former Development Bank of Southern Africa CEO Patrick Dlamini as its next chief executive, effective July 2025.
Endorsed by the Cabinet, Dlamini steps into one of the most powerful roles in South African finance – at the helm of the country's largest equities investor – with a mandate to restore credibility and deepen transformation. His arrival signals continuity in strategy, but also intensifies public expectations of stronger accountability.
But Daybreak's collapse suggests the rot isn't just about compliance – it's about consequence. If nearly R1.5-billion can disappear into a black hole of mismanagement, politically connected deals and ignored red flags, then the risk to the public purse isn't procedural. It's systemic.
What the Mpati Commission diagnosed was institutional capture through relationships and influence. What Daybreak reveals is how little that diagnosis means if no one is held to account.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
UDM to ‘vigorously push' for the prioritisation of combating corruption
UDM also vowed to advocate for the two commissions' findings to be legislated and institutionalised. The government needs to prioritise combating corruption, and the United Democratic Movement (UDM) will vigorously push for this by demanding implementation of the Zondo and the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) commissions' reports. The UDM also vowed to advocate for the two commissions' findings to be legislated and institutionalised, ensuring that combating corruption becomes a regular part of the state's operations. ALSO READ: 'We don't want him to be a pop star': Allegations by KZN police commissioner Mkhwanazi sparks uproar No compensation for mineworkers The party said that it would ensure the concerns of former TBVC (Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Venda and Ciskei) states' ex-mineworkers who contracted diseases but did not receive compensation, would be addressed. All this is contained in a report presented to the UDM caucus by party president and Deputy Minister of Defence and Military Veterans, Bantu Holomisa, as part of his accountability to the party regarding his performance since his appointment to the executive last July. In his report Holomisa said: 'The State Capture Commission unveiled architecture of corruption that compromised state institutions and undermined public trust. Yet, implementation of its findings remains inconsistent and slow. 'The UDM, through parliamentary procedures must demand detailed progress reports from the Presidency and the [National Prosecuting Authority], ensure asset recovery is expedited and transparent; create a dedicated oversight structure within parliament to track implementation and prevent institutional regression.' ALSO READ: Holomisa slams Cabinet and Treasury for crippling SANDF funding UDM pushing for reforms The party must push for reforms to seal procurement loopholes and reinforce the independence of law enforcement bodies. It must lead in championing the expediting of legislation to enshrine the commission's rulings into law, effectively safeguarding the state from any form of corruption. The Zondo Commission was appointed to probe the extent of corruption involving the capture of the state by corporations and unearth billions of Rand of alleged graft, mainly involving the Gupta brothers' companies. It found state funds were syphoned from state-owned enterprises, provincial administrations and national government departments, including an attempt to take over the National Treasury. Senior politicians and officials were found to have facilitated and benefited from the graft. Still, none have been jailed, while attempts to have the Gupta brothers extradited have so far failed. Regarding the PIC graft, the UDM would also demand accountability from the state and the implementation of the Lex Mpati commission report. NOW READ: David Mabuza's funeral date confirmed as Mokonyane dismisses ANC criticism claims
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘Progress' lands on the doorstep of rural communities as residents blast lithium mine
'Mining activity will certainly have an impact on an otherwise tranquil farming environment, but such impacts are a consequence of progress,' SA Lithium consultant Thys Blom remarked rather glibly last year, when several residents and landowners objected to the establishment of a new lithium mine near Umzumbe on the KwaZulu-Natal South Coast. 'Tranquillity' and 'progress' are both loaded, relative terms, shaped by the perceptions of the various parties who stand to win or lose from a particular situation. For Thys Blom, a Port Shepstone development planning consultant hired by the new SA Lithium group, the benefits of the new Highbury mine at Umzumbe are numerous and manifest, including a R2.4-billion capital investment into the local economy; the creation of hundreds of new jobs in an impoverished rural area; mining royalties for the fiscus; the upgrading of district road networks and the production of lithium-ion batteries as part of the global transition towards electric vehicles and renewable energy. SA Lithium director Ian Harebottle asserts that the company has already created more than 800 direct or indirect jobs for local residents (though Blom presented a significantly lower estimate in his official development motivation to the Ray Nkonyeni Municipality last year: stating that the project would lead to an estimated 100 new jobs in the first year, rising to just over 300 jobs by the 20th year of mining). Yet, whatever the numbers turn out to be, unemployment rates in the surrounding rural area are undoubtedly high, creating the ingredients for potential division and conflict as residents compete for jobs, haulage contracts and other opportunities: while also contemplating who really benefits and loses from living in the shadow of an open-cast mining pit and crushing plant for the next 25 years. Evacuations, blasting and dust For the residents of eChibini, Magog and Umsinsini, 'progress' is likely to include regular blasting noise and clouds of dust, while those living closest to the mine are also required to evacuate their homes periodically during blasting operations. (Satellite images show several homes less than 300m from the mine) There are also fears that scores of families may lose their current homes and land as mining expands further over the 1,200ha mining site. However, SA Lithium director Harebottle denies that any residents will lose land. According to community sources, directly affected families were previously supplied with fruit and fried chicken takeaway meals by mine management during such blast evacuations. Now they get an 'inconvenience allowance' for having to shelter periodically at a local crèche during these operations. Several residents contacted by Daily Maverick were reluctant to discuss their concerns on the record, citing concerns about increased tension and uncertainty in a rural community with a high rate of unemployment. A 42-year-old resident of eChibini (name withheld) said she and several neighbours renting homes in the area were living in a state of uncertainty. 'I have no idea what is going to happen because some people have gone and others are staying. I know of four families who are moving out, but there is no clear communication, at least with me. 'So, with all that is happening around us, I think that moving out is best, because we don't own this land. It has come to the point where some of us don't seem to have a choice. 'It's not like we want to leave our homes or the graves of our families behind – but no one is coming to help us. There may be minerals here that can be used, but we would also just like to be treated as human beings.' In the interim, she said, her family and several neighbours were required to evacuate their homes and move to a shelter point roughly once a week due to blasting. 'In the beginning, people stayed there for two to three hours at a time, but now that has reduced to about an hour.' Initially, evacuated residents were also supplied with KFC meals and other snacks, she said, but this had changed more recently, with affected families now receiving a R1,200 monthly payment. Harebottle reiterates his position that no one will lose land, stating: 'Regular formal interactions with all affected communities in the area of the project are ongoing and in full compliance with all legal requirements and all national guidelines. Claims to the contrary are outlandish and defamatory,' he said in response to questions from Daily Maverick. However, a copy of the company's social and labour plan has not been published and was not included in the voluminous bundle of public documents provided by SA Lithium during a municipal zoning application last year. Heavy truck traffic Aside from the impacts of blasting operations, noise, dust or rock-crushing, the influence of the mine also extends eastwards to the Fairview Mission area due to the projected increase in heavy truck traffic along a densely populated district road. According to a traffic impact assessment commissioned by SA Lithium consultants, an average of 222 trucks will travel between Fairview and Durban's export harbour daily once the mine is fully developed. That equates to roughly one truck every seven minutes. In a written objection sent to the Ray Nkonyeni Municipality last July, a resident summed up her concerns like this: 'We value our homes, we come back to them for peace and relaxation, which has been taken away from us. (At) 2am in the morning trucks drive over our heads while we are sleeping at night, shine their thousand lights in your window 7 days a week. 'In terms of the license, we must endure this for the next 20 years. The volume (of trucks) we see now is nothing compared to what is still to come. … Is this fair to us?' Gcwensa Attorneys wrote to the Department of Mineral Resources on 20 July 2023 to record that members of the Fairview Economic Development Committee objected to the mining and prospecting operations by SA Lithium/Afli Exploration, which they claimed had begun without consultation or consent. 'The continued operation of this mine presents a myriad of problems for the Fairview community in terms of safety, environmental and health issues of this community.' At two subsequent meetings of the Fairview Landowners Association in September 2023, residents also raised concerns about the safety of children walking to school, with so many heavy trucks on the road. In response, Harebottle said haulage trucks contracted to SA Lithium were restricted to a speed limit of 30km/h on this section of road and any exceedances should be reported. The landowners reiterated that they had neither been consulted nor given an opportunity to engage with SA Lithium before mining operations began, further emphasising that Fairview did not fall under the authority of the KwaMadlala traditional authority. Rezoning, public consultation issues On June 25 last year, another Fairview resident complained to the municipality that proposals to rezone farming land to mining had not been advertised properly. She became aware of the proposal by accident, noting that it had not been advertised at local community halls or tuck shops. Nor did it refer to the proximity of Fairview to the new mine. This gave her the impression that the municipality was 'not aware of the existence of Fairview Mission, or it was a deliberate attempt to completely disregard the residents'. A letter from a Fairview family on the same date raised similar concerns about the apparent failure to consult residents of this area about the impact of a new mine on their doorsteps. 'This leaves us as the community exposed and oblivious to the social, financial, environmental, as well as the health impact this mining activity will have on us and our children… This mining activity just keeps edging closer and closer to the occupied land, where there are schools, homes and graveyards, which has resulted in several people being put in a position where they have to leave their homes and where some are now living in houses that have structural … damage due to blasting that is taking place on their back doors.' Linda Cele, a Durban electrical engineer who grew up near Fairview Mission and still owns a family farm close to the Highbury mine, told Daily Maverick that residents found it difficult to engage in public participation meetings or to access information they needed to protect their interests. Noting that several residents in the area grew sugar cane and other crops, along with rearing livestock, Cele said one of his main objectives was to ensure that mining did not lead to long-term environmental pollution or degradation of the land and water around Fairview. 'Sometimes it feels like we are totally on our own. At the end of the day, we don't want to be left with a wasteland when the mining ends.' Closer to the coastline, there are concerns about impacts on the Umzumbe River estuary and local beaches due to water extraction and potential pollution from the mine. Paddy Norman, a resident of Sea Park and representative of the Wildlife and Environment Society of South Africa, believes the society's objection to the municipal rezoning of the Highbury land was disregarded entirely. 'Woefully inadequate' boxes ticked 'As far as I can see, they (SA Lithium/Afli) ticked all the official boxes, but the boxes were woefully inadequate,' argues Norman, a retired geologist and mining engineer. Norman wrote to the municipality, suggesting that SA Lithium had adopted a 'foot in the door' approach, with the intention of subsequently extending the affected area with greatly increased negative impacts on the local communities. Because the rezoning application had been submitted after mining operations began on a large scale, the mine appeared to be operating illegally, he alleged in a submission last year. Geremy Cliff, chair of the Umzumbe Beach Ratepayers Association, said a public meeting on July 5 last year was the first opportunity for many interested and affected parties to discuss the operation, 'long after SA Lithium was granted a licence to mine'. 'This is a serious flaw in the public consultation process. At the meeting, and in subsequent email correspondence, the neighbouring Fairview community clearly has some major issues to deal with, in the form of the noise and dust disturbance by the heavy vehicles transporting the lithium extract, seemingly at all hours of the day (not just Monday to Friday 08.00-17.00), as well as the impact of the detonations on their homes. 'Ian Harebottle from SA Lithium stated that there had been extensive consultation with the community but this was strongly disputed by those from the community present at the meeting. This issue cannot be swept aside, as a mere technicality, especially given the fact that SA Lithium does not have a website to share information with the public on a regular basis.' River water pollution and extraction fears His association was also concerned about the potential impact on the Umzumbe River and estuary from pollution or the extraction of river water for mining operations. According to Cliff, Harebottle told the meeting that Ugu municipality water was too expensive to be used by the mine and that borehole volumes were limited, so most of the water would come from the river. 'This may be acceptable when there is lots of rain, but in times of drought I fear the mine will not reduce its uptake and the ecological viability of the estuary will suffer greatly.' Cliff also raised concern about apparent discrepancies between the mine water use figures supplied by Harebottle at the public meeting (initially 5m3 daily, rising to 15m3 daily) and the volumes provided in the company's water use licence application (around 1,000m3 per day). Traffic impact reaction In response to the concerns of objectors, the Ray Nkonyeni Municipality has stated that a traffic impact study had recommended that the mining company should build new 'internal service roads' to accommodate additional heavy vehicle traffic and that it should also spray roads with water to reduce dust levels. The municipality's law enforcement superintendent further stated that 'everything is under control' and there was no objection to the mine from a traffic perspective. Regarding criticism of the public consultation process, the municipality said: 'Due to the overwhelming amount of objections received during public participation, a public hearing was held on 5 July 2024 with all the interested parties where an engagement with (Harebottle) was conducted.' It further said that: 'The application was duly advertised (South Coast Herald on 24 May 2024) and copies of notices forwarded to adjacent landowners, and persons who may in the opinion of the Municipality have an interest in the application, as prescribed by the Ray Nkonyeni Municipal Planning and Land Use Management Bylaw.' Regarding concerns about water use and potential pollution, the municipality said it had been assured by the mining company that 'No harmful chemicals will be used, no slimes dams will be created and no potable water will be required, with maximum reticulation and minimal water losses.' *** SA Lithium responds SA Lithium spokesperson Ian Harebottle has rejected suggestions that the company took any 'short cuts' or acted illegally in developing the mine. 'All key departments were kept fully updated and informed throughout the extremely long and arduous (approval) process.' Asked to explain why the company began to develop the mine before a water use licence application (Wula) and the municipal rezoning were approved, he said: 'While some duplicity (sic) exists between government departments – in this instance Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources, the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development and local municipalities) who were engaged simultaneously, absolutely no short cuts were taken.' (However, during the rezoning application, Plankonsult's Thys Blom acknowledged that mine development began before the rezoning approval, stating that: 'The applicant (SA Lithium) was under the impression that obtaining environmental authorisation and issuing of a mining licence provided sufficient authorisation for commencement of the mining operation. As soon as the applicant became aware that authorisation for rezoning of the land was also required, it appointed Plankonsult to prepare and lodge the appropriate application.' Blom further argued that water use licence application approval was not required for a rezoning application.) Asked to confirm the date on which the water licence was issued, Harebottle said: 'A Wula for the project was accepted in 2024 and an approved Water Use Licence was subsequently granted, remains valid and is fully complied with.' Asked to confirm the date when mining commenced at Highbury, Harebottle said: 'Project development under the terms of the prospecting right commenced mid-2023. Development completion and commencement of operations is targeted for end 2025.' Asked how many tons of lithium ore had been extracted at Highbury so far, Harebottle did not provide any figures, stating: 'Project development has allowed low grade spodumene ore to be extracted. A processing plant is still under construction.' On how neighbouring communities might benefit from lithium mining at Highbury, he said: 'Unemployment in the region of the project was estimated at 50%. The project has created more than 800 direct and indirect jobs. There are no known job losses in any sectors. Local businesses, including; transport, logistics, civil engineering, building, catering, hospitality and tourist services report increased activity. Preference is given to local contractors for all project services. Direct and indirect training and employment of community members is always prioritised.' Asked whether some residents had been advised that they had to move out, he said: 'Under no circumstances have any households been '… notified this week that they will shortly be required to move out of their homes …' and no community land or resources has been or will be 'lost'.' On why some residents had to vacate their homes during blasting, he said 'Standard practice and national guidelines require evacuation of certain neighboring communities during blasting for safety purposes. Evacuations are occasional and usually last for no more than one hour. Timing is usually decided in consultation with our neighbours who then receive proper notifications in advance of blasting, and they are appropriately compensated for any inconvenience. Affected neighbours have always been both supportive and cooperative. 'The project team maintains excellent relations with all adjoining communities and their elected leaders. Formal and informal interactions across all spectrums of the community are attended regularly.' Asked whether SA Lithium had a financial relationship with the Atlas Lithium Corporation in the United States, he said: 'There is no relationship.' On Cliff's concerns around the volumes of water required by the mine, Blom told the Ray Nkonyeni municipality that the volumes applied for in the water use licence application referred to maximum volumes, rather the actual volume likely to be used. He said SA Lithium hoped to minimise river water abstraction and the company was now 'reasonably confident that its targeted volumes provided during the meeting will be correct'. Commenting on the impacts of blasting on neighbouring residents, Blom said the company was required by national guidelines to take responsibility for any potential damage to homes within a 500m blast radius. Two local contractors had been employed to repair any damage within this zone. Regarding potential pollution from the mine, Blom said that no harmful chemicals were used in the lithium separation process at Highbury. DM
eNCA
5 hours ago
- eNCA
Durban business rises after 40m loss
DURBAN - It's been four years since KwaZulu-Natal was set alight while lives and livelihoods were snatched away during the July 2021 riots. In July 2021, violent protesters set fire to the country's economy. R50-billion worth of goods went up in flames, thousands of jobs disintegrated and over 350 people were killed. Four years later, the scars – on the economy, the landscape and the hearts of the victim's loved ones – are healing. Although slowly, it's a testament to the resilience of KwaZulu-Natal citizens and a 2019 BMW M4 Competition – like a Phoenix that rose from the ashes - stands proud as a shiny symbol of hope. Taren Ramsaroop, the owner of Deutsche Auto, tells us why.
