logo
‘Strikes on nuclear infrastructure, disinformation nearly sparked nuclear crisis during Op Sindoor'

‘Strikes on nuclear infrastructure, disinformation nearly sparked nuclear crisis during Op Sindoor'

The Print16-06-2025
'This should act as a stark warning for states seeking to increase their reliance on nuclear weapons,' he added.
'The combination of strikes on nuclear-related military infrastructure and third-party disinformation risked turning a conventional conflict into a nuclear crisis,' said Matt Korda, Associate Senior Researcher with SIPRI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme and Associate Director for the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists.
New Delhi: Referring to the hostilities between India and Pakistan earlier last month during Operation Sindoor, the latest report of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) has cautioned that disinformation and strikes on nuclear-related military infrastructure nearly triggered a serious escalation.
SIPRI released its 2025 annual report on the state of armaments, disarmament and international security on Monday, warning that a new and potentially more dangerous nuclear arms race is emerging, even as existing arms control frameworks continue to weaken.
The report highlights AI as both a potential advantage and a major risk. Its ability to process vast datasets rapidly could compress crisis decision-making timelines, increasing the risk of miscommunication, miscalculation or even accidental conflict.
According to SIPRI, India is estimated to have approximately 180 nuclear warheads as of January 2025, a slight increase over the previous year. These are distributed across a maturing nuclear triad comprising land-based missiles, aircraft and nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs).
It further believes that India's recent move toward deploying canisterised missiles and undertaking sea-based deterrent patrols may indicate the country's fresh shift towards mating some nuclear warheads with their launchers even during peacetime.
The assessment believes that India's Prithvi short-range missile is 'dual-capable' and acknowledges that in March 2024, India conducted the first flight test of its multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle (MIRV) equipped Agni-V under Mission Divyastra.
Meanwhile, as per the report, Pakistan's estimated nuclear arsenal remains stagnant at around 170 warheads, though 'there is a continued development of new delivery systems and accumulation of fissile material, suggesting a potential expansion over the coming decade,' it reads.
'It is developing two versions of the Ra'ad (Hatf-8) air-launched cruise missile, though neither has yet entered service. Its Mirage III and possibly Mirage V aircraft currently serve as delivery platforms, with growing indications that the JF-17 may take over the nuclear delivery role in the future,' it reads. 'All of Pakistan's missiles, including the Nasr (Hatf-9), are believed to be dual-capable.'
However, it adds that there is no certainty on whether all missile bases in Pakistan have been assigned nuclear roles.
As per the assessment, while Pakistan continues to be the central focus of India's nuclear posture, it points to a growing emphasis in India on longer-range capabilities, particularly those aimed at covering targets across China.
SIPRI identifies China as 'undergoing the most significant nuclear expansion' among all the nuclear-armed states. 'Its stockpile is estimated to have increased from 500 to 600 warheads in 2024, with at least 132 warheads thought to be assigned to launchers still being loaded'.
The annual assessment further believes that China's DF-26 intermediate-range ballistic missile is a key dual-capable system offering flexibility in switching between conventional and nuclear payloads and adds, 'the CH-AS-X-13 air-launched ballistic missile, reportedly carried by H-6N bombers, to be nuclear-capable.'
As of January 2025, SIPRI estimates that the nine nuclear-armed countries–the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel–together possess approximately 12,241 nuclear warheads.
'Of these, about 9,614 are potentially operationally available, and roughly 3,912 are deployed with military forces, and approximately 2,100 warheads are believed to be maintained at high operational alert on ballistic missiles,' it says.
Although the total number of nuclear weapons worldwide continues to decline due to the dismantling of retired warheads by the United States and Russia, the report warns that the number of warheads in active military stockpiles is beginning to rise. It adds that the annual pace of dismantling has slowed and may soon be overtaken by the rate at which new warheads are being added to global arsenals.
'The era of reductions in the number of nuclear weapons in the world, which had lasted till the end of the Cold War, is coming to an end,' said Hans M. Kristensen, Associate Senior Fellow with SIPRI's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programme. 'Instead, we see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements.'
On the future of security, stability and nuclear challenge
The latest SIPRI's report further underlines that the arms race today is more likely to be 'qualitative rather than quantitative', driven by rapid developments in cyber warfare, artificial intelligence (AI), quantum sensing and space technologies.
Quantum technologies, the report says, are likely to disrupt current cryptographic standards and enable novel forms of global surveillance. 'Until now, nuclear-powered submarines were considered virtually undetectable due to the vastness of the ocean,' the report notes. 'But quantum detection could challenge that assumption, potentially introducing new sources of instability.'
Development of nuclear missile defence is also flagged as a concern by the assessment. 'If it works, it acts as an anti-nuclear shield, removing the fear of retaliation and thus undermining deterrence,' the report warns.
The weakening of arms control agreements remains a key concern in the report.
The report notes that the New START treaty, the last remaining strategic arms control accord between the United States and Russia, is set to expire in early 2026. It adds that there are currently no ongoing negotiations to renew or replace it.
'There are no signs that either side is interested in a successor treaty.'
'The signs are that a new arms race is gearing up that carries much more risk and uncertainty than the last one,' said Dan Smith, SIPRI Director. 'The rapid development and application of technologies in AI, cyber, missile defence, space and quantum are radically redefining deterrence and creating new sources of instability.'
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also read: China outspends India on defence in 2024, shows SIPRI report. Pakistan far behind
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US tariff reset boosts India's export edge: Niti Aayog says India gains ground in 100 product lines, services and tech drive Q3 resilience
US tariff reset boosts India's export edge: Niti Aayog says India gains ground in 100 product lines, services and tech drive Q3 resilience

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US tariff reset boosts India's export edge: Niti Aayog says India gains ground in 100 product lines, services and tech drive Q3 resilience

AI image India stands to expand its footprint in the US market under Washington's evolving tariff regime, with favourable differentials in over 100 key product categories, according to the government think tank Niti Aayog 's Trade Watch Quarterly report for Q3 FY25. 'India is expected to gain competitiveness in 22 of the top 30 product categories at the HS-2 level, covering 61% of its exports to the US and 68% of total US imports in these categories,' the report said. At a more detailed HS-4 level, India has a favourable tariff differential in 78 of the top 100 products, accounting for around 52% of its shipments to the US. The opportunity arises from higher US import tariffs on key trade partners such as China, Canada, Mexico, Vietnam, and Thailand. This policy shift, which includes a baseline 10% duty on all imports since April 2025, presents Indian exporters with a 'strategic window' to gain share in sectors ranging from nuclear reactors and electrical machinery to vehicles, apparel, and textiles. Even in six of the top 30 HS-2 product lines where India faces a tariff disadvantage, the gap is just around 1%, keeping it broadly competitive, the think tank noted. Despite global demand headwinds and geopolitical uncertainty, India's Q3 FY25 trade data reflected 'cautious resilience'. Merchandise exports grew 3% year-on-year to $108.7 billion, while imports rose 6.5% to $187.5 billion—widening the merchandise trade deficit to $78.7 billion. However, services exports surged 17% to $102.6 billion, creating a $52.3 billion surplus that 'partially offset' the goods trade gap. Niti Aayog highlighted that India ranked as the world's fifth-largest exporter of Digitally Delivered Services (DDS) in 2024, clocking $269 billion in exports. This was driven by segments such as IT services, professional consulting, and R&D outsourcing. Among merchandise exports, the report noted a sharp rise in high-tech and value-added sectors. Aircraft, spacecraft, and related parts surged by over 200% and entered the top 10 export categories for the first time, thanks to demand from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the Czech Republic. India's high-tech exports reached $80.6 billion in 2024, growing at a CAGR of 10.6% since 2014 and accounting for 18.3% of total merchandise exports. Electrical machinery and parts now make up half of India's high-tech shipments, surpassing nuclear reactors and boilers. In digitally delivered trade, 'Other Business Services' accounted for 53% of 2024 DDS exports, while 'Computer Services' contributed 39%, aligning with global patterns. The think tank stressed that new trade alignments—particularly India's relative tariff edge in the US—underscore the importance of agile policy responses. 'India must deepen global value chain integration, expand production-linked incentive schemes to labour-intensive sectors, and pursue services-focused trade agreements,' the report said. It added that a deal with the US should prioritise digital trade, cross-border data flows, and mutual recognition of standards to further widen India's export footprint. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Trump reiterates claim that he stopped conflict between India & Pakistan
Trump reiterates claim that he stopped conflict between India & Pakistan

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Trump reiterates claim that he stopped conflict between India & Pakistan

US President Donald Trump Monday reiterated his claim that he stopped the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have turned into a "nuclear war", through trade. "We've been very successful in settling wars. You have India, (and) Pakistan. You have Rwanda and the Congo that was going on for 30 years," Trump said during his meeting with Nato Secretary General Rutte in the Oval Office. "India, by the way, Pakistan would have been a nuclear war within another week the way that was going. That was going very badly, and we did that through trade. I said, we're not going to talk to you about trade unless you get this thing settled', and they did, and they were both great, great leaders, and they were great, he added. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim more than a dozen times on several occasions that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan. However, India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. In a nearly 35-minute phone call with Trump last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi firmly stated that India does not and will "never accept" mediation and that the discussions between Indian and Pakistani militaries on cessation of military actions were initiated at Islamabad's request. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Trump reiterates claim that he stopped conflict between India and Pakistan
Trump reiterates claim that he stopped conflict between India and Pakistan

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump reiterates claim that he stopped conflict between India and Pakistan

US President Donald Trump Monday reiterated his claim that he stopped the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have turned into a "nuclear war", through trade. "We've been very successful in settling wars. You have India, (and) Pakistan. You have Rwanda and the Congo that was going on for 30 years," Trump said during his meeting with NATO Secretary General Rutte in the Oval Office. "India, by the way, Pakistan would have been a nuclear war within another week the way that was going. That was going very badly, and we did that through trade. I said, 'we're not going to talk to you about trade unless you get this thing settled', and they did, and they were both great, great leaders, and they were great," he added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Average Cost To Rent A Private Jet May Surprise You (View Prices) Private Jet I Search Ads Learn More Undo Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim more than a dozen times on several occasions that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. However, India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Live Events In a nearly 35-minute phone call with Trump last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi firmly stated that India does not and will "never accept" mediation and that the discussions between Indian and Pakistani militaries on cessation of military actions were initiated at Islamabad's request. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack that killed 26 civilians. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. PTI

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store