Tulsi Gabbard twists the screws on Pam Bondi amid Epstein fury as Tim Dillon floats Megyn Kelly replacement
She's facing increasing pressure to file charges to investigate and prosecute former President Barack Obama and his officials for their alleged roles in the Russia 'hoax' against Trump.
The immense campaign comes as Bondi is already in hot water with MAGA supporters for dropping the ball on the long-anticipated release of the Epstein files.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard recently released new documents surrounding intelligence efforts to 'frame' Trump during the 2016 election.
Her bombshell report showed that Obama's team 'manufactured and politicized intelligence' to make it appear that Russia and criminal actors impacted the 2016 election.
The Russian collusion theory, which Trump raged as a 'witch hunt' against him, has been widely debunked after consuming his first term.
Gabbard specifically targeted Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel during an interview with Sunday Morning Futures host Maria Bartiromo.
'It is their responsibility to gather all of the evidence, both that we have released, the facts that have already been known previously, the information that will continue to come out, and move forward with this prosecution and these indictments.'
Gabbard putting public pressure on Bondi to take action against Obama officials, as MAGA supporters are also clamoring for more to be done on Epstein, puts her in a tough spot.
Bondi is already struggling to respond to the Epstein controversy.
The Department of Justice announced in early July that there was no evidence that billionaire financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in prison and that there was no 'client list' that could be released to the public.
The news fueled calls for Bondi's resignation, after she sent mixed messages about the existence and release of the Epstein files.
Comedian and podcaster Tim Dillon revealed he recently traveled to Washington, DC, for a dinner with a few members of the Trump administration to talk about the issue, as they tried to clarify details of the case.
When Bondi said she had 10,000 hours of video connected to the Epstein case, Dillon revealed on his podcast, officials clarified she was speaking only about the footage of child porn found in Epstein's possession, not footage of Epstein and clients.
Dillon recommended the president fire Pam Bondi and release the files if he wanted to get ahead of the scandal that threatened to 'engulf his presidency.'
'She's either incompetent or, or she's untruthful,' Dillon said.
'Pam Bondi's gotta go. She's gotta go back to Florida and prosecute people that you know are misbehaving on jet skis,' Dillon continued.
'She's gotta get out and you gotta bring in Megan Kelly. Truly you have to bring in Megan Kelly to be the Attorney General of America.'
Other podcasters and influential Trump supporters have joined calls for Bondi's dismissal.
Political activist Laura Loomer referred to Bondi as 'Blondi' and said she had failed the president.
'Pam Blondi is very damaging to President Trump's image. She drags the administration down and the base doesn't want her as AG,' she wrote.
Trump has defended Bondi, despite criticism from his base, praising her for doing a 'FANTASTIC JOB' in the administration.
'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein,' he continued.
Kelly joined voices criticizing Bondi's handling of the case, noting she 'repeatedly misled on Epstein' and 'didn't have the courage to explain herself.'
Dillon was critical of Bondi's handling of the Epstein case, describing it as the 'biggest bungle ever.' He also recommended that Trump fire FBI director Kash Patel.
'You can't just bring in just TV people, you have to bring in good TV people,' Dillon said, noting that Patel and other officials were 'like people who failed at having podcasts.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Crude finishes with 1% gain on supply concerns and US crude draws
HOUSTON, July 24 (Reuters) - Oil prices rose 1% on Thursday as U.S. crude draws and expected cuts to Russian gasoline exports overwhelmed news that oil major Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab will gain U.S. approval to renew production in Venezuela. Brent crude futures settled at $69.18 a barrel, up 67 cents or 0.98%. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures finished at $66.03 a barrel, up 78 cents, or 1.20%. Crude fell in early afternoon trade on news that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration was preparing to allow limited oil operations in sanctioned OPEC nation Venezuela. Earlier in the session, WTI had been up more than a dollar and Brent crude came near that level. "The news about Chevron being able to go back into Venezuela and get oil going again just took the knees out of the market," said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital LLC. Even so, Kilduff said the market did not expect the Trump administration would open up Venezuela to other U.S. oil companies. "This is a unique one-off," he added. Oil rebounded late in the session on news Russia was planning to cut gasoline exports to all but a few allies and nations like Mongolia, with which it has supply agreements. "Russia looking to cut off gasoline exports gave the market a boost," said Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group. "The market was looking for a reason to go higher." Also lifting futures was the previous day's report of a U.S. crude inventory draw and hopes for a trade deal between the U.S. and the European Union that would lower tariffs. U.S. Energy Information Administration data showed crude inventories fell last week by 3.2 million barrels to 419 million barrels, far exceeding analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 1.6 million-barrel draw. "The U.S. crude inventory draw and the trade efforts are adding some support to prices," said Janiv Shah, an analyst at Rystad. On Wednesday, two European diplomats said the EU and the U.S. were moving toward a trade deal that could include a 15% U.S. baseline tariff on EU imports and possible exemptions. That could pave the way for another major trade agreement following a deal with Japan.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Grim new Social Security outlook revealed as checks set to shrink by huge sums
Social Security's retirement fund is set to run short in just seven years — which could end up slashing benefits for millions of Americans by thousands of dollars a year. According to latest projections, retirees could face automatic 24 percent benefit cuts as early as the end of 2032. This means a couple who both worked would receive $18,100 less each year if they retire at the start of 2033. The new forecast from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), released Thursday, moves up the insolvency date for both Social Security and Medicare trust funds. A projection just last month had funds lasting until 2033, but that has already been revised. A major factor is the impact of President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill ', which experts warned would speed up the use of funds. Social Security relies on its trust fund to provide monthly benefit checks to around 70 million Americans. Once the reserves are exhausted, federal law requires that benefits be cut to match incoming revenues. This means payments will continue, but at reduced levels. The cuts would also grow over time as scheduled benefits continue to outpace dedicated revenues, the CRFB said. By 2099, the size of the benefit cut would grow to well over 30 percent, the nonpartisan committee said. Depending on a couple's age, marital status and work history, the actual size of the benefit cut would vary. For example, the average single-earner couple would face a $13,600 cut in late 2032, while a dual-earner low-income couple would face an $11,000 annual cut. High-income couples could see a cut of closer to $24,000. While the absolute size of the cut would be smaller for a typical low-income couple than for a high-income couple, it would represent a larger share of their income and their past earnings, the CRFB said. The depletion of Social Security's trust funds would also be compounded by the insolvency of a Medicare trust fund. The hospital insurance trust fund, which is also known as Part A of Medicare, finances health care services related to hospital stays and skilled nursing facilities for eligible beneficiaries, which is mostly those aged 65 and over. This fund is also projected to be exhausted in late 2032, cutting payments by 11 percent. The forecast predicts that a dual-earning couple who retire at the start of 2033 would receive $18,100 less a year in vital benefits The latest CRFB estimates of potential benefit cuts are somewhat larger than those put forward in the most recent Trustees' report from June. The committee blamed changes brought in by the Trump administration's 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Despite facing bipartisan criticism, the bill was signed into law earlier this month. It extends most of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017, including slashing rates on estates and for corporations. Deductions for state and local taxes, as well as business owners, are included. The CRFB said the tax rate cuts and the increase in the senior standard deduction from the bill would reduce Social Security's revenue from the income taxation of benefits, increasing the required cut by about a percentage point upon insolvency. It warned if the senior standard deduction and other temporary measures are made permanent, the benefit cut would grow larger, hurting millions of Americans. 'Policymakers pledging not to touch Social Security are implicitly endorsing these deep benefit cuts for 62 million retirees in 2032 and beyond,' the committee added. 'It is time for policymakers to tell the truth about the program's finances and to pursue trust fund solutions to head off insolvency and improve the program for current and future generations.'
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
National Science Foundation staff decry Trump's ‘politically motivated' cuts
Almost 150 workers from the National Science Foundation (NSF) have lambasted Donald Trump's cuts to the agency as 'politically motivated and legally questionable', joining colleagues at three other federal research agencies in warning that the administration is destroying innovation and sacrificing the US's position as a global scientific leader. The three-page dissent states the actions of the administration 'collectively amount to the systemic dismantling of a world-renowned scientific agency' and that they have been compelled to act because 'NSF employees are bound by their oath to uphold the Constitution.' The document condemns the decision as 'illegally' withholding $2.2bn of the $9bn budget appropriated by Congress for 2025 and the 'unlawful termination and threatened mass reductions' in the workforce, which has already seen more than 10% of the agency's staff dismissed. They also point to the termination of more than 1,600 active NSF grants 'using undisclosed criteria devised by the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge)' – the quasi-government agency set up by Trump's billionaire donor Elon Musk. Earlier this month, the Guardian reported on the unprecedented political interference being wielded by Doge which, together with the chaotic cuts, has already undermined the gold standard review process used by the NSF to support cutting-edge science, and was jeopardizing the future of US industries and economic growth. 'A covert and ideologically driven secondary review process by unqualified political appointees is now interfering with the scientific merit-based review system,' the letter states. The NSF was created 75 years ago and until Trump took office for his second term had enjoyed bipartisan support. It is the only federal agency that funds fundamental research across all fields of science and engineering, and which over the years has contributed to major breakthroughs in organ transplants, gene technology, AI, smartphones, extreme weather warning systems, American sign language, cybersecurity and even the language app Duolingo. Trump's budget proposal calls for a 56% cut to the NSF budget for 2026, which if enacted 'would undermine US leadership in science, eliminate funding for over 250,000 researchers and students, and break bipartisan commitments made under the CHIPS and Science Act', the letter states. The NSF statement follows similar unprecedented dissent by hundreds of scientists and other staff at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and most recently the Voyager Declaration from almost 300 current and former Nasa scientists including four astronauts. All have warned about the devastating impact of the administration's arbitrary and chaotic cuts to staff and research funds on the lives of Americans – now and in the future – in order to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy including Trump's billionaire donors. The NSF dissent is addressed to California member of Congress Zoe Lofgren, the top Democrat on the House science committee, who has repeatedly condemned Trump's assault on science. Only one employee, Jesus Soriano, president of the local chapter of the American Federation of Government Employees which represents two thirds of the NSF's unionized bargaining unit, included his name; 148 of the 149 signatories are anonymous due to fear of reprisals. The fear is well founded given that around 140 named signatories of the EPA 'declaration of dissent' were put on administrative leave, and Lee Zeldin, the climate change denier and EPA secretary, warned that there was a 'zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging, and undercutting' the current administration. It ends with a stark warning: 'NSF employees are committed to serving the American people through research, education, and innovation. But they cannot do so under fear, censorship, and institutional sabotage. Without immediate oversight and corrective action from Congress, one of our nation's greatest engines for scientific and technological advancement faces irreversible long-term damage. Put simply, America will forfeit its scientific leadership position to China and other rival nations.'
