Bin strike deal offer watered down, says union
A deal offered to striking bin workers in Birmingham has been watered down, their union claims.
Unite has called for further negotiations with the city council after a "ball park" proposal discussed at talks with conciliation service Acas had been revised "by government commissioners and the council leader".
An all-out strike in the city is now in its third month, after staff walked out on 11 March over plans to downgrade some roles, which the union says could cost workers £8,000 a year.
Birmingham City Council has been approached for a response over the current deal it is offering.
Talks between the Labour-run council and Unite have been taking place with the conciliation service since the start of May, after previous negotiations to resolve the strike ended without a solution.
The union's latest statement accuses the authority of missing deadlines on the proposals which had been tabled on Friday evening.
"After weeks and weeks of saying one thing in public and another to workers, the government commissioners finally allow a proposal to be put on the table," said Unite's General Secretary Sharon Graham.
She said the offer had been watered down by the council leader and government commissioners "who were not in the negotiating room".
Ms Graham said the offer would be discussed with reps over the weekend and a detailed response would be issued ahead of a reconvened Acas meeting.
"The actual decision makers now need to be in the room at the further ACAS talks," she said.
A court order preventing striking workers from delaying bin lorries leaving depots in the city will continue indefinitely, it was confirmed on Thursday.
The union said it was preparing to challenge the injunction, but said it agreed to abide by the law on picketing.
On 23 May, when the injunction was granted, the city council said disruption at depots had led to a backlog of up to 12,800 tonnes of waste.
Police recently scaled down their presence on picket lines, where they had been helping to ensure bin trucks could get out of the depots, to prevent waste piling up on city streets.
The West Midlands force withdrew after stating the issues did "not meet the threshold" to impose powers under Section 14 of the Public Order Act.
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Bin strike picket court order to continue indefinitely
Council gets court order over bin lorry blocking
Union blames council for lack of bin strike deal
Why are Birmingham bin workers on strike?
Birmingham City Council
Unite the Union
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
11 hours ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Republican governors want state AI pause out of budget bill
A group of 17 Republican governors wrote to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday calling for the state AI bill moratorium to be stripped from the reconciliation bill. The big picture: Many Republican-run states have passed AI-related laws and don't want to see them knocked down. The letter is led by Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders and signed by the governors of Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Wyoming. The governors wrote in the letter that the provision "threatens to undo all the work states have done to protect our citizens from the misuse of artificial intelligence." Catch up quick: Earlier on Friday, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that the provision does not violate the Byrd Rule as long as its conditions only apply to a $500 million pot of AI deployment grants. Sanders wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post against the AI moratorium earlier this week. What they're saying:"In just the past year, states have led on smart regulations of the AI industry that simultaneously protect consumers while also encouraging this ever-developing and critical sector," the governors write.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Warnings of tax rises after Downing Street welfare U-turn
There are predictions of tax rises in the Autumn budget after Sir Keir Starmer U-turned on welfare reforms in the face of a backbench rebellion. The Prime Minister said that the concessions strike 'the right balance', but think tanks have warned that the changes announced in the early hours of Friday morning have made Rachel Reeves's 'already difficult Budget balancing act that much harder'. Downing Street declined to rule out the possibility of increases in the autumn, telling reporters on Friday that 'tax decisions are set out at fiscal events'.The concessions on offer include protecting personal independence payments (Pip) for all existing claimants, while all existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said on Friday that the changes make tax rises in the budget expected in the autumn more likely. Associate director Tom Waters said: 'These changes more than halve the saving of the package of reforms as a whole, making the Chancellor's already difficult Budget balancing act that much harder.' Ruth Curtice, chief executive at the Resolution Foundation, said that 'the concessions aren't cheap, costing as much as £3 billion and more than halving the medium-term savings from the overall set of reforms announced just three months ago'. She added: 'This adds to the already mounting pressure to deliver fresh consolidation in the Budget this Autumn.' Asked about how the climbdown would be funded, Downing Street said on Friday that 'There'll be no permanent increase in borrowing, as is standard. 'We'll set out how this will be funded at the budget, alongside a full economic and fiscal forecast in the autumn, in the usual way.' Asked whether they could say there would be no tax rises, a Number 10 spokesman said: 'As ever, as is a long-standing principle, tax decisions are set out at fiscal events.' Some 126 Labour backbenchers had signed an amendment that would have halted the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in its tracks when it faces its first Commons hurdle on July 1. The list of Labour MPs putting their name to the amendment had been growing throughout the week, as Downing Street said that they would be pressing on with next week's vote. After the late-night U-turn, Sir Keir said that 'the most important thing is that we can make the reform we need'. 'We talked to colleagues, who've made powerful representations, as a result of which we've got a package which I think will work, we can get it right,' he added. 'For me, getting that package adjusted in that way is the right thing to do, it means it's the right balance, it's common sense that we can now get on with it.' While leading rebels believe the concessions are likely to be enough to win over a majority, some remain opposed to the plans in their current form. Dr Simon Opher, who represents Stroud, said in a statement that he is glad the Government 'are listening', but that the changes 'do not tackle the eligibility issues that are at the heart of many of the problems with Pip'. 'The Bill should be scrapped and we should start again and put the needs of disabled people at the centre of the process,' he said. It is also understood that talks are underway over rebel attempts to lay another amendment to seek to delay the plans, as reported by The Guardian. The fallout also threatens to cause lasting damage, with some backbenchers having called for a reset of relations between Number 10 and the parliamentary party. Speaking to the PA news agency, a number of Labour backbenchers expressed deeper frustration with how Downing Street has handled its backbenchers since last year's election. The Government's original package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit. Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
What benefit claimants need to know about Labour's welfare U-turn
Labour ministers have announced two major changes to their controversial welfare reforms amid intense criticism over the measures. Over 120 Labour MPs were threatening to rebel against the government over its 'Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill' which is still set to be voted on by members on Tuesday. Writing to Labour MPs on Thursday evening, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall said: 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right.' 'We have listened to colleagues who support the principle of reform but are worried about the impact of the pace of change on those already supported by the system.' The piece of legislation will still bring in the two key changes to Universal Credit and the Personal Independence Payment (PIP). However, tweaks have been made to ensure that existing claimants have greater protections than first promised. Here's everything you need to know: The central cost-cutting measure remains a tightening of the eligibility to be awarded PIP. Currently claimed by 3.7 million people, the benefit is designed to help with extra costs related to health or disability. Under the changes, around 1.5 million of the current claimants would not be found eligible for the 'daily living' side of the benefit. This is because, while they scored the eight points needed at assessment to be awarded at least the lowest payment rate, they did not score four in any single category. Initially, Labour had pledged to give transitional protection to any claimant who was reassessed and found ineligible for the benefit because of the changes. This meant they were guaranteed the same payment rate for 13 weeks. Ms Kendall has now confirmed that all existing claimants will not be subject to the new criteria. While they will still be subject to reassessment – happening every three years on average – they will not have the requirement to score four points in a single category. This means it is advisable for anyone who thinks they might be eligible for PIP to apply for it as soon as possible. And at least before November 2026 when the changes would come in to effect. This can be done on This means that around 370,000 claimants are expected to have an average £4,500 protected, research from the Resolution Foundation finds. The other key change in the bill sees the rates of Universal Credit changed, with the standard rate rising while the health-related rate is cut back. The plans would bring in an across-the-board increase to the standard Universal Credit allowance for new and existing claims from April 2026. This will be a boost of £7 a week, to £106. But at the same time, the payment rate for the health-related element of Universal Credit was due to be frozen at £105 a week until 2029/30. However, Ms Kendall has confirmed that the income of existing claimants will be protected in real-time, meaning it should at least rise with inflation. This will also apply to any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria. The Resolution Foundation estimates that this will 'insulate 2.25 million people from a loss of between £250 and £500 per year.' However, the government has not made any concession on its plan to cut the Universal Credit health element for new claimants to £54 a week – a rate of almost half. Charities and campaigners have criticised the government's concessions over the bill as threatening to create a 'two-tier' system. This is because those currently claiming PIP and Universal Credit health will benefit from more generous rules and rate than new applicants after the changes come into effect. Responding to the concessions, Charles Gillies, senior policy officer at the MS Society and policy co-chair of the Disability Benefits Consortium, said: 'These supposed 'concessions' to the cuts bill are just a desperate attempt to rush through a disastrous piece of legislation. 'By pushing the cuts onto future claimants, the government are betraying the next generation of disabled people. Why should someone who needs support to wash in 2025 be entitled to PIP, but not someone who has the same needs in 2035?'
