logo
UK's Wise to move primary listing to the US

UK's Wise to move primary listing to the US

Reuters05-06-2025
June 5 (Reuters) - Money transfer company Wise (WISEa.L), opens new tab on Thursday said it intends to move its primary listing to the U.S. from London, the latest British company to do so.
Wise, which will maintain a secondary listing in London, had been exploring its listing options lately - a move seen across the London markets due to stunted growth opportunities and lower valuations at home.
"We believe the addition of a primary U.S. listing would help us accelerate our mission and bring substantial strategic and capital market benefits to Wise and our owners," the company said.
Metals investor Cobalt Holdings, backed by Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab, also scrapped its plans for a London IPO on Wednesday, which, according to one source, was driven by a lack of demand.
In recent months, Unilever (ULVR.L), opens new tab chose Amsterdam for the primary listing of its ice-cream business while fast-fashion firm Shein has been considering Hong Kong after plans for a London IPO were met with Chinese regulatory hurdles, according to sources.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gamblers will have to pay taxes on their losses thanks to provision in Trump's spending bill
Gamblers will have to pay taxes on their losses thanks to provision in Trump's spending bill

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Gamblers will have to pay taxes on their losses thanks to provision in Trump's spending bill

The Trump administration 's signature spending package contains a little-known provision which could radically upend the gambling industry. Previously, gamblers could deduct all their losses from their declared income, while still having to pay taxes on their winnings. As a result, bettors were only taxed if they walked away from the table with a net profit. But starting next year, under the new bill, which the president signed into law Friday, bettors can only deduct 90 percent of their losses from their declared income. This sets up the potential for people to pay income taxes even if they ultimately came out of their bets at a loss. Insiders warned the change could drive away professional and recreational gamers alike impacting tax revenue. 'Did anyone think this through?' Russell Fox, a Nevada-based accountant specializing in gambling, told The Washington Pos t. 'They thought: 'We'll bury this somewhere in the bill. No one will see it, and now we've got $1 billion of income to offset $1 billion of tax cuts.'' 'This is bad long-term for the casino industry,' he added. 'It's bad for gamblers. It's actually bad for the IRS, too. We need a less-complex tax system.' Rep. Dina Titus, a Democratic congresswoman who represents Nevada, said earlier this week she would seek a 'legislative fix' to the provision. 'This is just another attack on gaming and tourism and on districts like mine that rely on these industries,' she said in a statement to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 'This also punishes people who are trying to do the right thing by reporting gambling on their taxes, pushing them towards offshore outlets and the predictions market, which unlike legitimate gambling sources, do not invest in bricks and mortar, pay state taxes, hire union labor, or contribute to problem gaming efforts.' Professional gamblers have also warned about the impact of the provision. 'This new amendment to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would end professional gambling in the U.S. and hurt casual gamblers, too,' poker player Phil Galfond wrote on X on Tuesday. 'You could pay more in tax than you won. Contact your representative quickly.' Others suggested the provision could push gamblers away from casinos and traditional sports books to online prediction markets such as Kalshi, which in practice often function like gambling but are regulated and taxed differently. Sports betting is legal in 38 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. The gaming industry brought in a record high of nearly $72 billion last year, according to the American Gaming Association.

Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes
Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes

Daily Mail​

time24 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes

Villagers are up in arms after the new owner of a £585,000 historic cottage applied to bulldoze it to make way for new-build homes. Eric Abbott has also hit out at new owners of the property he lived in for more than 60 years after claiming they only sold it on the condition that it would be lived in by a family. Almost a thousand people have now signed a petition to stop the development in Swanmore, Hampshire, and 200 objections were written during the public consultation period for the plans. New owner Simon Smith has submitted an application to Winchester City Council to demolish the house and build two two-storey modern houses with four bedrooms each, parking for three cars and gardens. Neighbours think that the new build won't fit in well with the character of the village, and will cause traffic problems on an already busy street which is around the corner from a primary school. Houses on the street cost an average of £800,000, and some buildings in Swanmore - which is mentioned in the Domesday Book - date back to the 16th or early 17th centuries. Villagers received flyers about the petition against the redevelopment, which has 931 signatures, through their letterboxes. The flyers said that the cottage, known as Hiawatha, is being 'flattened' and replaced with 'two modern, bland new-builds'. Former company director Mr Abbott, 94, raised his family in the property with his wife Peggy. It was sold after being put on the market last year for £585,000. In an objection he wrote against the planning application, Mr Abbott said: 'As the previous owner of Hiawatha I was totally dismayed to see the change of heart of the new owners attempting to destroy Hiawatha and replace with totally unsuitable houses. 'I instructed the estate agent to ensure my wonderful house was only sold to a family who would love it like I did and not destroy it. 'The estate agent assured me that he had made this clear to the new owners and that they had agreed it to be their forever home which is all I ever wanted for another family to love it like I had for the last 64 years. 'It seems they lied and were buying Hiawatha for financial gain. 'I had been offered to sell to many builders and I declined as this house is part of history, it was there before Chapel Road was even made. 'I would never have sold it had I known this was their intention and they knew that. 'There is an ancient well that in the deeds demands that it should be operable for future water shortages in the village and this was a legal requirement. 'I believe Hiawatha was built in the 15th century it is a beautiful flint cottage which should not be replaced with two identical new builds. 'I feel it should remain standing and let the slow worms, birds, bats and many other species carry on living as they have been for many years. 'I strongly object and do hope that this does not go ahead it would be a great shame to the wonderful village of Swanmore.' David Hughes, 63, lives nearby and hopes he's not a 'nimby' for wanting the house to keep its character. The scientist said: 'I put in [an objection] saying I wasn't very keen on it, hopefully not from a nimby point of view. 'If we're not careful, we'll have a lot of new houses here. 'It's an unusual-looking house, it breaks up some of the monotony of the architecture.' The villager admitted that he was surprised 'how many other people were that bothered about it'. Swanmore local John Allen thinks that the council like the idea of the demolition because replacing the house with two houses will bring in more council tax. The 79 year old retiree said: 'The council like it, wouldn't it, more council tax, more money, that sort of thing.' Paraphrasing film producer Samuel Goldwyn in reference to Mr Abbott's agreement with the new owners, he said 'a verbal agreement isn't worth the paper it's written on'. 'He should've got it done legally,' he said. A middle-aged female neighbour who wanted to remain anonymous said she had signed the petition against the redevelopment. She said: 'I don't think it's the prettiest building in the village, but my main concern for it is if they put two properties in it. 'The road is already abused enough with traffic, I know there's three bedrooms [in each house].' 'As we all know, if you've got three teenagers moved in all of a sudden you haven't got enough parking.' An elderly female neighbour who also didn't want to be named said that it's 'bad' that the new owners didn't honour the agreement not to demolish the house. 'That's pretty poor, actually, I think,' she said. 'I mean, they knew what they were going to be doing with it - that doesn't seem very honest.' Ash Bennett, Mr Abbott's former neighbour, a 54 year old air traffic controller said: 'I've lived here 18, 19 years. 'I was aware when they sold the house, I didn't know until more recently about what was going to happen to it. 'I didn't follow it closely, but my understanding was that there was an agreement it wasn't going to be knocked down and developed, it would be renovated which isn't what they wanted to do. 'Personally speaking, I would rather they wouldn't knock it down.' The father of three added that the house needs 'a lot of work'. He said: 'I went in it 18 years ago, nothing much has been done to it since. 'My understanding is it would require a lot of work to it.' On the planning application, Historic England said that there is no evidence to indicate that the building predates the 19th century - it is believed to have been built between 1840 and 1868. It said: 'The building does not illustrate an important aspect of the nation's history, nor does it have the historic associations with nationally important individuals, groups, or events, which might give it historic special interest.' A decision is due to be made about the planning application on July 18.

Nissan Launches Killer Sentra Lease Offer for July
Nissan Launches Killer Sentra Lease Offer for July

Auto Blog

time30 minutes ago

  • Auto Blog

Nissan Launches Killer Sentra Lease Offer for July

By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. A smart deal for value-focused drivers The 2025 Nissan Sentra has never pretended to be a performance car. It's not especially fast, and it doesn't handle with much excitement. But for everyday drivers looking for an affordable, comfortable, and well-equipped small sedan, it's long been a strong contender. Now, thanks to a new lease offer from Nissan, it's one of the best bargains you can find in July. 0:01 / 0:09 2025 Nissan Z undercuts Toyota Supra by a surprising amount Watch More With gas prices still bouncing around and interest rates keeping new car loans high, leasing a compact car like the Sentra is a smart way to keep monthly costs down without settling for something stripped-down or outdated. Here's the lease deal for the 2025 Sentra This month, Nissan is offering the 2025 Sentra SV for just $239 per month on a 39-month lease. The deal requires $3,239 due at signing, not including taxes or fees, and it applies to vehicles equipped with splash guards and carpeted floor mats. You should find that deal in most major cities across the country, but exact figures can vary, so make sure to check with your local dealership if you're interested in the lease offer. Nissan Sentra — Source: Nissan While the down payment might feel steep for a compact car, the low monthly rate helps even things out over time. With many compact crossovers and rival sedans pushing well above $300 a month on comparable leases, this one stands out. More comfort and tech than you might expect Nissan's lease deal applies to the Sentra SV, the mid-level trim that balances affordability with added features. While the base model is fairly spartan, the SV trim brings in welcome upgrades like adaptive cruise control, reverse automatic emergency braking, and an 8-inch touchscreen display. The front and rear seats are surprisingly supportive, with quality materials that punch above the car's price point. Nissan Sentra — Source: Nissan You also get modern essentials like Bluetooth connectivity and automatic climate control. It's not perfect—the infotainment system can feel laggy, and the 2.0-liter engine doesn't offer much punch—but for daily commuting and city driving, the Sentra gets the job done with ease. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Why the Sentra is still worth considering What the Sentra lacks in excitement, it makes up for in usability. It's easy to drive, easy to park, and offers a quiet ride that's more refined than you might expect. Fuel economy is competitive for the class, and the safety tech included on the SV trim helps it feel more modern than some older competitors still using barebones equipment lists. Nissan Sentra — Source: Nissan The interior, while not flashy, is thoughtfully designed and relatively spacious for a compact sedan. You won't find luxury-grade materials, but the quality and comfort are better than average in this segment. Final thoughts If you're looking for a new car this summer and want to keep your monthly costs low without ending up in something bare or outdated, the 2025 Nissan Sentra SV should be on your radar. This lease offer makes it one of the most accessible and practical cars on the market right now. *Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The information presented herein is based on manufacturer-provided lease offer information, which is subject to frequent change and may vary based on location, creditworthiness, and other factors. We are not a party to any lease agreements and assume no liability for the terms, conditions, availability, or accuracy of any lease offers mentioned. All terms, including but not limited to pricing, mileage allowances, and residual values, require direct verification with an authorized local OEM dealership. This article does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement of any particular lease or vehicle. About the Author Elijah Nicholson-Messmer View Profile

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store