‘Big party promotion!': Singaporeans react to Desmond Lee's appointment as PAP chair, but some look for DPM Gan
Other changes include the appointment of Health Minister Ong Ye Kung as Party Treasurer, and Minister for National Development Chee Hong Tat has taken over as assistant treasurer.
Minister of State for National Development and Trade and Industry Alvin Tan, meanwhile, is now the head of Young PAP, and Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs Faishal, who has been appointed chairperson of the PAP Malay Affairs Bureau, will now be part of the CEC.
Mr Lee had previously been the party's assistant secretary-general. He replaces former Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat, who retired before this year's General Election.
'The CEC expressed its appreciation to outgoing chairman Mr Heng Swee Keat for his years of leadership and service to the Party and Singapore, and wished him a fulfilling retirement from politics,' the party said in a statement on its website.
Some commenters reacting to the announcement from the PAP appear to feel that this is a major step up for Mr Lee.
'This is a big party promotion for the son of Lee Yock Suan. This adds to his promotion to Minister for Education, which is one of the big four portfolios (finance, defence, home affairs, and education),' wrote a Reddit user.
Lee Yock Suan, the minister's father, was a longtime Member of Parliament (MP) and Cabinet member, having served as Minister for Labour and Minister for Education, among other roles. He retired from politics in 2006.
Others noted that the younger Mr Lee's new role as Education Minister is a significant one as well.
'MOE sets the ethos for the future generation of the country. It is a heavy responsibility, like defence and finance. This is why all potential leaders of the country have been picked to helm MOE at some point (in) their political career (e.g., Chan Chun Sing, Heng Swee Keat, Tharman, Ong Ye Kung, Lawrence Wong),' one wrote.
'If we go further back, Tony Tan and Goh Keng Swee were also education ministers before,' another pointed out.
One chimed in to say, 'The GE showed his pull in West Coast and from those who have worked with him, he is well regarded, albeit someone that is more of a quiet technocrat. Though he tends to be understated, his trajectory remains constant and will likely continue to be a presence, especially in the 4-5G and the PAP. All the more so given his age.'
The commenter added that Mr Lee reminded them a little of Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong.
Speaking of Mr Gan, some Facebook users wondered why he is not in the PAP CEC.
'Didn't see DPM Gan in the slate? What happened?' one wrote.
'Where is the task force man?' another echoed. /TISG
Read also: Desmond Lee: The Dark Horse in the Cabinet
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Johor-Singapore cooperation: Boom, bane or both?
Corporate Singapore has long moaned about high real estate costs and the lack of affordable labour – problems that the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ) is expected to tackle. On Jan 6, Singapore and Malaysia inked a formal agreement to establish the JS-SEZ to attract businesses in every thing ranging from manufacturing, to health and to digital. With a land area four times that of our tiny island-state, the JS-SEZ opens up the possibility for Singapore companies to set up in Johor Bahru. In May, a convenient light rail transit system connecting Singapore and JB was announced. Slated for launch end-2026, the JB-Singapore Rapid Transit System (RTS) Link will be able to serve up to 10,000 commuters during peak periods for every hour and in each direction, with a journey time of about five minutes. This should significantly reduce congestion along the Causeway and reduce travel times between JB and Singapore. While lowering costs and increasing efficiency should be golden words to corporate leaders' ears, every conversation I have had with business owners or CEOs have so far started with a grimace and ended with a groan. Clearly, the JB-Singapore story is more than cost reduction and transport efficiency. Competition with Singapore The closer linkage may offer opportunities, but it also presents formidable competition to Singapore – at least in the short term. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up RM1 is currently worth 30 Singapore cents. For Singaporeans, the favourable exchange rate means that prices are lower in Malaysia. Already, many are making day trips to JB to stock up on diapers, enjoy cheap meals and get pampered in a spa. And they are there not just for basic necessities. They are also going to Malaysia for health check-ups and simple medical treatments. Pharmaceuticals, too, are cheaper across the Causeway. Business owners in Singapore are worried that this will hollow out local demand in supermarkets, food and beverage (F&B) outlets and other specialised services. If the product is something that Singaporeans can buy in JB and carry home, it appears they are already doing it. As Singaporeans enjoy their days off across the Causeway, the dollars they would have spent at home otherwise is now being converted into ringgit (and if they fail to declare it, the purchases are not attracting goods and services tax). This has already happened in Hong Kong, where residents eat and play on weekends in nearby Shenzhen for half the cost. Hong Kong, as I have heard, is a thriving metropolis five days a week but a ghost town come Saturday. A more divided Singapore? The supply of land in Johor should ease commercial and industrial real estate prices here, which should have an eventual knock-on effect on residential real estate, making housing more affordable for first-time Singaporean homeowners. But as one business leader pointed out, if a guy loses his job or has to shutter his business, he will not be able to buy a house anyway. Also, existing homeowners will not be celebrating property prices coming down. Cost of living issues – so central to the discussions during the recent General Election and already exacerbated by the US tariffs – could loom even larger in the national consciousness. Middle and lower-income Singaporeans have been talking about buying a retirement home in Malaysia where housing is cheaper and savings stretch further. With JB becoming such an efficient commute away, will more than just silver-haired Singaporeans relocate? Working individuals, while continuing to be employed in Singapore for higher salaries, may consider commuting from homes in Forest City. Singapore businesses, to retain customers, may move with them. Such businesses could enjoy cost savings and offer lower prices in JB. However, the same products and services would not become cheaper in Singapore where the savings do not apply. This cannibalisation of a company's own business may lead it to bifurcate offerings between high-end Singapore stores and more basic shops across the Causeway. Think premium CS Fresh versus Cold Storage's standard fare. If their Singapore offerings become more high end, the less well-off would simply shop in Malaysia. Local outlets may increasingly cater principally to the well-heeled, likely to comprise a larger component of expatriates and uber-wealthy new citizens or permanent residents. If our country becomes a place where only the rich can afford to work and live, but the everyday Singaporean can only travel in to work, that may have an impact on the fabric and cohesiveness of our society. Will we see a 'two-speed Singapore' with a hollowing out of the middle and lower middle income demographic? And even if this does not happen at significant scale, will the everyday Singaporean start to feel less rooted in their home country? Intentional policies for social cohesion The issue is a complex one. Sure, Singapore needs to address property prices. Rent is becoming an untenably high portion of business costs; and citizens need access not just to affordable public housing, but the ability to aspire to upgraded homes. If the JS-SEZ ameliorates that problem, this would be a good long-term outcome. Likewise, productivity enhancements from efficiency of the RTS Link should be embraced. But in the near term, there will be discomfort and discombobulation. As the JS-SEZ and RTS Link come into operation, Singapore businesses and landlords will be affected. This may result in more precarious businesses failing or choosing to relocate offshore. That will in turn have an impact on their employees' livelihoods. So far, there has not been much discussion on this – but I think it is an issue that needs to be unpacked and tackled openly. We need to assess and address the implications that the new linkages will have in the short term, even while celebrating anticipated future upsides for big corporates and small businesses. On the employment front, upskilling and training need to be core. Singapore will have to accelerate its development into a higher-up-the-value-chain hub, especially in the services sector, where compensation packages are most attractive. Local businesses also need to upgrade to stay creative and relevant. This could be in the form of curating new concepts or offering innovative experiences unique to Singapore. The consequences to our social fabric must not be less front-of-mind. We need intentional policies to build community cohesion and make Singaporeans feel that this, here, is – and always will be – our home. On the business front, this could entail holding space for local entrepreneurs, F&B startups or small businesses. If a home-grown clothing label starts to feel squeezed out by big-name international brands, they will decamp offshore. On the community side, we must be purposeful in building a local identity – be it ever so diverse and messy – with shared spaces and events to enjoy and build cohesion and belonging. The economic benefits of JB-Singapore collaboration will take time to be felt, and in the near term, individuals and businesses will be economically discomfited. Let us not allow that uncomfortable adjustment to lead to a more divided Singapore community. The writer is joint managing partner at TSMP Law Corporation
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Iran made preparations to mine the Strait of Hormuz, US sources say
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox WASHINGTON - The Iranian military loaded naval mines onto vessels in the Persian Gulf last month, a move that intensified concerns in Washington that Tehran was gearing up to blockade the Strait of Hormuz following Israel's strikes on sites across Iran, according to two U.S. officials. The previously unreported preparations, which were detected by U.S. intelligence, occurred some time after Israel launched its initial missile attack against Iran on June 13, said the officials, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters. The loading of the mines - which have not been deployed in the strait - suggests that Tehran may have been serious about closing one of the world's busiest shipping lanes, a move that would have escalated an already-spiraling conflict and severely hobbled global commerce. About one-fifth of global oil and gas shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz and a blockage would likely have spiked world energy prices. Global benchmark oil prices have instead fallen more than 10% since the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, driven in part by relief that the conflict did not trigger significant disruptions in the oil trade. On June 22, shortly after the U.S. bombed three of Iran's key nuclear sites in a bid to cripple Tehran's nuclear program, Iran's parliament reportedly backed a measure to block the strait. That decision was not binding, and it was up to Iran's Supreme National Security Council to make a final decision on the closure, Iran's Press TV said at the time. Iran has over the years threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on that threat. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says US could reach trade deal with India, casts doubt on deal with Japan Singapore A second chance to excel: 3,800 private candidates taking O- and A-level exams in 2025 Multimedia Right on track: Meet the new JB-Singapore RTS Link train Opinion US strikes on Iran: The impact ripples on, from Baghdad to Beijing Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26 Singapore Judge rejects woman's claim that she owns 99% of Bukit Timah condo mostly paid for by ex-boyfriend Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance Business Key features and risks of investment products to be on one page under MAS proposals Reuters was not able to determine precisely when during the Israel-Iran air war Tehran loaded the mines, which - if deployed - would have effectively stopped ships from moving through the key thoroughfare. It is also unclear if the mines have since been unloaded. The sources did not disclose how the United States determined that the mines had been put on the Iranian vessels, but such intelligence is typically gathered through satellite imagery, clandestine human sources or a combination of both methods. Asked for comment about Iran's preparations, a White House official said: "Thanks to the President's brilliant execution of Operation Midnight Hammer, successful campaign against the Houthis, and maximum pressure campaign, the Strait of Hormuz remains open, freedom of navigation has been restored, and Iran has been significantly weakened." The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Iranian mission at the United Nations also did not respond to requests for comment. KEY THOROUGHFARE The two officials said the U.S. government has not ruled out the possibility that loading the mines was a ruse. The Iranians could have prepared the mines to convince Washington that Tehran was serious about closing the strait, but without intending to do so, the officials said. Iran's military could have also simply been making necessary preparations in the event that Iran's leaders gave the order. The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and links the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond. It is 21 miles (34 km) wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 2 miles wide in either direction. OPEC members Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. Qatar, among the world's biggest liquefied natural gas exporters, sends almost all of its LNG through the strait. Iran also exports most of its crude through the passage, which in theory limits Tehran's appetite to shut the strait. But Tehran has nonetheless dedicated significant resources to making sure it can do so if it deems necessary. As of 2019, Iran maintained more than 5,000 naval mines, which could be rapidly deployed with the help of small, high-speed boats, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency estimated at the time. The U.S. Fifth Fleet, which is based in Bahrain, is charged with protecting commerce in the region. The U.S. Navy has typically kept four mine countermeasure vessels, or MCM vessels, in Bahrain, though those ships are being replaced by another type of vessel called a littoral combat ship, or LCS, which also has anti-mine capabilities. All anti-mine ships had been temporarily removed from Bahrain in the days leading up to the U.S. strikes on Iran in anticipation of a potential retaliatory attack on Fifth Fleet headquarters. Ultimately, Iran's immediate retaliation was limited to a missile attack on a U.S. military base in nearby Qatar. U.S. officials, however, have not ruled out further retaliatory measures by Iran. REUTERS
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: As tariff deadline looms, can Southeast Asia strike a deal with the US?
SINGAPORE: The global economy will enter yet another cycle of volatility as the deadline to negotiate a trade deal with the United States approaches in a week. The stakes for Southeast Asia couldn't be higher. The Trump administration will fall short of its ambitious target of making 90 deals in 90 days, after it paused its rollout of the 'Liberation Day' tariffs. For now, only two framework agreements – which codify parts of an eventual deal including trade and non-trade measures – have been signed with the United Kingdom and China. On Friday (Jun 27), US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick claimed another 10 deals with major trading partners will be announced 'soon' and many more will be concluded by Labour Day on Sep 1. Separately, President Donald Trump remarked that the Jul 9 deadline to conclude negotiations won't be extended. Instead, Washington will inform countries of the final tariffs rates they will pay to have access to the US$28 trillion economy. Given that mixed messaging is a tactic Washington has used quite successfully, it is best to watch financial markets for signs which of these pronouncements will be the actual outcome. TRICKY NEGOTIATIONS Washington imposed a baseline 10 per cent tariffs on all countries and territories, including Singapore, which buys more from the US than it sells. This will undoubtedly affect but not derail the local economy. But for some – particularly Cambodia (49 per cent), Vietnam (46 per cent), and Malaysia (24 per cent) – the additional tariffs could permanently damage their trade-driven economies and leave millions unemployed. Trade negotiations are notoriously difficult and time consuming. Negotiators haggle over tariffs on individual goods, they negotiate non-tariff barriers, and they ask for time for local industries to adjust to concessions. All these are at play in the Liberation Day tariff negotiations. Almost every Southeast Asian country has offered lower-to-zero tariffs for American goods of importance to the US such as agriculture products, commodities and automobiles. Vietnam, Cambodia and Malaysia have also offered more stringent rules about counterfeits and customs controls, so their territories are not misused by other countries trying to avoid higher tariffs. Two factors make these negotiations tricker. One, the region is competing with the rest of the world – and with itself – to get the best possible deal in a near-impossible time frame. For the US, the biggest bang for the buck will be concessions from its largest trading partners - and then the rest of the world. From the region, only Vietnam is in the list of top trading partners, and it is competing for concessions with the likes of Japan and Canada. Compared with the rest, Vietnam has significantly less leverage with the US, and it is unlikely to end up with the 10 per cent baseline tariff rate. Countries also have to keep an eye on regional competition. Cambodia, for example, needs to ensure that whatever tariff rate it ends up with, its low-margin, labour-intensive textile and apparel industries don't become less competitive against companies from Vietnam and others with whom they compete. CHINA LOOMS LARGE As a key trading partner and investor in the region, China looms large in the negotiations. Southeast Asian countries will want to ensure that whatever deals they strike are not worse that what Beijing extracts from Washington. China is also significant for the entire region in other ways. Washington is very keen to use tariffs as a leverage to disentangle the global supply chain from China. Achieving that goal completely is both wishful thinking and virtually impossible. But countries will need to ensure that in industries critical to the US, reliance on Chinese parts is reduced over time. Furthermore, like Vietnam has done, countries will need to be stricter so that country of origin rules are not misused by Chinese companies. With just a week to go, a deal – even an imperfect one – will be an ideal outcome. For the Trump administration, an initial agreement is as good as a final one to satisfy its political base and reinforce Mr Trump's image as a master dealmaker. For those countries who fail to strike a deal, an extension to the deadline will be the second-best outcome. For the millions whose livelihoods depend on trade with the US, anything less will be a disaster.
