logo
Actor Reece Richards condemns police watchdog over race decision on arrest

Actor Reece Richards condemns police watchdog over race decision on arrest

The Guardian30-03-2025
The Hairspray and Sex Education actor Reece Richards has condemned the police watchdog for refusing to consider race in its investigation of Met officers who arrested and pepper-sprayed him.
The 34-year-old was walking home in west London last September after performing in Hairspray when a car crashed into a lamp-post nearby. Two white men fled the scene. When Metropolitan police officers arrived seconds later, Richards pointed out the suspects' directions. He said that, instead of pursuing them, an officer began shouting at him to get the ground and pointed a pepper spray at him.
He recalled telling the officers: ''I'm not part of this. I'm a performer. I've just done Hairspray, I'm Seaweed.' I tried to give him as much information about myself: 'I'm an actor, I've been in Sex Education.''
He also told them he lived across the street with his mother, pointing to the flat. But the officer, Richards said, 'saw me as a Black boy that is a part of this'. The actor said he began backing against a wall with his hands raised, and continued pleading, until two more officers arrived.
'I'm saying, 'I'm a performer. My name is Reece Richards.' I'm trying to do everything to humanise myself.'
He said officers shouted: 'Get on the fucking floor!' and tackled him to the ground. 'Three people on top of me, they're pummelling my hands into my back, pushing my head into the floor.' He said he was then pepper-sprayed in the face and handcuffed.
His mother rushed outside and told officers he lived with her in the flat across the street. As a crowd gathered, Richards heard people questioning his treatment. 'I could hear my mum … I begged [them], 'My mum has got high blood pressure. I don't care what happens to me. Just make sure that she's OK.' I lost my dad last year and I'm not trying to lose anyone else.'
Richards said he remains shaken months later. As a Black man in the UK, he explained the great lengths he goes to not be perceived as dangerous. 'You look at things that are traps and you try to navigate away from them … I won't make sure that my voice is as deep as it actually is, just so I can get through things without being judged … But, in this situation, I couldn't get out.'
Richards was de-arrested at the scene. He filed a complaint with the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), but it said it found no indication of racial discrimination in the way that Richards was treated. But it is investigating the use of excessive force.
A report is expected this week.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Richards criticised the IOPC for refusing to investigate whether racial bias was the reason for the excessive force, citing its own guidelines urging investigators to examine the context of an incident.
'They were doing everything to go around the racial thing,' Richards said. 'It was really surreal … for something to be so clear to me and for something to be so muddy for them. It's saddening, it's distrusting.'
His lawyer, Jessica Webster of Bindmans LLP, said: 'For Mr Richards, the IOPC's new discrimination guidelines seem little more than a public relations exercise, with the investigators in his case failing to follow or even appear to understand them.'
She said: 'The Met's institutional racism will persist while the police watchdog fails to hold officers to account.'
The incident also aggravated a prior injury, forcing Richards to stop working for three months, he said. It also left deep emotional scars.
'It's difficult to have the capacity to fully immerse myself in work now because things take me back,' he said. 'This happened where I live. Home represents a safe space, but now it's tainted massively.'
A spokesperson for the IOPC confirmed an officer would not be investigated for racial bias.
They said one officer was investigated for potential gross misconduct, while a second officer faced a misconduct investigation for their use of force and discreditable conduct.
The IOPC said it would also rule on complaints from Richards and his mother regarding use of force, conduct and alleged racial discrimination during the incident.
The spokesperson said: 'Our investigation is in its final stages, and we are making our initial decisions on whether any officers should face disciplinary proceedings. As required by law, we will then share our report and decisions with the Met which will provide its view, which we must consider before making our final decisions.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sex Education star looks worlds away from Netflix role in tense mystery thriller streaming soon
Sex Education star looks worlds away from Netflix role in tense mystery thriller streaming soon

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Sex Education star looks worlds away from Netflix role in tense mystery thriller streaming soon

One of Sex Education's biggest breakout stars took on a very different role in a sun-soaked new drama coming to streaming soon Sex Education star Emma Mackey's latest cinematic role will be available to watch at home very soon. ‌ Best known for portraying Maeve Wiley in all four seasons of Netflix 's beloved comedy-drama, she has since appeared in major films like Barbie and Death on the Nile. ‌ Still currently in cinemas, her latest project sees her taking on her first leading role in a provocative and mysterious drama based on a Booker Prize nominated novel. ‌ Inspired by Deborah Levy's 2016 novel of the same name, Hot Milk follows Mackey as Sofia, a young woman whose mother, Rose (played by Fiona Shaw), has contracted an unknown illness that's left her wheelchair-bound. When the mother-daughter pair travel to a small Spanish seaside town to track down a physician with unusual methods who could hold the cure, Sofia finds herself drawn to an alluring traveller named Ingrid (Vicky Krieps). ‌ The film will be streaming on Mubi from Friday, 22nd August for anyone who missed out on Mackey's sultry and thought-provoking drama on the big screen. The Independent gave Hot Milk four stars, calling it "a slippery, subversive coming-of-age tale'. Mackey and Krieps were praised as 'formidable' in The Guardian, while Deadline says Shaw's performance is 'truly extraordinary'. ‌ One fan of the film gave it a five-star Google review, penning: 'Powerful performances set against dreamlike scenery where reality merges with imagination. 'Starts as a slow burn but builds into a heightened frenzy of complex sensations that is impossible not to sense as you witness each separate character's life unravel and deteriorate.' Someone else praised: 'Fever dream magic, great indie film if you like trippy movies, reminds me of I'm Thinking of Ending Things on Netflix.' ‌ Enthusiasm for the film continued on Letterboxd, where one user wrote: 'The pace was perfect. The score was stunning. 'The acting was incredible, Fiona Shaw is such a talented actor. Emma Mackey is just an unreal actress too. ‌ 'I felt as if she was speaking to me and I shall carry these words with me the rest of my life. This was a film I watched at the right time in my life. A film I didn't know I needed till I had seen it. I wish I had words to properly express how much I adore this film.' And a final fan said: 'Beautiful adaptation of the book, felt it in my soul - the story, the characters, the setting.... so moving and so real.' Film fanatics should make sure they sign up to Mubi to check out this indie cinema gem, and many more movie masterpieces, in just under a month's time. Hot Milk will be released Friday, 22nd August on Mubi.

Four in ten people charged over heinous sex attacks in London are foreign nationals, shocking police stats show
Four in ten people charged over heinous sex attacks in London are foreign nationals, shocking police stats show

The Sun

time5 hours ago

  • The Sun

Four in ten people charged over heinous sex attacks in London are foreign nationals, shocking police stats show

NEARLY four in ten people charged over sex attacks in London in the last seven years are foreign nationals, police figures show. Police figures show these migrants were behind 2,809 of the 7,798 alleged crimes recorded in the capital since 2018 - despite making up less than a quarter of the city's population. 1 The number of annual sexual offence charges recorded in London has almost doubled in that period. Romanians were behind 308 sexual offence charges to be the highest non-British cohort in terms of raw numbers. But the 89 charges of Afghans makes them the most frequent offenders as a share of their population - estimated to be up to 12,000. The Centre for Migration Control obtained a breakdown from the Met on the nationalities of people who have had charges brought for sexual offences since 2018. Of the 7,798 offences, 4,631 were from British nationals, 2,809 from non-Brits, and 358 with unknown nationalities. If unknowns are counted as foreign nationals, it means non-Brits carried out 40.6 per cent of the crimes. If they are excluded, the figure is still 37.8 per cent. Robert Bates, Research Director at the Centre for Migration Control said: 'Our capital city is stuck in the depths of lawless decay. The spike in sexual offences against women and girls is directly attributable to our open borders. 'Any foreign national found guilty of these crimes must be deported without question and those nationalities overrepresented in crime statistics must face visa restrictions. 'It is time to be unashamedly robust in protecting British decency and making sure our streets are safe.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Those who commit sex crimes are despicable, causing the most unimaginable harm to victims and survivors. 'It is this government's mission to halve violence against women and girls in a decade. 'We continue to deport foreign nationals who commit heinous crimes in the UK are not left free on our streets. 'Since the election, over 35,000 people have been returned from the UK, including a 14 per cent increase in the number of foreign national offenders.'

Police use spit hoods on suspects once an hour
Police use spit hoods on suspects once an hour

Telegraph

time9 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Police use spit hoods on suspects once an hour

Police officers are using spit hoods to defend themselves in potentially violent situations once every hour, new figures have shown. The mesh fabric hoods are placed over a suspect's head to prevent them from spitting or biting when arrested or in custody. Figures show that they were used 26,4000 times over three years and that their use is increasing each year. Official data showing the use of spit hoods between 2021 and 2024 has been released by the Home Office, following a House of Lords written question by Lord Palter of Spalding. In 2021-22, they were used by police 8,281 times, in 2022/23 it was 8,275 and in 2023-24, it was 9,844. On average, that is 8,800 each year, which breaks down to 24 times a day. The Metropolitan Police had the highest number with 4,503 over the three years, Greater Manchester Police with 1,951 and West Midlands Police using 1,875. Critics of the tactic have voiced concerns that spit hoods can be dangerous, potentially leading to suffocation or distress, and that they can mirror a waterboarding effect. Two serving Metropolitan Police officers and a former officer are facing a gross misconduct hearing after a 90-year-old black woman with dementia was 'red-dotted' with a Taser, handcuffed and put in a spit hood. The woman was targeted with the Taser when she refused to drop kitchen utensils she had been holding after officers were called to an address in Peckham, south London, in May this year over reports of a disturbance. Officers approached the woman who spat in the direction of some officers. She was physically detained and placed in handcuffs and then a spit hood was applied, but she was not arrested. Ambulance staff attended and the woman was taken to hospital still in the handcuffs and spit hood. These were later removed at the hospital. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is now investigating the police officers' actions. Steve Noonan, the IOPC director, said: 'We are concerned by some of the actions and decision-making of police officers involved in the detention of this elderly and vulnerable lady, and we recognise this incident has also caused community concern. 'It's important that an independent investigation takes place to establish the full circumstances.' But officers have defended their use of spit hoods. Peter Bleksley, a retired Metropolitan Police detective, said: 'This is the shocking reality of policing in 2025. If there's a risk of an officer being spat on, I'd say put the hood on. ' Violence against police is out of control. It needs a proper crackdown. The use of these hoods is a clear sign it is not acceptable in any form.' 'Put yourselves in the shoes of the officers' He added: 'It's a horrific thing to have to go through. Anyone who does not believe me, I'd say put yourselves in the shoes of the officers it is happening to. 'They are there for a reason. Anyone making the human rights argument, what's humane about being spat on? It's a disgraceful act.' One officer from Kent, who did not want to be named, said: 'It's becoming an increasing problem. There is more reporting of it now. 'No police officer wants to have to use them. But if we're being spat on, we have to. It's also about controlling what could be an unfolding violent situation and not making it worse.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store