
This winery is one of Napa Valley's best-kept secrets
But there is a small class of wineries that have consistently produced excellent wine, the kind of wine whose taste can lodge into your memory and stay with you for a lifetime, and yet have always remained something of a secret. By chance or by choice, they never entered the zeitgeist.
One of the best-kept secrets is White Rock Vineyards, tucked away in the valley's eastern foothills above the Silverado Trail. Here, the Vandendriessche family has produced quietly extraordinary wines for nearly five decades. They're a true family operation, farming organically, preserving a historic property and charging eminently reasonable prices by Napa standards.
The red wines are herbal and savory, their whites elegant and minerally. Stylistically, they're aligned with other long-overlooked Napa wines, like Corison, Diamond Creek and Mayacamas, that have recently reached widespread renown after decades of toiling in obscurity. Maybe it's the wines' — and the family's — understated nature that has allowed White Rock to evade the spotlight for so long. But I think it's about time that the word got out.
Despite its relatively low profile, White Rock is historically significant: It's one of Napa Valley's original wineries. In 1870, Dr. John Pettingill, whose many vocations included dentistry and horse breeding, purchased land in the lower slopes of the Vaca Mountains. He planted Zinfandel and Riesling, and quarried the compressed volcanic ash that he discovered in the soils to build himself a winery. He named it after that ash: White Rock.
The winery that Pettingill constructed became Henri and Claire Vandendriessche's house when they bought the property in 1977. France-born Henri had moved to California to study economics at UC Berkeley and fell in love with Claire, a Napa native. 'We knew we wanted to live in the country, and we knew that Napa was waiting for us,' Henri told me on an afternoon in May as we sat under a coastal live oak in the middle of the vineyard. 'So Claire and I set out to find land with our meager means.'
Napa's western mountains were too pricey for their budget, as was Carneros. The eastern foothills were more affordable, but were considered 'dry and rocky and unplantable,' said Henri. It took them three years of searching, but when they found the 64-acre parcel — shaped like a bowl, almost like its own little valley — on a winding back road near Soda Canyon, they knew.
Rocky, yes, but unplantable, no. The Vandendriessches learned that the soils here were loaded with a soft, crumbly volcanic rock called breccia. Veins of it run through various parts of Napa Valley (and Sonoma County's Chalk Hill region has a lot of it), but it's rare in Napa to find the accumulation that's at White Rock. The soil's low nutrient levels cause the vines to struggle, resulting in small berries and concentrated flavors.
The Vandendriessches planted the Napa standards of Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon and other red Bordeaux grapes. In 1987, they used a coal mining machine to bore into the hillside for subterranean caves, one in a wave of new cave construction that was underway in Napa Valley at the time. Henri and Claire's sons, Michael and Christopher, started working for the family business early; as teenagers, the brothers planted an entire new section of the vineyard. After attending school and working other jobs, they both returned to White Rock full time: Michael as vineyard manager in 1996, Christopher as winemaker in 1999.
Christopher was fresh off a stint as the assistant winemaker at Luna Vineyards, where his boss was John Kongsgaard, famous for his indulgent, dense Chardonnays. 'I came out of the Kongsgaard school of winemaking,' Christopher said. 'We were definitely making big, robust wines on the edge of extraction. I felt back then that that was the truest way of expressing the terroir, to get as much as possible out of the grapes.'
But as Christopher learned the White Rock vineyard more deeply, he began to feel that this site's terroir could be best revealed by a lighter winemaking touch. 'White Rock's grapes don't need to be overextracted to have an expression that's unique,' he said. Gradually, he has taken to fermenting the wines at cooler temperatures in an effort to draw out less oomph.
'Each wine for me is like finding a piece of driftwood on the beach, and I'm trying to figure out how to make it into a piece of art,' he said. 'It's its own strange form, and my job is to do as little as possible.'
The wines are 'understated, which is really endearing to the people who love them,' said Kelli White, the author of 'Napa Valley, Then and Now' and director of education at the Wine Center at Meadowood, 'but also potentially means they get left behind in certain critical roundups.'
Unfailingly, the White Rock wines 'are really ageworthy,' White said. 'They never did the chasing-high-alcohol thing. They never did the 200% new oak thing.' They also never chased the $300 Cabernet thing: White Rock's Claret is $65, and its estate Chardonnay $45, much lower than Napa wines of comparable quality.
That ageworthiness comes largely from the breccia, which imbues White Rock's red wines with a formidable tannin. Christopher embraces that rusticity, rather than trying to melt it into the silky, soft tannins that are a signature of Napa's modern-day Cabernet style. He also ages the wines for much longer than is typical before selling: at least three years for the whites, and up to five years for the reds. Rather than send them to a warehouse where he can't fully control the ambiance, Christopher installed sparkling-wine cages in corners of the caves, in which he (now with the help of assistant winemaker Libby Foulk) tightly stacks hundreds of bottles, then labels them by hand when he's ready to sell them.
When I joined the Chronicle in 2015, White Rock was one of the first Napa wineries I visited in my new role; another winemaker had tipped me off to it. It looked so different from the other glitzy estates I was seeing, so much more modest and earnest. Just a family, a few employees and a cave. I appreciated that the wines seemed like an expression of that restraint. 'Herbs, eucalyptus, dusty cocoa, black tea. LOVE,' I wrote in my notebook of a 2011 Cabernet. That visit informed several stories I wrote, including one about the pyrazine controversy in Napa, but I never wrote a dedicated story about White Rock. I guess I couldn't find a news hook.
Two years later, there was all too much of a news hook. In October 2017, the Atlas fire tore through White Rock, and the family fled quickly. When they returned, they found that Henri and Claire's house — the winery that Dr. Pettingill had built — had partially burned, and a large section of the cave was rubble. The fire destroyed 800 cases of library wine in the cave, as well as 8,000 bottles in the original barrel cellar at the house.
I drove past the evacuation-zone lines to report on the damage. It was heartbreaking to see thousands of charred, broken bottles of wine lying in heaps, and a house reduced to a pile of debris with only a chimney still standing. Over the phone, the family recounted to me their harrowing exit.
When I returned this spring, the Vandendriessches had just broken ground on the portion of the cave that they're rebuilding. It took them nearly eight years to secure the plans and permits, but by next spring they expect to be finished with the construction, which will include a new tasting room. In the meantime, they've been hosting customers in an air-conditioned trailer and at a picnic table underneath the towering live oak in the vineyard. Engineers were able to salvage the original stone siding on Henri and Claire's house, replacing the mortar block by block and sandblasting to remove blackening.
The intervening years have brought other changes. White Rock's vineyards achieved organic certification this year. Although it was merely a codification of practices they'd always had in place — the vineyard has never been treated with pesticides or herbicides — an employee with experience in grant writing finally had the bandwidth for the paperwork. The winery, too, is undergoing organic certification, a separate process that regulates materials including cleaning solutions and yeast nutrients.
White Rock also implemented an unorthodox approach to releasing wines to its mailing list. Every six months, the team tastes through a range of older and younger vintages to determine which are at their peak, then sells an assortment of those regardless of their age. The current release includes reds from 2013 and 2014 as well as 2014 and 2018 Chardonnays. (The White Rock wines currently available at restaurants and wine shops, on the other hand, are from the 2022 vintage.) Customers love it, Christopher said: 'When they hear that they can buy a wine that was perfectly aged in a cave for 10 years, they're really excited.'
Christopher has increased his driftwood art collection. When I visited him a decade ago, he produced around eight wines a year; he now makes upwards of 15. 'I've become obsessed with single-tank wines,' he said, and now has a series of small-lot bottlings. He added a Champagne -method wine in 2019, White Rock's first foray into sparkling.
But these shifts are not fundamental. For the most part, White Rock remains charmingly the same. A taste of its jasmine flower-inflected Breccia Chardonnay, its mint- and sage-forward Merlot or its licoricey, herbal Claret makes it clear: These wines are timeless.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Top economist Brad DeLong to recent college grads: Don't blame AI for job struggles—blame the sputtering economy
As recent college graduates face one of the toughest job markets in years, Berkeley economist and voluble Substacker Brad DeLong has a message for those struggling to land their first full-time gig: Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are not to blame. Larger forces are at work. DeLong, a professor at UC Berkeley and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, argued in a recent essay that the challenges confronting young job-seekers today are primarily driven by widespread policy uncertainty and a sluggish economy—not by the rapid rise of AI tools like ChatGPT or data-crunching robots. DeLong offered his analysis on July 23, roughly 10 days before the July jobs report stunned markets, revealing that the economy has been much weaker than previously thought for several months. Prominent business leaders had also flagged troubling signs in the economy before the July jobs report dropped. IBM Vice Chair and former Trump advisor Gary Cohn went on CNBC a day before the jobs data, noting 'warning signs below the surface.' Cohn said he pays close attention to the quits rate in the monthly JOLTS data, arguing that 150,000 fewer quits was an ominous sign of poor economic health. DeLong sounded a prophetic note, writing that 'policy uncertainty' over trade, immigration, inflation, and technology has 'paralyzed business planning,' leading to a self-reinforcing cycle of hiring freezes. New entrants to the job market are bearing the brunt of the retreat to risk aversion. In other words, the college graduate class of 2025 is really unlucky. The economist argued that the uncertainty causes companies to delay major decisions—including hiring—in the face of an unpredictable policy environment. 'This risk aversion is particularly damaging for those at the start of their careers, who rely on a steady flow of entry-level openings to get a foot in the door,' he wrote. DeLong has sounded similar warnings of a slowdown for years. He talked to Fortune in 2022 about his theory of the economy starting to sputter from his book Slouching Towards Utopia. In 2025, he wrote, the big story in the jobs market is not actually AI, but something different. Policy paralysis So, what's really keeping freshly minted graduates from clinching that all-important first job? DeLong cited Bloomberg BusinessWeek's Amanda Mull and her theory about 'stochastic uncertainty'—a cocktail of unpredictability around government policies, trade, immigration, and inflation. Companies aren't firing; instead, they're just waiting. And many are delaying new hires in anticipation of possible sudden shifts in tariffs, inflation rates, and regulatory environments. The result is a wait-and-see climate where employers, worried about future economic shocks, have selected caution over expansion. The holding pattern hits new entrants to the workforce especially hard. While overall unemployment in the U.S. remains low, the situation is uniquely difficult for new graduates relative to the rest of the workforce. Citing economists including Paul Krugman, DeLong noted that while the absolute unemployment rate for college graduates isn't alarming, the gap between graduate unemployment and general unemployment rates is at record highs. In the past, higher education reliably led to lower unemployment, but now recent grads are struggling 'by a large margin' compared to previous generations. As previously reported by Fortune Intelligence, Goldman Sachs has argued that the college degree 'safety premium' is mostly gone. The team, led by Goldman's chief economist Jan Hatzius, wrote: 'Recent data suggests that the labor market for recent college graduates has weakened at a time when the broader labor market has appeared healthy.' It also found that since 1997, young workers without a college degree have become much less likely to even look for work, with their participation rate dropping by seven percentage points. Mull cited an analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York which found that tech and design fields, including computer science, computer engineering, and graphic design, are seeing unemployment rates above 7% for new graduates. Why the AI hype misses the mark Although the tech sector is buzzing about AI's potential to replace junior analysts or automate entry-level tasks, DeLong urged caution in assigning blame. In his typical style, he noted, 'there is still [no] hard and not even a semi-convincing soft narrative that 'AI is to blame' for entry-level job scarcity.' Hiring slowdowns, he pointed out, are driven by broader economic forces: uncertainty, risk aversion, and changes in how companies invest. Here again, DeLong's analysis rhymes and aligns with recent research from Goldman's Hatzius. The bank's quarterly 'AI Adoption Tracker,' issued in July, found that the unemployment rate for AI-exposed occupations had reconciled with the wider economy, which contradicts fears of mass displacement. They also noted there have been no recent layoff announcements explicitly citing AI as the cause, underscoring that it's contained to disruption of specific functions, not entire industries. Crucially, he argued, rather than hiring people, companies in the tech sector are splurging on 'the hardware that powers artificial intelligence'—notably Nvidia's high-performance chips—fueling a boom in capital investment while sidelining junior hires. 'For firms, the calculus is straightforward: Investing in AI infrastructure is seen as a ticket to future competitiveness, while hiring junior staff is a cost that can be postponed.' Underpinning these trends is a shift away from any and all risk. Employers prefer to hire for specific short-term needs and are less willing to invest in developing new talent—leaving young applicants caught in a cycle where 'just getting your foot in the door' is more difficult than ever. Incumbent workers, worried about job market uncertainty, are less likely to change jobs, leading to fewer openings and greater stagnation. DeLong's analysis harmonized with Goldman Sachs' findings about the declining premium attached with a college degree: 'For the longer-run, the rise in the college wage premium is over, and a decline has (probably) begun.' For decades, he continued, a college degree was a ticket to higher earnings, and the labor market rewarded those with advanced skills and credentials. In recent years, though, 'this has plateaued and may even be falling.' The causes are complex, he added, but the takeaway: While degrees remain valuable, they are no longer the ever-ascending ticket to prosperity they once were. These comments confirm the gloomy remarks of University of Connecticut professor emeritus Peter Turchin, who recently talked with Fortune about the declining status of the upper middle class in 21st century America. When asked where else he sees this manifesting in modern life, Turchin said, 'It's actually everywhere you look. 'Look at the overproduction of university degrees,' he said, arguing that the decreasing premium that Goldman and DeLong write about shows up in declining rates of college enrollment and high rates of recent graduate unemployment. 'There is overproduction of university degrees and the value of a university degree actually declines.' DeLong's bottom line for recent grads: Blame a risk-averse business climate, not technology, for today's job woes. And now that we know the economy may have been much more risk-averse in 2025 than previously, DeLong's warnings are worth revisiting. DeLong did not respond to a request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The minimum wage is set to rise in California on Jan. 1
The state minimum wage will increase again in the new year. Under California labor law, the state's director of finance has to calculate annually how much the minimum wage will go up in the following year. The increase is determined by whichever number is lesser: 3.5%; or the rate of change for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics non-seasonally adjusted U.S. Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (U.S. CPI-W). This year, the lesser number is 2.49% — the average U.S. CPI-W for the 12-month period from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in the prior year. On Jan. 1, 2026, the minimum wage for all employers in California will be $16.90. That will put California at the second-highest minimum wage in the country, after the District of Columbia, where it's $17.95 an hour. In Washington state, the minimum wage is $16.66 per hour; $16.50 in parts of New York state; and $16.35 an hour in Connecticut. Health care and fast-food workers in California receive a higher minimum wage than the state minimum. Certain health care workers qualify for a $24-an-hour minimum wage as of the beginning of July 2025. The minimum hourly rate for fast food workers increased to $20 per hour in April 2024. Critics said the fast food minimum wage would lead to job losses and price hikes, but a study from the Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics at UC Berkeley found that didn't happen. A ballot proposition to increase the statewide minimum wage to $18 an hour failed in the 2024 election, with 50.7% of voters voting 'no.'


Los Angeles Times
4 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
How California can cash in on federal incentives for green power before they disappear
California is often criticized for high electricity costs and slow development timelines. Rightly so: My electricity bill has doubled in a decade, and as a renter I can't buy solar or batteries to cut the costs. But critics confuse the real reasons for this problem. According to California's utility regulators, our power bills are soaring because of drought, wildfires and an antiquated approach to rooftop solar. Clean energy has been the best solution to this problem — solar, wind and batteries simply cost less to power our lives. Unfortunately, the Trump administration's One Big Beautiful Bill Act just put a ticking clock on the most affordable energy sources. The bill repealed tax credits that were created by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and killed federal programs supporting clean energy technological innovation. Utilities and businesses were banking on these policies to build electricity generation, affordably meet soaring power demand and keep the lights on. But instead of a decade of policy certainty as had been expected, federal tax credits for clean energy now are set to abruptly end after 2027. Californians will pay dearly, adding new costs to already high statewide power prices. The new budget law is likely to spike electricity rates 7% to 11% by 2035, forcing households to pay $320 more per year. But we're not powerless: State officials can still help prevent some of these cost increases by buying renewables now while the discount is still available. New projects can qualify for federal incentives if they start construction by July 4, 2026, or complete construction before the end of 2027. More than likely, this means signing contracts by the end of 2025. If utilities and developers can hit this mark, Californians will save 30% to 50% compared with what new renewable power generation will cost after the credits expire. Developer interest is strong. Enough prospective wind, solar and battery projects to power 100% of California's statewide demand have filed requests with our grid operator to plug into the grid. But connecting a new project currently takes five years — too late to hit that narrow window. Getting projects online quickly is critical to cutting our electricity costs. Here's how to do it. UC Berkeley analysis suggests that building clean energy at existing gas-fired power plant sites — an innovative approach called 'surplus interconnection' — could save money immediately and solve our timing problem. Gas plants are running less often as California cuts its planet-warming emissions, leaving their grid-connected transmission wires mostly unused. Building solar and wind projects adjacent to these gas plants could use this existing 'surplus' infrastructure to add massive amounts of clean energy, rather than waiting five years for grid upgrades to unlock the same potential. The UC Berkeley report found surplus interconnection could add 29 gigawatts of solar and wind potential at existing gas plant sites — enough to meet our state's renewable energy targets for 2035, or power more than 60 large artificial intelligence data centers. While using or transferring surplus interconnection is a business decision for existing generation owners or a contractual matter with prospective new generation owners, the electricity utilities that buy power on our behalf significantly influence these decisions. All levels of California's state government can help. The state Legislature is already debating Assembly Bill 1408, which would promote surplus interconnection by directing California agencies to examine and integrate this approach into their planning and procurement processes. Passing the bill will empower agencies and our grid operator, the California Independent System Operator, to accelerate procurement and save money. The California Public Utilities Commission can require utilities to accelerate resource procurement through its proposed Reliable and Clean Power Procurement Program. The commission can also clarify that resources using surplus interconnection qualify for expedited procurement toward meeting California's clean energy goals. Gov. Gavin Newsom can order expedited procurement by the commission, and our executive agencies can prioritize permitting these near-term projects. The governor can require utilities, power plant owners and agencies to identify an action plan for accelerated permitting and procurement and take it to the Legislature. Such recommendations must be swift — we have weeks, not months — to hit the rapidly closing construction window. In the longer term, the California Independent System Operator can incorporate surplus interconnection into its transmission planning processes — one significant way to cut costs on the $45 billion to $63 billion in new transmission infrastructure that the operator says California must build by 2045. With electricity rates surging, California could be a role model for America — and the world — in making the most out of our existing transmission infrastructure with advanced transmission technologies and surplus interconnection. Congress' repealing of federal incentives and policies means we can't afford to wait. Bold action can tap billions in clean energy investment and save consumers hundreds of millions — but only if the state moves quickly. Mike O'Boyle is the acting policy team director at Energy Innovation, an energy and climate policy research firm in San Francisco.