Secretive Russian satellite appears to be spinning out of control
The Cosmos 2553 satellite, which launched from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome three weeks before Russia 's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, is reportedly no longer operational after encountering problems while in orbit.
Data from Doppler radar and space-tracking firm LeoLabs suggests that it has been tumbling since mid-November 2024.
Analysts suggest the satellite may actually be a test for future orbital nuclear weapons, with the Russian ministry of defence describing Cosmos 2553 as a 'technological spacecraft... equipped with newly developed onboard instruments and systems for testing them under the influence of radiation and heavy charged particles'.
The satellite is potentially carrying a 'dummy warhead', according to the Space Threat Assessment report, published by the Washington-based thinktank Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on 25 April.
'If the satellite is testing new technologies, it may have been placed in such a remote orbit because there would be less risk of affecting other satellites and it would be difficult to monitor,' the CSIS report stated.
US officials have noted that if a nuclear weapon was detonated at a 2,000km altitude, the effects would be 'indiscriminate' and render low-Earth orbit unusable for at least a year.
One potential target could be SpaceX's Starlink internet network, which is used by Ukraine's military to communicate and coordinate operations.
Mallory Stewart, who served as the US Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control, Deterrence, and Stability under former president Joe Biden, said last year that Russia is already testing a nuclear-armed anti-satellite weapon in orbit.
'Based on information deemed credible, Russia may be considering the incorporation of nuclear weapons into its counterspace programs,' she said at an event hosted by the CSIS in May.
'The orbit [of Cosmos 2553] is in a region not used by any other spacecraft – that in itself was somewhat unusual. And the orbit is in a region of higher radiation than normal lower Earth orbits, but not high enough of a radiation environment to allow accelerated testing of electronics as Russia has described the purpose to be.'
In April 2024, Russia vetoed a UN Security Council resolution aimed at solidifying the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that barred the use of nuclear weapons in space.
Moscow claimed the veto was because the resolution did not include other weapons from being deployed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's two-word verdict on what will happen if Putin doesn't sign deal
Donald Trump spoke to reporters on the White House South Lawn after imposing a 50-day ultimatum on Vladimir Putin - and explained what would happen if it is not met Donald Trump has said it will be 'too bad' if Vladimir Putin does not agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine in a blasé ultimatum. The US president spoke to reporters on the White House South Lawn on Tuesday afternoon, the day after he threatened to impose "secondary tariffs" of up to 100% on Moscow if they fail to sign a deal within the next 50 days. Despite his infamous bust-up with Zelensky in the Oval Office in the first few weeks of his second term, Trump has in recent days signalled a surprising change in his position on the war, with his country now set to send a cache of"top-of-the-line" Patriot missiles to Kyiv via its allies in Europe. He's also appeared to toughen his rhetoric on the Russian president, claiming earlier this week that he was "disappointed" in Putin. On Tuesday, he repeated his threat to impose tariffs on sanctions on Russia if they fail to meet the 50-day ultimatum. Asked by one reporter what he repercussions would be for Moscow if they do not come to an agreement with Ukraine, Trump said: "Well at the end of 50 days if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad." "The tariffs are going to go on and other sanctions going to go on," he added when asked what the future of Russian relations looked like if Putin did not agree to end his war. He was also pressed on whether he had now switched sympathies in favour of Ukraine, after previously appearing reluctant to criticise Russia, and replied: "No, I'm on nobodies side. "You know whose side I'm on? Humanity's side, I want to stop the killing of thousands of people a week. I want to stop the killing. I want the killing to stop in the Ukraine-Russia war, that's the side I'm on." The President went on to say: 'We're going to see what happens with President Putin. So far I've been very disappointed with President Putin. I've solved a lot of wars in the last three months, but I haven't got this one yet. This is a Biden war, it's not a Trump war, I'm here to try and get us out of that mess.' But Trump appeared to downplay reports that he could soon supply Ukraine with more long-range weaponry, allowing it to strike directly on Moscow. Some in Ukraine and the US have said the move could help push Putin towards negotiations to end the fighting. Asked if he intended to supply Ukraine with weapons that could reach deeper into Russian territory, Trump replied: "We're not looking to do that." Trump made the remarks to reporters before departing the White House for an energy investment event in Pittsburgh.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
The View host tears into Republican infighting over Epstein files
The View host Ana Navarro tore into Republicans' responses to the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files during Tuesday's (15 July) program. It comes as a growing number of the president's supporters have complained after he encouraged people to move on from the Epstein files. For years, right-wing influencers circulated theories online about the government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his death in federal prison, perpetuating claims that a ring of high-profile, powerful individuals helped cover up the convicted pedophile's actions and ensure he never stood trial. But last week's Justice Department and FBI memo shut down many of those theories, including the existence of a 'client list,' and disappointed many Trump supporters who refused to believe the absence of bombshell revelations. "It turns out that when you spend years building a five-alarm fire, you can't put it out by pissing on it," Ms Navarro said.
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Migrant charity says new UK and France deal will be ‘drop in the ocean'
However, the deal still faces final legal verification and consultation with the EU bloc before it can come into effect. Kent-based migrant charities have offered criticism of the Prime Minister's plans, with one leader suggesting the plan is a 'drop in the ocean' and does not address the full scale of the issue. Dr Razia Shariff, the chief executive of Kent Refugee Action Network (Kran) told PA News Agency it is 'unlikely' that the deal is a step in the right direction. Dr Shariff said: 'I don't actually understand how it's going to help. I think it's welcome that we've got some form of a safe or legal route being introduced for the first time – above and beyond a resettlement scheme.' However, she went on to point out that the UK and French leaders 'don't know if the EU is even going to verify it' and that they haven't worked out the details yet. She continued: 'There's a little bit of light if you like, given the fact that they are going to be offering some safer legal routes on this new scheme, but it's definitely not enough. It's a drop in the ocean, right?' French officials have suggested the pilot scheme is expected to return an estimated 50 migrants a week. A spokesperson for Dover based migrant charity Samphire said: 'This is a small proportion of the total number crossing. 'Desperate people in need of sanctuary are taking a huge risk to cross the Channel to safety – a small chance of being returned will just be another risk to take and does not, on the face of it, seem like a strong deterrent.' A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover, Kent, onboard an RNLI Lifeboat following a small boat incident in the Channel (Gareth Fuller/PA) Last week, some 1,375 migrants arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel, according to provisional figures from the Home Office. At least 22,000 people have already made the journey since January, putting 2025 on course to be a record year for crossings. The returns scheme will be accompanied by a crackdown on illegal working in the UK as the Government attempts to address the 'pull factors' encouraging people to attempt the crossing from France. Dr Shariff, who has worked with Kran for almost 10 years, argued that the deal did not address the bigger picture. 'If they just offered humanitarian visas or safe and legal routes in the first place, then they wouldn't have to be in the hands of criminals and smugglers and be brought over here in the first place,' she said. According to Samphire, 61% of people crossing the Channel on small boats in the year to March 2025 were Afghans, Syrians, Iranians, Vietnamese and Eritreans, who have a 66.6% asylum seeker acceptance rate in the UK between them. The charity's spokesperson said: 'There is a high likelihood that the UK will attempt to return some seeking asylum with legitimate claims, which will no doubt be subject to legal challenge. 'The Government should not be playing with human lives or catering to anti-migration narratives. Saying that any deal is better than no deal is not the right way to treat people.' The UK Government has said it expects Brussels to approve the pact, while a spokesman for the European Commission indicated it wanted to know more about the 'substance and form' of the arrangement before offering support. Both charities welcome safe and legal passage which could offset the power of the smuggling gangs, but neither seems to think this deal provides a comprehensive answer. 'It's side-stepping the issue, trying to appease everyone a little bit in some shape or form, but you know we will see if it's going to actually address the issue – I really don't think it will,' added Dr Shariff.
