Australian Legal Action Against Chinese Rare Earth Investors
A strategically important deposit of rare earths in Australia is the prize in a legal brawl which erupted earlier today when the Australian Government launched its first case for alleged breaching of foreign investment laws against a group of shadowy Chinese investors.
Australia's Treasurer (Finance Minister) Jim Chalmers said the action was being taken against Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company for failing to comply with an order to sell shares in a rare earth project developer, Northern Minerals.
Australian Treasurer Jim Chalmers. (Photo by)
Indian Ocean and five associated foreign investors were ordered last year to sell the shares they had acquired in Northern which owns the Browns Range rare earth project in the far north of Western Australia.
Browns Range is rich in dysprosium and terbium two of the most valuable rare earths with specialist uses in industrial and defence equipment. China dominates current supply.
Both dysprosium and terbium were on a list of materials which China temporarily banned from export to the U.S. earlier this year.
Terbium was also recently added to the inventory of products produced by Australia's Lynas Rare Earths which is working closely with the U.S. Government on rare earth refining.
The Northern Minerals project at Browns Range is reported to contain the biggest deposit of dysprosium and terbium outside China.
Military Uses
The company, in a background note, said dysprosium and terbium were used in the production of magnets for military, clean energy, and high technology industries.
'Dysprosium and terbium are prized because their unique properties improve the durability of magnets by increasing their resistance to demagnetization, Northern Minerals said.
"The flagship deposit in Browns Range is Wolverine which is thought to be the highest-grade dysprosium and terbium orebody in Australia.
Periodic symbol and diagram of Dysprosium illustration
'The company is preparing to bring Wolverine into production with the objective of providing a reliable alternative source of dysprosium and terbium to production sourced from China.'
Chalmers said in a statement that he was doing what was 'necessary to protect the national interest and Australia's foreign investment framework'.
He did not name any individuals in the compulsory share sale (disposal) order but last year there were five groups of investors said to have been ordered to sell their Northern Minerals shares including a business called Yuxiao and individuals named as Ximei Liu and Xi Wang.
The Australian Financial Review newspaper said Yuxiao is close to China-based Shenghe Resources and China Northern.
Ordered To Sell
Today's case against the Chinese investors is said to focus on the fact that they have defied the original order to sell stock as required by Australian law.
Browns Range is being developed in association with a rare earth refinery being built in the south of Western Australia by Lynas Rare Earths.
Northern Minerals told the Australian Stock Exchange that it was not party to the government action against the Chinese investors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Victoria's Secret hired a superstar CEO to turn around the flagging brand. But a 50% stock drop has activist investors circling
As bras go, wireless is winning. On Victoria's Secret's latest earnings call earlier this month, CEO Hillary Super explained that the brand's So Obsessed underwire-free push-up bra was a fast-growing hit, calling it 'a standout,' with 30% year-over-year growth and a 'deep resonance with the millennial customer.' Those comments landed well with Morgan Stanley analyst Alexandra Stratton, who wrote in a subsequent research note that Super seemed to have a better handle on fashion trends than the previous management team. 'Super's commentary demonstrated a deeper understanding of how the intimates industry has evolved in recent years,' she wrote. Several other analysts sprinkled their response to the earnings call with optimistic observations about Super, who has led the lingerie shop since last September and was hired to revamp a brand that has spent the past six years careening from one disaster to the next. And yet the CEO is also contending with a host of problems. Like other retail leaders, Super is navigating Trump's tariffs and uncertainty about consumer spending. The company's stock is down 50% since January, following a December surge on signs of a turnaround. (The share price hovers at $20 at the time of writing, compared to $22 when she took over.) She's also still reeling from the effects of a security breach last month that forced the company to shut down its website for three days. And worst of all, two activist investors—Australia's Brett Blundy, the company's largest shareholder, and hedge fund Barrington Capital—have the retailer in their crosshairs, and have called for an overhaul of its board. Barrington Capital also suggested in an open letter that a reconstituted board needed to evaluate whether Super was the right person for the CEO job. In an email to Fortune, the lingerie company said: 'The board has full confidence in Hillary's vision, leadership, and her ability to unlock the potential of our iconic brands.'Super has laid out a turnaround strategy that includes reasserting the brand's authority in bras, and growing categories like youth-focused PINK, beauty, and sport, while reimagining the company's marketing and sales strategy to better suit the way customers are shopping now. But after a rollercoaster few years, Victoria's Secret finds itself once again at a critical inflection point as it tries to reestablish its place in the wallets and boudoirs of American consumers. Hillary Super's arrival at Victoria's Secret 10 months ago was met with enthusiasm from Wall Street. When the leadership change was announced in August, the company's share price jumped 16%. The board poached Super from Rihanna's Savage X Fenty, where she had been CEO for a year, offering her a compensation package that totalled $18 million for the year, including a signing bonus and a one-time award. Super brought a certain cool factor thanks to her role at Fenty. She also brought vast experience, having spent more than three decades in retail leadership roles, including at Anthropologie, a cult-favorite label and subsidiary of Urban Outfitters, where she spent four years in top roles, including president and global CEO. But with Victoria's Secret, Super inherited a beleaguered brand stained by upheaval and scandal. In its mid-aughts heyday, the company reached a market share of over 30%, and raked in around $8 billion in revenue in 2016 under CEO Sharen Turney. But Turney was dismissed in 2017 and replaced by L Brands owner Les Wexner. Under his leadership, and that of his chief lieutenant, longtime senior leader Ed Razek, the company missed important retail trends like athleisure wear. Its marketing also fell out of step with major cultural shifts, and remained overtly sexual and at the height of the #MeToo in 2019 and 2020, Victoria's Secret became the focus of two scandals involving its male leadership. First, Wexner's close relationship with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein became a PR liability, along with reporting that Epstein posed as a scout for Victoria's Secret to lure and abuse aspiring models. (Wexner has previously said that he is embarrassed by his ties to Epstein, whom he called 'depraved.') Then, in 2020, the New York Times published a bombshell investigative piece outlining allegations of sexual harassment at the company, specifically involving Rezek. By that time, Victoria's Secret's entire ethos had largely fallen out of favor. L Brands decided to spin off the company, which it did in 2021, separating it from its former sister company, Bath & Body Works. (L Brands has since rebranded as Bath & Body Works.) In 2020, Wexner, who purchased Victoria's Secret in 1982 when it was a small chain of stores on the verge of bankruptcy, stepped down. Once known for turbocharging the careers of models like Karlie Kloss and Heidi Klum, Victoria's Secret went about trying to transform its reputation after Wexner's exit. Under Martin Waters, who was named CEO of the spun-off company, the over-the-top fashion shows featuring diamond-studded fantasy bras were out, and the Victoria's Secret Angels, a rotating group of It-girl models who had become synonymous with the label, were disbanded. Instead, the VS Collective, a group of brand ambassadors of various ethnicities and sizes, known for their careers in sports or technology, would become the face for the brand. But while this top-to-bottom revamp sparked a conversation about feminism and the definition of 'sexy,' it didn't ignite much passion in consumers. The rebranding was deemed inauthentic by some critics, and an overcorrection by others. The company's market share had fallen to 18.7% by 2022. The company changed strategies again while Waters was still in the corner office, and began reclaiming some of its supermodel history, hiring Hailey Bieber and Emily Ratajkowski, and bringing back its fashion shows. In a letter about Waters' departure, the board said he had 'established a foundation for VS&Co to enter its next chapter.' Super is now tasked with finding ways to thread the needle between Victoria's Secret's past and future. On the recent earnings call, the CEO said that she felt the company's marketing had become 'too serious' in recent seasons. 'We have an opportunity to have a more energetic, more joyful expression of VS,' she said. But activists may put a dent in Super's plans. In March of this year, BBRC International Private, an investment company run by Australian billionaire Brett Blundy, increased its stake in Victoria's Secret to about 13%, prompting the retailer to adopt a poison pill to ward off a potential takeover. On June 9, Blundy sent the Victoria's Secret board a letter decrying its oversight of the retailer and its management team. Just a week later, the New York-based hedge fund Barington Capital said it would add to its stake in Victoria's Secret—it's thought to have over 1% now, though the exact figure isn't yet known—as it called for the company to overhaul its board, refocus on the brand's core products, and drop the poison pill. 'Since its spin-off and public listing in 2021, the company has lost over $2.4 billion in shareholder value,' Barington Capital chair and CEO James Mitarotonda wrote in an open letter to the board. Neither Barington Capital nor Brett Blundy's investment company responded to Fortune's request for activist investors feel they know what Victoria's Secret needs. Blundy, the Australian billionaire, has a history in the intimates business and has recently purchased another lingerie brand. His letter to the company called attention to a total stockholder return of -64% since 2021 and what it called 'catastrophic' capital allocation, including the purchase of Adore Me in 2022, which 'has failed to generate meaningful returns.' Barington Capital, meanwhile, has already successfully advocated for changes at Victoria's Secret once, just before it was spun out from L Brands. 'The share price of L Brands increased by 221.5% during our tenure as an advisor to its board of directors,' Mitarotonda wrote in his open letter. Given that Victoria's Secret is one of the world's most iconic brands, the letter said, 'the company should be creating significant long-term value for its shareholders.' 'Victoria's Secret has meaningfully underperformed its peers and the market as a whole since becoming an independent company,' the activist argued, pointing to lackluster growth. He also said Super lacked CEO experience, since her stint at Savage X Fenty only lasted for one year. But Barington's harshest criticisms were for the board and its chair, Donna James, a longtime director at Victoria's Secret. The hedge fund believes the board has the wrong skill sets and needs refreshing. 'Of the current nine directors,' it noted, 'six have presided over the company's decline since its public listing.' Victoria's Secret is pushing back against the activist's claims, pointing to Super's focus on bras, and steady improvements at the company, with momentum growing in its Pink brand, as well as its healthy and beauty division. Although the company lowered its sales guidance for the second quarter when it announced its first quarter results earlier this month, it also reported earnings per share of 9 cents, beating market expectations of 4 cents. At $1.35 billion, sales were slightly ahead of analysts' expectations, while the retailer also reduced its overall losses compared to the same period in the previous year. A Wells Fargo analyst also heralded Super's work at the company, noting that Victoria's Secret saw improved performance in North American sales and PINK brands in the second half of last year, following her hiring. Bloomberg research predicts full-year sales would beat the company's guidance and reach $6.2-$6.3 billion in the second half of this year. And a JPMorgan analyst defined the current moment as 'early in the turnaround.' Some retail-watchers appear ready to give Super the time to prove herself. In a LinkedIn post, Neil Saunders, a retail analyst and consultant, wrote: 'Victoria's Secret is mainly a brand for women. It was run by men for quite some time, and they ultimately made a hash of it.' 'Now Hillary Super is at the helm and is starting to reinvent things. She has been in post for less than a year and has to be given a chance to put her vision into practice. But the carping from activist investors has already begun,' he continued. 'Activist investors are also mostly men. I honestly think that sometimes these finance men should sit down and take a seat, because they don't really understand the women's fashion business.' Other defenders also question whether Super is being judged prematurely. Patricia Lizarraga, managing partner and chief investment officer of Hypatia Capital, which manages an exchange-traded fund invested in public companies run by women, says that she was 'shocked' that activist pressures have arrived so quickly. Then again, she notes, activist investors are more likely to go after women CEOs, according to studies. Interference from activists also appears to be one of many reasons that women have shorter tenures as CEOs. 'We have some real superstars that have turned around fallen brands,' she said, pointing to CEOs like Fran Horowitz, who has led a revival of Abercrombie & Fitch. 'There's a model to follow.' Super has recently hired new senior leaders, including a new chief marketing officer and a new creative director. On the latest earnings call, she referred to her leadership team as the 'super squad,' quoting a fashion magazine's play on her name. Together, the squad will have to move as quickly as possible. This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 Reasons to Buy QLD and 3 Reasons Not To
QLD is an ETF that aims to double the gains of the Nasdaq-100. But it also doubles your losses if the index declines. Its wild swings, dependence on swap contracts, and high expense ratio make it a very risky investment. 10 stocks we like better than ProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Qqq › ProShares Ultra QQQ (NYSEMKT: QLD) is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the Nasdaq-100 index. But unlike other Nasdaq-100 ETFs, which directly track the index, Ultra QQQ aims to double the performance of the Nasdaq-100. If the Nasdaq-100 rises 1% in a day, the Ultra QQQ should advance 2%. But it also doubles its losses: If the Nasdaq-100 declines 1%, the Ultra QQQ should drop 2%. It tries to consistently double those gains and losses with a mix of swap agreements, options, and other derivatives. Over the past five years, the Nasdaq-100 has rallied 114% as Ultra QQQ's price surged 191%. While it hasn't exactly doubled the Nasdaq-100's return -- since it needs to be constantly rebalanced -- it still outperformed the index by a significant margin. Is Ultra QQQ a good growth play for investors who can stomach the volatility? Let's review the three reasons to buy this ETF -- and the three reasons to avoid it -- to decide. Ultra QQQ might be worth buying for three reasons: The tech sector is booming, its derivatives strategy allows its investors to pursue riskier strategies with less capital, and it could be a useful tool for short-term traders who can stomach a lot of volatility. The Nasdaq-100's biggest companies include Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Apple, and Broadcom. These companies have plenty of exposure to the secular expansion of the cloud and artificial intelligence (AI) markets, and their stocks could continue to beat the market. If that happens, it might be smart to park your cash in an ETF that aims to double those returns. If an investor wants to replicate Ultra QQQ's aggressive strategies on their own, they may need to deploy a lot more cash or take on margin loans to fund their own derivative trades. Simply buying the ETF puts those decisions in the hands of its fund managers -- and frees up investors' cash for other investments. For short-term traders, Ultra QQQ could be a great way to amplify gains from temporary tailwinds, such as economic data, earnings reports, and other news-driven events. Ultra QQQ is a tough ETF to recommend for three reasons: Its dependence on swap contracts is risky, it magnifies losses, and it charges high fees. Ultra QQQ tethers most of its assets to swap contracts. This means that it strikes agreements with banks and other parties to receive double the gain of the Nasdaq-100 on a regular basis. In return, it continues to pay fees and interest to those banks. But if a bank struggles or goes bankrupt, that swap contract could collapse and leave Ultra QQQ empty-handed. It mitigates that counterparty swap risk by diversifying its contracts, but it could face major losses in the event of another credit crunch or financial crisis. The way it doubles the Nasdaq-100's losses also makes it a much riskier investment than other ETFs, such as the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ: QQQ), which simply tracks the Nasdaq-100. While it may be an attractive ETF for short-term traders seeking to magnify their gains, it could easily backfire and burn investors during a market downturn. Lastly, the Ultra QQQ charges a gross expense ratio of 0.97% and a net expense ratio of 0.95%. In comparison, the Invesco QQQ Trust charges a total expense ratio (comparable to the gross expense ratio) of just 0.20%. Therefore, you're paying nearly five times the fees to try to double the Nasdaq-100's gains, but you're exposing yourself to double its downside potential. Warren Buffett famously told investors to be "fearful when others are greedy," and the Ultra QQQ ETF is a pretty greedy play. If you expect the Nasdaq-100 to keep rising and can stomach a lot of near-term volatility, this ETF might be worth nibbling on as a short-term trade. But if you're looking for a diversified, low-cost ETF to hold while sleeping soundly at night, the Ultra QQQ ETF isn't for you. Instead, you should either stick with a straightforward ETF, such as the Invesco QQQ Trust, or a less volatile one that tracks the S&P 500. Before you buy stock in ProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Qqq, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and ProShares Trust - ProShares Ultra Qqq wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Leo Sun has positions in Amazon and Apple. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Reasons to Buy QLD and 3 Reasons Not To was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thiess secures $1.5bn contract extension for Lake Vermont Mine in Australia
Thiess has announced a contract extension valued at A$2.3bn ($1.5bn) over three years at Jellinbah Group's Lake Vermont Mine in Queensland's Bowen Basin. The new agreement, which supersedes the existing contract set to expire in 2026, will now extend until June 2028. Under the terms of the renewed contract, Thiess will continue to deliver comprehensive mining services at the Lake Vermont Mine. These services include managing the site according to legal requirements, covering all facets of mine engineering and operations. They also involve the upkeep and asset management of stationary and mobile equipment, restoration projects, as well as operating and maintaining Jellinbah Group's processing facility, train loading station and mining camp. Thiess group executive chair and CEO Michael Wright said: 'For nearly two decades, Thiess has worked with the Jellinbah Group to safely enhance and expand Lake Vermont Mine's operations – driving efficiency, productivity and cost effectiveness through commodity cycles. This further extension is a testament to the strong and trusted partnership built over many years, and reflects Thiess' track record in the safe, efficient delivery of sustainable mining solutions.' Jellinbah awarded Thiess the initial mining contract for the Lake Vermont Mine in 2007. Thiess not only constructed the mine infrastructure but has also been integral to the mine's expansion and operational success through multiple contract renewals. Thiess Australia East group executive Rae O'Brien said: 'Thiess is proud of the advancements we have introduced at Lake Vermont Mine over the years with the support of Jellinbah Group. These include safety innovations, world-leading autonomous drilling and semi-autonomous dozing technology, and strategic mine planning and resource optimisation, to support our client's longer-term business outcomes.' In a related development, Thiess has been awarded a contract extension for three years, worth approximately A$590m, to maintain its mining services at QCoal's Northern Hub in Queensland. "Thiess secures $1.5bn contract extension for Lake Vermont Mine in Australia" was originally created and published by Mining Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
