
‘An impossible job': the daunting task of finding a new archbishop of Canterbury
The General Synod is meeting eight months after Justin Welby dramatically quit over the way he handled one of the C of E's worst abuse cases, and as the opaque process of replacing him slowly grinds on.
In contrast to the 17 days it took the Roman Catholic church to choose a new pope, the C of E is expected to take almost a year to appoint a new archbishop. The Crown Nominations Commission (CNC), the 17-strong body that will nominate Welby's successor, is due to meet for a second time this month. A third meeting will take place in September, after which a name will be submitted to Downing Street and then finally to King Charles for approval.
Meanwhile, many C of E faithful are asking not just who is capable of leading this splintered and declining institution, but who would even want such a poisoned chalice?
'It's hard to see why anyone would be up for such an impossible job,' said one suffragan (junior) bishop. 'It's increasingly challenging even to find good clergy willing to become suffragan bishops, and I know several who are thinking about leaving. It feels a long way from what most of us came into the church to do.'
The CNC for the Canterbury vacancy comprises the archbishop of York, the bishop of Norwich, three priests and three lay members from the General Synod, three members of the Canterbury diocese, and – for the first time – five representatives of the global Anglican church. It is chaired by Jonathan Evans, a former MI5 chief. The elections for the Canterbury representatives had to be run three times – apparently due to cock-ups but fuelling conspiracy theories about attempts by liberals to rig the outcome.
A public consultation on the role earlier this year produced more than 11,000 responses, many suggesting a woman be appointed for the first time. In an interview with the Church Times last week, Lord Evans said: 'There is no reason why a woman should not be appointed, but whether a woman will be appointed is another question.'
A first female archbishop would allow the C of E to claim a historic and radical move, but it would not please everyone. Hundreds of parish churches still refuse to accept women as priests, let alone as an archbishop, and a female leader of the global Anglican church would be resisted by those in more conservative parts of the world.
The issue of same-sex marriage is even more incendiary. The C of E has seen bitter divisions over this issue for many years, with little sign of a way forward that will be accepted by traditionalists and progressives.
Conservative evangelicals claim that any candidate who signed a letter in November 2023 supporting official church blessings for same-sex couples is 'dead in the water', as one put it. The 44 signatories include Guli Francis-Dehqani, the bookies' favourite to be the next archbishop of Canterbury.
The requirement for the successful candidate to win the support of two-thirds of CNC members means opponents of same-sex blessings could veto anyone who has spoken publicly in favour. In the past few years, several bishop appointment processes have become deadlocked in a standoff between conservatives and liberals, leaving positions unfilled.
Many believe the job of archbishop of Canterbury has become impossible. He or she must offer spiritual leadership to a country that often is not interested in hearing their message, sit and debate in the House of Lords, manage and run the C of E, whose 42 dioceses fiercely guard their independence, officiate at state occasions, and try to hold together disparate and often warring factions within the national and global churches.
In theory, an archbishop can be any ordained priest, but is likely to be a senior bishop with about a decade to go before the compulsory retirement age of 70.
The CNC was also seeking someone who could 'take the appropriate lead on safeguarding', said Evans.
The latter could be a stumbling block for some. As the C of E struggles to get a grip on its long, dark history of abuse and cover-up, potential candidates accused of mishandling allegations could be ruled out as too high a risk, especially after Welby's downfall. Martyn Snow, the bishop of Leicester and once a favourite for the top job, may be in that position after a BBC investigation into a stalking case and his response to the initial allegations. The BBC reported that he later apologised to the victim.
At the moment, the bookies' favourites are Francis-Dehqani, the bishop of Chelmsford who has a compelling backstory as a child refugee from Iran; Sarah Mullally, the capable bishop of London and a former NHS chief nursing officer, who could be installed as a short-term safe pair of hands; and Michael Beasley, the bishop of Bath and Wells, who has navigated a careful path between progressives and traditionalists on blessings for same-sex couples.
Whoever makes it through the long selection process may find commanding the confidence of clergy, congregations and the wider public a challenge. 'I believe in God, but I don't particularly believe in the Church of England, and I certainly don't believe in the current crop of bishops,' said one synod member. 'We need someone with moral courage, and I have no confidence that's what we'll get.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Tory leader no longer considers herself Nigerian despite ancestry
Kemi Badenoch has stated she no longer identifies as Nigerian, despite her ancestry. The Conservative leader confirmed she has not renewed her Nigerian passport since the early 2000s. Born in Wimbledon in 1980, Ms Badenoch was raised in Lagos, Nigeria, and the United States. She explained her identity is now rooted in her family, stating 'home is where my now family is'. Ms Badenoch was among the last individuals to receive birthright citizenship in the UK before the rules were abolished the following year.


The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Far-right extremists using games platforms to radicalise teenagers, report warns
Far-right extremists are using livestream gaming platforms to target and radicalise teenage players, a report has warned. The new research, published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology, reveals how a range of extremist groups and individuals use platforms that allow users to chat and livestream while playing video games to recruit and radicalise vulnerable users, mainly young males. UK crime and counter-terror agencies have urged parents to be especially alert to online offenders targeting youngsters during the summer holidays. In an unprecedented move, last week Counter Terrorism Policing, MI5 and the National Crime Agency issued a joint warning to parents and carers that online offenders 'will exploit the school holidays to engage in criminal acts with young people when they know less support is readily available'. Dr William Allchorn, a senior research fellow at Anglia Ruskin University's international policing and public protection research institute, who carried out the study with his colleague Dr Elisa Orofino, said 'gaming-adjacent' platforms were being used as 'digital playgrounds' for extremist activity. Allchorn found teenage players were being deliberately 'funnelled' by extremists from mainstream social media platforms to these sites, where 'the nature and quantity of the content makes these platforms very hard to police'. The most common ideology being pushed by extremist users was far right, with content celebrating extreme violence and school shootings also shared. On Tuesday, Felix Winter, who threatened to carry out a mass shooting at his Edinburgh school, was jailed for six years after the court heard the 18-year-old had been 'radicalised' online, spending more than 1,000 hours in contact with a pro-Nazi Discord group. Allchorn said: 'There has definitely been a more coordinated effort by far-right groups like Patriotic Alternative to recruit young people through gaming events that first emerged during lockdown. But since then a lot of extremist groups have been deplatformed by mainstream spaces, so individuals will now lurk on public groups or channels on Facebook or Discord, for example, and use this as a way of identifying someone who might be sympathetic to reach out to.' He added that, while some younger users turn to extreme content for its shock value among their peers, this can make them vulnerable to being targeted. Extremists have been forced to become more sophisticated as the majority of platforms have banned them, Allchorn said. 'Speaking to local community safety teams, they told us that approaches are now about trying to create a rapport rather than making a direct ideological sell.' The study also spoke to moderators, who described their frustration at inconsistent enforcement policies on their platforms and the burden of deciding whether content or users should be reported to law enforcement agencies. While in-game chat is unmoderated, moderators said they were still overwhelmed by the volume and complexity of harmful content, including the use of hidden symbols to circumvent banned words that would be picked up by automated moderation tools, for example, a string of symbols stitched together to represent a swastika. Allchorn highlighted the need for critical digital literacy for parents as well as law enforcement so they could better understand how these platforms and subcultures operate. Last October Ken McCallum, the head of MI5, revealed that '13% of all those being investigated by MI5 for involvement in UK terrorism are under 18', a threefold increase in three years. AI tools are being used to assist with moderation, but they struggle to interpret memes or when language is ambiguous or sarcastic.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour's border chaos is fuelling public fury and fear as dangerous foreign offenders vanish into thin air
Labour's not smashing it IT is little more than a year since Labour came to power promising to smash the people-smuggling gangs. Instead they have smashed the economy — with inflation up, unemployment up and business confidence at a record low. The only significant growth is in the number of illegal migrants coming here in small boats. Already over 25,000 have arrived this year — a 50 per cent rise on the 2024 figure by this stage, which was shocking enough. That number is dwarfed by the UK's astonishing 700,000 population increase in just a year — almost entirely due to legal immigration — which itself is utterly unsustainable. The arrival of thousands of mostly undocumented illegal migrants is symptomatic of just how badly Britain has lost control of its borders. It's not just the millions of pounds it costs taxpayers every day to shower the migrants with handouts and put them up in hotels, nor the fact that so many of them find black market jobs. Most of the arrivals are young men of fighting age — yet the authorities seem to have little idea who they are, even if they end up in court. National emergency We discovered earlier this week that the number of foreign sex offenders and violent criminals in prison in England and Wales is at a record high, and that 40 per cent of people charged with sex attacks in the capital were foreign nationals. Now we learn foreign criminals are simply walking free mid-trial and disappearing under false names because of a dangerous 'disconnect' between prosecutors and immigration enforcement. It is little wonder that people — not least mothers — worry about migrant hotels on their doorsteps, or that protests are growing, or that polls show immigration is the number one issue concerning voters. So what is the Government doing about this national emergency? Reform UK's rising star Laila Cunningham It seems to have no plan, beyond a sketchy one-in-one-out deal with France and setting up a spy unit to track anyone on social media discussing anti-migrant sentiment or two-tier justice. While Britain continues to house soaring numbers of uninvited guests in four-star hotels, America has seen a massive drop in illegal border crossings because tough detention centres and deportations await those who do. President Donald Trump has shown the problem CAN be tackled, if only the political will exists. The Government, which ditched the Rwanda scheme — the only viable deterrent — as its first act in power, has shown precious little will so far. It's about time Sir Keir Starmer realised the urgency of the situation... and started taking tough action of his own. 1