
PSM denies joining Perikatan after meeting Muhyiddin, says coalition talks not decided
It said in a statement that PSM said it accepted the invitation in line with its policy of attending discussions initiated by any political party.
'Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin put forward several proposals, including the idea of an understanding among opposition parties,' said PSM deputy chairman S. Arutchelvan.
'PSM welcomed the discussion and shared our views and position; however, no decision has been made for PSM to join Perikatan Nasional (PN) or any new coalition.'
The party stressed it currently only has a political understanding with the Malaysian United Democratic Alliance (Muda) and Parti Rakyat Malaysia (PRM).
PSM said it has previously had similar arrangements with Gagasan Demokrasi Rakyat (GDR) and Pakatan Rakyat (PR).
The party reiterated that any coalition decision must go through the PSM Congress.
It added that such decisions are guided by the party's principle of Democratic Centralism.
Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin yesterday said he held a meeting with leaders of several opposition parties to discuss forming a coalition focused on national interests.
Muhyiddin said the proposed coalition aims to provide a united opposition front and reinforce the check and balance function in and out of Parliament.
PN component parties Gerakan and Malaysian Indian People's Party were present — but not PAS.
Other parties represented included Muda, Parti Pejuang Tanahair, Parti Bumiputera Perkasa Malaysia (Putra), People's Progressive Party, Berjasa, United for the Rights of Malaysians Party (Urimai), and Malaysian Advancement Party.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysiakini
21 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
'Turun Anwar' rally proves opposition running out of ideas: Kamil
The 'Turun Anwar' rally this Saturday is the culmination of Perikatan Nasional's mental block to present ideas and counter the notion that the 'government has failed to manage the economy'. Political secretary to the finance minister Kamil Abdul Munim said current figures and reports showed that the country's economy is recovering and growing consistently, rendering their claims baseless.


Malay Mail
34 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Concerns over appointment of AG: Are they about principles of good governance and independence or politics? — Hafiz Hassan
JULY 25 — Perikatan Nasional (PN) deputy chairman Datuk Seri Hamzah Zainudin has raised concerns over the appointment of a serving civil servant as Auditor-General (AG). He makes reference to Articles 7 and 105(4) and (5) of the Federal Constitution. Article 7 is on 'Protection against retrospective criminal laws and repeated trials'. What has this got to do with the appointment of AG? Article 105(4) and (5) read as follows: '(4) Parliament shall by law provide for the remuneration of the Auditor General, and the remuneration so provided shall be charged on the Consolidated Fund.' '(5) The remuneration and other terms of office (including pension rights) of the Auditor General shall not be altered to his disadvantage after his appointment.' The above are said to imply that the AG must not be a serving member of the civil service, stressing the importance of independence in the role. While Hamzah (pic) may have conceded that the appointment of the AG 'may not be illegal', Kota Bharu MP Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan did question the legitimacy of Datuk Wan Suraya Wan Mohd Radzi's appointment as AG and whether it complied with the Federal Constitution. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa It is curious that Hamzah makes no reference refer to Article 105(1) which states as follows: 'There shall be an Auditor General, who shall be appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister and after consultation with the Conference of Rulers.' The Opposition Leader does not also refer to Article 139(1), which reads as follows: '(1) There shall be a Public Services Commission, whose jurisdiction shall, subject to Article 144, extend to all persons who are members of the services mentioned in paragraphs © and (f) of Clause (1) of Article 132, other than the Auditor General, to members of the public services of the State of Malacca and the State of Penang, and, to the extent provided by Clause (2), to members of the public service of any other State.' (Emphasis added) While Hamzah may have conceded that the appointment of the AG 'may not be illegal', Kota Bharu MP Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan did question the legitimacy of Datuk Wan Suraya Wan Mohd Radzi's appointment as AG and whether it complied with the Federal Constitution. Takiyuddin is not just a lawmaker but a lawyer by profession. He should know that there is a legal presumption called presumption of legality which is an established common law rule. It is the very general presumption that people have acted lawfully unless and until the contrary is proved. The presumption is the basis of the requirement that someone who alleges wrongdoing on the part of another must establish the truth of his allegation, according to the relevant standard of proof and in a court of competent jurisdiction. The presumption is said to be strong as the party who alleges having an onerous burden to overcome the presumption with compelling prima facie evidence of grounds to challenge the legality or lawfulness of an act. (See the Federal Court decision in Sundra Rajoo a/l Nadarajah v Menteri Luar Negeri, Malaysia & Ors [2021] 5 MLJ 209) Let's raise this question about the opposition raising questions over the appointment of Wan Suraya as AG: are they principles of good governance and independence or politics? **This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.


Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Don't insult rakyat by saying PM trying to buy votes
MP SPEAKS | It seems to me that some people are determined to find fault with whatever initiatives that Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and the government carry out for the benefit of the people. This is clear after the several major initiatives including the one-off RM100 grant under the Rahmah Necessities Aid (Sara) programme, the delay in toll hikes for 10 highways, and the lower RON95 petrol price subsidy at RM1.99 per litre. We have stable growth, inflation, low unemployment rates, high foreign investment volume, and good EPF rates. We are bouncing back from Covid-19 and the economic mismanagement of previous administrations, such as the recession-ridden days of Muhyiddin Yassin. Just imagine my annoyance at reading false claims that the latest initiatives are ill-advised handouts and wastage designed to buy the people's votes at the next election. I wonder if the critics would be happier if the government did not try to help the people at all! Despite the good figures, these are difficult and unpredictable times with international tariffs and sales and services tax (SST), electricity tariffs also making possible impacts on the economy. There are difficult decisions that have to be made, because of the corruption and economic mismanagement of the past. So, when the government tries to give the people a buffer, why complain? Elite entitlement We are trying and have succeeded in combating the fiscal deficit, improving governance, and restoring investor confidence over the past two and a half years. One of the main initiatives is the expansion of the Sara programme, which will benefit 22 million citizens aged 18 and above, with an allocation of RM2bil. This is across the board and eligible Malaysians can redeem the one-off RM100 Sara aid credited to their MyKad at over 4,000 participating outlets nationwide to purchase essential goods, such as rice and eggs. So, the critics are upset, saying that this is nothing. To me it reflects the privilege and entitlement of the elite to fail to recognise that these contributions will mean something, especially to those in the B40. Let's not forget that aside from the expanded Sara programme, the government is also doubling the allocation for the Rahmah Sales programme from RM300mil to RM600 mil. Then how about the reduced RON95 petrol price, from the current rate to RM1.99 per litre, with the mechanism to be detailed by the Finance Ministry. Surely this will help us all, by easing the burden on the people and increasing the cash flow in the economy. Reducing fuel prices shows the government is committed to inducing growth and restoring some imbalances, particularly as in the long term the strategy is to have targeted subsidies on fuel prices. Greater economic programme All this is part of a greater economic programme with the 13th Malaysia Plan scheduled to be tabled on July 31, followed by Budget 2026 in October. So, we know that the opposition wants to disrupt the progress, but we don't mind, we are committed to peaceful assembly for rallies like 'Turun Anwar'. We know that some columnists and cybertroopers are being paid to attack our initiatives and confuse the people, but we are committed to freedom of speech. We know that some try to divide us on the basis of race and religion, but we remain committed to a progressive and prosperous Malaysia for all. R YUNESWARAN is the Segamat MP. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.