Noem on claims that new FEMA rule delayed resources to Texas: ‘Absolutely false'
In an interview Sunday on NBC News's 'Meet the Press,' Noem acknowledged that she implemented the new rule but said the resources were deployed promptly after the flooding.
'Those claims are absolutely false. Within just an hour or two after the flooding, we had resources from the Department of Homeland Security there, helping those individuals in Texas. It was a heartbreaking scene. And I think it's been well covered about what the Coast Guard did, how they were deployed immediately and helped rescue so many individuals from those floodwaters. And we had Border Patrol down there with their tactical teams, and FEMA was there just within a few hours as well,' Noem told NBC News's Kristen Welker about the reports.
'So those claims are false,' she continued. 'They're from people who won't put their name behind those claims. And those call centers were fully staffed and responsive. And this is the fastest, I believe, in years, maybe decades, that FEMA has been deployed to help individuals in this type of situation.'
Noem explained that her new policy is 'an accountability' mechanism for contracts but insisted that 'there was no break in contracts' and that resources were deployed immediately.
'Those contracts were approved as soon as they were in front of me, and FEMA knew they were fully to deploy the instant that the local officials asked for their request,' she said.
Noem pushed back on Welker's suggestion that her new rule amounted to 'extra red tape.'
'It's not extra red tape. It's making sure everything is getting to my level and that it's immediately responded to. This was not slowed down at all. In fact, it was much more responsive. If you remember, I was there. I was standing right there long before this report ever came out. And people were asking, and we were granting permission in real time,' she said.
'So the false reporting has been something that is inappropriate and it's something that I think we need to clear up: that this response was by far the best response we've seen out of FEMA, the best response we've seen out of the federal government in many, many years and certainly much better than what we saw under Joe Biden.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
25 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Sen. Schumer Channels Marx
In 'Chuck Schumer's Mamdani Test' (Review & Outlook, July 10), you ask whether the Senate minority leader will endorse Zohran Mamdani, the socialist who has given the OK to globalize the intifada. By doing so, Mr. Schumer would being turning his back 'on a good portion of his life's work.' Maybe. It seems to me that the senator's main achievement is simply getting re-elected. If bending the knee to Mr. Mamdani is what it takes to secure another term, count on it. Dana R. Hermanson
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Backs Bondi, Blames Dems For Epstein List Fiasco
President Donald Trump has sought to calm growing divisions within his political base by defending Attorney General Pam Bondi and dismissing renewed scrutiny over the handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. Trump took to social media over the weekend and posted to support Bondi, writing that Bondi is 'doing a FANTASTIC JOB!' Trump claimed in his post that the Epstein 'client list,' which has recently been claimed nonexistent by the Department of Justice (DOJ), was created by previous Democratic leaders. 'For years, it's Epstein, over and over again. Why are we giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration…' wrote the President. 'They created the Epstein Files, just like they created the FAKE Hillary Clinton/Christopher Steele Dossier that they used on me, and now my so-called 'friends' are playing right into their hands. Why didn't these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files? If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn't they use it?' Trump also berated a reporter last week when asked about the handling of the Epstein documents, indicating that more important things were to be focused on than Epstein. 'And are people still talking about this guy, this creep?' Trump questioned. 'That is unbelievable.' These statements from the President come shortly after a joint memo from the DOJ and FBI claiming that there is no evidence supporting conspiracy theories about Epstein's death or the existence of a so-called 'client list.' However, the claims made by the FBI and DOJ directly contradict Bondi's previous statement, in which she claimed to have the client list ready for review. 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump,' she said in February when asked about the client list. Bondi has since attempted to clarify these comments, claiming that she meant to review more than just Epstein's files. 'I did an interview on Fox, and it's been getting a lot of attention because I said I was asked a question about the client list, and my response was, it's sitting on my desk to be reviewed – meaning the file along with the JFK, MLK files as well. That's what I meant by that,' she explained, per CNN. Despite the attempt at clarification, many political activists have now called for changes within the Trump administration. 'Blondi [sic] has been very DAMAGING to the admin and she has damaged public trust in the DOJ. She is hurting President Trump and his staff/advisors,' wrote Laura Loomer on social media. 'She lied on national TV and needs to be held accountable for harming the Trump admin and public trust.' Similarly, Tucker Carlson called out Bondi's claims, adding that he now believes that the government does not have 'much relevant information about Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes.' 'Rather than just admit that, Pam Bondi made a bunch of ludicrous claims on cable news shows that she couldn't back up, and this current outrage is the result,' he explained during an interview with NBC News. Currently, there has been no indication made by the White House about plans to move on from Bondi, with many expecting the attorney general to retain her role for the foreseeable future.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed Chair Powell's finally fighting back as the White House looks to fire him "for cause"
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell may finally have had enough of the White House's pressure campaign to have him either slash rates or resign. For months, Powell has resisted reacting to constant public berating from President Donald Trump, but the final straw may have come last week when White House advisers alleged Powell either lied to Congress about the Fed's headquarters renovation or grossly mismanaged it. Either of those, if proven true, could give Trump cover to fire Powell 'for cause.' Powell and the Fed are finally fighting back. Over the weekend, the Fed quietly posted a FAQ explaining what happened with the renovation of the Fed's headquarters, and Powell reportedly has asked the central bank's inspector general to review its $2.5 billion headquarters renovation project. A Powell firing could sow doubts over the Fed's independence and wreck the central bank's credibility to manage monetary policy unfettered by policy makers. 'Equities would likely sell off on impact, on a risk-off flight to safety trade,' said Padhraic Garvey, regional head of research, Americas, at Dutch bank ING. 'After all, this would be an effective forced exit of a reputable Fed Chair by the U.S. president, an unprecedented event for the market to get its head around. "But thereafter, equities could quickly reassess and choose to rally, on the theory that deep cuts in rates are a boon for corporates, as is a potentially steamy economy," he said "And inflation is not necessarily a bad thing for equities." The original cost of the renovation of the Fed's three office buildings overlooking the National Mall in Washington D.C. was estimated at $1.9 billion in 2019 but swelled to $2.5 billion. The more than 33% increase in budget was due to design changes, costs of materials, equipment, and labor and other 'unforeseen conditions' like more asbestos than anticipated and toxic contamination in soil, the Fed's FAQ said. Last week, Trump's budget director Russell Vought wrote a letter suggesting Powell either made false statements to Congress about the expensive renovation or failed to comply with permitting rules around capital-area construction. Trump also named three White House advisers to the National Capital Planning Commission, which must sign off on major construction projects in the area. Vought called out, among other things, luxe VIP dining areas and rooftop terrace gardens. However, the Fed's FAQ says 'no new VIP dining rooms are being constructed' and 'garden terrace' refers to 'the ground-level front lawn of 1951 Constitution Avenue, which serves as the roof of the parking structure beneath.' It also noted 'Green roofs are found on other federal government buildings, like the Departments of Justice, Interior, and many others, and are encouraged by the General Services Administration.' To some, Powell has already done damage, whether he stays on as Fed chair. 'It is easy to argue the market has lost confidence in the Fed,' said Nancy Tengler, chief executive of Laffer Tengler Investments. She noted some of what she sees as Powell missteps as Fed chair, including raising rates in 2018, which she says caused the 'intra-year bear market in response to Trump 1.0 tariffs. He was forced to capitulate months later.' Then in 2021, the Fed 'waited way too long to hike rates as inflation morphed from a controlled burn into a wildfire' that allowed consumer prices to soar to 9.1% by June 2022, Tengler said. Other economists say if Powell goes, the impact could be limited. 'Basically, it is likely that this would lead to a sizeable initial sell-off that could be calmed by the other governors forcibly reiterating Fed independence,' said Jim Reid, Deutsche Bank's global head of economics and thematic research. ING's Garvey said likely, 'an early departure of Powell would be followed quickly by a replacement super-dove as head of the Federal Reserve.' A dove is someone who leans toward keeping interest rates low to grow the economy, compared with a hawk who favors higher interest rates to keep inflation controlled. But even with a 'super-dove' atop the Fed, Garvey questions how much policy would change. 'We can acknowledge that the (Fed's policy-making arm) would swing more dovish than it has been. But we can't conclude that the Committee would then cut rates just because Trump commands it. In the end, it's a majority decision, and the Committee is likely to remain as divided as the latest minutes suggest, but with a bias to keep rates on hold until the coast is clear to cut them.' Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Could renovations finally sink Fed chair and stocks? Experts weigh in Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
