INDIA bloc parties back Rahul Gandhi, say it is his responsibility to comment on issues of national interest
on Tuesday termed "unwarranted" the Supreme Court observations against
Rahul Gandhi
for his alleged remarks on the Army, and asserted it was the responsibility of political parties to comment on issues of national interest.
The remarks came a day after the Supreme Court censured Gandhi, the
Leader of Opposition
in the Lok Sabha, over his alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during his Bharat Jodo Yatra.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Floor leaders of several parties of the INDIA bloc discussed the remarks of the Supreme Court against Gandhi at a meeting here.
Congress
president Mallikarjun Kharge and Gandhi were present at the meeting.
"All the leaders of the India parties agreed that the sitting judge has made an extraordinary observation which is unwarranted on the democratic rights of political parties," the Congress said in a statement.
"It is the responsibility of political parties especially the Leader of Opposition to comment on issues of national interest," the statement said.
Live Events
"When a government fails so spectacularly to defend our borders, it is every citizen's moral duty to hold it accountable," it further said.
Congress leader
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra
also said that Rahul Gandhi holds the Indian security forces in high esteem and as Leader of Opposition he has every right to question the government.
Asked about the top court's observations, she told reporters at the Parliament House complex, "With due respect to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court, they do not decide who is a true Indian. It is the job of the opposition leader, it is his duty to ask questions and to challenge the government."
"My brother would never say anything against the Army. He holds the Army in the highest respect. So it is a misinterpretation (of his remarks)," she said.
A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih on Monday told Rahul Gandhi, "You are leader of opposition. Why don't you say things in Parliament, why do you have to say it on social media?"
The bench further asked, "Why do you make these statements without having any material? If you are a true Indian, you won't say such a thing."
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Africa News Live Updates: Botswana's health crisis, South Africa's policing woes signal institutional strain
August 6, 2025, 11:04:09 (IST) Whatsapp Facebook Twitter Political crisis in South Sudan deepens as government minister is named opposition party's interim chairman A significant political crisis is unfolding in South Sudan after a government minister was named the interim chairman of the main opposition party, the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army-In Opposition (SPLM-IO), Africanews says in a report. This development directly challenges the leadership of First Vice President Riek Machar and is viewed as a major consolidation of power by President Salva Kiir's ruling SPLM. The manoeuvre critically undermines the 2018 Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS), the cornerstone of the nation's fragile peace and power-sharing government. From an economic perspective, this escalation in political instability significantly raises the country's risk profile, jeopardising the already delayed democratic transition and general elections. The resulting uncertainty threatens to deter crucial foreign investment and disrupt aid flows from international partners, further destabilising an economy already facing severe humanitarian challenges and posing a risk to regional security.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump envoy Witkoff lands in Russia, India's NSA Doval in Moscow; meeting on the cards?
Ahead of US President Donald Trump's deadline for a ceasefire in Ukraine, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff has arrived in Moscow to hold talks with Russian officials. Incidentally, Indian National Security Advisor Ajit Doval is also in Moscow. read more Ahead of US President Donald Trump's deadline for a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine, US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Wednesday arrived in Moscow to hold talks with Russian officials — possibly Vladimir Putin as well. Late last month, Trump shortened the 50-day ultimatum to Putin to agree to a ceasefire in his war on Ukraine to 10-12 days. The deadline will expire this week. With his continued attacks on Ukrainian civilians and statements, Putin has so far shown no indication that he wants a ceasefire. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On the failure to reach a ceasefire, Trump has threatened to impose tariffs and sanctions on Russia and those countries buying Russian oil. He has already slapped 25 per cent tariff on India and has said he would 'substantially' increase that and impose additional penalties over the trade with Russia. Incidentally, Indian National Security Advisor Ajit Doval is also in Moscow in the moment. Even though Doval's visit had been planned in advance of Witkoff's visit, there has been speculation about a meeting between the two officials, possibly to manage the spiralling relations between the two countries. Witkoff arrives in Moscow as Putin remains defiant Witkoff's visit comes just ahead of Trump's Friday deadline to Putin to agree to a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin has previously said that Witkoff could have a meeting with Putin. However, Putin so far not indicated that he wants peace — or at least real peace. Last week, in an apparent reference to Trump's deadline, Putin said that 'all disappointments arise from inflated expectations'. Making it clear that he had no intention to stop ongoing ground offensive, he said that 'to stop our advance at any cost' was the objective of Russia's enemies and ill-wishers. Separately, Reuters on Tuesday reported three sources as saying that Putin's determination to keep going with the offensive is prompted by his belief that Russia is winning the and belief that any new US sanctions will not have much of an impact on Russia. Even though Putin does not want to anger Trump, the war goals take precedence, two of the sources told the news agency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD One of the sources said that Putin's goal now is to completely capture Ukraine's four provinces of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. However, there is a possibility that Putin may be able to convince Trump via Witkoff. Analysts have said that Putin has been looking for a short-term break in the war to replenish the Russian forces and rearm the troops. For such a purpose, Putin may very well agree to a ceasefire now to escape Trump's immediate wrath and return later to war. Witkoff, who has long been very friendly to Putin and Russia, may be the best person to convince Trump if this is what Putin has decided. 'For Putin, the ideal scenario is to freeze the conflict for a while, build up strength, and then resume the war — ideally with a more plausible pretext, such as accusing Ukraine of failing to comply with peace agreements,' Kseniya Kirillova, a Russia analyst at Jamestown Foundation, previously told Firstpost. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is Witkoff-Doval meeting on the cards? As Witkoff and Doval are both in Moscow, there is speculation about a meeting, but there not been any official confirmation. Doval's visit had been planned before and he is expected to speak to Russian officials about the delivery of S-400 air defence systems, according to The Hindu. The S-400 is among the many Russian defence deals that are running late by several years. As Russia has devoted all resources to the war on Ukraine, it has not been able to deliver the various platforms it has signed deals for, such as the S-400 air defence systems and navy vessels. The Hindu reported that US tariffs are also expected to feature in Doval's meetings in Moscow.
Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why is Trump upset with India? It is not about peace in Ukraine
As India and the United States failed to clinch a trade deal by the stipulated deadline, President Donald Trump announced on his social media post that all imports from India would now be subject to a 25 per cent tariff, and an additional penalty for importing Russian energy. While a higher tariff across the board was expected if the deal fails, the additional penalty for trading with Russia has irked the Indian establishment. The MEA issued a statement criticising the US and the EU by exposing their own hypocrisy on the issue of doing business with Russia. It is true that India's energy imports, mostly crude oil, from Russia have increased. But Russia's emergence as India's major supplier of crude oil is a consequence of US policy itself. To begin with, US sanctions on Venezuelan crude oil continue to be in force, blocking off a major source of supply. This is significant because Venezuela holds the world's largest reserves of crude oil. A fear of secondary sanctions has prevented the world from importing from Venezuela. Then, in 2019, the US, during the first Trump presidency, imposed sanctions on Iranian oil after it pulled out of the JCPOA. Iran was one of India's major oil suppliers, but the threat of secondary sanctions forced it to immediately cut its imports from Iran to 0.76 per cent of its total oil imports by 2020. Today, the share has fallen below 0.04 per cent. Finally, after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the EU, which felt morally compelled to reduce its energy dependence on Russia, undertook measures to gradually phase out Russian coal and oil imports. The EU's decision to transition from traditional suppliers to new ones threatened to drive up global oil prices. To further worsen the situation, OPEC's practice of capping output to create artificial scarcity threatened to trigger inflationary pressures worldwide. And even then, Russian oil was not under any direct sanctions, like Iran or Venezuela. While the G7 placed a price cap on Russian oil, which they were able to enforce globally, India didn't violate any understanding. And thus, Trump's sudden frustration with India's trade with Russia is bizarre. Moreover, while Trump has singled out India, alongside China, he chose to conveniently absolve the EU for the same. For all its moral chest-thumping, the EU has only been successful in cutting its coal dependence on Russia. It continues to import crude oil from Russia even as imports have reduced substantially. But most importantly, the EU has not stopped importing Russian gas, LNG and pipeline gas. In fact, it continues to be Russia's top export destination for both LNG (51 per cent) and pipeline gas (37 per cent). Additionally, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, India emerged as the top supplier of refined oil to the EU, overtaking Saudi Arabia. The EU had no problems until very recently in importing Russian crude oil refined in India. Trump's actions appear, more than anything else, to be a result of his frustration and exasperation in dealing with Russia, India, and China. That he doesn't care about Ukraine or the Ukrainian cause is quite evident. However, it is no secret that when Trump assumed the presidency earlier this year, he made some tall claims regarding Russia, China and India. He vowed to bring the Russian war on Ukraine to an end. He also expressed confidence in concluding a favourable trade deal with both India and China. Trump expressed his admiration for the three leaders of all three countries. He was hoping to bank on his personal working relationship with them to deliver on these promises. Yet, more than six months after Trump took office, Putin has shrugged off repeated deadlines set by Trump to end the war. Xi Jinping, too, has refused to buckle under pressure and instead coerced Trump into agreeing to a 90-day truce amidst the ongoing tariff war between the US and China. Finally, India's decision to refute Trump's claim of mediating a ceasefire with Pakistan and its refusal to compromise on some core issues during the trade talks seems to have further infuriated the US president. Trump's decision, therefore, to sanction Russian crude oil, all of a sudden, is an expression of his disappointment arising from the mismatch between his expectations and reality. The writer is with Takshashila's Indo-Pacific Studies programme
