Iran-linked hackers threaten to release Trump aides' emails
In online chats with Reuters on Sunday and Monday, the hackers — who go by the pseudonym Robert — said they had roughly 100 gigabytes of emails from the accounts of White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Trump lawyer Lindsey Halligan, Trump adviser Roger Stone, and porn star–turned–Trump antagonist Stormy Daniels.
Robert raised the possibility of selling the material but otherwise did not provide details of their plans. The hackers did not describe the content of the emails.
US Attorney General Pam Bondi described the intrusion as 'an unconscionable cyber-attack.'
The White House and the FBI responded with a statement from FBI Director Kash Patel, who said: 'Anyone associated with any kind of breach of national security will be fully investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.'
Halligan, Stone, a representative for Daniels, and the US cyberdefense agency CISA did not respond to requests for comment. Iran's mission to the United Nations did not return a message seeking comment. Tehran has in the past denied committing cyberespionage.
Robert materialized in the final months of the 2024 presidential campaign, when they claimed to have breached the email accounts of several Trump allies, including Wiles.
The hackers then distributed emails to journalists.
Reuters previously authenticated some of the leaked material, including an email that appeared to document a financial arrangement between Trump and lawyers representing former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — now Trump's health secretary.
Other material included Trump campaign communication about Republican office-seekers and discussion of settlement negotiations with Daniels.
Although the leaked documents did garner some coverage last year, they did not fundamentally alter the presidential race, which Trump won.
The US Justice Department, in a September 2024 indictment, alleged that Iran's Revolutionary Guards ran the Robert hacking operation. In conversations with Reuters, the hackers declined to address the allegation.
After Trump's election, Robert told Reuters that no more leaks were planned. As recently as May, the hackers said, 'I am retired, man.' But the group resumed communication after this month's 12-day air war between Israel and Iran, which was capped by US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites.
In messages this week, Robert said they were organizing a sale of stolen emails and wanted Reuters to 'broadcast this matter.'
American Enterprise Institute scholar Frederick Kagan, who has written about Iranian cyberespionage, said Tehran suffered serious damage in the conflict and its spies were likely trying to retaliate in ways that did not draw more US or Israeli action.
'A default explanation is that everyone's been ordered to use all the asymmetric stuff that they can that's not likely to trigger a resumption of major Israeli/US military activity,' he said. 'Leaking a bunch more emails is not likely to do that.'
Despite worries that Tehran could unleash digital havoc, Iran's hackers took a low profile during the conflict. US cyber officials warned on Monday that American companies and critical infrastructure operators might still be in Tehran's crosshairs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Lebanon drafts reply to US demand for Hezbollah to disarm, sources say
Barrack said full disarmament should be completed by November or by the end of the year at the latestThe proposal also refers to establishing a mechanism overseen by the United Nations to secure the release of Hezbollah-linked prisoners by IsraelBEIRUT: Lebanese officials were drafting a response on Tuesday to US demands for armed group Hezbollah to relinquish its weapons across the country by November in exchange for a halt to Israeli military operations, two sources briefed on the matter deadline has turned up the heat on Iran-backed Hezbollah, which was struck hard by Israel during last year's war, is suffering a financial crunch and faces pressure in Lebanon to demands were conveyed by Thomas Barrack, US special envoy to Syria and ambassador to Turkiye, during a trip to Beirut on June sources, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, told Reuters Barrack had shared a written roadmap with Lebanese officials and told them he expected to hear back by July 1 on any proposed six-page document centers on the disarmament of Hezbollah and other militant groups, and urges Lebanon to improve ties with neighboring Syria and implement financial reforms, they proposes a phased approach to disarmament, in which Hezbollah would hand in its arms throughout Lebanon in exchange for the withdrawal of Israeli troops occupying areas in south Lebanon, the sources said full disarmament should be completed by November or by the end of the year at the latest, they would end Israeli strikes targeting Hezbollah members and unlock funds to rebuild parts of Lebanon destroyed by Israeli forces last year, they US has said Washington will not support reconstruction in Lebanon without Hezbollah laying down proposal also refers to establishing a mechanism overseen by the United Nations to secure the release of Hezbollah-linked prisoners by Israel, the sources said Barrack had urged Lebanese officials to seize the opportunity laid out in the roadmap as it 'may not come up again.' He is set to return to Lebanon next had not yet gotten Israeli approval for the roadmap, the sources said. There was no immediate response from the US state department, Israel's prime minister's office or Israel's foreign ministry to Reuters requests for comment.'THE RIGHT TO SAY NO'Lebanon has appointed a committee to formulate a preliminary response, comprised of delegates from the offices of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, President Joseph Aoun and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, a Hezbollah ally, the sources was not clear whether the initial reply would be ready by Tuesday. The US proposal includes a condition that the final deal be sealed with a unanimous decision by Lebanon's government, the sources second source, and a third source briefed on the matter, said Berri was in close communication with Hezbollah to secure the group's input.'Hezbollah has not refused to cooperate with the committee and in fact began sending signals of cooperation — but has not committed to disarming,' the third source prospect of securing Hezbollah's disarmament — unimaginable two years ago — underlines the big shifts in the Middle East power balance to the detriment of Iran's allies across the region since the start of the war between Israel and Hezbollah ally Hamas in October of Hezbollah's arsenal was destroyed by Israeli airstrikes, and other depots in southern Lebanon were handed over to Lebanon's army in accordance with the US-brokered ceasefire that ended that round of deal called for the disarmament of armed groups across Lebanon. Hezbollah has said it applies only to the group in Lebanon's southernmost has not commented publicly on Barrack's proposal. But in a televised address on Monday, its secretary general, Naim Qassem, reiterated Hezbollah's resistance to US and Israeli pressure and urged other Lebanese to do the same.'We have the right to say 'no' to them, 'no' to America, 'no' to Israel,' Qassem said. 'We call on you in Lebanon: do not help Israel and America with their plans.'Qassem said the US and Israel 'want to exploit the moment to turn the equation in the entire region in their image.'
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Saudi FM receives written message from Iranian counterpart
RIYADH: Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan received a written message from his Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi regarding relations between their countries. The message was received by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Waleed bin Abdulkarim Al-Khuraiji during a meeting with Iran's ambassador to the Kingdom Alireza Enayati on Tuesday, Saudi Press Agency reported. Al-Khuraiji and Enayati reviewed Saudi-Iranian relations and discussed topics of common interest.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
FACT FOCUS: Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Does Not Let Him Delay or Cancel Elections
Social media users are falsely claiming that President Donald Trump's sprawling tax bill, which passed the Senate Tuesday after a turbulent overnight session, will give Trump undue influence over US elections. 'The reason the GOP isn't concerned about the midterms and why they are pushing this bill is because it gives Trump power to cancel elections,' reads one X post. 'If this bill passes – it's the end of the country. Democracy is over.' The bill contains no such provision. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: President Donald Trump's tax bill will allow him to delay or cancel elections. THE FACTS: That's false. There is nothing in the legislation that would allow Trump or any future president to stop an election from going forward. According to legal experts, a constitutional amendment would have to pass for anyone to have the ability to cancel a federal election. The timing of elections for federal offices is stipulated in federal law, and it is highly unlikely that Congress would pass a bill allowing the president to change that timing, experts said. 'Although President Trump might like to cancel or postpone an upcoming election if he thought his party was going to fare poorly, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' does not actually grant him that power,' said Barry Burden, director of the University of Wisconsin–Madison's Elections Research Center and a political science professor. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson called the false claims 'obviously fake news.' Burden and other experts agree that these allegations may stem from a misunderstanding of a section of the bill on judicial enforcement that was included in the version passed by the House. That section was removed from the bill after Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough ruled that it violates the so-called Byrd Rule, which essentially bars policy matters in budget reconciliation bills. Section 70302 could have made it easier for Trump to disregard federal court rulings requiring parties seeking preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders to put down a security, such as a cash bond, before the court could issue contempt penalties. Regardless, such a provision would not allow Trump to delay or cancel elections, even if he tried. 'If Trump announced 'I'm canceling the elections,' that has as much power as my announcing 'I'm canceling the elections,'' said Justin Levitt, a professor at Loyola Marymount University who specializes in constitutional law and the law of democracy. Asked whether section 70302 would have given Trump power over whether elections occur, Richard Pildes, a professor of constitutional law at New York University, replied, 'Obviously not.' The US Constitution gives state legislatures the power to set the time of elections subject to any laws Congress enacts that make or alter such regulations. Congress set standard federal election dates with a series of laws starting in 1845. That year, it was determined that states would choose presidential electors the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November. Presidential elections have been held every four years on this day since 1848, including through the Civil War, World War I, and World War II. Congress aligned House elections with presidential races in 1872 and in 1914 aligned the election of senators with biennial House elections. The Constitution states that the term for president and vice president is four years, the term for senators is six years, and the term for representatives is two years. Unless they are reelected, there is no mechanism for any of these officials to remain in office after their term ends. Only a constitutional amendment could change this. Some states have a provision that allows voting in federal races to continue after Election Day in extraordinary and catastrophic circumstances, such as a natural disaster. There is no other way to delay a federal election. Levitt explained that, theoretically, Congress could pass a law giving the president the power to choose when a federal election happens, but that such a scenario is extremely unlikely.
