Slum dwellers on mangrove land not entitled to rehab, rules HC
A division bench of Justice Girish S Kulkarni and Justice Advait Sethna upheld the Maharashtra government's stance that Section 3Z-6 of the Slum Act explicitly excludes forest areas from its scope. As a result, encroachments on forest land are not entitled to the protections or benefits afforded to recognised slum dwellers.
The court was hearing a petition filed by four residents of Laxminagar, a settlement located within mangrove forests and buffer zones in Charkop, Kandivali. The petitioners approached the High Court through advocate Ronita Bhattacharya Bector after revenue authorities demolished around 500 huts in the area — including theirs — in April 2021.
The petitioners argued that the demolition was unlawful as they had been residing there since 1980 and were therefore eligible for rehabilitation under a government resolution (GR) dated June 16, 2015. That GR protects slum dwellers who settled before January 1, 2000, by entitling them to permanent alternate accommodation. They also cited a second GR dated May 16, 2018, which extends similar benefits to those settled between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2011.
However, additional government pleader Uma Palsuledesai, appearing for the state, countered that the petitioners were not entitled to any relief as they had encroached on protected mangrove land — classified as a reserved forest under Survey No. 39, spanning 57 hectares. She pointed out that Section 3Z-6 of the Slum Act expressly excludes such areas, including those falling under Coastal Regulation Zones (CRZ), from its purview.
Agreeing with this submission, the bench observed, 'There is a clear exclusion for the applicability of the Slums Act set out under Section 3Z-6. The land in question falls within a protected forest. Therefore, the provisions of the Slums Act will not apply, and the petitioners cannot claim benefit as protected occupiers under the Act.'
The court also noted that the area had never been formally declared a slum under the Act, and that the petitioners failed to meet the statutory definition of 'eligible slum dwellers' as laid out in Section 2(c-b) of the Act.
'This is a case where protection, relocation, and rehabilitation under Section 3Z of the Slums Act are not available to the petitioners, rendering their claim against the demolition legally untenable and unsustainable,' the court concluded, dismissing the petition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC forms expert panel to preserve Mumbai's ancient rock-cut cave heritage
MUMBAI: In a significant step toward protecting Mumbai's ancient heritage, the Bombay High Court on Wednesday ordered the formation of an expert committee to study and recommend preservation measures for three historic rock-cut cave complexes—Kanheri, Mandapeshwar, and Mahakali. Mumbai, India - April 25, 2016 : Kanheri Caves in Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai, India, 25th April 2016. (Photo by Samson Tupdal/ Hindustan Times) (Hindustan Times) The directive came from a division bench of chief justice Alok Aradhe and justice Sandeep Marne while hearing a public interest litigation filed by Janhit Mancha, a city-based citizens' forum. The plea sought urgent intervention for the protection, upkeep, and demarcation of the caves, which the group said were under threat from encroachments, neglect, and rapid urbanisation. 'The authorities are under a statutory obligation to maintain the caves,' the court noted, adding, 'We hope and trust that all necessary actions will be taken. In case encroachments are observed, appropriate steps should be taken in accordance with the law.' The court-constituted committee will include officials from the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, the Urban Heritage Committee, and the Prince of Wales Museum. Experts from the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH), a reputed environmental group, and a Janhit Mancha representative will also join. The panel is tasked with formulating an action plan for the caves' protection, including security arrangements, encroachment removal, and long-term conservation. Ancient marvels in Mumbai's backyard The Kanheri Caves, located within Sanjay Gandhi National Park, date back to the 1st century AD. Once a thriving monastic settlement, the site includes over 100 Buddhist viharas (monastic cells), prayer halls, water cisterns, and carved pathways. Known for their elaborate rock-cut architecture, they stand as a testament to Mumbai's early Buddhist history. The Mandapeshwar Caves in Borivali are Hindu rock-cut shrines dedicated to Lord Shiva, believed to be carved between the 6th and 8th centuries. These caves have a layered colonial history—Portuguese invaders built a church atop the shrine in the 16th century, only to be challenged later by the Marathas and eventually reclaimed by the British. Today, traces of all three empires linger at the site. The Mahakali Caves, also known as the Kondivite Caves, are located in Andheri East. Dating from the 1st century BC to the 6th century AD, the 19 caves were once part of a larger village ecosystem. Though less visited than their counterparts, they form a crucial part of the region's archaeological narrative.
Indian Express
20 hours ago
- Indian Express
After protests, Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board orders closure of incinerator in eco-sensitive zone near Gangotri
Days after Gangotri residents protested against its establishment, the Uttarakhand's State Pollution Control Board has ordered the closure of an incinerator set up by the state tourism department in the eco-sensitive zone. The unit was found to have violated the provisions under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, and for operating in the Bhagirathi Eco Sensitive Zone without obtaining a consent to operate. It was also found that it had no proper monitoring facilities, a logbook of operations, or a disposal of waste generated from the process, said the Uttarakhand Pollution Control Body. The residents, part of the collective Himalayi Nagarik Drishti Manch, had written to authorities, stating that the incinerator was burning mixed solid waste disposed of in the area, causing emissions. Such units are required to obtain a Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate certificate from the State Pollution Control Board, and they are mandated to keep their effluent quality within the specified norms as specified under the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986. The Gangotri unit processes one tonne of solid waste every day. Moreover, the unit was set up in the Bhagirathi Eco Sensitive Zone, an area in which every activity is monitored and regulated by a committee under the chairmanship of the Chief Secretary of the state. The incinerator was permitted by the committee last year and was set up by the Ministry of Tourism under the PRASAD Scheme (Pilgrimage Rejuvenation and Spiritual Augmentation Drive). Officials from the state and Central Pollution Control Body visited the facility on June 24 and found that the Uttarkashi District Tourism Development Officer had not obtained a Consolidated Consent and Authorisation (CCA) under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and authorisation under the Hazardous and other wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016. Though the unit representative said that it processes one tonne of solid waste every day, they could not provide a logbook record. Similarly, the unit representative said the ash generation is negligible and it is kept on the premises, but there was no record of the ash generation, the pollution control body said. The unit also did not maintain records for plastic waste collection. The pollution control bodies also recommended that the facility obtain necessary permissions, including a Consent to Operate from the UKPCB. Following a letter from residents of Uttarkashi to authorities regarding the operation of the unit at Bhagirathi Eco Sensitive Zone, the Uttarkashi DM had said that the unit is a zero-emission system with a solar-powered furnace and operates through a programmed oxygenation plasma technology. He also said that the waste is processed without any combustion or involvement of water or other moving parts. However, according to CPCB guidelines, incinerators have a pollution index of 100 and fall under the red category. Aiswarya Raj is a correspondent with The Indian Express who covers South Haryana. An alumna of Asian College of Journalism and the University of Kerala, she started her career at The Indian Express as a sub-editor in the Delhi city team. In her current position, she reports from Gurgaon and covers the neighbouring districts. She likes to tell stories of people and hopes to find moorings in narrative journalism. ... Read More
Time of India
21 hours ago
- Time of India
Rescued python returns to wild after Lakshadweep vacation
Kochi: It was a homecoming for the young python, whose nearly eight-month sojourn in Lakshadweep ended with its return to its natural habitat here. The Indian rock python, a Schedule 1 species under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, had landed in Kavaratti Island around Oct–Nov last year in a 'manchu' — a traditional wooden sailing vessel. The python likely sneaked into the vessel while it was docked in Kozhikode and remained hidden among the cargo, forest officials said. During unloading, workers spotted the baby python and, startled, threw it into the sea. True to its ilk, considered excellent swimmers, the python swam ashore and survived. With no natural predators on the island, the snake continued to grow until it was rescued by forest officials there last month. Since Kavaratti lacks forest cover and is not part of the species' natural range, they decided to return it to Kerala. "The workers threw the baby python out of fear, but it swam ashore and wandered around. We were getting calls from people who spotted the reptile at various locations," said C N Abdhul Raheem, range forest officer, Kavaratti. "We conducted searches and set up traps to rescue it, but we were unsuccessful until midnight on June 17, when we received an alert about its presence near the residential quarters for harbour employees, behind the port assistant's office on the northern side of the Kavaratti jetty. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Искате да научите повече за новото BMW 2 Gran Coupe? BMW Научете повече Undo We rushed to the spot, rescued it and brought it to the forest office," he said. "As far as Lakshadweep is concerned, the python was our special guest. People barged into our office to see it. We kept it in a specially prepared cage. When we rescued it, the python had fed — possibly on a lamb or kitten — as its stomach was bloated. Though we tried feeding it chicks, it refused to eat and preferred to stay inside a jute sack placed in the cage. When pythons are afraid, they often stop feeding," Raheem said. The officers cared for the python for nine days before transporting it to Kochi after completing necessary procedures. "Since the archipelago is not its natural habitat, we contacted the Kerala forest department for safe relocation. With permission from higher-ups both in Kerala and Lakshadweep, we transported the snake in a cage placed in a separate room on a passenger ship, armed with an order from the department of port, shipping and aviation in Lakshadweep. We escorted it to Cochin Port on June 27 and handed it over to Kerala forest officials," Raheem said. In Kochi, the python was received by officers from the Mekkapala forest station near Perumbavoor. "A veterinary doctor examined it; confirmed that it was healthy and well cared for during its time in Kavaratti. As there were no injuries or health concerns, the doctor cleared it for release the same day. We released it within our station limits in the Kodanad range of Ernakulam district," said Manoj Kumar A, deputy range officer. Indian rock pythons are typically found near water bodies along the fringes of forests.
