Army to recode 20,000 parachutist jobs in major airborne restructuring
The recoding means the positions will remain airborne billets, but soldiers will no longer be required to maintain jump status or receive jump pay.
Over a five-month period beginning last September, two dozen Army organizations met to examine the service's requirements for airborne operations and training, Lt. Gen. Gregory Anderson, head of the 18th Airborne Corps, told Army Times.
18th Airborne at the center of major Pacific exercise for the first time
Since 2006, the Army has kept 56,756 paid parachutist positions on its rolls, Anderson said. For reference, the entire force of Army parachutists that jumped into Normandy during World War II was 13,000 troops.
In recent years, limited aircraft availability, especially C-17s and C-130s, has contributed to an overall 'decline in collective airborne proficiency,' Anderson said.
As a result, assets used to maintain the jump status of the more than 56,000 positions has come at the expense of keeping the assault force — the combat troops in immediate response missions — at a high level of readiness, the three-star said.
'We started to assume risk with the high-end forces that have to be ready to go tonight,' Anderson said. 'This is not about saving money; it's about getting readiness to where we need it.'
Below are the parachutist position recodings by command; these figures are estimates by the U.S. Army and are not yet finalized:
9,000 – Army Special Operations Command
3,600 – Army National Guard
3,500 – Army Forces Command
1,900 – Army Reserve
1,000 – Army Pacific
850 – Army Europe and Africa
Currently, to maintain jump status, a parachutist must jump four times each year.
'What ends up happening we take fewer aircraft, same jump requirements and units doing everything they can to achieve basic airborne currency,' Anderson said. 'In many cases, they were not meeting even currency.'
The Pentagon requires the Army to produce 15,000 parachutists at the ready at any time.
As the organizations analyzed this requirement, training needs and the demands of maintaining the force from riggers to jumpmasters, they had to ask tough questions, Anderson said.
'Are support battalions going to jump into a combat situation with the assault echelon?' Anderson said. 'Or would they come in later some other way?'
Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George told Army Times in an email statement that the adjustments will prioritize training and resources where they are needed most.
'Too many positions were allocated outside the direct combat force. This was a drain on resources and we're fixing it.'
Soldiers in the affected billets will still be airborne trained and if they transfer into an assault position, they will be retrained with a refresher course and put on paid jump status, Anderson said.
'These decisions help make our paratroopers more proficient by concentrating on those who could be jumping into combat,' George said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Military chopper traffic over Washington was a worry leading up to fatal midair crash, NTSB hears
Military helicopter traffic over Washington was a longtime worry among aviators operating around the airport where an Army helicopter and commercial airliner collided this year, killing 67 people, federal investigators heard during testimony on Thursday. It is the second of three days of witness testimony and public inquiry by the National Transportation Safety Board into the January midair crash over the Potomac River. The board focused on air traffic control and heard Thursday that it was common for pilots to ask to use visual separation — basically relying on their eyesight — just as the Army Black Hawk's pilot agreed to do the night of the crash. FAA officials also said controllers relied heavily on pilots using visual separation as a way to manage the complex airspace with so many helicopters flying around Washington D.C. But Rick Dressler, an official with medevac operator Metro Aviation, told the board it is difficult to identify other aircraft in the night sky around Ronald Reagan National Airport, especially if an onboard locator system was switched off, as Army choppers routine did. Dressler said that he and other civilian helicopter pilots in the area have long been concerned about the Army and Air Force helicopters flying around Reagan airport. 'I don't like saying this. I'll say it again on the record," Dressler, a former Army aviator and retired Air Force officer, said. 'I'm speaking for my group there. We we are all very uncomfortable when those two units are operating.' Clark Allen, an FAA training manager in the Washington area who worked in the tower at Reagan National Airport, said it was common for visual separation to be used daily between helicopter pilots and commercial traffic. The American Airlines jet arrived from Wichita, Kansas, carrying, among others, a group of elite young figure skaters, their parents and coaches, and four union steamfitters from the Washington area. The collision was the nation's deadliest plane crash since November 2001 and was the first in a string of crashes and near misses this year that have alarmed officials and the traveling public, despite statistics that still show flying remains the safest form of transportation. It's too early for the board to identify what exactly caused the crash. The board's final report won't be released until sometime next year. 'Fix it' On the first day of hearings Wednesday, investigators highlighted a number of factors that may have contributed to the crash and the warnings about helicopter traffic that the Federal Aviation Administration received years before the tragedy over the Potomac River. NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy urged the FAA to 'Fix it. Do better' at the end of a fiery exchange when she highlighted the warnings the agency ignored years earlier. She also suggested the Army adopt a formal policy making it clear that helicopter pilots should never fly under landing planes because pilots told investigators they were doing that routinely. 'Every sign was there that there was a safety risk and the tower was telling you that,' Homendy said. But there were 21 bureaucratic steps the tower had to follow to get a change made and after the accident the FAA transferred managers out of the tower instead of acknowledging that they had been warned. 'What you did is you transferred people out instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem,' Homendy said. 'But you guys are pointing out, 'Welp, our bureaucratic process. Somebody should have brought it up at some other symposium.' Are you kidding me? 67 people are dead. How do you explain that?' FAA didn't add warning to helicopter charts, official says Homendy said an FAA working group raised concerns about all the helicopter traffic around Ronald Reagan National Airport and the risk of a collision in 2022, but the FAA refused to add a warning to helicopter charts urging pilots to use caution when this runway was in use. 'This is the very event that this would have been the cautionary note for,' she said. Video and animation presented during the proceeding's first day showed the helicopter flying above the 200 feet (61 meters) altitude limit before colliding with the plane. Investigators said Wednesday the flight data recorder showed the helicopter was actually 80 feet to 100 feet (24 to 30 meters) higher than the barometric altimeter the pilots relied upon showed they were flying. So the NTSB conducted tests on three other helicopters from the same unit in a flight over the same area and found similar discrepancies in their altimeters. Dan Cooper with Sikorsky helicopters said that when the Black Hawk helicopter involved in the crash was designed in the 1970s, it used a style of altimeter that was common at the time. Newer helicopters have air data computers that didn't exist back then that help provide more accurate altitude readings. Army officials said a discrepancy of 70 to 100 feet (21 to 30 meters) between the Black Hawk's altimeters is within the acceptable range because pilots are expected to maintain their altitude plus or minus 100 feet. Concern about distances between planes and helicopters The greater concern is that the FAA approved routes around Reagan airport that included such small separation distances between helicopters and planes when planes are landing. 'The fact that we have less than 500 foot separation is a concern for me,' said Scott Rosengren, who is chief engineer in the office that manages the Army's utility helicopters. During the two minutes before the crash, one air traffic controller was directing airport traffic and helicopters in the area, a task that involved speaking to or receiving communications from several different aircraft, according to the NTSB's History of Flight Performance Study. Chief Warrant Officer Kylene Lewis told the board that she wouldn't find an 80 to 100 foot discrepancy between the different altimeters on a helicopter alarming because at lower altitudes she would be relying more on the radar altimeter than the barometric altimeter. Below 500 feet (152 meters), Lewis said she would be checking both instruments and cross referencing them. The air traffic controller had spoken to or received communications from the Black Hawk helicopter, an airplane that was taking off, an Air Force helicopter, an airplane on the ground, a medical helicopter and an inbound flight that was not the American Airlines plane that would crash.
CNN
6 hours ago
- CNN
NTSB to probe air traffic control training, collision avoidance technology in second day of hearings on DC midair collision
The National Transportation Safety Board will question witnesses Thursday about air traffic control training and collision avoidance technology, two key parts of the investigation into January's deadly midair collision at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. It's the second of three days of investigative hearings into what happened in the accident that killed 67 people. On Wednesday, the day began with an overview of the incident, including an 11-minute detailed timeline of the moments before the Army Black Hawk helicopter and American Airlines regional jet, operated by PSA Airlines, collided midair. NTSB members later questioned witness for the Army and Federal Aviation Administration. The NTSB also released thousands of pages of information gathered during the investigation, including cockpit voice recorder transcripts that detail the final moments before the collision that show one second before the collision, the helicopter's instructor had told the pilot to change course. The helicopter route at the time of the collision allowed the Black Hawk to fly as close as 75 feet below planes descending to land on runway 33 at Reagan National Airport, according to the NTSB. In 10 hours of questioning Wednesday, the NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy grew frustrated with some of the answers given by representatives of the FAA and Army. After the hearing concluded for the day, she told reporters she has 'concerns' there is a 'safety culture' problem in both Army aviation and the air traffic organization of the FAA. The hearing also uncovered that Army helicopters would regularly fly below aircraft that were descending to land at Reagan National Airport and they sometimes used civilian heliports without authorization. 'I don't have concerns about the leadership, but I think they have issues below the leadership, with respect to flying underneath aircraft,' Homendy told reporters Wednesday night. 'At no point should there ever be helicopters flying underneath civilian aircraft that are departing and landing on any runway, any runway in the national airspace. I'm concerned that if it's happening here, that it's happening somewhere else.' Sixty-seven people died in the accident over the Potomac River, including 60 passengers and four crew members on the plane and three soldiers on the helicopter. The NTSB will meet again on Friday. A determination of what caused the crash will come in January.
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
NTSB criticizes FAA for failing to act before fatal Army helicopter collision
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - The head of the National Transportation Safety Board sharply criticized U.S. officials for failing to act before the January 29 collision of a U.S. Army helicopter with an American Airlines regional jet in Washington that killed 67 people. NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said on Wednesday that the Federal Aviation Administration did not act on warnings from air traffic control staff who proposed flight path changes to avoid such dangers and noted there had been high staff turnover at the airport's control tower. "Every sign was there that there was a safety risk, and the tower was telling you," Homendy said on the first day of an investigative hearing. "You transferred people out instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem…. Fix it. Do better." The crash over the Potomac River near the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport was the deadliest U.S. air disaster in more than 20 years. More: Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter was on a 'proficiency training flight' The NTSB disclosed that in 2022 members of an FAA air traffic working group had urged moving helicopter traffic away from Reagan airport and to establish airborne "hot spots" but it was rejected because the issue was "too political." Senator Maria Cantwell, a Democrat, cited the recommendation in sharply criticizing the FAA's inaction. "What caused the FAA's oversight to be so flawed that they couldn't fix this problem before this tragedy occurred?" Cantwell said. Homendy noted the Reagan air traffic control tower had three managers in the last two years and around 10 since 2014. The FAA did not respond immediately to a request for comment. FAULTY ALTITUDE DATA The NTSB hearing also focused on faulty altitude data in U.S. Army helicopters like the one that collided with the American Airlines jet. The NTSB investigative hearing is looking at the Black Hawk aircraft's air data systems and altimeters, including the potential it received faulty altitude data. "There is a possibility that what the crew saw was very different than what the true altitude was," NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said. Testing after the crash showed that Army Black Hawk helicopters in flight showed discrepancies of 80 to 130 ft (24 to 40 m) versus the actual altitude. Army officials said discrepancies of up to 100 ft were not a cause for concern in the Black Hawk, manufactured by Lockheed Martin's LMT.N Sikorsky division. NTSB board member Todd Inman questioned why the Army was not doing more testing and taking other steps to alert pilots about potential discrepancies. "Could you hurry it up?" Inman said. Homendy said that discrepancy was significant, especially given the margin of error was 75 ft at the edge of the helicopter route near Reagan airport. She also questioned if broader testing was needed and whether the issue could impact civilian Sikorsky helicopters. The NTSB played audio excerpts of communications between air traffic control towers during the minutes before the crash, including a request by controllers to the American Airlines regional jet to shift to a different runway. Previously, the NTSB said the helicopter's altitude was higher than it should have been for the area at the time of the crash. The maximum altitude for the route the helicopter was taking was 200 ft, but the collision occurred at an altitude of around 300 ft. More: Flying feels riskier. Here's what the experts say about that high number of accidents. The Black Hawk, which was on a nighttime training flight, had a crew of experienced pilots wearing night vision goggles. The FAA restricted helicopter flights in March after the NTSB said the presence of those aircraft posed an "intolerable risk" to civilian aircraft. In May, the FAA barred the Army from helicopter flights around the Pentagon after a May 1 close call that forced two civilian planes to abort landings. The FAA this week said the helicopter flights remained on hold even after the agency disclosed it had signed a new agreement with the Army on July 1. (Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama, David Gregorio and Jamie Freed)
